FidelityConnects: Rethinking retirement: Insights from the 2026 Fidelity Report

What does retirement look like for Canadians today? Join Jacqueline Power and Michelle Munro as they unpack the key findings from the 2026 Fidelity Retirement Report — from reliance on government income to the widening gender gap and growing role of (artificial intelligence) AI in financial decision-making. Discover why, despite new technology, financial advisors remain the most trusted source for retirement guidance.

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

 

 

00:06.773 --> 00:08.508

Hello, and welcome to Fidelity Connects.

 

00:08.508 --> 00:12.512

I'm Pamela Ritchie. The 21st edition of the Fidelity Retirement

 

00:12.512 --> 00:17.050

Report is now available, based on responses from 2,000

 

00:17.050 --> 00:21.254

Canadians and informed by decades of research along with insights from

 

00:21.254 --> 00:23.456

tax and retirement experts.

 

00:23.456 --> 00:27.727

It explores the attitudes and the behaviours shaping retirement in

 

00:27.727 --> 00:29.462

Canada today.

 

00:29.462 --> 00:31.765

Some of the findings actually may surprise you.

 

00:31.765 --> 00:35.235

Across all of the themes explored one insight stands out.

 

00:35.235 --> 00:39.806

Canadians with a written retirement plan feel more prepared across

 

00:39.806 --> 00:44.644

key dimensions of financial, emotional, social, and physical.

 

00:44.644 --> 00:48.581

Joining us here today to unpack the report's key findings and discuss

 

00:48.581 --> 00:52.685

how they can help you better support your clients on their financial

 

00:52.685 --> 00:56.923

journeys are Fidelity Directors of Tax and Retirement Research,

 

00:56.923 --> 00:59.225

Michelle Munro and Jacqueline Power.

 

00:59.225 --> 01:01.528

Warm welcome to Michelle and Jacquelyn. Great to see you.

 

01:01.528 --> 01:02.562

Congrats.

 

01:02.562 --> 01:03.530

Thanks so much.

 

01:03.530 --> 01:05.165

Great to be here. We're very excited.

 

01:05.165 --> 01:08.201

This is actually quite a big week when this comes out each year.

 

01:08.201 --> 01:11.738

Why don't you just quickly tell us what this means to people.

 

01:11.738 --> 01:13.940

This is something you work at for a long time.

 

01:13.940 --> 01:16.776

As you touched upon we've been doing this for 21 years.

 

01:16.776 --> 01:21.514

I think it's one of the longest retirement surveys in the industry.

 

01:21.514 --> 01:24.350

Because we've been doing it for so long we get to ask the same questions year

 

01:24.350 --> 01:27.287

after year, really get those longitudinal insights.

 

01:27.287 --> 01:31.057

But also we can weave in some questions and really understand how are people

 

01:31.057 --> 01:33.760

feeling about things like AI?

 

01:33.760 --> 01:37.497

How does that impact their retirement planning?

 

01:37.497 --> 01:39.299

The newsreel is constant.

 

01:39.299 --> 01:42.769

How is that impacting peoples' perspectives on retirement?

 

01:42.769 --> 01:45.605

That's fascinating. Anything just to add quickly on sort of getting this

 

01:45.605 --> 01:49.008

enormous report out there to all of the people that you work with.

 

01:49.008 --> 01:54.013

For sure. No, it's amazing. We love this time of year because everybody's

 

01:54.013 --> 01:58.084

so excited about it. There's always little nuggets of

 

01:58.084 --> 02:02.222

information and it just makes it a very exciting

 

02:02.222 --> 02:02.922

week for us so yeah, we're very happy.

 

02:02.922 --> 02:06.759

It's nice to get that picture from across the country.

 

02:06.759 --> 02:10.663

What would you say sort of the outlook, the retirement outlook is if you had to

 

02:10.663 --> 02:12.031

sort of sum it up, Michelle.

 

02:12.031 --> 02:16.002

We ask a very basic question to pre-retirees and retirees.

 

02:16.002 --> 02:19.339

What's your outlook on retirement? Positive or negative?

 

02:19.339 --> 02:23.376

What we really see consistently is that retirees feel more

 

02:23.376 --> 02:27.113

positive than pre-retirees, there's a gap there.

 

02:27.113 --> 02:32.385

The gap was the widest in 2020 which was the height of the pandemic.

 

02:32.385 --> 02:36.589

It has narrowed but there still is a pretty

 

02:36.589 --> 02:42.762

significant gap.

 

02:42.762 --> 02:47.200

I think that retirement is better enjoyed

 

02:47.200 --> 02:49.869

than imagined.

 

02:49.869 --> 02:52.906

That's really interesting. It's like the anticipation.

 

02:52.906 --> 02:56.976

Right. With anything unknown you're sort of like, ah, feel less positive about

 

02:56.976 --> 02:59.979

it but then once you get there people really enjoy it.

 

02:59.979 --> 03:04.017

Okay, that's really, really interesting, the confidence there.

 

03:04.017 --> 03:08.221

Jacqueline, anything to kind of add to what makes people so

 

03:08.221 --> 03:11.424

nervous, the uncertainty piece of it all.

 

03:11.424 --> 03:15.295

I think what's a top concern right now is just the geopolitical that's

 

03:15.295 --> 03:19.299

happening, inflation, everything that's sort of happening around the

 

03:19.299 --> 03:23.303

world, that is definitely making people feel

 

03:23.303 --> 03:26.005

a little less confident than they could have before.

 

03:26.005 --> 03:30.777

Even if they've planned they think what are all these things layered on top?

