Building wealth with global real estate

From office towers and data centres to residential and logistics properties, real estate can play an important role in long-term wealth creation. Join Steve Buller, Portfolio Manager, as he discusses the forces driving global real estate markets, where opportunities are emerging and how Fidelity Global Real Estate Fund is positioned to navigate the evolving landscape.

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

00:00.000 --> 00:06.406

<b>Subtitles are AI Generated</b>

 

00:07.107 --> 00:10.010

Hello, and welcome to Fidelity Connects, I'm Pamela Ritchie.

 

00:10.010 --> 00:14.414

Higher bond yields, shifting rate expectations and uncertain economic

 

00:14.414 --> 00:19.386

backdrop here could continue to shape the global real estate market.

 

00:19.386 --> 00:22.789

But beneath the headlines, opportunities are emerging for active investors,

 

00:22.789 --> 00:25.091

particularly in data centres.

 

00:25.091 --> 00:27.427

So where is our next guest finding value?

 

00:27.427 --> 00:29.396

Which sectors stand out?

 

00:29.396 --> 00:32.866

And what are the key drivers for real estate markets going forward?

 

00:32.866 --> 00:36.603

Joining us here today to highlight the forces driving global real estate

 

00:36.603 --> 00:40.940

markets. And for a look at how the fund is positioned to navigate the evolving

 

00:40.940 --> 00:45.211

landscape is Fidelity global real-estate fund portfolio manager,

 

00:45.211 --> 00:49.315

Steve Buller. And Steve, a warm welcome

 

00:49.315 --> 00:51.618

to you first of all. We haven't seen you in a while. Great to see you.

 

00:51.618 --> 00:53.319

Thank you for joining us from Boston. How are you?

 

00:54.754 --> 00:56.990

I'm very good. Thank you. Good morning to you.

 

00:56.990 --> 00:59.459

Delighted to have you with us here today.

 

00:59.759 --> 01:01.761

Let's begin our conversation.

 

01:01.761 --> 01:05.198

We'll invite everyone to send questions in for Steve over the next half hour or

 

01:05.198 --> 01:06.199

so.

 

01:06.900 --> 01:11.237

Let's, if you don't mind, just address kind of the interest rate story that's

 

01:11.237 --> 01:15.241

floating around markets and leading some to wonder about all

 

01:15.241 --> 01:19.412

kinds of different things. Broadly speaking, uncertainty about interest

 

01:19.412 --> 01:21.714

rates is sort of what we're sitting with at this moment.

 

01:22.916 --> 01:26.052

What does that do one way or the other to real estate broadly?

 

01:26.052 --> 01:28.521

And then we'll take it down to what you do specifically.

 

01:28.521 --> 01:29.522

What would you say to that?

 

01:30.657 --> 01:35.095

Yeah, real estate is a capital intensive industry

 

01:35.095 --> 01:39.065

so obviously the cost of capital is impacted by interest

 

01:39.065 --> 01:41.901

rates first and foremost throughout the world.

 

01:41.901 --> 01:46.372

So we have lived in a rising long-term interest rate environment

 

01:46.372 --> 01:50.410

which has impacted a little bit the performance of global

 

01:50.410 --> 01:54.781

REITs over the last couple of years, but I need to remind people

 

01:54.781 --> 01:58.885

over long periods of time we've actually seen very little

 

01:58.885 --> 02:03.123

correlation of the performance of global REITS in

 

02:03.123 --> 02:07.060

interest rates. That's not to say a day, a week, a month or sometimes

 

02:07.060 --> 02:10.296

even longer will see that impact.

 

02:10.296 --> 02:13.199

Actually, the statistics don't clear that out.

 

02:13.199 --> 02:15.568

One of the reasons for that is this ...

 

02:15.568 --> 02:19.772

I like to call this tug of war that goes on between interest rates, cost

 

02:19.772 --> 02:23.476

of capital and the fundamental side of the business.

 

02:23.476 --> 02:27.580

When fundamentals are good that can offset oftentimes the

 

02:27.580 --> 02:28.581

interest rate [audio cuts out].

 

02:30.416 --> 02:34.120

So let's go through a little bit about how the fund invests.

 

02:34.120 --> 02:37.957

Fundamentals are obviously an enormous part of that, ultimately.

 

02:37.957 --> 02:41.728

Give us a little bit of a reminder of how the fund invest mostly in REITs,

 

02:41.728 --> 02:43.463

mostly in the public markets, ultimately.

 

02:43.463 --> 02:45.999

Just take us down that road a bit.

 

02:47.367 --> 02:51.437

Yeah, it only invests in listed public real estate securities,

 

02:51.437 --> 02:54.140

of which some of them are in a REIT structure.

 

02:54.140 --> 02:58.144

There's nothing magical about a REIT structure, all it is is an advantageous

 

02:58.144 --> 03:01.648

tax structure that you have to then follow certain rules in certain

 

03:01.648 --> 03:05.919

environments. One of the big rules is that you have to distribute the majority

 

03:05.919 --> 03:10.023

of your net income which equates sometimes a little bit to cash flow out

 

03:10.023 --> 03:14.227

in the form of dividends. So, hence you usually have higher dividend yielding

 

03:14.227 --> 03:16.362

securities in REIT structures.

 

03:16.362 --> 03:19.666

The other ones are just called developers or something like that.

