FidelityConnects: Geopolitics and growth part two: Canada-U.S. energy and resources
Geopolitics is the dominant force shaping markets and driving headlines. Join Portfolio Manager Joe Overdevest and Equity Research Analyst Jin Hwang for insights on new opportunities for the Canadian economy, markets and key sectors like energy and commodities. From oil to natural gas, they break down why energy is at the centre of geopolitical conversations, the key movers in the energy sector — and what that may mean for investors.
Transcript
[00:00:06.740]
Welcome back to Fidelity Connects. I'm Glen Davidson.
[00:00:09.442]
From oil to natural gas our next guests will break down the key movers in the
[00:00:13.346]
energy sector and what they could mean for client portfolios.
[00:00:16.683]
I'm joined by portfolio manager, Joe Overdivest, and equity research analyst,
[00:00:20.820]
Jin Hwang. Joe manages several Fidelity funds including Global Natural
[00:00:24.591]
Resources and Jin covers the Canadian energy sector.
[00:00:27.827]
Great to see you both, wonderful to have you here.
[00:00:29.829]
Thank you for having us.
[00:00:31.431]
I think we'd be remiss if we didn't talk about how you as an analyst and
[00:00:35.435]
you, Joe, as a portfolio manager deal with news as it accelerates
[00:00:39.672]
like we've seen over the last several days.
[00:00:41.341]
Jin, maybe I'll start with you. How did you react when you saw what was going
[00:00:44.544]
on with the news in general and energy?
[00:00:47.480]
Certainly a busy weekend.
[00:00:49.883]
The first thing, funny enough, is actually just turning off the news, taking a
[00:00:53.753]
step back and understanding what this actually means.
[00:00:55.522]
Our training is specifically in understanding equities and what's priced into
[00:00:58.625]
equities so turn off the new, refresh your models, understand what
[00:01:02.796]
type of oil environment are these equities pricing in today and being able to
[00:01:06.399]
action against that. Once you have a good understanding of the starting point
[00:01:09.002]
from there you can start analyzing all the different developments.
[00:01:12.038]
For me personally, I have my own work that I kind of do in the background but
[00:01:15.542]
just as equally we have a ton of analysts around the world.
[00:01:18.011]
This is not just a conflict in energy, it's actually kind of wider reaching.
[00:01:22.282]
We have tanker analysts out in Asia, we have different kind of chemicals
[00:01:25.452]
analysts out in Europe, speaking to them and understanding exactly what the
[00:01:29.422]
implications are across the supply chain and bringing that into the analysis
[00:01:32.358]
and bringing it into the work that I did prior.
[00:01:34.360]
You've got a lot of great partners around the world.
[00:01:36.429]
I like what you said, turn the news off and then figure out what does it really
[00:01:39.833]
mean from a quantitative research, from a fundamental research standpoint and
[00:01:44.170]
stick with the models that you've created as well.
[00:01:46.639]
Joe, you've got experience as an analyst in the past and also many years as
[00:01:50.577]
a portfolio manager. How does your day change?
[00:01:53.079]
I know you're both very busy anyway but how does it change when things like
[00:01:56.082]
this go on?
[00:01:57.016]
Saturday morning at 06:00 a.m. the priority is to read, to read about this.
[00:02:01.921]
My normal reading would have been was definitely prioritize for the more recent
[00:02:05.492]
events.
[00:02:07.827]
Obviously, we read the public news but, as you said, having a rock star analyst
[00:02:11.731]
like Jin but more importantly, multiplying Jin to a thousand investment
[00:02:15.368]
professionals around the world, hearing what people are saying globally in
[00:02:18.638]
Fidelity about this event, and more importantly, putting it in perspective.
[00:02:22.208]
I've lived through, sadly, certain events like this before but also
[00:02:26.579]
others have as well, what is the precedent?
