The Upside: CIO insights: Mid-year market review with Andrew Marchese

Join us for a mid-year market update with Andrew Marchese, Chief Investment Officer. Andrew shares his latest perspective on the forces shaping markets, how portfolios are positioned and what investors should be watching in the months ahead.

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

 

00:00.000 --> 00:05.805

Subtitles are AI-Generated.

 

00:06.072 --> 00:08.174

Hello, and welcome to The Upside.

 

00:08.174 --> 00:10.043

I'm your host, Emily Anonuevo.

 

00:10.043 --> 00:13.380

Well, we've reached the halfway point of the year and perhaps there's no better

 

00:13.380 --> 00:17.484

time as investors to pause, reflect and look out to the rest of the year

 

00:17.484 --> 00:21.688

ahead. Canadians are surely concerned about inflation, housing,

 

00:21.688 --> 00:24.824

unemployment, and ongoing geopolitical tensions.

 

00:24.824 --> 00:29.062

At this point in time the markets have absorbed a lot, economic slowdown,

 

00:29.062 --> 00:33.466

shifting global dynamics but also strong corporate performance as well.

 

00:33.466 --> 00:36.903

What should investors be focused on at this point of the year and what major

 

00:36.903 --> 00:39.639

factors will shape the markets going forward?

 

00:39.639 --> 00:43.443

Here to share his CIO insights and perspectives is portfolio manager, Andrew

 

00:43.443 --> 00:44.911

Marchese. Welcome, Andrew.

 

00:44.911 --> 00:45.412

Pleasure to be here.

 

00:45.412 --> 00:47.380

Nice to have you in the studio today.

 

00:47.380 --> 00:48.114

Thank you.

 

00:48.114 --> 00:52.152

Okay, let's just dive right in. I wanted to get your overall thoughts on this

 

00:52.152 --> 00:54.354

technical recession that we're in.

 

00:54.354 --> 00:59.225

Should investors be worried? For the investors watching online right now,

 

00:59.225 --> 01:03.363

a technical recession is when we experience two consecutive quarters

 

01:03.363 --> 01:05.865

of negative GDP decline.

 

01:05.865 --> 01:09.035

A true recession is when we see a more severe decline.

 

01:09.035 --> 01:10.036

Is that about right?

 

01:10.036 --> 01:13.139

Yeah, that's about right. I think should we be concerned?

 

01:13.139 --> 01:17.110

No. The first thing you have to remember about the stock market and

 

01:17.110 --> 01:20.513

investing in general, the stock market's are forward looking discounting

 

01:20.513 --> 01:24.918

mechanism so any bad news is usually anticipated

 

01:24.918 --> 01:28.121

ahead of time and it's priced in ahead of the time.

 

01:28.121 --> 01:32.725

Now, that can be anywhere from 3 months to 18 months in some cases

 

01:32.725 --> 01:36.096

depending on what the news actually is, whether it's macroeconomic related or

 

01:36.096 --> 01:38.665

related to specific companies or securities.

 

01:38.665 --> 01:42.769

In this case, if you look at it consensus estimates on Bay Street are

 

01:42.769 --> 01:47.173

for about 1.1% GDP growth in Canada this year,

 

01:47.173 --> 01:51.344

for the calendar year, and then next year I think estimates are closer to about

 

01:51.344 --> 01:56.049

1.7%, 1.6% and then 1.8%.

 

01:56.049 --> 02:00.353

A slow, gradual kind of increase.

 

02:00.353 --> 02:04.991

What to be noteworthy about that I think is some

 

02:04.991 --> 02:09.562

of the initiatives that we're seeing more in the industrial context,

 

02:09.562 --> 02:14.134

the commercial context kind of going forward, fixed

 

02:14.134 --> 02:18.104

asset investment in Canada has been trending a little bit below

 

02:18.104 --> 02:20.440

normal over the last two to three years.

 

02:20.440 --> 02:24.878

If we were to resume a pace that we saw a

 

02:24.878 --> 02:29.015

few years back, call it five years back, six years back, that would be a more

 

02:29.015 --> 02:33.953

normalized pace, you could easily add about a half a percentage point

 

02:33.953 --> 02:36.523

to those GDP numbers.