 

03:19.666 --> 03:23.536

They're like any other company listed on a stock exchange that their activities

 

03:23.570 --> 03:26.239

happen to be just involved in real estate.

 

03:26.239 --> 03:30.210

So I'm going to ask you a little bit how within the fund you are

 

03:30.210 --> 03:32.845

weighted, overweighted, underweighted, we'll get a sense of the positioning

 

03:32.845 --> 03:36.616

ultimately. There's absolutely no way to avoid a very large piece of this

 

03:36.616 --> 03:38.418

discussion is going to be about data centres.

 

03:38.418 --> 03:42.622

That is what a lot of people are talking about and it is certainly

 

03:42.622 --> 03:44.958

partly what you're invested in.

 

03:44.958 --> 03:49.295

The landscape for data centres that we hear about an awful lot

 

03:49.295 --> 03:53.733

is basically the Mag-7, plus some others, that are

 

03:53.733 --> 03:58.137

plowing what used to be tons of free cash flow, still tons, but

 

03:58.137 --> 04:00.974

really into data centres to build them fast.

 

04:02.475 --> 04:04.010

Tell us if that's what you're invested in.

 

04:05.678 --> 04:09.716

Not really. Now, data centres can mean a lot of different things when you look

 

04:09.749 --> 04:13.820

underneath the rock. It can mean the AI hyperscale, which the

 

04:13.820 --> 04:18.124

majority of their capital and activities is going in now, but

 

04:18.124 --> 04:22.262

people have to remember there's also Cloud and Colocation which

 

04:22.262 --> 04:26.432

had been growing nicely till this thing called AI kind of showed up

 

04:26.432 --> 04:28.901

18, 24 months ago.

 

04:28.901 --> 04:31.938

And then there's what I like to invest in as much as possible, is

 

04:31.938 --> 04:35.875

interconnection. People don't realize that you need to

 

04:35.875 --> 04:40.513

connect somewhere and it's usually in a carrier-neutral site where,

 

04:40.513 --> 04:44.717

for example, Amazon's AWS and Microsoft's Azure, where

 

04:44.717 --> 04:48.588

they actually meet. That can be very profitable.

 

04:48.588 --> 04:53.092

So actually, the listed world has very little exposure to that hyperscale

 

04:53.092 --> 04:57.096

AI build that you're seeing a lot of publicity about going on.

 

04:57.096 --> 05:00.166

It's more with the bread and butter, which is growing nicely.

 

05:00.166 --> 05:04.771

Don't get me wrong, they see a positive impact from all this AI activity,

 

05:04.771 --> 05:08.808

but in a very different way than just building a gigawatt data centre in

 

05:08.808 --> 05:09.809

the middle of nowhere.

 

05:10.209 --> 05:14.180

It's really interesting. So the Colocation is where everyone can

 

05:14.180 --> 05:17.183

connect, and that happens, but as you said, the interconnectivity

 

05:18.318 --> 05:21.020

is really a neutral ... it's a little bit, I mean, if you were thinking about

 

05:21.020 --> 05:24.257

it and sort of playing a game of risk or something, it's sort of neutral

 

05:24.257 --> 05:25.758

territory. It's a bit of Switzerland, isn't it?

 

05:26.793 --> 05:30.330

It is a bit of a Switzerland. That's the interconnection where they meet,

 

05:30.330 --> 05:31.364

exactly.

 

05:31.364 --> 05:32.365

That's where they meet.

 

05:33.733 --> 05:36.936

You can see if you took the Switzerland analogy further why it's interesting to

 

05:36.936 --> 05:39.172

invest there but just sort of take that further for us.

 

05:39.172 --> 05:41.341

What is there that isn't elsewhere?

 

05:42.942 --> 05:45.745

Well, it's very hard to get that position, i.e.

 

05:45.745 --> 05:49.849

you're in many different cities or locations which over time have

 

05:49.849 --> 05:51.751

become the interconnection point.

 

05:51.751 --> 05:54.620

So even though you may want to tomorrow, hey, I want to get involved in

 

05:54.620 --> 05:56.656

interconnection, it's not that easy.

 

05:56.656 --> 05:58.858

This has evolved over time.

 

05:58.858 --> 06:02.929

Where these relationships, where this trust, where these locations

 

06:02.929 --> 06:07.066

are, where latency does matter, that's a huge competitive

 

06:07.066 --> 06:11.337

advantage. We see that to some extent in the publicly listed, quote

 

06:11.337 --> 06:13.373

unquote, data centre space.

 

06:13.373 --> 06:16.642

Don't get me wrong, they are a little bit at the margin building some of the

 

06:16.642 --> 06:20.012

larger AI ones but that's not the bread and butter business.

 

06:20.012 --> 06:23.015

And because they've been building, and there's also relationships and there's

 

06:23.015 --> 06:26.953

sort of, probably web is the wrong word for it, but that strikes

 

06:26.953 --> 06:31.057

me that they would be more stable should you want to be in a situation to

 

06:31.057 --> 06:35.161

hedge against market movements that can swing very quickly.

 

06:35.161 --> 06:37.830

There's a lot of discussion whether there's overbuilding or underbuilding.

 

06:37.830 --> 06:39.866

We don't really know where that's going yet.

 

06:39.866 --> 06:43.836

How might such a REIT work in such

 

06:43.836 --> 06:45.238

a moment? It should be somewhat protected?

