FidelityConnects: True North Trends: Opportunities in Canadian equities

Join portfolio manager Maxime Lemieux as he unpacks the Canadian equity landscape and provides an update on Fidelity True North® Fund. Maxime will share his insights on the current state of Canada’s markets, key sectors driving performance, and strategies for positioning portfolios in 2026. Whether you’re focused on growth opportunities or navigating volatility, this session will provide actionable ideas and a clear outlook for the year ahead.

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

00:06.973 --> 00:08.708
Hello, and welcome to Fidelity Connects.

00:08.708 --> 00:12.879
I'm Pamela Ritchie. After a strong year for Canadian markets investors are

00:12.879 --> 00:17.117
taking a closer look at what's driving returns for this year.

00:17.117 --> 00:21.054
Gold and energy have moved back into focus and Canada's industrial

00:21.054 --> 00:23.723
base is beginning to take shape again.

00:23.723 --> 00:27.394
Our next guest believes this is exactly the kind of environment where

00:27.394 --> 00:31.297
selectivity matters more than broad exposure.

00:31.297 --> 00:35.435
What does he say that active management matters,

00:35.435 --> 00:38.304
how does it matter more now and where is he seeking opportunity.

00:38.304 --> 00:42.575
Joining us here today to discuss all of this further is Fidelity

00:42.575 --> 00:46.312
True North Fund portfolio manager, Max Lemieux.

00:46.312 --> 00:49.315
Great to see you, Max. Thank you for joining us from Montreal.

00:49.315 --> 00:51.418
How are you today?

00:51.418 --> 00:53.520
Good. Good morning, everyone.

00:53.520 --> 00:55.622
Great to have you joining us here.

00:55.622 --> 01:00.693
Let's begin with what a year it was, certainly, last year.

01:00.693 --> 01:04.864
One of the big questions is sort of is it repeatable in the Canadian markets?

01:04.864 --> 01:08.101
You're sitting in the midst of it. You've been doing this for years.

01:08.101 --> 01:12.672
What did last year mean? Has it wrapped and where are we going?

01:12.672 --> 01:15.909
I call it a vintage type of year.

01:15.909 --> 01:20.914
Over the past 30 years, well, soon coming out to 30,

01:20.914 --> 01:25.085
it's been impossible to predict such a

01:25.085 --> 01:29.622
movement. We met last year talking about the first

01:29.622 --> 01:33.626
grenade from Washington in terms of potential tariffs and

01:33.626 --> 01:37.630
so on. I would have never been able to predict such a

01:37.630 --> 01:42.769
strong recovery for the Canadian market, finishing up more than 30%.

01:42.769 --> 01:46.706
Obviously, when there's so much sentiment and

01:46.706 --> 01:51.344
speculation, especially in gold and metals, it's

01:51.344 --> 01:54.447
been a heck of a year.

01:54.447 --> 01:58.785
I think it's hard to repeat this but there are trends that we

01:58.785 --> 02:02.856
think, again, personal view, trends that might continue

02:02.856 --> 02:06.693
to remain in place for the next year or two.

02:06.693 --> 02:10.930
We'll see. As you know, True North, we have a long term view when we invest.

02:10.930 --> 02:15.001
It's usually over the next three years plus.

02:15.001 --> 02:17.737
It's not day trading.

02:17.737 --> 02:22.041
Last year was very special because

02:22.041 --> 02:23.743
everything went up at the same time.

02:23.743 --> 02:27.747
Reminded me a little bit 2010, 2011 where the very speculative

02:27.747 --> 02:31.951
companies were just going after

02:31.951 --> 02:35.622
returns of 20, 30%, and small-cap also.

02:35.622 --> 02:39.359
We've seen a bit of a broadening marketplace coming towards the end of the year

02:39.359 --> 02:43.396
last year. I would say gold and copper and

02:43.396 --> 02:48.635
all these metals, including energy, as you mentioned, was also important, not

02:48.635 --> 02:52.805
necessarily because the price of oil has been as positive as

02:52.805 --> 02:53.139
gold.

02:53.139 --> 02:57.110
Remember that gold last year was up 60% and Canadian gold equities were

02:57.110 --> 03:01.080
up 120%, so it's a double.

03:01.080 --> 03:05.018
Energy, remember, there's been huge improvements out

03:05.018 --> 03:10.123
of Calgary over the past 10,15 years, consolidation,

03:10.123 --> 03:14.661
better management, the cost of producing gas

03:14.661 --> 03:17.063
and oil has improved quite a bit.

03:17.063 --> 03:21.834
Lower discounts on oil and also the new pipeline,

03:21.834 --> 03:26.639
Trans Mountain, allows us to export internationally

03:26.639 --> 03:29.676
so less dependent on the US Gulf Coast.

03:29.676 --> 03:33.646
To top it off, as you know, LNG Canada has just started last

03:33.646 --> 03:36.282
year, it's going to start to export more.