 

02:36.523 --> 02:40.460

Typically, when economies get better through fixed asset investment

 

02:40.460 --> 02:44.230

and whatnot by the private sector  that has a way of trickling down to the

 

02:44.230 --> 02:48.334

consumer. In theory, the number could be greater than a

 

02:48.334 --> 02:52.639

half a percentage point if consumers feel confident, they spend,

 

02:52.639 --> 02:55.542

interest rates are manageable, so on and so forth.

 

02:55.542 --> 02:58.945

People feel good about their investments, people feel good about their real

 

02:58.945 --> 03:03.316

estate, people feel about their job. If all that comes to fruition then

 

03:03.316 --> 03:05.818

you potentially have upside to those numbers.

 

03:05.818 --> 03:09.756

Right, correct. I mean, consumers have felt a lot and

 

03:09.756 --> 03:13.293

experienced a lot in the first six months of 2026.

 

03:13.293 --> 03:16.729

We're seeing higher gas prices at the pumps.

 

03:16.729 --> 03:19.933

Now they're a bit lower, give or take which week you're in.

 

03:19.933 --> 03:24.103

Maybe a bit of their discretionary

 

03:24.103 --> 03:25.872

income has gone down.

 

03:25.872 --> 03:29.909

Let's take a step back and look at the first six months of this

 

03:29.909 --> 03:33.413

year and then maybe look ahead to the next six months.

 

03:33.413 --> 03:37.483

What, in your perspective, are the main factors and forces

 

03:37.483 --> 03:40.687

shaping and influencing the market today?

 

03:40.687 --> 03:44.757

If we look back six months, we came into the year, I think, noticing a

 

03:44.757 --> 03:48.795

few positives. One was, generally speaking, in both Canada and

 

03:48.795 --> 03:53.199

the United States we saw a lot of improving

 

03:53.199 --> 03:57.637

economic metrics, in both manufacturing and

 

03:57.637 --> 04:01.541

service. That was good so the market got off to a good start this year.

 

04:01.541 --> 04:05.612

As we got into late February, obviously, we had to deal with

 

04:05.645 --> 04:10.083

the Iran conflict, the conflicts in the Middle East.

 

04:10.083 --> 04:13.319

We saw a spike up in oil prices as a result of that.

 

04:13.319 --> 04:17.023

A lot of people were consternating exactly about what you said, higher prices

 

04:17.023 --> 04:21.427

at the pump, what would that do for consumers' wallets,

 

04:21.427 --> 04:25.398

discretionary spending, what would mean for industry that

 

04:25.398 --> 04:29.736

manufactures things because the price of raw materials

 

04:29.736 --> 04:33.906

would go up in nature and therefore that would potentially hurt profit margins.

 

04:33.906 --> 04:37.610

We thought generally these things are kind of fleeting, and indeed it's proven

 

04:37.610 --> 04:41.814

to be fleeting. The oil is now back in the 70s, it

 

04:41.814 --> 04:44.884

didn't take that long to get there in the grand scheme of things.

 

04:44.884 --> 04:49.022

As we look forward into the next six months of the year, the theme that

 

04:49.055 --> 04:52.492

tends to be dominating the stock market is all things related to artificial

 

04:52.492 --> 04:56.729

intelligence, whether you're talking about semiconductors,

 

04:56.729 --> 05:00.867

whether you're talking about data centers, power generation and supply, all

 

05:00.867 --> 05:03.836

of this is in some way, shape or form related.

 

05:03.836 --> 05:08.174

It has been the most newsworthy and probably frothiest

 

05:08.174 --> 05:11.944

place in the market on a day in and day out basis.

 

05:11.944 --> 05:15.982

Those themes are gonna dominate continue going

 

05:15.982 --> 05:20.019

forward. I think to a somewhat lesser degree there could

 

05:20.019 --> 05:24.123

be continued talk about central bank interest rate policy

 

05:24.123 --> 05:28.127

kind of going forward. You may have seen more recently

 

05:28.127 --> 05:30.963

that some inflation metrics have ticked up.