 

06:46.539 --> 06:50.410

It should be somewhat protected. Interconnection, it's very less capital

 

06:50.410 --> 06:54.380

intensive. All these megawatts and gigawatts that you're hearing

 

06:54.380 --> 06:56.182

now being built it takes real ...

 

06:56.182 --> 07:00.186

I actually say it's where the chips meet the real world where

 

07:00.186 --> 07:04.023

you actually have to use bulldozers and dig something, you have to build

 

07:04.023 --> 07:08.027

something, you have hook up to substations and the electrical

 

07:08.027 --> 07:11.998

grid. That's very difficult, very time consuming and

 

07:11.998 --> 07:14.434

what we're finding increasingly costly.

 

07:14.434 --> 07:18.471

The interconnect is not as capital intensive because in some ...

 

07:18.471 --> 07:22.442

I'm simplifying it, you're usually taking a one metre cord connected

 

07:22.442 --> 07:25.912

in this box to this box and then you're charging both of them quite a bit of

 

07:25.912 --> 07:30.016

money. So I like that business better than just dumping money in

 

07:30.016 --> 07:34.520

where these Nvidia chips are all gonna be running and cool.

 

07:34.520 --> 07:37.723

The data centre in and of itself is just a large refrigerator.

 

07:37.723 --> 07:40.560

It's just cooling all the heat that's being generated by these chips.

 

07:41.627 --> 07:45.698

So from that are there offshoots, opportunities to invest in large plants

 

07:45.698 --> 07:49.902

that are sort of the cooling places and all those pieces that go together?

 

07:49.902 --> 07:52.872

Are those also, from your perspective, real estate investments?

 

07:54.173 --> 07:58.377

Yeah, I mean, not only the list of data centres, I

 

07:58.377 --> 08:02.315

do have exposure to some extent on the development side.

 

08:02.315 --> 08:06.352

Many of the large logistics players around the world have

 

08:06.352 --> 08:10.389

become quasi data centre plays because many of their

 

08:10.389 --> 08:14.961

development pipeline, their locations already have access to power.

 

08:14.961 --> 08:18.998

Right now you can, you know, it's much more profitable to

 

08:18.998 --> 08:22.101

build a data centre than it is a logistics facility.

 

08:22.101 --> 08:26.239

So you're often seeing these kind of morph into, you know what, I'll build this

 

08:26.239 --> 08:30.243

data centre here, lease it out, I can make two or three times more money than a

 

08:30.243 --> 08:33.913

logistics facility. So there are some actually, I'll call latent data centre

 

08:33.913 --> 08:35.815

plays that the fund does invest in.

 

08:35.815 --> 08:39.952

That's really interesting. So are we seeing sort of takeovers in those

 

08:39.952 --> 08:42.488

particular? Or actually, are the companies transforming themselves?

 

08:44.023 --> 08:48.060

They're transforming themselves. We have seen a merger more recently that has

 

08:48.060 --> 08:52.231

been publicly announced where Prologis is buying SEGRO in the UK,

 

08:52.231 --> 08:56.435

and SEGRO has a large exposure to data centres in the UK

 

08:56.435 --> 08:58.604

and continental European countries.

 

08:58.604 --> 09:02.842

I would say that as difficult as it's becoming to build a North America

 

09:02.842 --> 09:06.779

data centre it's already been very difficult in Europe and

 

09:06.779 --> 09:10.983

only going to get so. So one could argue in Europe overall is,

 

09:10.983 --> 09:14.720

I would guess, maybe two to four years behind the whole data centre cycle.

 

09:14.720 --> 09:18.858

But I would argue that a site that has power today in Europe

 

09:18.858 --> 09:22.495

is almost worth more than North America because of those prohibitions and

 

09:22.495 --> 09:23.296

difficulties.

 

09:23.296 --> 09:27.833

That's fascinating. There's probably more to that and more of them around

 

09:27.833 --> 09:30.736

the European zone and other areas.

 

09:30.736 --> 09:34.740

If you contrast that to Canada, or just a

 

09:34.740 --> 09:36.976

place where there's an awful lot of space and actually, an awful a lot of

 

09:36.976 --> 09:41.047

power, I was wondering to what extent do you make sure,

 

09:41.047 --> 09:43.916

you've mentioned it a couple of times, that you're investing in places that can

 

09:43.916 --> 09:46.719

build and have access to power.

 

09:46.719 --> 09:48.487

Sometimes that's in the middle of nowhere.

 

09:48.487 --> 09:51.390

I wonder if you can just take us into that part of it.

 

09:51.390 --> 09:55.127

You've got to have power but maybe not at any geographical cost.

 

09:55.127 --> 09:57.697

Yeah, you have to ... and remember a lot of these ...

 

09:57.697 --> 10:01.667

I'm simplifying it, I'm not trying to insult, middle of nowhere, but

 

10:01.667 --> 10:03.536

it is that access to power.

 

10:03.536 --> 10:07.506

But right now that's being driven primarily by the AI, the

 

10:07.506 --> 10:11.944

training models, where latency, and latency is closeness,

 

10:11.944 --> 10:14.914

you know, simply defined, doesn't matter as much.