[00:02:28.882]
Is there anything we can look towards as like what more importantly for our
[00:02:32.051]
clients will happen going forward? That event has already happened, where are
[00:02:35.321]
the opportunities? So using all the analysts, a lot of Team's messages, a
[00:02:39.292]
lot of calls, a lot of talking with PMs and analysts.
[00:02:42.061]
I like that as well because it's not just the analysts you're talking to.
[00:02:45.265]
We have this big team. PMs look at different angles, growth, value,
[00:02:49.369]
sometimes just sector specialists, really, rewarding as someone who loves
[00:02:52.972]
research and loves being very intellectually stimulating at a very dynamic
[00:02:56.576]
time.
[00:02:57.944]
Jin, Joe called you a rock star analyst.
[00:03:00.180]
I can just picture because ... just to paint a picture for our viewers you all
[00:03:03.216]
sit in an open concept environment.
[00:03:05.785]
You must have had the lineup like you're the next best coffee shop in town.
[00:03:09.289]
Everybody's saying, I gotta talk to the energy guy in particular in an
[00:03:12.659]
environment like this but there's just a free flow of information.
[00:03:15.728]
I'm incredibly fortunate because before me there was another energy analyst,
[00:03:19.098]
before that there was another energy analyst, going all the way back to kind of
[00:03:22.468]
Joe's days covering the sector specifically.
[00:03:24.404]
To Joe's point around understanding historical precedents on these types of
[00:03:27.140]
events, I'm able to call up the analyst that was dealing with the US invasion
[00:03:30.443]
of Iraq, or even the Russian invasion of Ukraine, to understand how do these
[00:03:34.514]
equities actually trade. That positioned us that much better than any other
[00:03:38.384]
investment firm because we have that institutional knowledge all kept inhouse
[00:03:41.788]
and I can leverage that as the current analyst.
[00:03:43.823]
You'll always remember these days, Jin.
[00:03:45.325]
100%.
[00:03:46.092]
Let's talk about, from your perspective, why is it always, it seems it's always
[00:03:49.696]
about oil. What are the ramifications for the market right now based on what
[00:03:53.666]
we know?
[00:03:54.834]
The conflict can kind of be divided into two pieces.
[00:03:57.303]
The first that everyone is really focused on is the Strait of Hormuz which
[00:04:00.306]
transports 20% of global oil shipments every day.
[00:04:03.376]
The other piece is the broader conflict which could be kind of longer in
[00:04:06.446]
duration than we think but everyone for now is focused on that first piece.
[00:04:09.482]
The reason that everyone's so focused on this is, look, the energy markets
[00:04:12.919]
globally, they're balanced on a knives edge, plus or minus 1% of supply and
[00:04:16.322]
demand can actually mean the difference between $50 versus $80 oil.
[00:04:19.692]
As we think about the two components, the Strait of Hormuz, I think most
[00:04:22.829]
incentives are there for kind of oil to keep flowing, whether it's
[00:04:26.799]
the US needing kind of lower oil prices or Iran needing, effectively, oil
[00:04:30.570]
export revenue to fund the war, that, I think, most people are generally
[00:04:34.073]
confident in. The bigger piece is what happens with the broader conflict and
[00:04:37.010]
how long that can go on.
[00:04:38.778]
As we sit here today we try to understand what type of oil price environment
[00:04:42.315]
are we in, what are the equities pricing in, are they effectively pricing in
[00:04:46.352]
those two that we're looking at right now.
[00:04:48.955]
Some may ask if the Strait of Hormuz is being backed
[00:04:53.026]
up, and it's an insurance issue now, isn't it, we'll see what happens with
[00:04:56.129]
that, but when that gets going again the majority of flows, from
[00:05:00.166]
my understanding, go to Asia.
[00:05:01.968]
In Canada we might be sitting here very soon seeing a huge increase at the
[00:05:05.872]
pumps. Can you remind everybody why it affects us the way it does when that
[00:05:09.742]
supply really is going elsewhere?