 

03:30.777 --> 03:34.747

From year to year we find that it's really interesting information

 

03:34.747 --> 03:37.083

and it's quite similar.

 

03:37.083 --> 03:41.087

What I find really surprising is with all of this turmoil that's

 

03:41.087 --> 03:45.225

happening, with everything that's going on there's there's so much uncertainty

 

03:45.225 --> 03:48.962

but the markets are still doing so well.

 

03:48.962 --> 03:52.932

It's so interesting to see that the headlines aren't equaling an

 

03:52.932 --> 04:00.807

outcome. If you

 

04:00.807 --> 04:02.609

look at the S&P TSX, last year when the tariffs were going crazy we thought it

was

 

04:02.609 --> 04:05.678

going to be absolutely horrible, 32.

 

04:05.678 --> 04:09.949

It's incredible to see but it's not slowing

 

04:09.949 --> 04:13.987

people down as far as wanting

 

04:13.987 --> 04:15.355

to be in the market.

 

04:15.355 --> 04:19.626

I guess some of that at the moment leads to retirees being perhaps

 

04:19.626 --> 04:22.228

happy with where they are because they probably made this plan and they're

 

04:22.228 --> 04:25.598

sitting with markets that are afloat, which is great.

 

04:25.598 --> 04:29.602

Are there important differences within pre-retirees, those that are

 

04:29.602 --> 04:37.377

approaching, obviously, in different states of economic wealth?

 

04:37.377 --> 04:39.412

When we looked at the pre-retiree set, overall much more concerned than the

 

04:39.412 --> 04:44.017

retiree set. We talked about the geopoliticals,

 

04:44.017 --> 04:47.320

the interest rates, what's going on with inflation.

 

04:47.320 --> 04:52.091

When we drill down into it we found that female women pre-retirees

 

04:52.091 --> 04:56.029

were even more concerned than our male counterparts.

 

04:56.029 --> 05:00.333

Three women here on the panel.

 

05:00.333 --> 05:03.069

I think that's more impactful ...

 

05:03.069 --> 05:07.307

women feel the impact more. Where we found the biggest gap

 

05:07.307 --> 05:09.542

was actually in inflation.

 

05:09.542 --> 05:13.413

We asked the questions and then you sort of have to come up with some reasoning

 

05:13.413 --> 05:17.517

behind it, and maybe that is because women are more involved

 

05:17.517 --> 05:21.521

in the day-to-day household items, feeling the pinch when they go to

 

05:21.521 --> 05:25.958

the grocery store, what have you, buying clothing for the household.

 

05:25.958 --> 05:32.565

That could be reasoning why women feel more worried about the cost of inflation.

 

05:32.565 --> 05:36.602

Do they approach some of the questions in the meetings that you have with I

 

05:36.602 --> 05:40.206

know that these are the things that are prescribed but there isn't a one size

 

05:40.206 --> 05:43.009

fits all, maybe I fit over here.

 

05:43.009 --> 05:44.610

Where do you get some of those nuances?

 

05:44.610 --> 05:47.780

I think that's where we get into the value of advice, that it is a very

 

05:47.780 --> 05:52.018

tailored individual approach where you can be asking questions 'cause

 

05:52.018 --> 05:54.420

advisors know their clients the best.

 

05:54.420 --> 05:56.189

Really interesting.

 

05:56.189 --> 06:00.626

Across this country, we've mentioned 2,000 people were discussed, you consulted

 

06:00.626 --> 06:03.096

with. It's a big country.

 

06:03.096 --> 06:07.400

There are some different economic realities across

 

06:07.400 --> 06:12.071

this country as well. Are there quite visible differences across the country?

 

06:12.071 --> 06:16.309

It's really interesting, when we asked how everybody was feeling

 

06:16.309 --> 06:20.279

and that sort of thing generally across the country it was quite

 

06:20.279 --> 06:24.717

consistent. People were concerned about inflation,

 

06:24.717 --> 06:28.654

concerned about cost of living, geopolitical, everything that

 

06:28.654 --> 06:32.792

we've been talking about. What's really interesting is Quebec is not as

 

06:32.792 --> 06:35.595

affected as the rest of the country.

 

06:35.595 --> 06:37.530

It's because they have great coffee or something.

 

06:37.530 --> 06:41.434

It's so true.

 

06:41.434 --> 06:45.438

What's really interesting though is what they are concerned about, and that's

 

06:45.438 --> 06:49.675

housing. They're worried about rent increases and

 

06:49.675 --> 06:53.780

that sort of thing, very much more so than the rest of Canada.

 

06:53.780 --> 06:57.850

I think it goes to the fact that not as many people own in Quebec

 

06:57.850 --> 07:01.854

as the rest of Canada so, of course, if there's an increase to

 

07:01.854 --> 07:05.892

rent and that thing it's going to affect them more than it would other parts

 

07:05.892 --> 07:08.728

of the country.

 

07:08.728 --> 07:10.830

That's really interesting. The ratio is different for those who own versus

 

07:10.830 --> 07:13.199

rent. Fascinating.

 

07:13.199 --> 07:17.270

Let's go into that. We asked you the one size fits all but the idea of

 

07:17.270 --> 07:21.374

working with an advisor and the confidence that that ultimately breeds

 

07:21.374 --> 07:23.342

within. Tell us a little bit about ...

 

07:23.342 --> 07:25.678

you probably notice it between people and groups.

 

07:25.678 --> 07:28.981

We're looking at those who have that positive outlook.