 

05:30.963 --> 05:35.134

We attribute that largely to oil and some other input costs that have

 

05:35.134 --> 05:39.238

temporarily risen. It would not surprise me if those numbers

 

05:39.238 --> 05:43.176

came off in the back half of the year and we wouldn't have

 

05:43.176 --> 05:47.280

to worry about, necessarily, central bank tightening to curb

 

05:47.280 --> 05:48.381

inflation.

 

05:48.381 --> 05:54.153

That will be an ongoing watch to see how those numbers progress and, by

 

05:54.153 --> 05:57.123

definition then, how central banks will react.

 

05:57.123 --> 06:01.060

Typically, when central banks have to tighten, and they have to tighten

 

06:01.060 --> 06:05.031

multiple times, that has a knock-on effect of

 

06:05.031 --> 06:08.134

slowing the economy, not immediately but usually about 12 months out.

 

06:08.134 --> 06:12.238

The market kinda sees through that and that results

 

06:12.238 --> 06:16.743

in a higher discount rate which means lower valuations and also, potentially,

 

06:16.743 --> 06:18.845

some negative earnings revisions.

 

06:18.845 --> 06:23.216

But we're not there yet so this is just something to keep on our radar screen.

 

06:23.216 --> 06:27.286

Absolutely. Now, if we step back and focus on

 

06:27.286 --> 06:31.524

home soil, interested to get your thoughts on the health of

 

06:31.524 --> 06:35.461

Canada's economy right now. You've spoken about this on our previous

 

06:35.461 --> 06:38.197

webcasts. How would you describe it?

 

06:38.197 --> 06:42.735

I mean, I know you've used cautiously optimistic as a term,

 

06:42.735 --> 06:45.605

how would you diagnose the health our economy right now?

 

06:45.605 --> 06:51.144

Well, as I stated previously from the GDP's numbers, it's not great.

 

06:51.144 --> 06:55.014

What you have to ask yourself is where could it possibly improve?

 

06:55.014 --> 06:58.284

The one area I think it could improve, and our Prime Minister has talked about

 

06:58.284 --> 07:02.321

that, is bringing more focus in on industry here in

 

07:02.355 --> 07:05.558

Canada and forming new trade alliances around the world.

 

07:05.558 --> 07:10.229

Now, that's not a quick fix. That's a multi-year, multi-decade

 

07:10.229 --> 07:14.233

potentially, strategy that the country has to

 

07:14.233 --> 07:15.968

undertake, be committed to.

 

07:15.968 --> 07:20.039

How they execute that and the success of those

 

07:20.039 --> 07:23.776

measures will dictate how our future GDP looks.

 

07:23.776 --> 07:28.214

In the short term we have kind of mediocre growth.

 

07:28.214 --> 07:32.318

Those things that the Prime Minister is talking about tend to be longer term

 

07:32.318 --> 07:34.020

in nature.

 

07:34.020 --> 07:38.658

The other thing in the short term that we have to be wary of is just for

 

07:38.658 --> 07:42.728

years many Canadians have been in the black

 

07:42.728 --> 07:46.732

on their housing. That's been a huge source of wealth

 

07:46.732 --> 07:51.771

for Canadians. We tend to have a levered consumer

 

07:51.771 --> 07:55.608

but it's disproportionately exposed to mortgages.

 

07:55.608 --> 08:00.413

Now, more recently we've seen 20%,

 

08:00.413 --> 08:04.984

some 20+% corrections in real estate in the GTA, other

 

08:04.984 --> 08:08.955

parts around the country as well, so some people are underwater in

 

08:08.955 --> 08:14.393

their house right now from an equity value perspective.

 

08:14.393 --> 08:18.030

To the extent that that bottoms out and starts to come back I think consumers

 

08:18.030 --> 08:21.767

will feel better about their real estate situation, their home situation, and

 

08:21.767 --> 08:23.836

that could be a good thing going forward.

