FidelityNow: Ilan Kolet’s rate decision reactions

[00:00:04.304]

This was absolutely the right decision to make, right?

[00:00:06.239]

So the Fed's goal, again, is to take incoming

[00:00:10.176]

information on inflation, which has fallen substantially

[00:00:14.514]

since its peak, it's not exactly where they'd like it, and signals on the

[00:00:18.418]

labour market, which, again is not amazing, but

[00:00:22.455]

not awful, right, sort of not unlike a, I say not

[00:00:26.393]

unlike a meal on an aeroplane, and take

[00:00:30.764]

those two bits of information and set monetary policy.

[00:00:34.801]

With an eye towards growth, economic stability, the labour market,

[00:00:39.139]

and inflation. And it was absolutely the right decision to make, I

[00:00:43.143]

believe, to remain on hold and pause

[00:00:47.680]

any further interest rate cuts or hikes,

[00:00:51.684]

for that matter, based on the data.

[00:00:54.854]

The much more concerning thing, as you alluded to, is political interference

[00:00:58.992]

in the Federal Reserve and monetary policymaking.

[00:01:00.994]

And let's not sugarcoat it.

[00:01:02.695]

All right, this is. You know, a serious investigation into the chair,

[00:01:06.633]

into other members of the Fed Board, political appointees, right?

[00:01:10.003]

So this is not what you wanna see.

[00:01:13.773]

Between myself, David Tulk, and David Wolff, we have about 20

[00:01:17.977]

years of combined experience at the Bank of Canada.

[00:01:21.848]

And the separation between the political function of government and

[00:01:25.985]

monetary policy is very deliberate.

[00:01:29.122]

And that's becoming a blurred line in the US.

[00:01:31.891]

In my assessment, both the Fed and even the Bank of Canada probably

[00:01:36.229]

are likely on hold for some time, right?

[00:01:39.165]

And that's because there's a tremendous amount of uncertainty right now, right.

[00:01:42.135]

So we have trade uncertainty, policy uncertainty,

[00:01:46.172]

interference in monetary policy, the functioning of monetary policy.

[00:01:52.946]

And later on that, geopolitical uncertainty and volatility

[00:01:56.883]

as well. Sometimes no decision is the best decision.

[00:02:00.353]

Right? And no decision is not no decision.

[00:02:02.956]

No decision is we've examined the flow of incoming information since

[00:02:07.293]

the last time we've met, and we've determined that the best

[00:02:11.364]

stance for monetary policy right now is to remain data dependent and

[00:02:16.503]

to keep things where they are, right, given the flow of of incoming

[00:02:20.240]

information. Again, I always like to say central banks don't have

[00:02:24.177]

some magical set of data that we don't.

[00:02:26.212]

They're looking at the same Bloomberg screens you and You're looking at and

[00:02:29.716]

assessing the economy versus their baseline and making the best decision

[00:02:33.987]

they can for the future of employment, inflation,

[00:02:38.525]

growth, et cetera. And so there are market

[00:02:42.662]

probabilities and forecasters who say, oh, I think the next rate cut or rate

[00:02:46.266]

hike is gonna be here or there. I would generally sort of fade any

[00:02:51.204]

table-pounding accuracy in rate decisions that

[00:02:55.341]

are towards the end of this year.

[00:02:57.577]

We don't know. Right?

[00:03:00.180]

As the landscape changes, so do the central bank forecast and so do the base

[00:03:04.117]

cases for those interest rate decisions.

[00:03:06.753]

But right now, the data dependent sort of hold steady

[00:03:10.857]

approach is the right approach to take.

[00:03:13.493]

You know, honestly, when I talk about central bank decisions to clients

[00:03:17.664]

across the country, I always mention the framework that

[00:03:21.601]

we should be thinking about when we examine a central bank decision is

[00:03:26.506]

much simpler than what's presented to us sometimes in the ink

[00:03:30.510]

spilled or the experts on TV, we

[00:03:34.847]

should handcuff ourselves to two variables, right?

[00:03:37.584]

So we should, and I talked about this at the start, we should think about

[00:03:40.119]

inflation and we should about unemployment.

[00:03:42.989]

Inflation, again, it was exceptionally high, right, a few years ago, it has

[00:03:46.693]

come down, it is moderated. It is roughly in the neighbourhood of

[00:03:50.897]

where central banks would want it to be.

[00:03:52.865]

Again, inflation measures the rate of change in the price, not the price level

[00:03:56.769]

itself. And the rate change in price, the growth rate of

[00:04:00.907]

prices now, is in the neighbourhood of where central banks would want it to be.

[00:04:05.211]

So call that a check mark or maybe a pencil.

[00:04:08.348]

And the other one is the labour market.

[00:04:10.883]

And again, the labour markets in both Canada and the U.S.

[00:04:15.154]

Is okay. So unemployment rates in Canada were somewhat elevated.

[00:04:18.625]

They have fallen. It looks like Canada job growth is sort of coming back now

[00:04:22.662]

a little bit since maybe Q2 of last year.

[00:04:25.999]

And in the US, you know, we have had declining rates of

[00:04:30.403]

job growth on a monthly basis, but we shouldn't expect the rate of job-growth

[00:04:34.474]

and the unemployment rate we had three years ago, right?

[00:04:36.676]

There is a break-even that will get successively lower.

[00:04:39.846]

There's a lot underneath that as well with population changes and

[00:04:43.783]

stuff. But again, if you look at inflation and you look at

[00:04:47.820]

unemployment. Again, the two most important factors for a central bank

[00:04:51.791]

and a central-bank decision, it indicates that the right stance right now

[00:04:55.728]

is to kind of stay where things are, take that data-dependent approach.