 

07:28.981 --> 07:31.918

We looked further and said, well, what are sort of ...

 

07:31.918 --> 07:36.088

we talked about being a retiree, pre-retiree, next, we want to look at those

 

07:36.088 --> 07:39.425

who have a written plan and do not have a written plan.

 

07:39.425 --> 07:41.260

It's the biggest gap we've ever had.

 

07:41.260 --> 07:45.531

Those who have a written plan, 82% said positive about retirement

 

07:45.531 --> 07:49.836

versus only 54% of those who did not have written plans.

 

07:49.836 --> 07:54.974

That gap is pretty significant.

 

07:54.974 --> 07:56.008

And you say it's growing. Is that population?

 

07:56.008 --> 07:57.710

It's the biggest ...

 

07:57.710 --> 08:01.280

those who feel positive have a written plan, highest percentage versus those

 

08:01.280 --> 08:06.185

who haven't.

 

08:06.185 --> 08:10.423

We're looking at positive outlook on retirement but it's also feeling prepared

 

08:10.423 --> 08:14.727

for or living in retirement, financially prepared.

 

08:14.727 --> 08:18.898

Also physical, social, emotional, those are all

 

08:18.898 --> 08:22.969

pillars of overall well-being that comes from having

 

08:22.969 --> 08:25.371

a written financial plan.

 

08:25.371 --> 08:29.442

Those who have a written plan, almost 90% of those

 

08:29.442 --> 08:33.246

work with a financial advisor to create it.

 

08:33.246 --> 08:37.416

The whole industry is moving towards the written plan.

 

08:37.416 --> 08:41.487

I talked to, casually, with some advisors and it was like, oh, do

 

08:41.487 --> 08:43.189

we have to?

 

08:43.189 --> 08:47.426

But they really have a really positive impact on

 

08:47.426 --> 08:50.897

the feeling, overall well-being of their clients.

 

08:50.897 --> 08:54.834

Fantastic. I guess does it also lead to not being as

 

08:54.834 --> 08:58.304

thrown by some of the headlines and noise you were talking about earlier if you

 

08:58.304 --> 08:59.639

sort of know you've got something [crosstalk].

 

08:59.639 --> 09:04.143

You have your plan. It's really a roadmap to retirement success

 

09:04.143 --> 09:08.080

because you have the plan. When the headlines come in, this goes up, that

 

09:08.080 --> 09:13.519

goes down, you're staying on track.

 

09:13.519 --> 09:17.456

There's so many benefits. Every way we look at it that written financial plan

 

09:17.456 --> 09:22.094

benefits clients and the client relationship that they have with their advisor.

 

09:22.094 --> 09:26.165

Do you find that the discussion about the plan itself has to do with

 

09:26.165 --> 09:30.303

how retirement is being defined these days, which sometimes is not just

 

09:30.303 --> 09:33.606

65, exactly that date and that's the end.

 

09:33.606 --> 09:35.274

Things are changing a lot there.

 

09:35.274 --> 09:35.675

Very much so.

 

09:35.675 --> 09:36.275

What do you notice?

 

09:36.275 --> 09:39.579

What we're definitely seeing is more and more individuals are delaying

 

09:39.579 --> 09:44.150

retirement. I think it's lots of different factors that are

 

09:44.150 --> 09:48.287

contributing to that. One positive that came out of COVID was

 

09:48.287 --> 09:52.458

the fact that we have hybrid or remote work environments, so much easier for

 

09:52.458 --> 09:56.596

somebody to continue and to work later in life if that's

 

09:56.596 --> 10:00.533

something that's available to them and easier than having to go into the office

 

10:00.533 --> 10:02.401

every single day, that sort of thing.

 

10:02.401 --> 10:06.739

We're definitely seeing changes as far as when people are retiring.

 

10:06.739 --> 10:10.710

I think also the fact that we have a longer

 

10:10.710 --> 10:14.847

life expectancy. If you retire at 65 and you live to

 

10:14.847 --> 10:18.985

95 are your assets going to keep you going for that

 

10:18.985 --> 10:23.222

long? I think there are lots of factors that are getting people to think about

 

10:23.222 --> 10:25.291

retiring later.

 

10:25.291 --> 10:29.228

There's more to say on that but just with assets for those that do

 

10:29.228 --> 10:34.100

own, for instance, and maybe you mentioned in Quebec, renting,

 

10:34.100 --> 10:38.237

those are income streams for people who are in retirement, is

 

10:38.237 --> 10:41.273

that part of planning in some cases?

 

10:41.273 --> 10:44.977

Oh, most definitely. Some people will use rental.

 

10:44.977 --> 10:48.547

Sometimes if people have corporations and they're receiving dividends out of

 

10:48.547 --> 10:52.852

that corporation that's another source of retirement income for them, That's

 

10:52.852 --> 10:56.989

why, again, we keep going back to working with an advisor because there isn't

 

10:56.989 --> 11:01.027

a one size fits all. It really depends on the situation and looking

 

11:01.027 --> 11:06.198

at the individual holistically and get a sense for what it all looks like.

 

11:06.198 --> 11:10.002

With hybrid there what does working in retirement look like?

 

11:10.002 --> 11:12.571

There must be a number of different ways you've been looking at this.

 

11:12.571 --> 11:14.707

Working from home is obviously a big piece but what else?

 

11:14.707 --> 11:18.544

It's the hybrid working but what we're finding is those who have retired from

 

11:18.544 --> 11:22.782

their primary career but not quite ready for

 

11:22.782 --> 11:25.818

the retirement per se, full retirement.

