FidelityConnects: Canada's moment part 3: The real investment story behind CUSMA

As the CUSMA deadlines approach, headlines suggest uncertainty, but could this moment be a major opportunity for Canada? In this conversation, Pamela Ritchie speaks with sovereign debt analyst Heather Hagerty, who explains why July 1 is not a “cliff event” and why North America’s $2 trillion trade system remains deeply resilient. Drawing on recent discussions with policymakers across all three countries, Hagerty highlights how market volatility is being driven more by sentiment than by any shift in underlying fundamentals. The conversation looks beyond tariffs to the next phase of regional integration, including supply chain realignment, a new capital investment cycle and growing opportunities in energy, EV supply chains and digital trade. For investors, the message is clear: this is a story of evolution, not disruption, and Canada is well positioned, provided it captures the opportunity.

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

00:01.001 --> 00:06.573

<b>Subtitles are AI Generated</b>

 

00:06.940 --> 00:08.875

Hello, Heather, welcome. Great to see you.

 

00:10.577 --> 00:11.878

Nice to see you, Pamela.

 

00:11.878 --> 00:14.881

Thanks for joining us here today.

 

00:14.881 --> 00:19.085

We'll begin, I think, just a little bit with we're all reading

 

00:19.085 --> 00:23.056

and we know that trade negotiations are taking

 

00:23.056 --> 00:24.891

place in certain ways.

 

00:24.891 --> 00:28.862

We know that there's a deadline that may not be made and all those

 

00:28.862 --> 00:30.630

bits and pieces.

 

00:30.630 --> 00:34.868

I wonder if you can just sort of begin with letting us know how

 

00:34.868 --> 00:37.704

serious it's all going to be sort of after July 1st.

 

00:37.704 --> 00:40.573

Is this a bit of a drop dead date or how does this work?

 

00:43.410 --> 00:47.480

First, I think it's important for us to understand that

 

00:47.480 --> 00:51.651

CUSMA is a process. I don't see

 

00:51.651 --> 00:54.054

the approaching July 1st as a rupture date.

 

00:54.054 --> 00:58.091

The reason for that is because North American

 

00:58.091 --> 01:02.195

trade is deeply integrated with over one and a half trillion

 

01:02.195 --> 01:04.564

of annual trade flows.

 

01:04.564 --> 01:07.033

A sudden breakdown is highly unlikely.

 

01:08.368 --> 01:12.605

We've kind of seen how this has played out before with the

 

01:12.605 --> 01:17.911

NAFTA negotiation uncertainty where despite volatility

 

01:17.911 --> 01:22.882

trade flows continued and the system ultimately adapted.

 

01:22.882 --> 01:27.921

What we're seeing happening now is just another phase of that evolution

 

01:27.921 --> 01:30.423

where trade is expanding beyond tariffs.

 

01:30.423 --> 01:33.460

We're seeing it taking place today into

 

01:34.561 --> 01:38.498

investment decisions, into supply chain configurations

 

01:38.498 --> 01:40.200

and also into strategic sectors.

 

01:42.268 --> 01:45.205

It's fascinating to have your take on that.

 

01:45.205 --> 01:48.675

Just remind us a little bit, you'll be looking around the world at

 

01:48.675 --> 01:52.912

opportunities where trade is a

 

01:52.912 --> 01:57.150

huge part of countries relationship and ultimately the investment

 

01:57.150 --> 02:01.221

opportunities that are there. Just tell us a bit about your background.

 

02:01.221 --> 02:03.590

What lens do you look at Canada, for instance, through?

 

02:06.159 --> 02:10.263

I'm a sovereign debt analyst. What that means is I evaluate

 

02:10.263 --> 02:12.932

governments as credit issuers.

 

02:12.932 --> 02:17.237

I'm looking at growth, fiscal sustainability and risk and

 

02:17.237 --> 02:22.408

how policy translates into long term economic performance.

 

02:22.408 --> 02:26.946

In that role I've been meeting with government officials in Washington,

 

02:26.946 --> 02:31.784

in Mexico City and Ottawa ahead of the CUSMA review.