 

08:23.836 --> 08:27.106

That could, to the extent that those prices start to rise again that could

 

08:27.106 --> 08:31.177

potentially, you know, again, trickle down into the economy and

 

08:31.177 --> 08:33.613

spur a little bit of short term growth.

 

08:33.613 --> 08:37.817

Those are the things I'm probably most focused on

 

08:37.817 --> 08:40.753

with respect to the Canadian economy.

 

08:40.753 --> 08:44.690

We're kind of meandering but the longer term looks very

 

08:44.690 --> 08:49.061

good because I think there is a very disconcerted

 

08:49.061 --> 08:53.533

effort on behalf of our leadership federally to

 

08:53.533 --> 08:57.637

try to grow this economy for a sustained period of

 

08:57.637 --> 09:02.074

time by forging new trade alliances, changing policy,

 

09:02.074 --> 09:06.345

potentially changing taxation. Those are all good things.

 

09:06.345 --> 09:11.017

Again, they're not quick fixes. You won't see it in next quarter's numbers

 

09:11.017 --> 09:15.521

but I'm optimistic because it's talk and

 

09:15.521 --> 09:19.559

action that we haven't seen in decades.

 

09:19.559 --> 09:23.729

Interesting. In the longer term what I'm hearing is to

 

09:23.729 --> 09:27.633

be optimistic in the longer term but there are some pain points Canadians are

 

09:27.633 --> 09:32.071

failing in the short term, like you said, with debt on their mortgages

 

09:32.071 --> 09:33.873

and whatnot.

 

09:33.873 --> 09:38.177

If you turn back to last year, sort of the tariff

 

09:38.177 --> 09:42.348

turning point for our country, in the last year we've shown a lot of

 

09:42.348 --> 09:46.285

resilience and that has sort of shifted Canada

 

09:46.285 --> 09:50.623

to think about different ways to invest and maybe different trading

 

09:50.623 --> 09:53.025

partners, like you just alluded to.

 

09:53.025 --> 09:56.062

How's that shaping the economy?

 

09:56.062 --> 09:59.332

What is deglobalization affecting our economy?

 

09:59.332 --> 10:01.901

I know we talked about that in previous webcasts.

 

10:01.901 --> 10:06.839

How's that affecting how we invest here in Canada?

 

10:06.839 --> 10:11.444

I think what deglobalization does is it puts a

 

10:11.444 --> 10:15.448

magnifying glass or a microscope under the fact that as a

 

10:15.448 --> 10:17.583

nation we're very rich in natural resources.

 

10:17.583 --> 10:21.754

If you look historically, if you look back over centuries and centuries,

 

10:21.754 --> 10:25.791

where you have had periods where there has been unrest

 

10:25.791 --> 10:29.829

in trade and the formation and forging

 

10:29.829 --> 10:34.133

of new trade alliances because countries tend to break away from them,

 

10:34.133 --> 10:38.137

you have a major country that tends to break away, what

 

10:38.137 --> 10:42.208

you — and that's what the United States is really

 

10:42.208 --> 10:45.811

adopting, more of an isolationist kind of policy.

 

10:45.811 --> 10:49.815

We'll see if it endures beyond the current administration but

 

10:49.815 --> 10:54.120

generally when these things gain momentum they keep the inertia.

 

10:54.120 --> 10:58.157

I think it's very important to note that as your major trading

 

10:58.157 --> 11:02.194

partner kind of moves in a slightly different direction it's

 

11:02.194 --> 11:06.599

incumbent upon you as a nation to forge new alliances to diversify your

 

11:06.599 --> 11:10.736

trade base. It would be no different than if a

 

11:10.736 --> 11:14.740

business had 75% of

 

11:14.740 --> 11:17.843

its revenue tied to one customer, you'd want to diversify.

 

11:17.843 --> 11:21.881

No matter how good the customer is you want to diversify that customer base.

 

11:21.881 --> 11:23.683

I think that's what Canada has to do.