 

11:25.818 --> 11:28.921

The cruise.

 

11:28.921 --> 11:33.359

You get a spectrum because there's the reasoning behind that,

 

11:33.359 --> 11:36.796

financial  as well as the emotional side.

 

11:36.796 --> 11:40.800

What we saw more and more is the emotional aspect of wanting to stay

 

11:40.800 --> 11:44.203

busy, stay engaged, social reasons.

 

11:44.203 --> 11:47.273

The financial reasons are more of a secondary reason.

 

11:47.273 --> 11:51.277

People are realizing that

 

11:51.277 --> 11:55.281

there's longer life expectancies, oh, have I

 

11:55.281 --> 11:57.149

really saved enough?

 

11:57.149 --> 12:01.387

Even working part-time can help phase that, make a more gradual

 

12:01.387 --> 12:04.757

approach just to ease the financial pieces.

 

12:04.757 --> 12:08.527

Back to your original question what does it look like?

 

12:08.527 --> 12:12.798

What we're seeing is that when people sort of retire from their primary

 

12:12.798 --> 12:17.303

profession or career they're more looking for a part-time

 

12:17.303 --> 12:19.438

and self-employed.

 

12:19.438 --> 12:22.007

To me, that's indicating that they're looking for more control.

 

12:22.007 --> 12:26.045

They're able to do that through the flexibility from

 

12:26.045 --> 12:30.216

remote work that really became prevalent in the last five,

 

12:30.216 --> 12:34.420

six years since COVID.

 

12:34.420 --> 12:38.457

Alongside of that is the passion doing this because we're really enjoying

 

12:38.457 --> 12:43.095

it. The secondary reason, staying busy, staying engaged, financial

 

12:43.095 --> 12:44.163

as well.

 

12:44.163 --> 12:46.065

What about those that's absolutely necessary?

 

12:46.065 --> 12:50.002

There's a debt story. We talk a lot with the economists from Fidelity

 

12:50.002 --> 12:54.073

saying that we sort of got through the cliff of the house and

 

12:54.073 --> 12:58.277

the mortgage massive resets that we knew were coming.

 

12:58.277 --> 13:02.681

Everyone seems kind of okay, although some might argue that.

 

13:02.681 --> 13:05.951

There must be, I mean, still working off houses, working off debts, there's got

 

13:05.951 --> 13:09.054

to be another reason people stay working through retirement age.

 

13:09.054 --> 13:12.291

Oh, for sure. It really depends on the individual, right?

 

13:12.291 --> 13:16.162

We're seeing people who are continuing to work who have higher incomes, who are

 

13:16.162 --> 13:20.299

wealthier. For them it's probably because

 

13:20.299 --> 13:24.570

of the love of it. They're well educated and they've

 

13:24.570 --> 13:26.839

decided that this is something that they want to do.

 

13:26.839 --> 13:30.409

Now, on the flip side, there are people who have a lot of debt.

 

13:30.409 --> 13:35.114

I mean, years ago you would never consider retiring with a mortgage

 

13:35.114 --> 13:39.418

whereas this is something that is much more common that's happening now.

 

13:39.418 --> 13:43.055

To be able to finance that you need to make sure that ...

 

13:43.055 --> 13:47.059

in many situations people are having to continue to work so that

 

13:47.059 --> 13:49.094

they are able to finance that.

 

13:49.094 --> 13:52.231

It really does depend on the individual.

 

13:52.231 --> 13:55.568

Sometimes it's a choice, sometimes it's a necessity.

 

13:55.568 --> 13:59.271

It really varies from person to person.

 

13:59.271 --> 14:02.942

I was going to add on to there because what we saw across the board there are

 

14:02.942 --> 14:07.012

more people working in retirement but higher percentage, higher

 

14:07.012 --> 14:11.150

educated, higher income levels, higher asset levels.

 

14:11.150 --> 14:16.722

Those three key areas in higher proportions are working.

 

14:16.722 --> 14:21.827

These are often our advisors' clients as well.

 

14:21.827 --> 14:23.863

That's what I was going to say. The audience that you're sharing this and we're

all discussing

 

14:23.863 --> 14:28.601

with today are exactly often those people.

 

14:28.601 --> 14:32.238

Our advisors are also thinking about their own retirements and we often see

 

14:32.238 --> 14:36.108

them doing a more phased-in approach to retirement.

 

14:36.108 --> 14:39.812

You don't want to be the shoemaker who has no shoes, as we talk about this for

 

14:39.812 --> 14:44.316

our clients we're also talking about it for our advisors.

 

14:44.316 --> 14:46.585

That's fascinating.

 

14:46.585 --> 14:50.656

Much of what gets discussed at Fidelity and elsewhere is those who

 

14:50.656 --> 14:54.593

have money and they are on their own, privately investing their own money

 

14:54.593 --> 14:57.429

to have sources and so on. What about the government programs?

 

14:57.429 --> 14:59.265

To what extent do you talk about ...

 

14:59.265 --> 15:02.635

there's often shifts, there's lots of news about what pension funds, investment

 

15:02.635 --> 15:06.805

boards are doing, aren't doing, and the Old Age Security

 

15:06.805 --> 15:10.142

as well. Tell us a little bit about the role of that in most of the discussions

 

15:10.142 --> 15:10.876

you have.

 

15:10.876 --> 15:15.147

The most common ones are Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension

 

15:15.147 --> 15:18.284

Plan for our Quebec audience, as well as Old Age Security.