[00:05:11.878]
It's an open global market, it's a commodity business so if there is a higher
[00:05:15.748]
bidder for that barrel of crude elsewhere, be it Asia, Europe, or the Middle
[00:05:19.552]
East even, the commodity is always going to flow there.
[00:05:23.289]
While we may be insulated as a net exporter of energy
[00:05:27.694]
globally is how most of these things are settled.
[00:05:30.163]
Makes sense. Joe, could you give us your perspective on what's happening in the
[00:05:33.299]
Middle East and ramifications on Canada?
[00:05:36.069]
I think the bigger picture here is it's a very sad, obviously, human element
[00:05:40.073]
what's going on but the bigger thing is the geopolitics of this.
[00:05:43.009]
Almost sadly we see now two instances
[00:05:46.979]
of this going on, very recently Venezuela and, obviously,
[00:05:51.384]
this current situation with Iran is, the US isn't even mincing
[00:05:55.588]
words in some cases with Venezuela saying we're going to control the oil
[00:05:58.858]
afterward. This is very clearly quoted as saying that.
[00:06:04.063]
The biggest buyer of much of this oil is China.
[00:06:06.132]
Trust me, I'm sure China is very much involved looking at this going,
[00:06:11.070]
hmm, this will be interesting our negotiations now because, again, we can get
[00:06:14.741]
into this but on the resource side China for a number of years, as we know here
[00:06:18.611]
as Canadians, actually bought some of our oil companies back in the early
[00:06:22.048]
2000s. Oil was the big driver there of
[00:06:26.018]
all of a sudden buying different resources, in particular copper and oil, but
[00:06:29.622]
then all of a sudden last few years they've really cornered the market on
[00:06:32.792]
critical minerals.
[00:06:34.026]
It's probably one of those things, potentially, we'll see how history goes,
[00:06:37.263]
they couldn't corner oil but they can corner other markets, and you can see in
[00:06:40.967]
negotiations with the US in particular, it's like, well, if you want to put
[00:06:44.704]
tariffs on us we're going to cut the critical minerals.
[00:06:47.173]
Now you're seeing the US play another chess piece going, well, maybe we have
[00:06:51.244]
cornered where you get your cheaper barrels of oil.
[00:06:54.714]
This is yet to play out totally but you can see this is big ramifications
[00:06:59.051]
for trade and global GDP.
[00:07:01.220]
I want to pick up on Venezuela. That seems like a year ago and it really
[00:07:04.891]
wasn't. What's interesting is that oil prices came up when the
[00:07:08.895]
Venezuela situation happened but not incredibly.
[00:07:11.898]
Then there was a bit of a pullback and now what we're seeing is a big increase
[00:07:15.334]
in oil yesterday, as we do this today oil's now getting cheaper.
[00:07:19.639]
Can you talk about why the prices haven't been, perhaps, as excited
[00:07:23.743]
as what the news would allow us to believe.
[00:07:25.812]
As you said, tune that out, but I'm curious on your takes as well.
[00:07:29.382]
Venezuela was a different situation.
[00:07:31.217]
Venezuela was a change in regime and of, course,
[00:07:35.688]
what happened pretty much afterward was the military ...
[00:07:38.090]
usually with regime changes the military is very important how this gets handed
[00:07:42.094]
off. The military and a new leader stepped in and everything moved forward
[00:07:46.032]
and, more importantly. the flow of the oil kept going.
[00:07:49.702]
What's different right now is, as Jin is saying, as we stand here today the
[00:07:53.639]
flow of oil has massively changed, not just for what's coming out of Iran,
[00:07:56.876]
what's coming out of the whole Middle East because that one strait there is a
[00:08:00.680]
choke point.
[00:08:02.348]
That's the difference right now. The biggest thing going forward in the more
[00:08:05.952]
short term is can that strait be resolved, otherwise
[00:08:10.456]
you're going to be backing up oil into the Middle East.