 

02:31.784 --> 02:34.587

What I'm finding is that this is more than trade but

 

02:35.788 --> 02:40.026

it's rather how North America organizes investment,

 

02:40.026 --> 02:42.295

supply chain and growth.

 

02:42.295 --> 02:45.265

What's important is how Canada fits within that system.

 

02:46.633 --> 02:48.935

That's absolutely fascinating.

 

02:48.935 --> 02:52.739

To the extent that you've had conversations, you're taking a look at sovereign

 

02:52.739 --> 02:57.177

debt, I mean, ultimately it's as an investor taking a looks at these things.

 

02:57.177 --> 03:00.547

Can you just ... if you'll share with us a little bit of the inside baseball.

 

03:00.547 --> 03:04.150

How long have some of these conversations been circulating?

 

03:04.150 --> 03:08.354

One would think it's an ongoing process but to the extent that we're

 

03:08.354 --> 03:12.392

approaching a date that we knew was coming have things

 

03:12.392 --> 03:15.995

heated up in the last few weeks, have you had more meetings recently than you

 

03:15.995 --> 03:19.098

did six months ago? Can you just give us a little bit of what you're seeing?

 

03:20.867 --> 03:24.871

Sure, of course. I was in

 

03:24.871 --> 03:28.908

Mexico City back in February. I came at the same

 

03:28.908 --> 03:31.878

time that actually the Canadian delegation was in town.

 

03:31.911 --> 03:35.415

Those were the first meetings that took place.

 

03:36.983 --> 03:41.087

Meeting with the constituents both

 

03:41.087 --> 03:45.825

from US, from Canada and from Mexico I think things were evolving

 

03:45.825 --> 03:46.826

as expected.

 

03:47.927 --> 03:51.965

One thing that was very clear from my meetings is that the current framework

 

03:51.965 --> 03:53.633

is still very much intact. The

 

03:56.069 --> 04:00.306

cross border trade between the three nations remains around 3

 

04:00.306 --> 04:04.510

billion per day which underscores just how operational

 

04:04.510 --> 04:08.381

and embedded the North American system is.

 

04:09.382 --> 04:14.287

As you mentioned in terms of just it heating up, I think it's really important

 

04:14.287 --> 04:18.825

to be reminded that the near term risk that we're speaking about is

 

04:18.825 --> 04:22.862

primarily sentiment driven. Markets are reacting to

 

04:22.862 --> 04:27.133

headlines and they're reacting to political developments

 

04:27.133 --> 04:30.570

or even just the negotiation dynamics.

 

04:30.570 --> 04:35.241

The underlying economic integration has not changed.

 

04:35.241 --> 04:39.412

What we're seeing right now in the market is really a volatility in

 

04:39.412 --> 04:43.583

perception rather than any disruption in fundamentals.

 

04:43.583 --> 04:46.552

That distinction is critical when thinking about risk.

 

04:46.552 --> 04:49.188

It's critical and we really don't know that.

 

04:49.188 --> 04:53.993

I mean, I guess you do know that if you're under CUSMA and you are trading

 

04:53.993 --> 04:58.965

you know exactly as a business what is working and what isn't working.

 

04:58.965 --> 05:03.670

Layer on top of that discussion of how things are going right now

 

05:03.670 --> 05:08.107

a bit about how the world is either different or going to shift to

 

05:08.107 --> 05:12.078

take into consideration new types of supply chains for

 

05:12.078 --> 05:16.049

new types of stuff, data, digital, everything that the world is

 

05:16.049 --> 05:19.719

today that it wasn't, for instance, a few years back.

 

05:19.719 --> 05:22.555

What needs to not collapse but shift?

 

05:24.290 --> 05:28.961

Well, we're increasingly moving towards a next generation

 

05:28.961 --> 05:33.499

framework. I think this is where the story becomes particularly

 

05:33.499 --> 05:37.437

compelling. I believe that we're likely at the early

 

05:37.437 --> 05:39.739

stage of a new capital investment cycle.

 

05:39.739 --> 05:40.740

Global FDI...