 

10:14.914 --> 10:18.384

But we've all lived in a world where it's our computer or our phone where you

 

10:18.384 --> 10:22.588

see the spinning thing on, that's latency, if you will, so it's making the

 

10:22.588 --> 10:27.326

time it takes when you put in Chat GPT a question for it to answer.

 

10:27.360 --> 10:31.330

Increasingly, people will care about latency so you want to be

 

10:31.330 --> 10:35.534

closer. One of the old adages of real estate is location matters and

 

10:35.534 --> 10:39.472

I think you're going to see that increasingly in data centres, want to be close

 

10:39.472 --> 10:44.176

to where people, businesses, et cetera, are doing that latency matters.

 

10:44.176 --> 10:48.214

It doesn't matter when you're just running some AI training model trying to

 

10:48.214 --> 10:52.218

figure out the outcome but to employ that AI model

 

10:52.218 --> 10:53.219

you want to be close.

 

10:53.486 --> 10:56.689

Okay, that's really interesting. They are two separate areas.

 

10:57.823 --> 11:01.761

Take us a little bit into some of the other areas where you have

 

11:01.761 --> 11:04.764

leaned in recently. I mean, there's lots we've discussed over the years that

 

11:04.764 --> 11:09.368

have to do with office and geographically where that's been more

 

11:09.368 --> 11:13.539

useful to invest in and less and the work from home discussion as well

 

11:13.539 --> 11:17.343

as all aspects of sort of condo markets all over the place.

 

11:17.343 --> 11:20.680

But it's actually retail that I found quite interesting.

 

11:20.680 --> 11:24.684

You said the other day when we spoke prior to this that it's having a

 

11:24.684 --> 11:28.421

little bit of a renaissance and it's kind of because we haven't built a lot of

 

11:28.421 --> 11:31.190

malls lately. Is that partly where that goes?

 

11:32.458 --> 11:36.429

Yeah, a global phenomenon in the developed world over

 

11:36.429 --> 11:40.700

the last 10 to 15 years has been a lack of new retail

 

11:40.700 --> 11:41.701

real estate.

 

11:42.868 --> 11:46.906

Ao supply has been very close to zero, and in some cases it's actually

 

11:46.906 --> 11:51.377

been negative. For example, here in the United States we had approximately

 

11:51.377 --> 11:55.481

1,200 malls. The mall typically is characterized by

 

11:55.481 --> 11:59.452

something that's 800 square feet or 1,000 square feet or above.

 

11:59.452 --> 12:03.556

Today that number is a little over 800 because those malls

 

12:03.589 --> 12:07.727

have died and they become actually, their land was worth more

 

12:07.727 --> 12:11.997

as something else, or HBU is the phrase that's often used in real estate,

 

12:11.997 --> 12:14.300

higher and better use than as a mall.

 

12:17.169 --> 12:17.636

Maybe a data centre.

 

12:17.670 --> 12:20.740

Maybe some of them have turned into a data centre so you've actually shrunk the

 

12:20.740 --> 12:24.677

amount of retail space. I am overweight all forms

 

12:24.677 --> 12:28.547

of retail real estate, whether it's malls, whether it's convenience, strip

 

12:28.547 --> 12:31.684

centres, or power centres, or grocery anchor type stuff.

 

12:31.684 --> 12:35.988

Because of that lack of supply we have rising rental

 

12:35.988 --> 12:40.226

rates, we have tenants, and yes,

 

12:40.226 --> 12:43.896

the global economic environment now for retail sales, I would characterize as

 

12:43.896 --> 12:47.933

okay. But then at the same time, if they're only getting okay

 

12:47.933 --> 12:51.370

same-store sales growth they need unit growth.

 

12:51.370 --> 12:56.142

That unit growth is driving their demand for new spaces.

 

12:56.142 --> 13:00.579

One final thing I'd like to emphasize is many bricks

 

13:00.579 --> 13:03.916

and mortar retailers, they haven't made money online.

 

13:03.916 --> 13:08.554

If you're just shipping something online to somebody it's not very profitable.

 

13:08.554 --> 13:11.223

They make most of their money in their stores.

 

13:12.491 --> 13:16.595

The Omni retail channel and their technology has finally become

 

13:16.595 --> 13:20.633

so sophisticated, especially in this post-COVID world,

 

13:20.633 --> 13:24.737

whereby it's a seamless thing where you can go into the store but get it

 

13:24.737 --> 13:28.874

delivered online. You can go online to investigate but buy

 

13:28.874 --> 13:33.245

it in the store. One of the big things is when you return an item.

 

13:33.245 --> 13:37.183

That is huge because when you return an item, statistically

 

13:37.183 --> 13:41.120

here's a likelihood you're going to spend much more in that store than

 

13:41.120 --> 13:43.355

you actually did on that item you returned.

 

13:43.355 --> 13:45.157

Very possible [audio cuts out].

 

13:45.157 --> 13:48.360

And you come in slightly annoyed because you have to make the return in the

 

13:48.360 --> 13:52.164

first place and then you leave with that, yeah, sort of high because you've got

 

13:52.164 --> 13:53.165

something new.

 

13:54.133 --> 13:56.936

It's an overall return business model, isn't it?

 

13:56.936 --> 13:59.238

That's really, really interesting how that works.