[00:08:12.692]
Let's talk about models that you may have, Jin, in that respect.
[00:08:16.229]
What would a three to four week blockade ...
[00:08:18.664]
I'm not asking for a specific number ...
[00:08:20.433]
but what would that potentially mean to a barrel of oil?
[00:08:23.636]
I's interesting. We're balancing two conflicting forces right now.
[00:08:26.072]
Heading into this conflict I think the broader consensus was we are
[00:08:29.342]
oversupplied oil for at least the near term basis.
[00:08:32.278]
With this conflict you've seen oil prices shoot up $15.
[00:08:35.681]
What that premium is actually reflecting is exactly what you're alluding to,
[00:08:38.818]
it's actually a couple of weeks of disruption.
[00:08:41.120]
To the extent that the Strait of Hormuz, and everyone's bet that the Strait of
[00:08:44.223]
Hormuz remains open kind of starts to fade and becomes more like a month or two
[00:08:48.160]
months you're going to start seeing that premium start to increase pretty
[00:08:51.163]
quickly.
[00:08:51.731]
The challenge right now is the market's taking over a one-directional bet that
[00:08:54.901]
it's going to remain open and you're seeing that not just in kind of the
[00:08:58.004]
immediate price is not jumping as much as you think but even further back on
[00:09:01.474]
the curve, kind of 12 months out, the bets on oil prices 6 or 12 months up,
[00:09:05.311]
they actually still remain fairly depressed and that's a one-directional bet
[00:09:08.147]
that the Straits can remain open. Opportunities like that are where we're
[00:09:11.784]
trying to make sure we're not offside and making sure that we have the right
[00:09:15.154]
bets in place to not only kind of make money in the short term but also cover
[00:09:17.890]
those tail scenarios where let's say the Strait does remain closed for two
[00:09:21.761]
months, what does that mean for these equities?
[00:09:22.962]
I like that. You're looking at the core opportunities but you're looking at the
[00:09:25.665]
tails as well.
[00:09:27.033]
Hello, investors. We'll be back to the show in just a moment.
[00:09:30.236]
I wanted to share that here at Fidelity, we value your opinion.
[00:09:33.806]
Please take a few minutes to help us shape the future of Fidelity Connects
[00:09:36.108]
podcasts. Complete our listener survey by visiting fidelity.ca/survey,
[00:09:41.213]
and you could win one of our branded tumblers.
[00:09:43.182]
Periodic draws ending by March 30th, 2026.
[00:09:46.252]
And don't forget to listen to Fidelity Connects, the Upside, and French
[00:09:49.855]
DialoguesFidelity podcasts available on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever
[00:09:53.893]
else you get your podcasts. Now back to today's show.
[00:09:58.097]
Joe, let's go back to you just on a little bit of politics.
[00:10:01.033]
Does the power and influence and importance of oil overwhelm
[00:10:05.204]
politics?
[00:10:07.540]
In certain parts of history you would say yes.
[00:10:09.241]
You would you say, well, why does it even matter?
[00:10:11.711]
We look at different commodities, you talk about steel
[00:10:15.681]
or copper gets talked about a lot about, they're small percentages of
[00:10:19.919]
world GDP. Oil or energy, natural gas, just include energy altogether,
[00:10:23.889]
it's probably mid-single digits of global GDP.
[00:10:26.492]
More importantly, indirect costs are probably multiple times
[00:10:30.529]
that. When you buy food at the grocery store there's energy that was used to
[00:10:34.233]
bring that there, to actually farm it.
[00:10:36.068]
When you buy products there's chemicals, there's plastics in it.
[00:10:39.338]
There's many multiples of that mid-single digits that are affecting
[00:10:43.376]
our lives and inflecting economies.