 

15:18.284 --> 15:21.987

Those are the most retirement sources.

 

15:21.987 --> 15:26.625

We asked, well, how confident do you feel about these?

 

15:26.625 --> 15:31.130

Retirees, CPP, 83% felt confident.

 

15:31.130 --> 15:34.300

Versus pre-retirees, 61%.

 

15:34.300 --> 15:36.201

QPP was very similar.

 

15:36.201 --> 15:42.641

Old Age Security, retirees 78% confident,

 

15:42.641 --> 15:46.645

pre-retirees were 56% confident.

 

15:46.645 --> 15:49.181

So you can see...

 

15:49.181 --> 15:51.650

So they think it's going to run out? I mean, is that the discussion?

 

15:51.650 --> 15:55.587

That's what the concern is. CPP is more confident for

 

15:55.587 --> 15:59.591

both retirees and pre-retirees, Old Age Security less

 

15:59.591 --> 16:03.796

confident. Pre-retires who are receiving these benefits feel

 

16:03.796 --> 16:09.234

more confident than pre-retirees who have not started to receive them yet.

 

16:09.234 --> 16:13.572

CPP is a funded benefits

 

16:13.572 --> 16:19.144

pension board whereas Old Age Security is pay as you go.

 

16:19.144 --> 16:22.948

That's the concern, that something isn't as visible into the future.

 

16:22.948 --> 16:24.650

What else do we need to know about these?

 

16:24.650 --> 16:28.687

I mean, I do hear lots of nuance of people seeing the cheques or the

 

16:28.687 --> 16:33.092

amount going into their accounts regularly and discussions

 

16:33.092 --> 16:36.829

about it one way or the other. Is it important to retirees that you're speaking

 

16:36.829 --> 16:39.164

to, again, who often have other resources?

 

16:39.164 --> 16:43.168

Oh, most definitely. Everybody has conversations

 

16:43.168 --> 16:45.637

with us about CPP. When should I take it?

 

16:45.637 --> 16:48.640

When should I not? Will OAS be there for me?

 

16:48.640 --> 16:51.944

These are definitely top of mind for a lot of individuals.

 

16:51.944 --> 16:53.979

There's no question there.

 

16:53.979 --> 16:57.983

Now, what investors need to understand, especially with CPP

 

16:57.983 --> 17:02.087

and QPP, there are actuarial valuations that are done on this,

 

17:02.087 --> 17:04.289

the government is on top of this.

 

17:04.289 --> 17:08.227

When I was younger I did not think that CPP was going to be available to

 

17:08.227 --> 17:11.263

me. I thought this was something I was contributing to and it was never going

 

17:11.263 --> 17:11.797

to go anywhere.

 

17:11.797 --> 17:16.802

There was a long period of time where that was sort of the

 

17:16.802 --> 17:18.871

common knowledge or discussion anyway.

 

17:18.871 --> 17:21.006

Very much so.

 

17:21.006 --> 17:22.908

Exactly. But then the government made the changes.

 

17:22.908 --> 17:25.711

They upped the amount that we needed to contribute to.

 

17:25.711 --> 17:29.281

They now have a two-tiered system for those individuals who are making above

 

17:29.281 --> 17:31.650

what the original YMPE is.

 

17:31.650 --> 17:35.854

They're really having lots of contributions going into it and now it's

 

17:35.854 --> 17:38.757

extremely healthy, to the point where they're actually decreasing our

 

17:38.757 --> 17:38.957

contributions.

 

17:38.957 --> 17:41.727

They're making too much money.

 

17:41.727 --> 17:42.995

It should be used elsewhere.

 

17:42.995 --> 17:44.696

From a CPP perspective it's fantastic.

 

17:44.696 --> 17:48.734

To Michelle's point, as far as OAS is concerned that's

 

17:48.734 --> 17:54.039

a pay as you go. There's no fund that is set up as far as this is concerned.

 

17:54.039 --> 17:58.277

A new government comes in and makes a change, well, they could decide to

 

17:58.277 --> 18:02.014

do whatever they want as far as OAS is concerned.

 

18:02.014 --> 18:04.950

Very different program than what we're seeing with CPP.

 

18:04.950 --> 18:08.120

Concerns are justified in some of those because it's a reality that could

 

18:08.120 --> 18:12.224

change.

 

18:12.224 --> 18:15.794

As far as OAS, more so. CPP, no need to be concerned with respect to CPP.

 

18:15.794 --> 18:19.031

Again, many of the people you're speaking with here today this won't be their

 

18:19.031 --> 18:23.202

only source of income. What do you say to that and have the

 

18:23.202 --> 18:25.437

expectations conversation about that?

 

18:25.437 --> 18:29.408

Often what Canadians are looking in our working years, and we're in

 

18:29.408 --> 18:33.078

this pool as well, and then you go into retirement and you're looking to

 

18:33.078 --> 18:38.383

replace that income from sources, there's

 

18:38.383 --> 18:42.554

a replacement income. Then we'd be looking at where are those sources

 

18:42.554 --> 18:46.225

coming from. There are government sources or they'd be your personal savings as

 

18:46.225 --> 18:50.362

well. If somebody has a lower pre-retirement income

 

18:50.362 --> 18:54.333

a higher percentage of their replacement income in retirement is

 

18:54.333 --> 18:56.668

going to come from the government sources.

 

18:56.668 --> 19:00.873

For our advisors and their clients, their investors, now

 

19:00.873 --> 19:05.611

we're looking at typically higher incomes

 

19:05.611 --> 19:09.681

looking for a higher replacement income in retirement but a lower

 

19:09.681 --> 19:12.317

percentage of that is going to come from government sources.