 

13:59.238 --> 14:02.775

I'm surprised ... I know there's always the final mile, and you can talk a lot

 

14:02.775 --> 14:05.945

about online commerce and how that's evolved, and it's obviously evolved

 

14:05.945 --> 14:10.282

incredibly well, but it's interesting that the margins story

 

14:10.282 --> 14:11.951

really is in the in-person experience.

 

14:11.951 --> 14:15.921

That has always

 

14:15.921 --> 14:20.759

been the case. How does that kind of

 

14:20.759 --> 14:24.697

... they smaller places where people come into, smaller actual stores

 

14:24.697 --> 14:26.498

but at least they get you in the door.

 

14:26.498 --> 14:30.035

Is that sort of the model there or are they building quite large stores?

 

14:31.804 --> 14:36.141

A little bit. It really depends on what you're trying to sell

 

14:36.141 --> 14:38.210

often times and what the store size is.

 

14:38.210 --> 14:42.181

The retailers in and of themselves have always made

 

14:42.181 --> 14:46.919

money, as long as they've had enough traffic in inventory, versus the shipping.

 

14:46.919 --> 14:51.657

The shipping is such an expense for the online retailer,

 

14:51.657 --> 14:55.861

especially when you add and in on the return side of things,

 

14:55.861 --> 14:59.832

that whereby they've always made their money in the store or

 

14:59.832 --> 15:03.869

then online. You can see public disclosures

 

15:03.869 --> 15:08.107

of more pure online retailers how little they actually make in their

 

15:08.107 --> 15:10.075

retail online business.

 

15:10.075 --> 15:11.076

That's fascinating.

 

15:12.444 --> 15:16.382

And another area that we've spoken to you over, and also has a little bit of a

 

15:16.382 --> 15:20.519

connection to the COVID story, is broadly healthcare but I think

 

15:20.519 --> 15:24.690

specifically the area of assisted living, which can be retirement homes.

 

15:26.358 --> 15:30.396

For some time people were shying away from them because it was

 

15:30.396 --> 15:34.366

a place where their relatives got sick in a lot of cases.

 

15:34.366 --> 15:36.268

Take us through the progression of where we are now.

 

15:38.737 --> 15:42.808

This is more of a North American, both in Canada and US, story whereby it's

 

15:42.808 --> 15:47.246

private pay, which is very important here, not government pay.

 

15:47.246 --> 15:51.784

With private pay, and you have, obviously, a very ageing demographic,

 

15:51.784 --> 15:55.754

there's more people in both our countries, the US and Canada, turn 85 more than

 

15:55.754 --> 15:59.959

any other time. That's, on average, an age that you may enter

 

15:59.959 --> 16:02.328

into an assisted living facility.

 

16:02.328 --> 16:06.732

Then we had with COVID a stop of supply, new supply

 

16:06.732 --> 16:11.370

given you had the health-related worries,

 

16:11.370 --> 16:15.074

the accelerated deaths, unfortunately, during that period.

 

16:15.074 --> 16:19.878

Now you have demand going up, you have a limited amount of new supply,

 

16:19.878 --> 16:23.849

whereby you're seeing occupancies continue to tick up and the ability

 

16:23.849 --> 16:29.088

to push rental rates higher way above inflation exist.

 

16:29.088 --> 16:31.190

Now, that's a very good thing.

 

16:32.324 --> 16:35.527

I must tell you, though, that this story is not new.

 

16:35.527 --> 16:39.098

We are arguably in the second, third year of the story.

 

16:39.098 --> 16:43.369

Most of the assisted living REITs or healthcare REITS really

 

16:43.369 --> 16:47.673

reflect this. I do own them but I'm very leery about the valuation

 

16:47.673 --> 16:50.242

in some of them. We've also seen

 

16:52.277 --> 16:56.048

[audio cuts out] bordering on a very feeding frenzy in terms of external

 

16:56.048 --> 16:58.784

growth, that is what they're out there buying.

 

16:58.784 --> 17:03.789

There's a lot of competition, or increasing competition, by new facilities.

 

17:03.789 --> 17:08.093

we're talking about it now, it's probably in the middle

 

17:08.093 --> 17:11.663

innings of this story that has gone on for a couple of years.

 

17:11.663 --> 17:15.067

Okay, that's fascinating. I do see a lot of them, just sort of my own

 

17:15.067 --> 17:19.138

experience, being built, retirement homes that are pay for

 

17:19.138 --> 17:23.575

retirement homes just speaking to the overall demand there.

 

17:23.575 --> 17:27.679

When we come back to the data centre conversation, just for a second, give us a

 

17:27.679 --> 17:31.383

sense of the positioning that you have, ultimately.

 

17:31.383 --> 17:35.421

You are overweight but take us through the underweights and overweights

 

17:35.421 --> 17:36.922

and perhaps some nuance in between there.

 

17:38.390 --> 17:43.295

In terms of the data centres, yeah, the fund is overweight data centres.

 

17:43.295 --> 17:46.765

And if you look through bases like I talked about earlier, not just the pure

 

17:46.765 --> 17:50.769

data centres but we own, you know, logistics companies in

 

17:50.769 --> 17:55.007

both Europe and the US that have the

 

17:55.007 --> 17:58.944

underlying data centre story in terms of development, including Australia

 

17:58.944 --> 18:01.313

and also in Spain.