 

05:41.140 --> 05:44.210

Really? Feels like so much has been spent but we're at the beginning.

 

05:45.678 --> 05:46.679

Absolutely.

 

05:47.947 --> 05:50.917

Global FDI exceeding 1 trillion annually.

 

05:50.917 --> 05:54.921

An increasing share is being directed towards North

 

05:54.921 --> 05:59.258

America. This is because companies are regionalizing

 

05:59.258 --> 06:01.060

supply chains.

 

06:01.060 --> 06:05.398

That shift is being driven by policy clarity

 

06:05.398 --> 06:08.034

and confidence in long term market access.

 

06:08.034 --> 06:12.105

We're already seeing early signals

 

06:12.105 --> 06:16.209

of this through increased investment in energy,

 

06:16.209 --> 06:20.113

EV manufacturing and also infrastructure.

 

06:20.113 --> 06:24.050

What I have found in studying countries over time is

 

06:24.050 --> 06:28.221

that once that cycle begins it tends to persist over multiple

 

06:28.221 --> 06:32.158

years, making this not just a policy story but

 

06:32.158 --> 06:34.494

really a capital formation story.

 

06:34.494 --> 06:38.631

That is fascinating and exciting, actually, to think that we're sort of at the

 

06:38.631 --> 06:39.632

beginning of this.

 

06:40.900 --> 06:45.004

In broad strokes, again, as we look at Canada's

 

06:45.004 --> 06:48.474

sovereign position, its indebtedness and so on,

 

06:49.909 --> 06:52.645

often people will say it's okay if the government's spending as long as they're

 

06:52.645 --> 06:54.480

spending on the right types of things.

 

06:54.480 --> 06:57.450

We don't know exactly how all of this is gonna work out.

 

06:57.450 --> 07:01.220

We have a list of major projects, for instance, but we don't know everything.

 

07:01.220 --> 07:04.624

Are you happy with the direction of the way the Canadian government has aligned

 

07:04.624 --> 07:06.626

itself to spend, to engage?

 

07:08.361 --> 07:12.398

Yes. The reason for that is because I think that the policy

 

07:12.398 --> 07:16.502

is aligning in the key areas where the opportunity is

 

07:16.502 --> 07:17.770

most clear for Canada.

 

07:18.838 --> 07:22.809

First, energy remains foundational

 

07:22.809 --> 07:26.746

to Canada's economy and it will continue

 

07:26.746 --> 07:30.950

to play a central role both in the traditional and transformational

 

07:30.950 --> 07:35.121

pathways. Second is EV supply chains

 

07:35.121 --> 07:39.158

and critical minerals. They represent a

 

07:39.158 --> 07:43.229

major structural shift with global EV related

 

07:43.262 --> 07:48.034

supply chains expected to exceed over 1 trillion by 2030.

 

07:48.034 --> 07:52.071

I think Canada is well positioned in key inputs such

 

07:52.071 --> 07:54.574

as lithium, cobalt, nickel.

 

07:55.908 --> 07:59.612

Lastly is digital trade and AI.

 

07:59.612 --> 08:03.349

These are areas that Canada has structural advantages because of the public

 

08:03.382 --> 08:04.350

support.

 

08:05.451 --> 08:09.856

Canada produces roughly 5 to 10% of

 

08:09.856 --> 08:13.159

global AI talent relative to its population.

 

08:14.794 --> 08:19.098

That significantly expands the commercial potential of

 

08:19.098 --> 08:23.135

Canada's talent base because firms under CUSMA's digital

 

08:23.135 --> 08:26.839

provisions can operate across North America.

 

08:26.839 --> 08:30.510

When you think about those three key advantages,

 

08:32.011 --> 08:36.015

EV, supply chains, energy and digital, these are pillars of opportunity for

 

08:36.015 --> 08:37.016

Canada.

 

08:37.350 --> 08:42.121

To the extent that there are irritants and that we'll hear things about

 

08:42.121 --> 08:46.192

tariffs that are a global story, actually tariffs have

 

08:46.192 --> 08:49.962

been around forever, there's nothing new to them being around, as

 

08:51.764 --> 08:55.902

you speak to investors how should they be thinking about what has been sort

 

08:55.902 --> 09:00.273

of a difficult moment to digest a

 

09:00.273 --> 09:04.110

new tariff regime as we think of trading partners.