[00:10:45.277]
What happens generally, no one cares about oil, all of a sudden oil prices
[00:10:48.381]
start going up. The average person says I'm doing more at the gas pump than I
[00:10:52.018]
used to do in terms of price and all of a sudden everything I'm buying is going
[00:10:55.454]
a little higher. I'm upset, my standard of living is going down, this is
[00:10:59.558]
not good. Guess what happens?
[00:11:00.726]
They get upset, politicians all of sudden go, well, if all of sudden people are
[00:11:03.896]
upset guess what happened? They say who are we going to get mad at?
[00:11:06.966]
Politicians are going to vote us out. Then they go, well, okay, that's where it
[00:11:09.835]
comes now political, just geopolitical, because we need to solve this.
[00:11:13.305]
We need to say, okay, what countries can we partner with to get cheaper energy.
[00:11:17.209]
Yes, it definitely has an effect.
[00:11:19.945]
Again, what we're seeing here is if you want to actually have a leverage point
[00:11:23.516]
as well that's probably one of the best ways to leverage something is energy
[00:11:27.820]
because it's like the backbone of much of our daily lives.
[00:11:31.457]
Jim, let's direct our conversation to our fair country of Canada.
[00:11:34.593]
What's surprising you about energy today?
[00:11:37.530]
I think it's just how much the sector's actually changed over the last couple
[00:11:40.433]
of years. For some context, prior to me covering energy I
[00:11:44.403]
actually had a negative bias against the space because we know all the boom and
[00:11:47.106]
bust cycles.
[00:11:47.940]
Full disclosure here, eh?
[00:11:51.277]
If you take a step back 10 years ago it was driven by these balance sheets
[00:11:54.246]
being terrible, cost structures being inflated, pipelines being constantly
[00:11:57.650]
full. Fast forward to today and all that's completely 180.
[00:12:01.353]
You have balance sheets that are pristine, you have cost structures that
[00:12:03.823]
support free cash flow generation all the way down to $40 oil, you have
[00:12:07.393]
pipelines that are now in abundance, and all of a sudden these are now free
[00:12:11.163]
cashflow machines. It's really the directional change of the sector relative to
[00:12:14.867]
my original thinking. What's interesting is I don't think most people are there
[00:12:18.504]
yet in understanding that level of change.
[00:12:21.373]
Everything you're hearing about me on Canada specifically right now is
[00:12:23.943]
diametrically opposed to everything you are hearing elsewhere.
[00:12:26.212]
We hear about US shale, that was the abundant player for the last couple of
[00:12:29.148]
years, that's starting to slow. You're hearing about OPEC, maybe
[00:12:31.951]
[indecipherable] is a little less.
[00:12:33.753]
Canada is really well positioned with our third largest reserves in the world
[00:12:36.689]
to potentially be kind of the next beast within energy for the next 10 years.
[00:12:39.859]
There was a story today in the paper, well, online, that's
[00:12:43.863]
how old I am, about US shale production actually not stepping in.
[00:12:48.267]
Why would that be?
[00:12:50.136]
Typically, with these things you drill your best type of resource first and
[00:12:53.773]
after 10 years of the shale boom where production was growing 500,000, a
[00:12:57.243]
million barrels a day all of a sudden you start to run out of inventory.
[00:12:59.712]
If you look at the US landscape in total, years of inventory
[00:13:03.883]
left, somewhere in the 8 to 10 years level. You look at Canada,
[00:13:08.087]
we're looking at north of 50 potentially. It's more just slow down
[00:13:12.057]
because they've already drilled a lot of their best stuff and now they just
[00:13:14.827]
want to preserve what they have, versus Canada, we have kind of untapped
[00:13:17.296]
resources all throughout sort of Western Canada.
[00:13:19.999]
There is a big difference between those two right now.
[00:13:22.601]
Thank you for that. Joe, AI expectations and demands for
[00:13:26.806]
energy. Can you talk about that?