 

18:01.313 --> 18:05.250

There's a diversified REIT that over time was one of

 

18:05.250 --> 18:09.354

the first movers within the Spanish data centre market and it's

 

18:09.354 --> 18:13.692

in the process of being that's the primary thesis of their investment

 

18:13.692 --> 18:17.429

story [audio cuts out] data centres, not their office, retail [audio cuts out].

 

18:21.433 --> 18:25.437

When you take a look at real estate, the US, particularly

 

18:25.437 --> 18:29.475

sort of US REITs, there is a

 

18:29.475 --> 18:33.579

discussion about being slightly concerned about where AI

 

18:33.579 --> 18:36.248

spending is going. I mean, if you look at the fundamentals earnings stories

 

18:36.248 --> 18:40.986

look pretty fabulous. There's a lot of things to argue in favour of

 

18:40.986 --> 18:42.921

nothing really going that wrong.

 

18:42.921 --> 18:46.024

We've got fundamentals such as the ones that are here right now.

 

18:46.024 --> 18:47.025

But that said,

 

18:50.028 --> 18:53.966

there's lack of correlation really between, I think it's the NASDAQ, this is US

 

18:53.966 --> 18:57.336

REITs particularly. Take us through that because it's sort of this ballast

 

18:57.336 --> 18:58.337

within a portfolio.

 

18:59.671 --> 19:03.509

Yeah, and we talked about interest rates at the beginning of our discussion,

 

19:03.509 --> 19:07.546

lots of people want to focus on interest rates and the performance of global

 

19:07.546 --> 19:10.649

REITs. I like to change it a little bit.

 

19:10.649 --> 19:14.987

I actually, and people are very surprised by this statement, care more about

 

19:14.987 --> 19:19.024

how the growthier part of the equity markets are performing

 

19:19.024 --> 19:23.228

and that you see the most, the NASDAQ here in the United States and

 

19:23.228 --> 19:26.798

many other markets outside the United States, there's not as much growth or

 

19:26.798 --> 19:31.003

equity stocks to begin with, or pure AI stocks.

 

19:31.003 --> 19:35.107

We have seen over the last couple of years as the growthier

 

19:35.107 --> 19:39.144

part of the equity market has performed well, for example,

 

19:39.144 --> 19:42.948

global REITs have not performed as well up until recently.

 

19:42.948 --> 19:46.985

And we do see then ... if I had a chart and would flip it up here you'd

 

19:46.985 --> 19:51.056

see an increasingly like almost negative correlation

 

19:51.089 --> 19:54.960

on a day, a month or even longer type basis.

 

19:54.960 --> 19:59.765

This then leads to the punchline which is diversification

 

19:59.765 --> 20:03.835

benefits. In your portfolio we all would rather talk about those

 

20:03.835 --> 20:07.839

growth stocks that have kept going up but we've seen periods of times

 

20:07.839 --> 20:10.642

when they don't go up, they actually go down.

 

20:10.642 --> 20:14.580

This does add the other side, as you alluded to,

 

20:14.580 --> 20:16.281

kind of a balancing act.

 

20:16.281 --> 20:20.152

It does what it's supposed to do, it provides the diversification benefits to

 

20:20.152 --> 20:24.756

that growthier you're part of the market. It's a real asset

 

20:24.790 --> 20:28.427

[audio cuts out] income oriented. They don't have as much growth but they have,

 

20:28.427 --> 20:32.231

they have actually pretty good growth right now for what they are, just they

 

20:32.231 --> 20:35.934

can't keep up with the exponential growth that we have seen with AI

 

20:38.704 --> 20:39.705

or [audio cuts out] stock related.

 

20:40.572 --> 20:43.909

So you mentioned a chart. I mean, literally through the month of July, for

 

20:43.909 --> 20:47.813

instance, you could see, you would be able to see that play itself out.

 

20:49.114 --> 20:51.149

You would be able to see that play itself out.

 

20:51.149 --> 20:55.320

So in other parts of the world, just to get sort of the global footprint that

 

20:55.320 --> 20:58.390

you're discussing, you mentioned Spain, this is particularly in the healthcare

 

20:58.390 --> 21:00.692

side of things — or, sorry, was that data centres?

 

21:00.692 --> 21:01.393

That was data centres.

 

21:01.393 --> 21:02.394

That was data centres.

 

21:03.295 --> 21:07.432

Where else geographically? Just take us through how the portfolio leans and

 

21:07.432 --> 21:09.534

is diversified geographically.

 

21:10.736 --> 21:14.706

Yeah, it doesn't have actually huge geographical or country bets

 

21:14.740 --> 21:16.475

versus the benchmark.

 

21:16.475 --> 21:19.411

But there is ... let me answer this question one way.

 

21:19.411 --> 21:23.515

The fundamentals around the world are pretty similar in the

 

21:23.515 --> 21:27.352

developed work for real estate. We have this lack of supply, except in data

 

21:27.352 --> 21:31.957

centres, whether it's retail, whether it is logistics facilities,

 

21:31.957 --> 21:35.527

whether it's apartments for rent type ones.

 

21:35.527 --> 21:39.698

That's leading into very good fundamental, even with just this stable demand

 

21:39.698 --> 21:43.735

picture. Next, you get this capital side of

 

21:43.735 --> 21:47.072

the business. We talked about that. Unfortunately, cost of capital around the

 

21:47.072 --> 21:50.942

world, because long-term interest rates have gone up, so their cost of capital

 

21:50.942 --> 21:54.813

is a little higher, offset by those good fundamentals.