 

11:23.683 --> 11:28.487

What you have seen with the United States and the

 

11:28.487 --> 11:32.892

movement into Venezuela, the chatter about Greenland, you

 

11:32.892 --> 11:37.163

don't have to look that far back. You could go back into the late 1800s when

 

11:37.163 --> 11:41.400

the United States adopted a similar type of policy

 

11:41.400 --> 11:45.571

that trading lanes, shipping lanes and natural resources

 

11:45.571 --> 11:49.575

were front and centre as a means of commandeering power.

 

11:49.575 --> 11:52.578

Canada's sitting in a very good position because we're rich in natural

 

11:52.578 --> 11:56.549

resources. Those assets have become scarcer and, by

 

11:56.549 --> 11:58.551

definition, have become more valuable.

 

11:58.551 --> 12:01.420

The assets in the ground are more valuable.

 

12:01.420 --> 12:04.457

That's how we deal with globalization.

 

12:04.457 --> 12:08.794

Do we decide as a nation to build out pipelines from coast to coast?

 

12:08.794 --> 12:12.865

Do we change the laws in the ports in British Columbia

 

12:12.865 --> 12:17.002

to allow tankers to come in so that we can provide liquefied

 

12:17.002 --> 12:20.473

natural gas or other products to Asia?

 

12:20.473 --> 12:23.209

These are all things that we're going to have to deal with.

 

12:23.209 --> 12:27.313

The political endeavors that the United States is

 

12:27.313 --> 12:31.250

taking on has forced our hand to think about

 

12:31.250 --> 12:35.788

trade differently, to exploit industries or grow industries we haven't

 

12:35.788 --> 12:38.257

really thought about in a holistic way.

 

12:38.257 --> 12:42.328

Therefore, we have

 

12:42.328 --> 12:46.298

a great and rich natural resource base by which to take

 

12:46.298 --> 12:48.601

advantage of all that and exploit that.

 

12:48.601 --> 12:52.905

It'll be very interesting to see the inertia and the momentum that

 

12:52.905 --> 12:56.976

this whole idea of deglobalization kind of takes

 

12:56.976 --> 13:01.313

on over the next 5 to 10 years, but I have

 

13:01.313 --> 13:05.484

to believe that Canada, just given the words of our Prime Minister, is going to

 

13:05.484 --> 13:10.089

continue to forge forward and foster new relationships

 

13:10.089 --> 13:13.959

that we haven't had or had in a very small way previously.

 

13:13.959 --> 13:17.997

That's great, that's great. Now, you've been in this industry for quite some

 

13:17.997 --> 13:22.635

time, Andrew, over 28 years, been a fund manager for several years, interested

 

13:22.635 --> 13:26.572

to know what opportunities, what sectors are piquing your interest

 

13:26.605 --> 13:30.743

at the moment here in Canada or beyond?

 

13:30.743 --> 13:35.247

I think we're not really sector-specific.

 

13:35.247 --> 13:39.285

There isn't one area. I mean, thematically everybody is talking about

 

13:39.285 --> 13:43.622

artificial intelligence. Certainly, in many areas

 

13:43.622 --> 13:47.660

those sub-industries related to artificial intelligence have

 

13:47.660 --> 13:52.431

demonstrated the most profit growth in the market.

 

13:52.431 --> 13:56.502

If you look at all sectors you see

 

13:56.535 --> 14:00.840

a bias in stock performance towards

 

14:00.840 --> 14:05.144

earnings growth, more so than you've seen in recent memory.

 

14:05.144 --> 14:09.248

In other words, irrespective of industry or sector,

 

14:09.248 --> 14:13.586

consumer discretionary, industrials, financials,

 

14:13.586 --> 14:17.823

the stocks that are growing profits the fastest are getting the greatest lifts

 

14:17.823 --> 14:20.025

in terms of stock price.

 

14:20.025 --> 14:24.129

That is generally a true statement over long stretches of

 

14:24.129 --> 14:28.033

time in the market but it is particularly true over the last

 

14:28.033 --> 14:32.872

12 to 24 months. We call them factors.