 

19:12.317 --> 19:16.421

Just driving home the

 

19:16.421 --> 19:20.692

value of advice, helping our investors really stay

 

19:20.692 --> 19:24.830

on track, create that plan to

 

19:24.830 --> 19:27.799

have the retirement that they're looking for.

 

19:27.799 --> 19:31.937

A little bit about working in retirement, if those people are

 

19:31.937 --> 19:34.540

working in retirement they want it to be optional.

 

19:34.540 --> 19:36.909

That's the idea.

 

19:36.909 --> 19:41.446

The best outcome, working is optional in retirement.

 

19:41.446 --> 19:44.850

You're not at a point where you absolutely need to be raking that in in that

 

19:44.850 --> 19:47.085

particular way.

 

19:47.085 --> 19:52.057

You can't go too far without seeing downsizing signs, making

 

19:52.057 --> 19:54.560

things go from one stage in life to the next.

 

19:54.560 --> 19:59.231

This is much more of a financial decumulation discussion but how

 

19:59.231 --> 20:03.268

does it ... it kind of is a similar idea that you're going from sort

 

20:03.268 --> 20:07.839

of gathering, bringing into maybe your home or your life lots of things to

 

20:07.839 --> 20:09.908

really the opposite. It works with this too.

 

20:09.908 --> 20:13.412

Exactly, and this is something that not enough Canadians are actually putting

 

20:13.412 --> 20:15.113

any sort of thought into.

 

20:15.113 --> 20:19.952

When we looked at the report 18% of retirees, only 18%

 

20:19.952 --> 20:23.488

have a written decumulation strategy in place.

 

20:23.488 --> 20:26.124

How are they choosing where they're drawing assets from.

 

20:26.124 --> 20:30.329

You want to make sure that you have a written plan so that you know

 

20:30.329 --> 20:34.266

exactly where the different types of income are going to

 

20:34.266 --> 20:34.900

be coming from.

 

20:34.900 --> 20:36.768

The house, the condo.

 

20:36.768 --> 20:41.540

Exactly. Even RRSPs, TFSAs, non-REG,

 

20:41.540 --> 20:45.310

there's so many different options and you want to be sure that you're doing

 

20:45.310 --> 20:47.746

whatever is going to be most tax-efficient.

 

20:47.746 --> 20:51.516

They need to be working with an advisor to help them through this process.

 

20:51.516 --> 20:53.885

When we're looking at pre-retirees it's even worse.

 

20:53.885 --> 20:57.923

It's only 18% of pre-retirees that have any sort of a decumulation

 

20:57.923 --> 20:59.758

strategy in place.

 

20:59.758 --> 21:00.158

They have time.

 

21:00.158 --> 21:02.027

Because they're still accumulating.

 

21:02.027 --> 21:05.797

They do have time. I have to say I don't have a decumulation plan in place.

 

21:05.797 --> 21:09.868

There is still time for those pre-retirees but something that

 

21:09.868 --> 21:13.839

they need to somewhat have on their radar, especially

 

21:13.839 --> 21:17.075

as they get that much closer to retirement.

 

21:17.075 --> 21:19.011

Can you do some of that with the plan?

 

21:19.011 --> 21:24.016

If you're creating a plan for this is how I'm going to be earning

 

21:24.016 --> 21:28.020

and allotting things and at some point those things will be where

 

21:28.020 --> 21:31.690

I draw down. Does some of that happen [crosstalk]?

 

21:31.690 --> 21:34.293

So much of our industry for years, decades, we've really focused on the

 

21:34.293 --> 21:38.230

accumulation stage, RRSP, TFSA,

 

21:38.230 --> 21:41.566

First Home Savings Account, non-registered, all of that.

 

21:41.566 --> 21:45.671

Because our population is now ageing now it's coming down to the

 

21:45.671 --> 21:47.506

decumulation.

 

21:47.506 --> 21:53.178

The tax savings we could get can really generate really

 

21:53.178 --> 21:55.380

good, much better ...

 

21:55.380 --> 21:59.951

I'm stumbling with my words here but the tax savings can be substantial.

 

21:59.951 --> 22:02.621

It's something to be thoughtful about.

 

22:02.621 --> 22:06.958

When we asked retirees when they're drawing it down 31%

 

22:06.958 --> 22:09.928

said, just as I need it.

 

22:09.928 --> 22:14.766

Another 26% said, well, I don't have any specific approach.

 

22:14.766 --> 22:18.704

That's almost 60% that are just pretty much

 

22:18.704 --> 22:19.604

winging it.

 

22:19.604 --> 22:23.175

So they sort of think it's in the bank account.

 

22:23.175 --> 22:26.044

Right. I'll just take it as I need it.

 

22:26.044 --> 22:30.349

Whereas 8% ... talking about sort of what's referred to as the safe withdrawal

 

22:30.349 --> 22:34.019

rate is a 4% withdrawal rate and you draw that down ...

 

22:34.019 --> 22:37.956

only 8% were using a fixed percentage.

 

22:37.956 --> 22:41.927

Of those who have they use a 5% withdrawal rates, higher

 

22:41.927 --> 22:45.831

than what's typically considered that safe withdrawal rate.

 

22:45.831 --> 22:50.001

Again, this is where our advisors can really add value.

 

22:50.001 --> 22:51.937

I was just gonna say, what is the position ...

 

22:51.937 --> 22:55.841

maybe this is a question for you, Jacqueline, how do advisors handle that?