 

21:54.813 --> 21:56.782

And then you have valuation.

 

21:56.782 --> 22:01.453

On average today global REITs trade at a 10 to 20%

 

22:01.453 --> 22:05.457

discount to their net asset value, to their real estate value.

 

22:05.457 --> 22:08.126

You go, huh, that's pretty good.

 

22:08.126 --> 22:12.331

Where there is geographical disparity, though, there's a huge geographical

 

22:12.331 --> 22:15.167

disparity around that valuation.

 

22:15.167 --> 22:19.204

For example, here in the US we actually trade closer or

 

22:19.204 --> 22:21.673

slightly above that asset value.

 

22:21.673 --> 22:26.078

That's because we have more data centres and more assisted living exposure.

 

22:26.078 --> 22:30.082

Other place, for example, Europe, they trade arguably at a 20

 

22:30.082 --> 22:32.484

to 50% discount to their net asset value.

 

22:32.484 --> 22:36.555

We are seeing some opportunities based more

 

22:36.555 --> 22:40.125

on the valuation in those markets.

 

22:40.125 --> 22:44.129

One thing that I do have a small little thematic going on in

 

22:44.129 --> 22:48.066

my portfolio, which is owning some of those companies that trade

 

22:48.066 --> 22:52.704

at large discounts that I think could be privatized or go away.

 

22:52.704 --> 22:55.807

We have seen this privatization wave.

 

22:55.807 --> 22:59.578

There is a lot of money in the private real estate world.

 

22:59.578 --> 23:03.548

Remember, the private real estate world today is arguably

 

23:03.548 --> 23:07.652

80 to 90% of all the institutional quality

 

23:07.652 --> 23:11.256

commercial real estate in the world, the listed part is plus or minus 15%.

 

23:11.256 --> 23:15.827

So when you do trade at this discount

 

23:15.827 --> 23:20.165

I always believe it's incumbent upon the board, the management

 

23:20.165 --> 23:24.069

to, quote unquote, do the right things. Perhaps sell yourself for cash.

 

23:24.069 --> 23:28.473

We've seen that in the Canadian REIT market recently with

 

23:28.473 --> 23:31.176

Mint, apartment [audio cuts out].

 

23:31.176 --> 23:35.814

We've seen that HR  last week, sell and slightly merge into another

 

23:35.814 --> 23:40.118

apartment REIT. And then we've seen that outside of

 

23:40.118 --> 23:44.656

Canada, we've seen that in Europe more recently in a couple transactions.

 

23:44.656 --> 23:48.727

Those are those, you can get a nice one-day pop where

 

23:48.727 --> 23:52.697

it can be realized there, which you won't see as much, in

 

23:52.697 --> 23:55.133

my opinion, in the US [audio cuts out].

 

23:56.535 --> 24:00.539

When you're looking at some of those steep discounts that you mentioned in the

 

24:00.539 --> 24:04.509

UK, for instance, is there a way to connect

 

24:04.509 --> 24:08.780

the idea that data centre buildout and land for

 

24:08.780 --> 24:12.951

it is available to those that can power it?

 

24:12.951 --> 24:16.421

I mean, you mentioned that earlier and what sort of premium in a way in the UK

 

24:16.421 --> 24:20.592

if you've got a site, be it a logistics site or whatever it is,

 

24:20.592 --> 24:22.494

with power is unique.

 

24:23.762 --> 24:27.766

Can you sort of follow that trend around the world, those areas that have power

 

24:27.766 --> 24:31.837

to connect ultimately are gonna be very interesting investments for you,

 

24:31.837 --> 24:35.941

and maybe change that discount piece of the story?

 

24:35.941 --> 24:40.045

In some instances, it more is found

 

24:40.045 --> 24:44.282

in the logistics space more than any other one right now, rather than

 

24:44.282 --> 24:47.285

other types of property types.

 

24:47.285 --> 24:51.323

So yes, there is partially what you just said but I would slightly

 

24:51.323 --> 24:53.158

disagree that it's not the full story.

 

24:53.158 --> 24:57.429

Okay, and therefore is there any connection as we watch the

 

24:57.429 --> 25:01.366

oil price and the geopolitical story go up and then come back down

 

25:01.366 --> 25:05.470

again, that is obviously a crude oil story but it's

 

25:05.470 --> 25:09.641

certainly related to the various other areas of energy

 

25:09.641 --> 25:10.642

products.

 

25:11.376 --> 25:15.347

Yeah, I mean, where that flows into is obviously

 

25:15.347 --> 25:19.584

we've seen with energy prices elevated what does that mean for inflation

 

25:19.584 --> 25:21.887

and then ultimately what does that mean for interest rates.

 

25:23.388 --> 25:27.492

We've talked about that where would it hypothetically lead

 

25:27.492 --> 25:32.097

to even higher long term interest rates which could have, unfortunately,

 

25:32.097 --> 25:35.433

a negative impact on that cost of capital.

 

25:35.433 --> 25:39.671

As long as the fundamentals keep up ,or they trade at a discount, that

 

25:39.671 --> 25:42.407

can offset some of that cost of capital [audio cuts out].