 

14:32.872 --> 14:36.842

Profit growth as a factor, a term to look at,

 

14:36.842 --> 14:41.614

is really leading the charge and leadership in stock returns.

 

14:41.614 --> 14:45.684

We're just being mindful of businesses that are growing faster

 

14:45.684 --> 14:50.656

than their peers and competitors in the same industry and making sure that

 

14:50.656 --> 14:55.628

... ask ourselves the question, is that profit growth durable

 

14:55.628 --> 14:59.565

and is the stock still relatively inexpensive based on our outlook for growth

 

14:59.565 --> 15:02.534

in that specific security?

 

15:02.534 --> 15:04.904

It's really sector agnostic.

 

15:04.904 --> 15:09.108

Curious to know, we've mentioned AI a couple of times in

 

15:09.108 --> 15:13.846

the program, you've been in this business for a long time, has this

 

15:13.846 --> 15:17.983

AI bubble, is this the biggest you've seen it

 

15:17.983 --> 15:20.619

in your time, in your experience?

 

15:20.619 --> 15:24.657

Do you see a lot of growth in the short term, in the two

 

15:24.657 --> 15:26.225

to four years?

 

15:26.225 --> 15:30.362

If you look at some metrics you would still say that

 

15:30.362 --> 15:34.433

the technology bubble, Nasdaq bubble of '99

 

15:34.433 --> 15:38.370

and peaking in February of 2000, would be the biggest.

 

15:38.370 --> 15:42.341

In other ways some people would say this is

 

15:42.341 --> 15:46.578

as big as that. It depends on what data you want to use

 

15:46.578 --> 15:49.448

to make that conclusion.

 

15:49.448 --> 15:53.452

What we really need to figure out — there are some similarities to'

 

15:53.485 --> 15:56.055

99, there are also some differences.

 

15:56.055 --> 16:00.659

What everybody is really trying to figure out is the durability

 

16:00.659 --> 16:04.763

of the CapEx spend associated with this topic by

 

16:04.763 --> 16:06.665

a number of people involved in it.

 

16:06.665 --> 16:10.936

The numbers are enormous, they're absolutely astronomical, so

 

16:10.936 --> 16:17.076

it begs the question, can these astronomical numbers continue

 

16:17.076 --> 16:19.678

for multiple years?

 

16:19.678 --> 16:23.716

They're going to need to because some of the valuations associated with the

 

16:23.716 --> 16:25.484

securities are implying that.

 

16:25.484 --> 16:29.822

To the extent that does not come to fruition those stocks are gonna meet

 

16:29.822 --> 16:31.523

with some pretty significant headwind.

 

16:31.523 --> 16:35.661

To the extent that there's still a

 

16:35.661 --> 16:39.665

big, long runway ahead of us in terms of CapEx spending

 

16:39.665 --> 16:43.335

then one would think that the securities have more room to run.

 

16:43.335 --> 16:46.305

That's what we're all trying to figure out.

 

16:46.305 --> 16:50.342

There is some healthier aspects to this CapEx cycle that

 

16:50.342 --> 16:52.077

were not apparent in 1999.

 

16:52.077 --> 16:55.381

I lived through '99.

 

16:55.381 --> 16:59.318

There was companies who were consuming

 

16:59.318 --> 17:03.455

optical switches and equipment and telecom equipment, were

 

17:03.455 --> 17:06.992

spending 3 and 4X their cashflow, which is not sustainable.

 

17:06.992 --> 17:11.263

Today, the biggest spenders are pretty much spending their cash flow

 

17:11.263 --> 17:13.565

so they're not getting in trouble with debt and whatnot.

 

17:13.565 --> 17:17.302

Now, there's some similarities, like vendor financing and whatnot, we gotta be

 

17:17.302 --> 17:21.507

mindful of that. I guess the short answer is there's a lot of

 

17:21.507 --> 17:25.611

crosscurrents. There are some similarities to '99 but there's also some

 

17:25.611 --> 17:26.812

healthy differences.

 

17:26.812 --> 17:29.314

Interesting. Super interesting.