 

09:04.110 --> 09:07.513

How do you think investors should look at the tariff structure right now?

 

09:09.382 --> 09:11.017

First, the risks are real but

 

09:13.419 --> 09:15.254

they're manageable and they're familiar.

 

09:16.656 --> 09:18.558

These include the legacy issues that you mentioned.

 

09:18.558 --> 09:22.962

It also includes even a slower negotiation timeline

 

09:22.962 --> 09:27.767

which you began with but also the political constraints.

 

09:27.767 --> 09:31.771

It's important to keep in mind that despite the political

 

09:31.771 --> 09:35.775

tensions the incentives to maintain the agreement

 

09:35.775 --> 09:37.543

are strong across all three nations.

 

09:37.543 --> 09:41.847

The reason for that is because of just North American

 

09:41.847 --> 09:42.848

trade exceeding 1.5

 

09:45.851 --> 09:49.789

trillion annually, the economic incentives are there, but also because

 

09:49.789 --> 09:53.893

it supports millions of jobs across all three countries.

 

09:53.893 --> 09:57.930

What this will do is create pressure from businesses, from

 

09:57.930 --> 10:02.034

workers and local governments to maintain stability even in a

 

10:02.034 --> 10:03.970

more polarized political environment.

 

10:05.071 --> 10:09.375

That's fascinating. How do you see the world shifting

 

10:09.375 --> 10:13.145

in that way? I mean, as we talk about supply chains shifting, a

 

10:13.145 --> 10:17.149

deglobalization, what it also means is a retooling, which is

 

10:17.149 --> 10:20.486

kind of what we're talking about here, of trade closer to home.

 

10:20.486 --> 10:23.923

That includes North America and the way that's going to work.

 

10:23.923 --> 10:28.060

It is a more localized vision of the world for all

 

10:28.060 --> 10:30.129

the reasons that we've mentioned.

 

10:30.129 --> 10:34.333

I just wonder, almost societally what

 

10:34.333 --> 10:38.337

that might mean. It might mean something good and cozy

 

10:38.337 --> 10:42.541

and I'm just curious how you see that layering

 

10:42.541 --> 10:44.777

on top, some new trade realities.

 

10:44.777 --> 10:46.746

What will life look like to an extent?

 

10:49.949 --> 10:53.919

Well, first it's important to keep in mind that markets tend

 

10:53.919 --> 10:57.990

to move ahead of fundamentals. The sentiment

 

10:57.990 --> 11:02.161

can shift very quickly even when trade

 

11:02.161 --> 11:03.162

flows remain stable.

 

11:05.164 --> 11:09.268

What this does is it creates really a gap between perception and

 

11:09.268 --> 11:14.073

reality. That gap can create opportunity,

 

11:14.073 --> 11:18.411

especially for investors, for businesses and for governments

 

11:18.411 --> 11:20.579

who position early.

 

11:20.579 --> 11:24.917

Canada is in a strong position but there's an opportunity

 

11:24.917 --> 11:28.454

with this trade review for Canada to be more proactive.

 

11:30.256 --> 11:31.991

We've seen some of that happen.

 

11:31.991 --> 11:37.196

We've heard certainly leaders and people engage

 

11:37.196 --> 11:40.266

while there is a war going on in the Middle East.

 

11:40.266 --> 11:44.303

The story of oil making its way around the world has been constrained.

 

11:44.303 --> 11:47.406

Canada is ultimately a net beneficiary of that.

 

11:48.607 --> 11:52.645

Take us a few months, even a few years, sort of the structural shift that we're

 

11:52.645 --> 11:56.148

actually watching it looks like the beginnings of right now on the energy

 

11:56.148 --> 11:57.149

front.

 

11:59.618 --> 12:02.922

Well, first, as you point out, Canada has strong fundamentals.