[00:13:28.841]
AI is definitely one of the biggest drivers of many things, copper but also
[00:13:33.012]
energy. We talk to the actual tech companies and the utility companies in many
[00:13:37.049]
ways, they'll say in the short term it's probably more natural gas will solve
[00:13:40.920]
it just because it's the quickest energy source you can bring on to power the
[00:13:44.590]
electricity, but longer term will be nuclear which, again, Canada sits very
[00:13:48.627]
well in terms of providing the actual uranium but also developing
[00:13:52.665]
some of these nuclear reactors.
[00:13:55.201]
Is that like small modular reactors, SMRs?
[00:13:58.838]
It'll be a combination of everything.
[00:14:01.373]
We actually had a few conferences recently where government officials spoke.
[00:14:05.244]
We had an energy conference in Miami, we had another one in Florida recently on
[00:14:09.315]
metals. It's amazing too how things have changed geopolitically, the keynote of
[00:14:13.352]
both events was US government officials.
[00:14:16.655]
How they would say it in terms of safety,
[00:14:21.360]
I guess, of nuclear is they're looking more at who's doing it.
[00:14:25.030]
When they look at who they want to invest with, number one is is it tight
[00:14:28.434]
supply-demand? Number two is can they get it here in the US?
[00:14:33.272]
Number three, though, more importantly, they're looking at who's the pinch
[00:14:36.642]
point in the supply chain. If someone else can corner the market on something
[00:14:40.746]
they're more likely to invest or actually partner with them.
[00:14:44.016]
Let's talk about uranium and copper, just keeping with the nuclear but also
[00:14:47.553]
from a metal standpoint.
[00:14:49.455]
When we look at copper, in particular, it's probably one of the tightest supply
[00:14:53.292]
and demand right now. I would say oil is probably a little further out but
[00:14:57.162]
it's getting there. The reason why copper is so much is actually in terms of
[00:15:01.033]
reshoring, electrification, obviously, AI is more front-end loaded what's
[00:15:05.271]
going on. Nuclear, definitely we see a deficit
[00:15:09.808]
that you're seeing right now, there's not a big change.
[00:15:12.711]
There's not many major projects coming on for uranium for the next few years
[00:15:16.415]
and if so, they're usually in kind of maybe riskier countries or they're
[00:15:20.052]
involving major permits. Until those permits come all bets are off.
[00:15:24.823]
Right now uranium and copper are probably some of the tightest in terms of
[00:15:27.927]
supply and demand of the commodity outlook overall.
[00:15:30.229]
Can I just ask you a quick tangent on gold?
[00:15:32.765]
I look at you, I think of gold, I'm not sure why, I know you have an opinion,
[00:15:36.068]
and you also have great access. Could you talk a little bit about that?
[00:15:40.072]
The joke is I was supposed to be at one of the biggest gold company CEO's
[00:15:43.242]
offices right now but, again, that's the beauty of Fidelity, even when we're
[00:15:46.178]
busy we sent our gold analyst who will report back to me.
[00:15:49.448]
So you could be with us. This is wonderful.
[00:15:50.482]
Could be with us, exactly.
[00:15:53.152]
When you look at different commodities it's all about supply and demand.
[00:15:55.654]
Gold is a very unique asset and gold is more built on it's a reserve currency.
[00:16:00.359]
Really, what drives it is interest rates, inflation, more
[00:16:04.730]
importantly, your view on the US dollar and other major currencies.
[00:16:07.566]
What's changed after the Ukraine crisis is major central banks around the world
[00:16:11.670]
are moving away from the US dollar and buying gold.
[00:16:14.340]
That's a major buyer. We talk about ETFs, central bankers will dwarf all
[00:16:18.510]
that, and they have dwarfed it.
[00:16:20.713]
The biggest question for investors and for us is, really, do
[00:16:24.850]
you see going forward central banks continuing to favour less
[00:16:29.621]
US dollars in their investments and more towards gold.
[00:16:33.392]
If that continues that's what drives gold to where it is.