 

17:29.314 --> 17:33.519

Now, a lot to digest here, to sort of sum it up for our investors watching,

 

17:33.519 --> 17:37.523

Andrew, as we approach the mid-point of the year what should investors

 

17:37.523 --> 17:41.226

be focused on at this point in time?

 

17:41.226 --> 17:44.363

I think it's really about building a diversified portfolio.

 

17:44.363 --> 17:48.467

There's been a lot of chatter about artificial intelligence

 

17:48.467 --> 17:52.504

is the only game in town and if you miss out on that

 

17:52.504 --> 17:56.508

you're missing out on potentially the trade of a lifetime and that hurts

 

17:56.508 --> 18:00.612

your long term returns. I think that's pretty myopic thinking.

 

18:00.612 --> 18:04.116

I think you always want to have a balanced portfolio and not get yourself

 

18:04.116 --> 18:08.921

extended too far in any one direction.

 

18:08.921 --> 18:13.125

The question is what should they think about at this point in time, which I

 

18:13.125 --> 18:16.528

would answer like at every point in time you think about the same thing, which

 

18:16.528 --> 18:20.799

is are you well diversified, is the risk in your portfolio appropriate for

 

18:20.799 --> 18:24.870

you personally and the lifestyle you have, the financial goals

 

18:24.870 --> 18:29.541

that you have and the targets you aspire to achieve?

 

18:29.541 --> 18:31.043

That's first and foremost.

 

18:31.043 --> 18:35.013

The one aspect I would say about all this is traditionally we've

 

18:35.013 --> 18:37.516

looked at equity and fixed income splits.

 

18:37.516 --> 18:41.653

If you're younger it tends to be more 80/20, equity, fixed

 

18:41.653 --> 18:44.256

income, or even higher all equity.

 

18:44.256 --> 18:48.994

As you get older, maybe have children,

 

18:48.994 --> 18:53.565

you're planning for retirement, that ratio of equity comes down and it changes.

 

18:53.565 --> 18:57.503

The one aspect I would encourage people to look at is maybe

 

18:57.503 --> 19:00.372

— and it would be taken from the fixed income portion of their portfolio — is

 

19:00.372 --> 19:04.443

your exposure to hard assets and real assets, whether that

 

19:04.443 --> 19:08.947

means land, for some people that means gold,

 

19:08.947 --> 19:11.583

it can mean a whole lot of things in terms of hard assets.

 

19:11.583 --> 19:15.754

The reason I feel that way is because the money supply, M2 money

 

19:15.754 --> 19:19.725

supply has been growing uncontrollably for a long period of

 

19:19.725 --> 19:24.029

time so there is always that tail risk of

 

19:24.029 --> 19:27.432

inflation just grinding higher over time.

 

19:27.432 --> 19:30.936

We talked about a little bit earlier that it should abate a little bit as oil

 

19:30.936 --> 19:35.073

comes down but what I'm referring to is more of a multi-year

 

19:35.073 --> 19:38.043

type of tick-up in inflation.

 

19:38.043 --> 19:42.481

That's not to say it will happen but I think because of the underlying

 

19:42.481 --> 19:46.685

ingredients, so to speak, in the financial world it would

 

19:46.685 --> 19:50.956

be best to kind of devote some percentage of one's portfolio

 

19:50.956 --> 19:54.326

to hedge against that potential outcome.

 

19:54.326 --> 19:56.495

That outcome is not zero.

 

19:56.495 --> 19:59.565

There's a non-zero risk that actually comes to fruition.

 

19:59.565 --> 20:03.602

It's hard to gauge what the probability is but I think because it's a

 

20:03.635 --> 20:08.073

non-zero risk and we have a lot of things

 

20:08.073 --> 20:12.444

that have transpired over the course of the last, pretty much two decades,

 

20:12.444 --> 20:16.448

that could potentially lead to a secular tick-up in

 

20:16.448 --> 20:21.420

inflation. One's portfolio should be adequately hedged

 

20:21.420 --> 20:22.688

against that.

 

20:22.688 --> 20:26.758

Very good, very good. Andrew, always a pleasure to have you in studio to get

 

20:26.758 --> 20:29.061

your insights and perspectives. Really appreciate your time.