03:36.282 --> 03:40.820
There'll be two more terminals over the next three, four years and therefore

03:40.820 --> 03:44.757
they'll probably consume up to 10% of natural gas production in

03:44.757 --> 03:48.795
Canada. Short term, not necessarily a lot of excitement for the commodity,

03:48.795 --> 03:52.966
the natural gas per se, but I think that given the

03:52.966 --> 03:56.936
ongoing geopolitics we need to continue

03:56.936 --> 03:59.472
to take advantage of those resources that we have.

03:59.472 --> 04:03.243
We have not even talked about nuclear. Nuclear was topic du jour also last

04:03.243 --> 04:07.347
year. I'd like to remind the audience that

04:07.347 --> 04:11.884
two of the three nuclear technologies in the world are controlled by

04:11.884 --> 04:15.822
Canadians, i.e. Brookfield and Cameco both own

04:15.822 --> 04:18.791
Westinghouse, which is an American technology.

04:18.791 --> 04:22.595
And have a huge contract with the US government.

04:22.595 --> 04:26.332
Yes, absolutely. Those are long term duration, right?

04:26.332 --> 04:29.135
We don't always have all the details short term.

04:29.135 --> 04:33.206
I mean, as you know, Washington keeps us on our toes every single day.

04:33.206 --> 04:37.176
We don't have always have full transparency but we know what's the direction

04:37.176 --> 04:39.279
of travel.

04:39.279 --> 04:42.015
That's important.

04:42.015 --> 04:46.085
The old SNC, which is AtkinsRéalis, that owns the CANDU technology

04:46.085 --> 04:49.555
which is more in Europe but they'll try to probably enter the US market as

04:49.555 --> 04:52.558
well. We'll see how that's going to pan out for these names, doesn't mean that

04:52.558 --> 04:55.428
we own it today or if we're buying or selling.

04:55.428 --> 04:59.465
I just want to mention that Canada on the resource front,

04:59.465 --> 05:01.234
there's a lot also being supported by ...

05:01.234 --> 05:05.171
as you know, since Carney's been elected ...

05:05.171 --> 05:09.108
supporting these five large major projects and one of them that was in the top

05:09.108 --> 05:13.313
five was foreign, which is a copper mine, which is about to

05:13.313 --> 05:17.317
start, I think, next year out of Saskatchewan, that's

05:17.317 --> 05:20.853
a name that as of the last filing was in True North.

05:20.853 --> 05:24.891
We were in that name at that time for a long time, actually for

05:24.891 --> 05:28.961
more than a year. There's more to come, and this

05:28.961 --> 05:32.965
narrative is not changing in the short term so it's hard

05:32.965 --> 05:36.936
to say what's coming up next year, over the next 12

05:36.936 --> 05:41.007
months, but if commodity prices just remain where they're at a

05:41.007 --> 05:45.211
lot of companies in Canada, if they're energy or rare earth

05:45.211 --> 05:49.916
or copper, if the commodity prices maintain, sustain themselves

05:49.916 --> 05:54.487
you have companies that generate good free cash flow and good returns to

05:54.487 --> 05:55.455
shareholders.

05:55.455 --> 05:57.323
You're right in the middle of it.

05:57.323 --> 06:01.194
You just used that example of the mine in Saskatchewan which has now been

06:01.194 --> 06:05.198
picked up for bigger and greater and better things and you've been there

06:05.198 --> 06:09.102
for a long, long time. You've maneuvering this market and knowing the

06:09.102 --> 06:14.440
intricacies of it for such a long time

06:14.440 --> 06:18.244
so it sounds like you're saying the moment is continuing.

06:18.244 --> 06:21.681
This is something that's going to run for some time.

06:21.681 --> 06:25.718
That's what we feel. Again, I've given up on my crystal balls,

06:25.718 --> 06:29.989
the past three years have been quite something.

06:29.989 --> 06:33.659
The definition of a cycle, I think, has changed quite a bit.

06:33.659 --> 06:37.830
I'm not going back to university but I think what we've seen is

06:37.830 --> 06:39.832
unheard of in modern history.

06:39.832 --> 06:45.171
Think about it, the last recession was 2009,

06:45.171 --> 06:51.110
COVID was a two-week recession, it's very interesting.

06:51.110 --> 06:55.648
Again, rare earth, there's a company based

06:55.648 --> 07:00.119
in Montreal, they've been involved in this whole chain.

07:00.119 --> 07:03.322
Again, as of the last filing we had been shareholders for many, many years in

07:03.322 --> 07:07.627
that company. Sometimes to wait a bit more when you see that

07:07.627 --> 07:11.731
incrementally these companies are improving on what they do

07:11.731 --> 07:16.102
and expanding, the payoff long term can be very attractive.

07:16.102 --> 07:19.839
That's what we're trying to do. What people don't see necessarily, the

07:19.839 --> 07:23.943
investors, is that we try to manage risk in absolute terms,

07:23.943 --> 07:26.679
so we're not a benchmark hugger.

07:26.679 --> 07:30.683
Sometimes we're ahead of the crowd but when it becomes really

07:30.683 --> 07:34.654
exciting we're not going necessarily be overweighted, especially in

07:34.654 --> 07:38.624
Canada where the

07:38.624 --> 07:39.692
index is not as diversified.

07:39.692 --> 07:44.197
It's a different type of marketplace in Canada.