[00:16:37.229]
Again, it's not like, oh, it's supply and demand or it's the marginal cost,
[00:16:40.165]
it's just not like it when it comes to oil or copper.
[00:16:42.901]
Thank you for the gold tangent. Let's go back to energy.
[00:16:45.237]
Jin, I wanted to ask you about where the Liberals stand on oil and gas today.
[00:16:48.941]
It's interesting. I think for the first time in 10 plus years we're seeing a
[00:16:51.710]
little more bipartisan support towards energy development within this country.
[00:16:54.780]
I think that's been spurred by kind of the productivity crisis we've been for
[00:16:58.150]
that period. Energy is just a natural place and offset for that because
[00:17:02.221]
we're solving sort of two things here.
[00:17:04.390]
One is just we, obviously, need productivity to improve in this country and we
[00:17:07.359]
are in doubt with massive energy reserves all throughout the country.
[00:17:10.729]
The second is, and I think Iran sort of accelerated this, there is
[00:17:14.767]
an increasing focus on energy security, I think, globally.
[00:17:17.770]
We may be looking at 20% of global oil suddenly disappearing overnight
[00:17:22.207]
and countries are going to look for alternative sources of supply pretty
[00:17:24.743]
quickly. Canada with the third largest reserves globally fits that bill pretty
[00:17:28.180]
quickly. We have the need to export and countries have the need import.
[00:17:31.984]
With the layer of a productivity crisis I think there's a little more support.
[00:17:35.454]
We've heard kind of about the new pipeline opportunities out there.
[00:17:38.857]
Even putting that aside a lot of the companies in the ground have already
[00:17:41.460]
worked through a lot of different ways to improve pipeline capacity even beyond
[00:17:44.563]
a brand new pipeline.
[00:17:46.765]
Looks good and generally I think we're headed in a more positive direction.
[00:17:50.636]
We've just had a question come in and, Joe, I'll go to you because it's about
[00:17:54.073]
copper. It just says about the impact of fibre expansion on copper.
[00:17:58.944]
I think it all drives copper in many ways.
[00:18:02.915]
At this point in time it's a small part of it.
[00:18:05.551]
Probably the biggest thing still is the data centres but all are driving the
[00:18:08.987]
same kind of connectivity of the world and more data coming.
[00:18:11.490]
I think also too the sovereignty of it.
[00:18:13.859]
One of the biggest things when you talk to actually the companies who are
[00:18:16.962]
talking to the governments, one of biggest sensitivities is where will the data
[00:18:20.933]
be? That's being asked more and more.
[00:18:23.001]
That's why, in particular, for our Canadian government we almost want to be
[00:18:27.072]
involved with the discussion about data centres because if we don't
[00:18:31.110]
solve it and provide the energy here we'll be sending our data across
[00:18:35.214]
borders and it will actually usually sit in the US.
[00:18:38.083]
That's a bigger issue that maybe will drive certain decisions, in particular to
[00:18:42.154]
providing natural gas, uranium for our own data centres.
[00:18:45.190]
Great. I'm sure that was very useful for our viewer.
[00:18:47.693]
Let's go back to the energy cycle. What signals are you watching right now to
[00:18:51.163]
kind of figure where we're at?
[00:18:52.698]
My whole job is understanding supply demands.
[00:18:55.934]
We know demand is generally headed for a higher direction.
[00:18:58.137]
We used to think oil demand would plateau sometime in the 2030s, that's being
[00:19:01.573]
reshaped entirely. Now we think we don't really see an end until well beyond
[00:19:05.344]
2050. Against that, we've been lucky for the last 10, 15 years where we
[00:19:09.448]
always knew where the next barrel of supply was going to come from.
[00:19:11.850]
The US shale environment was growing consistently, OPEC was continuing to grow,
[00:19:14.853]
we had some offshore developments that were starting up.