 

20:29.061 --> 20:29.561

Thank you so much.

 

20:29.561 --> 20:30.862

Thank you, Emily.

 

20:30.862 --> 20:32.564

And thank you for tuning into The Upside.

 

20:32.564 --> 20:36.735

For more investor content be sure to subscribe to Fidelity Canada's

 

20:36.735 --> 20:40.706

YouTube channel or sign up for our Upside newsletter for more details on

 

20:40.706 --> 20:43.942

upcoming shows. Thanks for watching and we'll see you next time.

 

21:00.626 --> 21:05.030

Thanks for listening to, or watching, Fidelity Canada's The Upside podcast.

 

21:05.030 --> 21:08.967

Subscribe on your podcast platform of choice so you don't miss an episode.

 

21:08.967 --> 21:12.671

If you like what you're hearing please leave a review or a five-star rating.

 

21:12.671 --> 21:15.941

Fidelity mutual funds and ETFs are available by working with a financial

 

21:15.941 --> 21:18.844

advisor or through an online brokerage account.

 

21:18.844 --> 21:22.447

Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.

 

21:22.447 --> 21:25.884

While on fidelity.ca you can also find more information on future live

 

21:25.884 --> 21:29.821

webcasts. Don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on LinkedIn, YouTube,

 

21:29.821 --> 21:34.059

Instagram, or X. We'll wrap things up today with a quick disclaimer.

 

21:34.059 --> 21:37.362

The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants

 

21:37.362 --> 21:41.700

and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or

 

21:41.700 --> 21:45.737

its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should

 

21:45.737 --> 21:48.840

not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice.

 

21:48.840 --> 21:52.277

It is not an offer to sell or buy or an endorsement, recommendation or

 

21:52.277 --> 21:55.280

sponsorship of any entity or security cited.

 

21:55.280 --> 21:56.982

Read a fund's prospectus before investing.

 

21:56.982 --> 21:58.850

Funds are not guaranteed.

 

21:58.850 --> 22:02.421

Their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

 

22:02.421 --> 22:06.625

Fees, expenses and commissions are all associated with fund investments.

 

22:06.625 --> 22:08.460

Thanks for tuning in. We'll see you next time.

 

39:35.806 --> 39:41.612

Subtitles are AI-Generated.

 

53:25.869 --> 53:30.273

Thanks for listening to, or watching, Fidelity Canada's The Upside podcast.

 

53:30.273 --> 53:34.211

Subscribe on your podcast platform of choice so you don't miss an episode.

 

53:34.211 --> 53:37.914

If you like what you're hearing please leave a review or a five-star rating.

 

53:37.914 --> 53:41.184

Fidelity mutual funds and ETFs are available by working with a financial

 

53:41.184 --> 53:44.087

advisor or through an online brokerage account.

 

53:44.087 --> 53:47.691

Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.

 

53:47.691 --> 53:51.127

While on fidelity.ca you can also find more information on future live

 

53:51.127 --> 53:55.065

webcasts. Don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on LinkedIn, YouTube,

 

53:55.065 --> 53:59.302

Instagram, or X. We'll wrap things up today with a quick disclaimer.

 

53:59.302 --> 54:02.606

The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants

 

54:02.606 --> 54:06.943

and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or

 

54:06.943 --> 54:10.981

its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should

 

54:10.981 --> 54:14.084

not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice.

 

54:14.084 --> 54:17.520

It is not an offer to sell or buy or an endorsement, recommendation or

 

54:17.520 --> 54:20.523

sponsorship of any entity or security cited.

 

54:20.523 --> 54:22.225

Read a fund's prospectus before investing.

 

54:22.225 --> 54:24.094

Funds are not guaranteed.

 

54:24.094 --> 54:27.664

Their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

 

54:27.664 --> 54:31.868

Fees, expenses and commissions are all associated with fund investments.

 

54:31.868 --> 54:33.703

Thanks for tuning in. We'll see you next time.

Listen to the podcast version