07:44.197 --> 07:48.034
If we want to protect shareholders' money, especially during downturns because

07:48.034 --> 07:52.104
there will be shakeups at times, we've seen it over

07:52.104 --> 07:54.540
the past few days with AI's impact on software.

07:54.540 --> 07:57.109
It's nothing new but there was another breach.

07:57.109 --> 07:59.946
You don't know what's going to come.

07:59.946 --> 08:03.583
We don't know if there'll be another statement from Washington that will just

08:03.583 --> 08:05.585
mix up all the cards out there.

08:05.585 --> 08:09.589
But you know the background is, again, there's a direction

08:09.589 --> 08:13.593
of travel. I think Mr. Carney's trips in China and

08:13.593 --> 08:17.830
Europe, I think he's maneuvering, not to escape

08:17.830 --> 08:22.034
a potential renewable of the

08:22.034 --> 08:26.072
USMCA but I think we always need to have a B plan.

08:26.072 --> 08:30.443
It's like when I do my homework with my analysts

08:30.443 --> 08:34.714
we try to measure what is the absolute downside scenario and

08:34.714 --> 08:38.618
what is upside, that's what we do all the time on all the

08:38.618 --> 08:41.921
stocks. I think Mr. Carney is doing this, he needs to prepare Plan B and

08:41.921 --> 08:46.626
probably a Plan C because we don't know what's going to happen when July comes.

08:46.626 --> 08:50.696
Will there be a full renewal of the free trade or is

08:50.696 --> 08:54.700
that going to be just like no renewal so therefore

08:54.700 --> 08:58.704
it keeps going on a yearly basis for 10 years or, as you know,

08:58.704 --> 09:02.675
the default option is that any of the three

09:02.675 --> 09:06.846
country from July and on can

09:06.846 --> 09:12.251
exit on a six-month notice, and that would be the

09:12.251 --> 09:15.721
absolute downside scenario for the industrial companies.

09:15.721 --> 09:19.825
What I want the audience to remember, the industrial

09:19.825 --> 09:24.063
economy in Canada since 1987, the first free trade agreement

09:24.063 --> 09:28.134
between Reagan and Mulroney, sorry,

09:28.134 --> 09:32.838
1988, I believe, part of the industrial

09:32.838 --> 09:36.609
sector in Canada was about 18% of the market.

09:36.609 --> 09:41.547
Recently, as of last year I think, we touched a low of 8% or 8.5%.

09:41.547 --> 09:46.018
Because natural resources were available or

09:46.018 --> 09:50.022
part of that free trade agreement, unlike most of the free trade agreements in

09:50.022 --> 09:54.594
the world that have taken place over the past 30 years, well,

09:54.627 --> 09:58.864
we tend to specialize in what we're best at.

09:58.864 --> 10:03.569
When your largest client is just down south it's easy to ship,

10:03.569 --> 10:06.105
train, truck, whatever.

10:06.105 --> 10:10.076
That's what happened. Now because of the geopolitics we need to spend more

10:10.076 --> 10:14.213
on defence. Usually, spending more on defence helps a

10:14.213 --> 10:18.284
country or an economy to rebuild its own industrial

10:18.284 --> 10:21.721
base. I think that's we're going to see over the next few years.

10:21.721 --> 10:25.725
We've seen a lot of Canadian names that have had quite a move last

10:25.725 --> 10:29.695
year just based on that prediction of more

10:29.695 --> 10:30.329
spending.

10:30.329 --> 10:34.634
For sure. It's just fascinating to watch this roll out and with your expertise

10:34.667 --> 10:39.171
behind it being able to shepherd people through

10:39.171 --> 10:43.609
where there's an opportunity now and when it's perhaps a bit early to

10:43.609 --> 10:48.114
take a look at things. You'll know that better than almost anyone.

10:48.114 --> 10:51.484
When you take a Look at the geopolitics, I don't want to bring too many of them

10:51.484 --> 10:55.521
in here but, for instance, there's a discussion of

10:55.521 --> 10:58.157
whether oil is going to feel the global price.

10:58.157 --> 10:59.925
This is a bit of a shock.

10:59.925 --> 11:02.294
There are things going on in the Middle East. We don't know if it'll be a

11:02.294 --> 11:05.998
nothing or if it's something that goes further.

11:05.998 --> 11:09.835
Again, just tell us a little bit about your energy positioning within the fund

11:09.835 --> 11:13.739
at this point.

11:13.739 --> 11:18.544
Without naming specific names we've always been

11:18.544 --> 11:22.815
quite involved with royalties type of companies where

11:22.815 --> 11:26.619
the different moves in commodities are not necessarily going to have the same

11:26.619 --> 11:28.821
impact as a producer.

11:28.821 --> 11:32.992
You can think of the refiners, they can

11:32.992 --> 11:36.862
have a great run, especially if oil stays at a lower price because their

11:36.862 --> 11:40.633
margins improve by default.

11:40.633 --> 11:44.870
We've got some secular stories, including also some of the pipelines, some

11:44.870 --> 11:47.506
of the pipeline companies, especially for natural gas.

11:47.506 --> 11:51.544
We've always believed that natural gas is a bridge towards

11:51.544 --> 11:56.582
a greener world. I've not changed my personal view on this.