[00:19:17.156]
The next 10 years is actually not that clear.
[00:19:19.558]
What we're trying to understand is we're trying to skate to where the puck's
[00:19:21.593]
going. In this case we know that there's not going to be that much net new
[00:19:24.730]
supply. Canada has a ton of it, do we see a bridge from point A to point B on
[00:19:28.700]
that basis.
[00:19:29.902]
It's interesting talking about energy because it's a real diversifier and yet
[00:19:33.105]
there's tangential connections to AI so it does take people
[00:19:37.242]
away from where their core portfolio may be, and then there's also some
[00:19:40.712]
connections. Can you maybe, as we sort of summarize,
[00:19:44.950]
what are key opportunities that we, as investors, should think about from an
[00:19:48.487]
energy standpoint?
[00:19:50.088]
The overarching theme here is we don't know where the commodity price is
[00:19:52.758]
ultimately going to be any given day but we do know that Western Canada is
[00:19:55.661]
going to grow its energy production pretty significantly.
[00:19:58.197]
We're about to potentially triple our LNG export capacity over the next decade
[00:20:01.433]
plus. We have visibility to new pipeline expansions that potentially increase
[00:20:05.137]
exports by up to 50% if all goes through.
[00:20:08.774]
Who's going to benefit from that? It's producers drilling the molecules from
[00:20:11.643]
the ground, the service companies that are facilitating that, the pipelines
[00:20:14.279]
that are getting it to market. It really is across the value chain and it still
[00:20:18.016]
feels early in this investment cycle that I'm really excited about.
[00:20:20.686]
Okay, good, I'm glad you're excited about it. Joe, let's talk about where the
[00:20:24.523]
role of energy and natural resources are within a diversified portfolio.
[00:20:28.894]
I think natural resources provide, obviously, an inflation protection, usually
[00:20:32.998]
a diversification, especially with the major markets around the world right now
[00:20:35.901]
are very tech-heavy.
[00:20:38.570]
Lastly, it does involve some geopolitics.
[00:20:40.806]
We've already alluded to many times being
[00:20:44.843]
gold, oil in particular, are sometimes offsets
[00:20:48.981]
to some kind of unforeseen events, as, obviously, the last few even months
[00:20:52.951]
have seen. I think that gives you some balance into your portfolio.
[00:20:57.789]
Makes sense. Joe, Jin, thanks so much for being here.
[00:21:00.692]
That was a rapid fire session, lots that we covered, and I'm glad you were able
[00:21:04.696]
to really connect it to what's going on geopolitically right now.
[00:21:07.432]
Thanks to you both for being there.
[00:21:10.102]
Thank you for tuning in as well.
[00:21:11.637]
Thanks for watching or listening to the Fidelity Connects
[00:21:15.574]
podcast. Now if you haven't done so already, please subscribe to Fidelity
[00:21:19.711]
Connects on your podcast platform of choice.
[00:21:22.514]
And if you like what you're hearing, please leave a review or a five-star
[00:21:25.350]
rating. Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are available by working with
[00:21:29.321]
a financial advisor or through an online brokerage account.
[00:21:32.691]
Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.
[00:21:36.395]
While on Fidelity.ca, you can also find more information on future live
[00:21:40.232]
webcasts. And don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn,
[00:21:44.369]
and Instagram.
[00:21:46.371]
We'll end today's show with a short disclaimer.
[00:21:49.241]
The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants,
[00:21:53.078]
and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or
[00:21:57.015]
its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and should not
[00:22:01.019]
be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice.
[00:22:03.555]
It is not an offer to sell or buy.
[00:22:05.857]
Or an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any entity or securities
[00:22:10.195]
cited. Read a fund's prospectus before investing, funds are not guaranteed.
[00:22:15.000]
Their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.
[00:22:18.570]
Fees, expenses, and commissions are all associated with fund investments.
[00:22:22.407]
Thanks again. We'll see you next time.