 

12:02.922 --> 12:07.093

I think what we're starting

 

12:07.093 --> 12:11.997

to see now with the new government in place, having alignment of

 

12:11.997 --> 12:16.168

policy support not just from Ottawa but also from

 

12:16.168 --> 12:19.839

D.C. and also from Mexico City in the energy sector.

 

12:19.839 --> 12:23.776

I think it's creating, again,

 

12:23.776 --> 12:27.780

these opportunities to capture investment, to build upon the North

 

12:27.780 --> 12:29.782

American infrastructure buildout.

 

12:29.782 --> 12:33.853

There is a need and a desire to build out capacity and we're seeing

 

12:33.853 --> 12:36.655

that both at the federal level and the local level.

 

12:38.591 --> 12:42.728

Do you expect, again, in terms of your investment

 

12:42.728 --> 12:47.767

horizon and how you're looking at it, for Canada to do a fair amount of

 

12:47.767 --> 12:51.904

tightening up its economy on its own and also

 

12:51.904 --> 12:55.875

integrating in new ways, it looks like, through new trade policy with

 

12:55.875 --> 12:59.912

the United States and Mexico. Do you see Canada itself sort of developing

 

12:59.912 --> 13:03.415

as its own nation state building efforts  go forward?

 

13:07.453 --> 13:09.789

We're starting to see the first projects

 

13:11.390 --> 13:15.561

become announcing, coming underway. We had the Shell announcement

 

13:15.561 --> 13:19.632

which I think was very important because what

 

13:19.632 --> 13:24.203

that Shell announcement [indecipherable, huge change and a huge change because

 

13:24.203 --> 13:28.007

Canada is a central focal point of the company's strategy.

 

13:28.007 --> 13:32.077

Now it's not just about talk and

 

13:32.077 --> 13:34.079

planning but we're actually seeing action.

 

13:36.715 --> 13:40.719

Then just looking at the calendar and going forward the global investment

 

13:40.719 --> 13:45.457

summit that Prime Minister Carney has announced in September also

 

13:45.457 --> 13:49.428

presents an enormous opportunity to be able to kind of see this come to

 

13:49.428 --> 13:50.429

fruition.

 

13:51.096 --> 13:55.334

That's fascinating. If things take a little longer, July 1st

 

13:55.334 --> 13:59.471

is sort of flapping in the wind there, probably not gonna happen, if

 

13:59.471 --> 14:03.475

things take little longer to get the building blocks of this together

 

14:03.475 --> 14:04.944

is that good for investment?

 

14:06.679 --> 14:08.714

Should we worry about that if it takes a while?

 

14:11.784 --> 14:15.921

There's no cliff risk. It's very important

 

14:15.921 --> 14:20.292

to understand that this is a process of evolution and not disruption.

 

14:21.427 --> 14:24.663

This is long term investment story.

 

14:25.831 --> 14:29.969

The key question, or even the risk, if

 

14:29.969 --> 14:33.839

you were to ask me in terms of where I see the risk for Canada is just whether

 

14:33.873 --> 14:36.842

or not it becomes a missed opportunity.

 

14:36.842 --> 14:40.880

Canada has the opportunity to capture

 

14:40.880 --> 14:43.883

a larger share of investment with this negotiation.

 

14:43.883 --> 14:47.987

Canada offers strong institutional

 

14:47.987 --> 14:52.524

stability, resource ability, direct integration with

 

14:52.524 --> 14:56.729

US markets. Even with a more modest share of

 

14:56.729 --> 15:00.900

new supply chain investment it could translate into tens of

 

15:00.933 --> 15:04.069

billions of dollars in capital inflows.

 

15:04.069 --> 15:08.207

Okay, fascinating. Just give us one more look

 

15:08.207 --> 15:12.311

at sort of Canada's position relative to Mexico, US,

 

15:12.311 --> 15:15.814

Canada, sort of within the agreement itself.

 

15:15.814 --> 15:19.351

Is that different from, say, investors who are looking at it from another

 

15:19.351 --> 15:20.953

corner of the globe, for instance?