11:56.582 --> 12:00.686
Same thing as rare earth or some metals will be needed for this

12:00.686 --> 12:04.924
ongoing transition, but there will be hiccups.

12:04.924 --> 12:08.994
In terms of oil and gas, as I've mentioned earlier, a lot of these companies

12:08.994 --> 12:13.265
at $60, $65 oil are more

12:13.265 --> 12:15.167
profitable than they used to be.

12:15.167 --> 12:17.770
They're just better companies than they're used to.

12:17.770 --> 12:21.874
Now, of course, given the geopolitics, if you tell me that oil goes

12:21.874 --> 12:26.512
to 50 bucks some of these names will go down,

12:26.512 --> 12:30.349
there's no doubt about it. There's a currency also that we need to factor in.

12:30.349 --> 12:35.354
I cannot promise, and I don't know if there'll be another oil pipeline, it's

12:35.354 --> 12:39.825
not crystal clear. I think based on my readings and our discussions with

12:39.825 --> 12:43.896
CEOs of different companies it looks more like we might have

12:43.896 --> 12:47.867
a great opportunity to continue to expand on the current infrastructure that

12:47.867 --> 12:51.704
has already been built as opposed to building a brand new pipeline.

12:51.704 --> 12:55.674
That alone could increase quite a bit the overall exports [crosstalk].

12:55.674 --> 12:59.779
It's all about the capacity and the export piece

12:59.779 --> 13:02.014
so if it gets there...

13:02.014 --> 13:06.051
You want to diversify away from the US, right, 80% of what

13:06.051 --> 13:08.854
we ship used to be in the US.

13:08.854 --> 13:11.657
You want to play your cards well because now we don't know what's going to

13:11.657 --> 13:15.861
happen in Venezuela but if Venezuela were to go

13:15.861 --> 13:21.333
back to what they used to produce, which was like $3 million, I think, a year,

13:21.333 --> 13:25.437
they're at 800,000 barrels a day, I think, used to being closer to

13:25.437 --> 13:30.109
2, in the heydays I think it was 3 or slightly above,

13:30.109 --> 13:32.478
it would take years.

13:32.478 --> 13:37.216
It takes a long time. Remember when the US invaded Iraq

13:37.216 --> 13:41.420
it took them more than a decade to bring back the

13:41.420 --> 13:45.524
production that Iraq had back in their peak.

13:45.524 --> 13:47.326
It takes lot of time.

13:47.326 --> 13:51.363
Again, I want people to remember we have a

13:51.363 --> 13:53.933
diversified economy.

13:53.933 --> 13:58.871
As I said, uranium, nuclear, copper,

13:58.871 --> 14:02.374
the gold companies have a lot of byproducts as well.

14:02.374 --> 14:05.444
It's super interesting to see where Canada sits right now.

14:05.444 --> 14:10.015
I was speaking to an old friend in Boston a

14:10.015 --> 14:14.587
few weeks ago and he was mesmerized about why

14:14.587 --> 14:18.657
are investors more enthused about the Canadian marketplace

14:18.657 --> 14:22.728
given all the resources that we have, and if the world continues

14:22.728 --> 14:26.999
to go through a duplication of all the supply chains

14:26.999 --> 14:30.936
as a result of the geopolitics Canada sits very

14:30.936 --> 14:36.108
well. Remember, we talked about this when the Russians invaded Ukraine.

14:36.108 --> 14:39.311
Hello, investors. We'll be back to the show in just a moment.

14:39.311 --> 14:42.882
I wanted to share that here at Fidelity, we value your opinion.

14:42.882 --> 14:45.184
Please take a few minutes to help us shape the future of Fidelity Connects

14:45.184 --> 14:50.289
podcasts. Complete our listener survey by visiting fidelity.ca/survey,

14:50.289 --> 14:52.258
and you could win one of our branded tumblers.

14:52.258 --> 14:55.327
Periodic draws ending by March 30th, 2026.

14:55.327 --> 14:58.931
And don't forget to listen to Fidelity Connects, the Upside, and French

14:58.931 --> 15:02.968
DialoguesFidelity podcasts available on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever

15:02.968 --> 15:07.740
else you get your podcasts. Now back to today's show.

15:07.740 --> 15:11.944
Absolutely. That was the beginning of one piece of the gold trade,

15:11.944 --> 15:15.948
certainly. There's more to it perhaps now because it's a

15:15.948 --> 15:18.817
gathering storm to an extent.

15:18.817 --> 15:23.289
We saw gold fall out of bed last week, for sure,

15:23.289 --> 15:27.393
maybe linked to the new Fed nominee, head of the

15:27.393 --> 15:32.731
Fed nominee. I don't know what you think about that but where does gold

15:32.731 --> 15:34.533
play a role going forward.

15:34.533 --> 15:36.669
Maybe it was a buying opportunity for some people.

15:36.669 --> 15:39.738
It seems to be okay today.

15:39.738 --> 15:43.976
Maybe. In terms of how I perceive gold,

15:43.976 --> 15:48.147
I always had this soft rule since I've been a fund manager,

15:48.147 --> 15:50.082
gold is very much based on sentiment.