 

22:55.841 --> 22:59.978

If they see that, and even if they flagged it to their client, what

 

22:59.978 --> 23:03.949

ultimately should they take away from some of these facts and then I guess use

 

23:03.949 --> 23:05.984

some of these facts?

 

23:05.984 --> 23:09.955

Just like everything, every client is unique, every client situation is

 

23:09.955 --> 23:12.891

going to be unique. What's their life expectancy?

 

23:12.891 --> 23:15.394

What's their timeline that they're going to need this money?

 

23:15.394 --> 23:17.162

What's the risk tolerance?

 

23:17.162 --> 23:21.199

All of this factors into making that determination as to

 

23:21.199 --> 23:22.934

where money should be drawn from.

 

23:22.934 --> 23:26.972

It's not once it is set and it's determined this is where it's coming from

 

23:26.972 --> 23:31.243

for this year, that needs to be reviewed because there could be changes

 

23:31.243 --> 23:35.347

as far as accounts are concerned, values in accounts, all that

 

23:35.347 --> 23:39.518

sort of thing. As with everything you want to be reviewing on a

 

23:39.518 --> 23:43.488

regular basis, making any tweaks to it that need to be done as

 

23:43.488 --> 23:47.592

time goes on and as things change over time.

 

23:47.592 --> 23:52.330

It really is a great opportunity to just engage the advisor yet again.

 

23:52.330 --> 23:56.435

This is something else that the advisors bring into the table as

 

23:56.435 --> 23:58.637

far as their value is concerned.

 

23:58.637 --> 24:03.675

Can they offer great AI [crosstalk]. Maybe

 

24:03.675 --> 24:07.679

this is a good opener for how they can use that themselves to

 

24:07.679 --> 24:08.747

do exactly [crosstalk].

 

24:08.747 --> 24:10.749

I think we're all using AI.

 

24:10.749 --> 24:15.053

We did look at, and we asked pre-retirees and retirees, have you used AI

 

24:15.053 --> 24:19.057

for financial planning in the last 12 months?

 

24:19.057 --> 24:23.228

Retirees, 11% said, yes, they had for financial planning,

 

24:23.228 --> 24:26.832

26% of pre-retirees.

 

24:26.832 --> 24:31.570

I just also want to highlight our pre-retiree group is 45 and older.

 

24:31.570 --> 24:35.540

I would suspect that if our survey was to a larger range, a younger cohort,

 

24:35.540 --> 24:39.544

35, 25, you'd probably get a higher percentage

 

24:39.544 --> 24:45.083

there. We also asked, well, what are you using it for?

 

24:45.083 --> 24:49.788

Info on investments, looking at budgeting, understanding financial news,

 

24:49.788 --> 24:51.556

how much to save for retirement.

 

24:51.556 --> 24:55.827

That is our number one question I get, how

 

24:55.827 --> 24:57.996

much do I need?

 

24:57.996 --> 25:00.765

They also have tax information, asking about taxes.

 

25:00.765 --> 25:04.936

As a tax professional, I've used AI

 

25:04.936 --> 25:09.107

for taxes as well but [indecipherable] this is

 

25:09.107 --> 25:09.474

where we're going to get to.

 

25:09.474 --> 25:11.309

Because you actually have the education behind that.

 

25:11.309 --> 25:14.746

There are many out there that are just going to go and use and maybe take the

 

25:14.746 --> 25:15.447

advice.

 

25:15.447 --> 25:19.751

That's where we really found that Canadians are using it just

 

25:19.751 --> 25:23.922

for general learning. They're not relying on it, they're just not trusting

 

25:23.922 --> 25:27.359

it, they're not acting upon it.

 

25:27.359 --> 25:31.496

That's interesting. Do you find that then if retirees or those that are

 

25:31.496 --> 25:34.766

approaching or clients ultimately go in better educated to their advisors

 

25:34.766 --> 25:39.170

probably, that must be part of what advisors are noticing anyway.

 

25:39.170 --> 25:41.039

For sure because you're not starting at ground zero.

 

25:41.039 --> 25:45.110

At least they have some information that they

 

25:45.110 --> 25:49.080

can start that conversation with and go into the advisor's office a

 

25:49.080 --> 25:54.019

little more confident that they may have otherwise because at least they have a

 

25:54.019 --> 25:58.156

bit of a foundation that they're going into that conversation with.

 

25:58.156 --> 26:02.727

We do use a lot of jargon in the industry so I think that can help normalize

 

26:02.727 --> 26:07.032

it a bit, investors are able to look that up.

 

26:07.032 --> 26:10.502

Back to sort of the findings of the report which you've been mentioning here,

 

26:10.502 --> 26:15.140

what would you go into sort of the key findings,

 

26:15.140 --> 26:18.743

which are surprising, alarming, or actually very optimistic?

 

26:18.743 --> 26:21.947

How would you kind of term those?

 

26:21.947 --> 26:25.884

Going off the AI perspective is that people are using

 

26:25.884 --> 26:30.188

it. I think having that information at their fingertips is helpful

 

26:30.188 --> 26:34.225

but bringing it back to the

 

26:34.225 --> 26:38.496

value of advice. What we found is that the advisor is

 

26:38.496 --> 26:42.601

the most trusted source for financial

 

26:42.601 --> 26:47.639

planning advice, investment advice. We

 

26:47.639 --> 26:52.043

see that those who have a written plan feel better prepared.

 

26:52.043 --> 26:56.114

It's not just financially, it's also emotionally, socially, physically, four

 

26:56.114 --> 26:59.517

pillars of overall well-being.