 

15:23.122 --> 15:27.259

Well, I think what's important to understand is that we've seen how

 

15:27.259 --> 15:31.597

this has played out before with the NAFTA

 

15:31.597 --> 15:34.166

negotiation from 2017 to '19.

 

15:40.072 --> 15:44.410

Bringing it forth to today what we are is just another phase

 

15:44.410 --> 15:48.714

in that evolution. This is not something that is different, it's

 

15:48.714 --> 15:53.419

just evolving. What we're seeing is trade expanding beyond

 

15:53.419 --> 15:57.456

tariffs. It's going into investment decisions that we

 

15:57.456 --> 16:01.660

just spoke about with Shell, looking at it through supply chain

 

16:01.660 --> 16:05.431

reconfigurations, and then also in the building out of strategic sectors.

 

16:05.464 --> 16:09.902

The key question

 

16:09.902 --> 16:14.039

is not just whether or not the system holds but how it

 

16:14.039 --> 16:18.110

evolves and how Canada can capture the most value from within it.

 

16:18.110 --> 16:20.312

Is there anything you'd just like to add as a final thought?

 

16:22.247 --> 16:26.352

I would just kind of reiterate Canada's strengths and that strong

 

16:26.352 --> 16:30.456

institutional stability. Getting back to what I do,

 

16:30.456 --> 16:32.491

what does a sovereign analyst do?

 

16:32.491 --> 16:37.796

Well, a sovereign analyst analyzes institutional strengths

 

16:37.796 --> 16:41.500

and also real economic growth prospects.

 

16:41.500 --> 16:45.004

Canada does that and does that in spades against its competitors.

 

16:45.004 --> 16:48.774

It offers strong institutional stability.

 

16:48.774 --> 16:52.878

It offers that resource availability and it also offers

 

16:52.878 --> 16:57.416

the direct integration into  an almost $600 million

 

16:57.416 --> 16:58.617

consumer market.

 

16:59.651 --> 17:03.689

This is one that is going to potentially be able to

 

17:03.689 --> 17:07.826

kind of boost Canada's potential growth

 

17:07.826 --> 17:11.630

long term economic prospects and lead into even stronger

 

17:12.664 --> 17:14.967

debt sustainability going forward.

 

17:14.967 --> 17:19.104

Heather Hagerty, it's such a treat to be able to hear your perspective

 

17:19.104 --> 17:21.340

and learn from you. Thank you for joining us.

 

17:22.374 --> 17:23.342

Thank you.

 

17:23.342 --> 17:25.978

Thanks for watching or listening to the Fidelity Connects

 

17:25.978 --> 17:30.282

podcast. Now if you haven't done so already, please subscribe to Fidelity

 

17:30.282 --> 17:33.652

Connects on your podcast platform of choice.

 

17:33.652 --> 17:36.488

And if you like what you're hearing, please leave a review or a five-star

 

17:36.488 --> 17:40.459

rating. Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are available by working with

 

17:40.459 --> 17:43.829

a financial advisor or through an online brokerage account.

 

17:43.829 --> 17:47.533

Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.

 

17:47.533 --> 17:51.370

While on Fidelity.ca, you can also find more information on future live

 

17:51.370 --> 17:55.507

webcasts. And don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn,

 

17:55.507 --> 17:56.809

and Instagram.

 

17:56.809 --> 17:59.678

We'll end today's show with a short disclaimer.

 

17:59.678 --> 18:03.515

The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants,

 

18:03.515 --> 18:07.453

and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or

 

18:07.453 --> 18:11.457

its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and should not

 

18:11.457 --> 18:13.992

be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice.

 

18:13.992 --> 18:16.295

It is not an offer to sell or buy.

 

18:16.295 --> 18:20.632

Or an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any entity or securities

 

18:20.632 --> 18:25.437

cited. Read a fund's prospectus before investing, funds are not guaranteed.

 

18:25.437 --> 18:29.007

Their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.

 

18:29.007 --> 18:31.343

Fees, expenses, and commissions are all associated

 

18:31.343 --> 18:33.145

with fund investments.

 

18:33.145 --> 18:35.747

Thanks again. We'll see you next time.

Listen to the podcast version