15:50.082 --> 15:53.819
It's not a productive asset.

15:53.819 --> 15:58.023
As a result, all the funds I've managed previously usually I've got this 10%

15:58.023 --> 16:01.493
threshold as percentage of the total assets of the fund.

16:01.493 --> 16:05.497
We were in gold last year, two years, five years

16:05.497 --> 16:09.501
ago. Now as you get more advanced

16:09.501 --> 16:13.539
in that cycle people go from the large cap to the

16:13.539 --> 16:16.909
smaller and mid-cap companies that become more speculative.

16:16.909 --> 16:20.679
They want a bigger bang for their bucks, right?

16:20.679 --> 16:24.783
It gets a bit harder for True North, which is a 7

16:24.783 --> 16:28.954
billion plus fund, to get involved with but we're always on the lookout

16:28.954 --> 16:32.925
for interesting opportunities that will have potentially a long duration,

16:32.925 --> 16:36.161
no matter what happens with the gold price.

16:36.161 --> 16:40.265
The reality is we've been on the wait over the past couple months

16:40.265 --> 16:44.336
just because now it's way above 10% of the TSX,

16:44.336 --> 16:48.574
as I've mentioned to you, and therefore more than 10% of the fund,

16:48.574 --> 16:52.544
a little bit more. So I'm just a little careful on short

16:52.544 --> 16:55.848
term but the reality is that nothing's changed.

16:55.848 --> 17:00.185
Central banks have increased their reserves but they're not buying as

17:00.185 --> 17:02.421
much as two years ago.

17:02.421 --> 17:05.357
Last year, we just saw the numbers, central banks bought a little less last

17:05.357 --> 17:09.194
year versus 2024 but there's still a trend.

17:09.194 --> 17:12.931
Now over the past six months it's been all retail money and institutional

17:12.931 --> 17:14.600
investors coming in.

17:14.600 --> 17:19.071
Now, the dynamic, look at Venezuela, the more

17:19.071 --> 17:23.108
land grab that we see or the more changes that were

17:23.108 --> 17:27.246
unexpected in the previous world order, this

17:27.246 --> 17:29.848
I think will keep people interested in gold.

17:29.848 --> 17:33.852
Also, I'd like to mention something. As you know, I've never been a big bull or

17:33.852 --> 17:37.990
a strong believer in cryptos but over the past couple

17:37.990 --> 17:42.094
of weeks, months, there's been articles about quantum

17:42.094 --> 17:46.932
computing being able to break in the codes for cryptos.

17:46.932 --> 17:51.003
It's very interesting that over the past month or so

17:51.003 --> 17:54.873
we've seen really cryptos being under pressure.

17:54.873 --> 17:58.911
Obviously, gold has decoupled like last year but I think that people realize

17:58.911 --> 18:01.747
maybe that to own something that is really tangible ...

18:01.747 --> 18:07.086
we've seen this queue of people going to buy silver and gold

18:07.086 --> 18:11.323
in the US, in the UK. I don't know how many coins now are sold out at Costco.

18:11.323 --> 18:15.327
It's a bit crazy. When you look at the rate of change, when gold reached

18:15.327 --> 18:19.498
5,000 it was, I think, something psychological which coincided

18:19.498 --> 18:24.436
also with the nomination of the new Fed chair who is, by the way,

18:24.436 --> 18:27.005
an investor. His whole career has been ...

18:27.005 --> 18:30.042
he was a banker, investment banker, then he went to work with Stanley

18:30.042 --> 18:34.113
Druckenmiller who is one of the most famous stock investors in

18:34.146 --> 18:38.283
the West. A bit less well known because he just runs his own

18:38.283 --> 18:43.856
family office since he left George Soros many years ago.

18:43.856 --> 18:48.260
Scott Bessent worked at Soros with Stanley Druckenmiller and

18:48.260 --> 18:52.331
he's in charge of the Treasury, and you've got now Mr. Warsh who

18:52.331 --> 18:54.066
will be heading the Fed.

18:54.066 --> 18:58.103
These two individuals understand the stock market inside out.

18:58.103 --> 19:02.141
That's very interesting that now you'll have two voices

19:02.141 --> 19:04.576
reporting to Mr. Trump in some ways.

19:04.576 --> 19:08.480
We'd like to believe that the Fed will remain quite independent.

19:08.480 --> 19:12.651
Mr. Warsh understands markets, we'll see if he's going to be a dove

19:12.651 --> 19:16.121
like some people pretend, or if he is going to be a bit hawkish.

19:16.121 --> 19:20.058
It's not crystal clear to me what will be the approach.

19:20.058 --> 19:23.996
I don't think, again, personal view, I would not be surprised if in the short

19:23.996 --> 19:28.400
term rates could go down a little bit more. At the same time the economy in the

19:28.400 --> 19:32.437
US, despite the fact that it's a K economy, the bottom 20

19:32.437 --> 19:36.608
percentile is still hurting, it's hard to get by, inflation is

19:36.608 --> 19:41.513
not disappearing. But the economy,

19:41.513 --> 19:45.450
CapEx, infrastructure, you know, these CapEx from the large

19:45.450 --> 19:49.421
four players for the data centres geared towards AI keeps

19:49.421 --> 19:53.125
going and represents 75% of the overall CapEx in the US.