 

25:43.909 --> 25:47.379

So as a bit of a final tie-up to some of the areas that you mentioned, we

 

25:47.379 --> 25:51.483

talked through real estate, which is of interest, the data centre story kind

 

25:51.483 --> 25:55.487

of around the world and particularly what type of data centre, as

 

25:55.487 --> 25:59.457

well as related to the healthcare industry, how would you

 

25:59.457 --> 26:03.929

like to discuss or sort of leave a message with investors about what

 

26:03.929 --> 26:06.665

this fund provides kind of at this moment for everyone.

 

26:08.300 --> 26:12.604

I alluded to a little bit but just to reinforce, we have very good

 

26:12.604 --> 26:16.675

fundamentals within almost all sectors of

 

26:16.675 --> 26:20.912

real estate. Second, yes, we've had a slightly higher

 

26:20.912 --> 26:24.683

cost of capital but the good fundamentals are offsetting a lot of that.

 

26:24.683 --> 26:28.920

One thing I failed to mention is credit spreads are pretty tight

 

26:28.920 --> 26:33.458

for any forms of real estate so you're seeing some benefit from that.

 

26:33.458 --> 26:36.828

Thirdly, we have this overall valuation discount

 

26:37.929 --> 26:40.498

on a global type basis.

 

26:40.498 --> 26:44.336

So that's the three legs of the stool I always like to talk about, strong

 

26:44.336 --> 26:48.807

fundamentals, slightly less cost of capital, that leg, and

 

26:48.807 --> 26:51.743

then the third leg, valuation, pretty good.

 

26:53.812 --> 26:57.816

To reinforce once again, in a diversified portfolio this

 

26:57.816 --> 27:00.885

helps offset what you could experience

 

27:02.020 --> 27:06.358

or ... in terms of other parts of the market going down this historically

 

27:06.358 --> 27:10.495

has been an offset [audio cuts out] that negative correlation.

 

27:10.495 --> 27:14.265

It's a fascinating moment to hear you discuss data centres from this

 

27:14.299 --> 27:17.569

perspective. We're hearing it from a lot of other perspectives.

 

27:17.569 --> 27:20.271

Steve Buller, thank you very much for joining us and filling us in on how

 

27:20.271 --> 27:22.007

you're positioned at this moment through the markets.

 

27:22.707 --> 27:24.776

Thanks for watching or listening to

 

27:24.809 --> 27:27.012

the Fidelity Connects podcast.

 

27:27.012 --> 27:28.880

Now, if you haven't done so already,

 

27:28.880 --> 27:30.448

please subscribe to Fidelity Connex

 

27:30.448 --> 27:32.884

on your podcast platform of choice.

 

27:32.917 --> 27:34.219

And if you like what you're hearing,

 

27:34.252 --> 27:35.754

please leave a review or a five-star

 

27:35.754 --> 27:36.788

rating.

 

27:36.788 --> 27:38.556

Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are

 

27:38.556 --> 27:39.858

available by working with a

 

27:39.891 --> 27:41.393

financial advisor or through an

 

27:41.426 --> 27:43.128

online brokerage account.

 

27:43.161 --> 27:45.363

Visit Fidelity.ca slash howtobuy

 

27:45.363 --> 27:46.931

for more information.

 

27:46.931 --> 27:48.733

While on Fidelity dot CA, you can

 

27:48.733 --> 27:50.335

also find more information on future

 

27:50.368 --> 27:51.336

live webcasts.

 

27:51.369 --> 27:52.537

Don't forget to follow Fidelity

 

27:52.570 --> 27:54.773

Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn,

 

27:54.806 --> 27:55.807

and Instagram.

 

27:56.808 --> 27:58.610

We'll end today's show with a short

 

27:58.610 --> 27:59.678

disclaimer.

 

27:59.678 --> 28:01.279

The views and opinions expressed on

 

28:01.312 --> 28:02.714

this podcast are those of the

 

28:02.747 --> 28:04.482

participants and do not necessarily

 

28:04.482 --> 28:05.684

reflect those of Fidelity

 

28:05.717 --> 28:07.552

Investments Canada ULC or its

 

28:07.619 --> 28:08.520

affiliates.

 

28:08.553 --> 28:10.055

This podcast is for informational

 

28:10.055 --> 28:11.589

purposes only and should not be

 

28:11.589 --> 28:13.291

construed as investment, tax, or

 

28:13.324 --> 28:14.359

legal advice.

 

28:14.392 --> 28:16.428

It is not an offer to sell or buy,

 

28:16.428 --> 28:18.163

or an endorsement, recommendation,

 

28:18.163 --> 28:20.131

or sponsorship of any entity or

 

28:20.131 --> 28:21.633

securities cited.

 

28:21.633 --> 28:23.068

Read a funds prospectus.

 

28:23.068 --> 28:24.536

Before investing, funds are not

 

28:24.536 --> 28:25.437

guaranteed.

 

28:25.437 --> 28:26.838

Their values change frequently and

 

28:26.838 --> 28:28.106

past performance may not be

 

28:28.106 --> 28:29.174

repeated.

 

28:29.174 --> 28:30.675

Fees, expenses, and commissions are

 

28:30.675 --> 28:32.043

all associated with fund

 

28:32.043 --> 28:33.211

investments.

 

28:33.211 --> 28:34.746

Thanks again. We'll see you next

 

28:34.746 --> 28:35.714

time.

Listen to the podcast version