 

26:59.517 --> 27:02.487

Why did an advisor become an advisor?

 

27:02.487 --> 27:06.725

Well, interest in financial markets, financial planning, really wanting to

 

27:06.725 --> 27:11.696

help people. We see that consistently year after year, those

 

27:11.696 --> 27:15.667

who work with a financial advisor feel better and are

 

27:15.667 --> 27:17.535

better prepared for their retirements.

 

27:17.535 --> 27:21.106

Jacqueline, would you add anything just to close out there?

 

27:21.106 --> 27:25.276

For sure. I cannot stress enough how important the advisor is.

 

27:25.276 --> 27:28.747

They really are the key to all of this.

 

27:28.747 --> 27:32.117

I sort of think of them as the quarterback. They help in the accumulation

 

27:32.117 --> 27:36.921

phase, they help in the decumulation phase, and they help just really to

 

27:36.921 --> 27:40.925

calm people down when some of these crazy things are going

 

27:40.925 --> 27:44.863

on in the world. We turn on the television and it's always just a

 

27:44.863 --> 27:48.833

lot, having an advisor there to just bring it back

 

27:48.833 --> 27:52.771

down and say you are on track, things are going to be okay,

 

27:52.771 --> 27:54.606

I think that makes a huge difference.

 

27:54.606 --> 27:56.474

You're both very calming presences.

 

27:56.474 --> 28:00.378

Thank you for creating this report and it is available ...

 

28:00.378 --> 28:01.646

everyone can start asking for it.

 

28:01.646 --> 28:02.480

On fidelity.ca.

 

28:02.480 --> 28:04.249

It's right there.

 

28:04.249 --> 28:05.984

We'll ask everybody to go and get that.

 

28:05.984 --> 28:07.786

Michelle and Jacqueline, thank you for being here.

 

28:07.786 --> 28:08.753

Thanks so much.

 

28:08.753 --> 28:09.721

A pleasure.

 

28:09.721 --> 28:13.024

Thank you for joining us. This is all important information for you as well.

 

28:13.024 --> 28:15.694

We'll let you know what's coming up on the show. Tomorrow, portfolio manager

 

28:15.694 --> 28:19.698

John Dance, he's going to make his Fidelity Connects debut to discuss

 

28:19.698 --> 28:24.402

Fidelity's latest product. This is the Fidelity Emerging Markets Opportunities

 

28:24.402 --> 28:29.107

Fund. You can discover how this strategy might help complement developed

 

28:29.107 --> 28:32.577

market allocations, enhance portfolio balance.

 

28:32.577 --> 28:36.047

It's pretty fascinating to go around the world with John, I think you'll enjoy

 

28:36.047 --> 28:39.851

that. The webcast will feature live French audio interpretation.

 

28:39.851 --> 28:43.455

On Friday, Fidelity's head of Quantitative Index Solutions, Bobby Barnes.

 

28:43.455 --> 28:47.559

He's gonna be unpacking the advantages of Fidelity's quantitative research

 

28:47.559 --> 28:51.663

team, factor investing, of course, as well as the actual

 

28:51.663 --> 28:55.700

factors that Fidelity ETFs might be favourable in the way they work

 

28:55.700 --> 28:59.771

into some of the products and ultimately how they hit the marketplace

 

28:59.771 --> 29:01.840

for the months ahead.

 

29:01.840 --> 29:05.477

Then next Monday, we turn to Monday next week, Fidelity Director of Global

 

29:05.477 --> 29:09.114

Macro, Jurrien Timmer, will be back to kick off the trading week with macro

 

29:09.114 --> 29:13.351

themes on his radar and the market drivers that he is watching.

 

29:13.351 --> 29:15.420

Thank you for joining us here today. We'll see you in the days to come.

 

29:15.420 --> 29:16.888

I'm Pamela Ritchie.

 

29:16.888 --> 29:20.825

Thanks for watching or listening to the Fidelity Connects

 

29:20.825 --> 29:24.963

podcast. Now if you haven't done so already, please subscribe to Fidelity

 

29:24.963 --> 29:27.766

Connects on your podcast platform of choice.

 

29:27.766 --> 29:30.602

And if you like what you're hearing, please leave a review or a five-star

 

29:30.602 --> 29:34.572

rating. Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are available by working with

 

29:34.572 --> 29:37.942

a financial advisor or through an online brokerage account.

 

29:37.942 --> 29:41.646

Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.

 

29:41.646 --> 29:45.483

While on Fidelity.ca, you can also find more information on future live

 

29:45.483 --> 29:49.621

webcasts. And don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn,

 

29:49.621 --> 29:51.623

and Instagram.

 

29:51.623 --> 29:54.492

We'll end today's show with a short disclaimer.

 

29:54.492 --> 29:58.329

The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants,

 

29:58.329 --> 30:02.267

and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or

 

30:02.267 --> 30:06.271

its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and should not

 

30:06.271 --> 30:08.807

be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice.

 

30:08.807 --> 30:11.109

It is not an offer to sell or buy.

 

30:11.109 --> 30:15.446

Or an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any entity or securities

 

30:15.446 --> 30:20.251

cited. Read a fund's prospectus before investing, funds are not guaranteed.

 

30:20.251 --> 30:23.822

Their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.

 

30:23.822 --> 30:27.659

Fees, expenses, and commissions are all associated with fund investments.

 

30:27.659 --> 30:29.961

Thanks again. We'll see you next time.

Listen to the podcast version