19:53.125 --> 19:56.261
There's still on shoring.

19:56.261 --> 20:00.399
It's earning season as we speak so we see the backlog of major industrial

20:00.399 --> 20:04.536
companies starting to increase because it's been three years of complete

20:04.536 --> 20:08.807
stagnation. Those PMIs are starting to move

20:08.807 --> 20:13.178
but the stocks have already had quite a move since October already.

20:13.178 --> 20:17.282
You mentioned crypto. I want to ask you a little bit about AI and the

20:17.282 --> 20:20.085
discussions because all of the components that you've been discussing in many

20:20.085 --> 20:24.156
cases will be components of the AI build out, the commodity side

20:24.156 --> 20:27.926
of it, the energy side of it, certainly.

20:27.926 --> 20:31.163
Something that we've seen in markets has certainly been a reaction from

20:31.163 --> 20:35.300
software being displaced, essentially, by what

20:35.300 --> 20:37.402
AI can do for companies.

20:37.436 --> 20:39.538
I just want to kind of get your thoughts on that.

20:39.538 --> 20:43.575
For a long time software has been a very interesting place to invest but lots

20:43.575 --> 20:47.179
of investors are questioning that right now. What are your thoughts?

20:47.179 --> 20:51.350
It's a great question, very hard to have a

20:51.350 --> 20:55.387
clear cut answer or to have an answer on a timely manner.

20:55.387 --> 20:59.858
Again, I think there's a roadmap or a direction of travel but

20:59.858 --> 21:03.895
in terms of sequence, hard to tell you the when and

21:03.895 --> 21:07.899
the what. Here, I'd like to share a personal discussion

21:07.899 --> 21:12.137
I had with an acquaintance of mine who's been

21:12.137 --> 21:17.042
involved in enterprise software his whole life, knows AI

21:17.042 --> 21:21.046
intimately. He started a new company about a year

21:21.046 --> 21:24.383
ago which is enterprise software but based on AI.

21:24.383 --> 21:28.453
Basically, this gentleman told me recently he could bring up

21:28.453 --> 21:32.491
a product that he's been showcasing and using,

21:32.491 --> 21:36.595
there's a core client using his new solution

21:36.595 --> 21:40.565
that was all AI built and therefore he told me, I can do a

21:40.565 --> 21:44.336
lot more faster thanks to AI.

21:44.336 --> 21:47.539
He could do this with, I think, half the number of engineers.

21:47.539 --> 21:51.610
I forgot in terms of amount of time

21:51.610 --> 21:53.945
but it was much faster.

21:53.945 --> 21:57.649
Here's the hook or the pitfall.

21:57.649 --> 22:02.020
Where he was misled, his client is super happy

22:02.020 --> 22:06.024
but he cuts back on software engineering but where he

22:06.024 --> 22:10.729
had to hire a lot more people was on the design part.

22:10.729 --> 22:14.700
It's easy to bring up a new solution, what's a generic solution,

22:14.700 --> 22:19.037
and then you need to adapt and tailor it to the need of your customer

22:19.037 --> 22:21.540
who might be in a totally different industry, different sector.

22:21.540 --> 22:25.410
You need to do that work.

22:25.410 --> 22:28.513
That's more labour intensive than expected.

22:28.513 --> 22:33.452
It's just to show here that, listen,

22:33.452 --> 22:37.522
it's been a carnage year-to-date, and started last year for this

22:37.556 --> 22:41.526
software sector mostly, well, not only enterprise

22:41.526 --> 22:45.464
software but all kind of software companies including info service type

22:45.464 --> 22:49.768
of software, we've seen Thomson Reuters and RELEX in

22:49.768 --> 22:53.805
Europe, we've seen some of the stock exchange that have a business model that

22:53.805 --> 22:57.843
is more based on info service as opposed to just

22:57.843 --> 23:01.813
commissions and trading, it has a lot of ramification.

23:01.813 --> 23:05.917
The example I just shared with you is I think that this

23:05.917 --> 23:09.855
is happening a little bit too fast because we've got

23:09.855 --> 23:13.925
the proof here that there's another aspect of a

23:13.925 --> 23:17.996
software solution that is based on tailoring it and

23:17.996 --> 23:21.967
making this tangible to the users, and that has

23:21.967 --> 23:24.035
nothing to do with AI per se.

23:24.035 --> 23:28.206
No, that's the layers and the nuance and the idiosyncratic

23:28.206 --> 23:31.943
way that you would take a look at companies and the theme and obviously the

23:31.943 --> 23:36.348
sort of shock to the market that is being endured by software right

23:36.348 --> 23:40.452
now. That kind of leads me to your ability to take a look at companies

23:40.452 --> 23:44.623
that would maybe be private at this point, probably tech companies that

23:44.623 --> 23:46.691
are private. You do do that.

23:46.691 --> 23:49.094
I know that you have a wide knowledge.

23:49.094 --> 23:53.832
You actually invest in the companies as well.

23:53.832 --> 23:57.803
We still do. Not in the case that I just mentioned to you, that's way too

23:57.803 --> 24:01.206
early.

24:01.206 --> 24:04.643
If we invest in some private companies we like them to already have some kind

24:04.643 --> 24:08.046
of revenue generation.

24:08.046 --> 24:12.217
We do own three to four companies, it's probably about 1% of the

24:12.217 --> 24:14.820
portfolio so it's nothing very risky.

24:14.820 --> 24:18.857
We try to mitigate the absolute risk again but we're super enthused

24:18.857 --> 24:22.894
about ... two of these companies

24:22.894 --> 24:25.697
actually right now are very interesting.

24:25.697 --> 24:27.466
They've seen their backlog growing.

24:27.466 --> 24:29.668
One of them is related to automation.

24:29.668 --> 24:34.139
I've talked about all these backlogs for these large industrial companies where

24:34.139 --> 24:36.908
it's increasing recently.

24:36.908 --> 24:40.946
Some of these company's, they're unicorn, it's just a question of

24:40.946 --> 24:45.183
time. We saw actually just two days ago out

24:45.183 --> 24:49.921
of Quebec City there's a company that was purchased for

24:49.921 --> 24:54.125
$2 billion Canadian by ASSAB, a large

24:54.125 --> 24:56.495
US industrial company.

24:56.495 --> 25:00.799
Too bad that we lost that company but we

25:00.799 --> 25:05.403
have that. I want people to remember long term diversification

25:05.403 --> 25:09.508
will always pay off. It's one thing to chase the metals and the

25:09.508 --> 25:14.446
gold and the oil or the energy or infrastructure, we

25:14.446 --> 25:18.517
have to remind ourselves that technology despite AI, there'll

25:18.517 --> 25:22.220
be new winners out there and we have to be on the lookout for these.

25:22.220 --> 25:26.324
That's why we do that extra homework to keep an

25:26.324 --> 25:29.060
eye on some of these private companies.

25:29.060 --> 25:33.164
It's fascinating. And I think Charles Danis had a conversation with

25:33.164 --> 25:35.300
you in French just before this.

25:35.300 --> 25:39.804
This was actually a question that he was asking of you offline, we

25:39.804 --> 25:44.142
were talking about it, the idea that probably a lot of investors last

25:44.142 --> 25:48.246
year would have done very well just owning the TSX.

25:48.246 --> 25:51.016
That worked pretty well for a lot of investors.

25:51.016 --> 25:53.084
I guess the difference between ...

25:53.084 --> 25:57.589
there's a carry on of what went on last year and some of the themes

25:57.589 --> 26:01.726
but what's a bit different and nuanced and, frankly, requires a more

26:01.726 --> 26:04.596
active approach because last year you really could have owned the index,

26:04.596 --> 26:07.832
actually.

26:07.832 --> 26:11.870
Last year it's bittersweet, right?

26:11.870 --> 26:15.907
For any active fund manager like ourselves, when

26:15.907 --> 26:20.078
you're up in absolute by 24, 25% but your index

26:20.078 --> 26:25.116
is up 30, 32%, whatever it finished at,

26:25.116 --> 26:28.286
you're super happy in absolute terms.

26:28.286 --> 26:32.290
You might think that Christmas there'll be nice gifts under a tree

26:32.290 --> 26:36.494
but you still have this pressure or this sense of you're

26:36.494 --> 26:40.432
not completely fulfilled or satisfied because you

26:40.432 --> 26:43.802
could not beat the benchmark. The perfect year is when you're up in absolute in

26:43.835 --> 26:48.273
a nice way and when you beat the benchmark.

26:48.273 --> 26:51.009
That's not what happened last year, unfortunately. It was extremely hard to

26:51.009 --> 26:54.679
beat the benchmark for all the reasons I've mentioned, the Junior Gold and the

26:54.679 --> 26:56.615
metals just started to run.

26:56.615 --> 26:59.417
The Canadian banks also did better than expected.

26:59.417 --> 27:01.286
We've talked about this in the past, Pamela.

27:01.286 --> 27:05.690
I think since the financial crisis of

27:05.690 --> 27:09.894
'08, 09 the US large money centres, banks, and the Canadian banks,

27:09.894 --> 27:13.632
have really cut back on the subprime type of loans.

27:13.632 --> 27:17.902
In Canada it changes the nature of the risk profile for these

27:17.936 --> 27:22.107
Canadian banks because back in the days, previous cycles, again, that's why we

27:22.107 --> 27:26.177
always need to look at history but we need to adjust our models

27:26.177 --> 27:28.513
for the future because cycles are very different.

27:28.513 --> 27:31.916
No recession since '09.

27:31.916 --> 27:36.187
The Canadian banks cut back on subprime and now when you've got unemployment

27:36.187 --> 27:40.525
at 7%-ish, back in the day's that's when you would

27:40.525 --> 27:43.662
start to see defaults on mortgages and different loans.

27:43.662 --> 27:47.732
We've barely seen this so far.

27:47.732 --> 27:50.769
That's been a bit of a surprise and that's where we probably lacked a little

27:50.769 --> 27:53.104
bit last year.

27:53.104 --> 27:55.607
In absolute terms it was an amazing year.

27:55.607 --> 27:59.611
Again, we were positioned for some of these large moves but we

27:59.611 --> 28:03.615
choose to manage risk in absolute turns and that's, in turns, when we have a

28:03.615 --> 28:07.585
negative year when the market is down usually we tend

28:07.585 --> 28:11.222
to fare a lot better. I think that's part of the approach.

28:11.256 --> 28:15.160
We like to have our unitholders to sleep well at night.

28:15.160 --> 28:18.697
It's a fund that continues to perform well over the long term with much less

28:18.697 --> 28:20.665
volatility.

28:20.665 --> 28:24.469
Some of the in-depth knowledge that you have of the companies and often

28:24.469 --> 28:28.840
watching with the research you have at your hands

28:28.840 --> 28:32.944
of what can be overdone, that's obviously where you go hunting and

28:32.944 --> 28:35.714
looking for opportunities.

28:35.714 --> 28:39.484
The software example today, and maybe even gold, I don't know, are

28:39.484 --> 28:43.655
opportunities where there's extreme moves obviously in the market but you have

28:43.655 --> 28:47.258
a much more nimble approach to things.

28:47.258 --> 28:50.895
Listen, the research is part of our DNA.

28:50.895 --> 28:54.566
Our analysts work day and night.

28:54.566 --> 28:57.936
We've seen it during COVID, we've seen it recently.

28:57.936 --> 29:02.841
There was this threat from Washington from Mr. Trump to decertify

29:02.841 --> 29:05.844
certain planes made in Canada.

29:05.844 --> 29:10.148
Well, let me tell you, as soon as we saw the news I called my analyst.

29:10.148 --> 29:12.117
I think that was at 7:00 p.m.

29:12.117 --> 29:14.385
He was at home. We had a conversation.

29:14.385 --> 29:18.656
I could hear his kids playing in the background.

29:18.656 --> 29:22.861
You reach out to the company, had a note published the same evening

29:22.861 --> 29:24.963
before we go to bed.

29:24.963 --> 29:29.400
I knew exactly what to expect the

29:29.400 --> 29:33.238
next day, that we own it or that we don't own it, there's always an

29:33.238 --> 29:37.442
opportunity. In the morning we had another follow-up

29:37.442 --> 29:41.446
together and I double checked with the traders what was the outlook in

29:41.446 --> 29:45.350
terms of demand for the stock or not.

29:45.350 --> 29:48.219
It played out quite nicely. It was a very interesting day.

29:48.219 --> 29:52.257
Legally speaking, we found out a day later that

29:52.257 --> 29:56.795
it would be really hard for a president to decertify a plane just

29:56.795 --> 30:01.733
without having the infrastructure involved.

30:01.733 --> 30:05.904
It's really captivating to see what's going on because there's always

30:05.904 --> 30:09.974
something coming out from left field that we've not seen.

30:09.974 --> 30:14.145
It's part of the turmoil that started a year ago and we're getting used to it.

30:14.145 --> 30:18.716
I think COVID prepared us in some ways to expect the unexpected.

30:18.716 --> 30:21.753
Your experience and the steady hand, there's something to that particularly

30:21.753 --> 30:25.890
when markets drop and your fund sort of sales

30:25.890 --> 30:29.260
through with a keel that's a bit more stable.

30:29.260 --> 30:33.264
Max Lemieux, we want to thank you for joining us today, sharing your time and

30:33.264 --> 30:35.900
telling investors what you're looking at for this year.

30:35.900 --> 30:37.702
Thank you.

30:37.702 --> 30:38.703
Thank you.

30:38.703 --> 30:42.640
Thanks for watching or listening to the Fidelity Connects

30:42.640 --> 30:46.778
podcast. Now if you haven't done so already, please subscribe to Fidelity

30:46.778 --> 30:49.581
Connects on your podcast platform of choice.

30:49.581 --> 30:52.417
And if you like what you're hearing, please leave a review or a five-star

30:52.417 --> 30:56.387
rating. Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are available by working with

30:56.387 --> 30:59.757
a financial advisor or through an online brokerage account.

30:59.757 --> 31:03.461
Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.

31:03.461 --> 31:07.298
While on Fidelity.ca, you can also find more information on future live

31:07.298 --> 31:11.436
webcasts. And don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn,

31:11.436 --> 31:13.438
and Instagram.

31:13.438 --> 31:16.307
We'll end today's show with a short disclaimer.

31:16.307 --> 31:20.144
The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants,

31:20.144 --> 31:24.082
and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or

31:24.082 --> 31:28.086
its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and should not

31:28.086 --> 31:30.622
be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice.

31:30.622 --> 31:32.924
It is not an offer to sell or buy.

31:32.924 --> 31:37.262
Or an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any entity or securities

31:37.262 --> 31:42.066
cited. Read a fund's prospectus before investing, funds are not guaranteed.

31:42.066 --> 31:45.637
Their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.

31:45.637 --> 31:49.474
Fees, expenses, and commissions are all associated with fund investments.

31:49.474 --> 31:51.776
Thanks again. We'll see you next time.

Listen to the podcast version