FOCUS 2026: Uncovering potential with micro-caps – Salim Hart

Salim Hart highlights promising areas of the micro-cap universe and the attributes he looks for in compelling businesses.

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

00:00.000 --> 00:06.406

Subtitles are AI Generated

 

00:06.940 --> 00:08.942

That was a rousing applause. That was nice.

 

00:08.942 --> 00:09.442

Appreciate that.

 

00:09.442 --> 00:11.211

Salim, good to be up here with you. A number of you have

 

00:11.211 --> 00:14.180

seen Salim speak before since

 

00:14.180 --> 00:16.983

Global Micro-Cap was launched but what you might not know

 

00:16.983 --> 00:19.986

is that he grew up between here and Chattanooga,

 

00:19.986 --> 00:21.421

Tennessee.

 

00:21.421 --> 00:22.422

What was the town?

 

00:23.123 --> 00:26.159

I did. I apologise for my raspy voice a little

 

00:26.192 --> 00:29.562

bit. I've been having a little too much fun in Nashville.

 

00:29.562 --> 00:32.799

Last night I talked a lot at dinner and we

 

00:32.799 --> 00:34.601

did Honky Tonk over on Broadway.

 

00:34.601 --> 00:36.503

You actually joined us for part of that.

 

00:36.503 --> 00:39.539

Then I've sampling a lot of George Dickel whiskey

 

00:39.572 --> 00:40.607

since I've being here.

 

00:42.142 --> 00:44.277

Shannon might need to put me on the first day for the next

 

00:44.277 --> 00:45.278

conference.

 

00:46.780 --> 00:49.215

I actually grew up in Tullahoma where George Dickel is

 

00:49.215 --> 00:51.818

based and I hadn't been back in 20 years so I flew in early

 

00:51.818 --> 00:55.155

on Sunday. I rented a car, drove by my old house

 

00:55.155 --> 00:58.158

and my elementary school, did a

 

00:58.158 --> 01:00.994

George Dickel tour because I was under 21 when I lived

 

01:00.994 --> 01:02.395

there.

 

01:02.395 --> 01:04.931

It's a little sad it's been bought by Diageo because it

 

01:04.931 --> 01:07.100

used to be this little micro-cap

 

01:08.234 --> 01:11.838

kind of distillery out in rural Tennessee.

 

01:11.838 --> 01:13.640

Jack Daniels was a little bit of the same way.

 

01:13.640 --> 01:15.175

It's been bought by Brown and Forman.

 

01:17.177 --> 01:19.746

Micro-caps that are good, they get bought, Glen.

 

01:19.746 --> 01:21.147

Well, we're going to talk about that.

 

01:21.147 --> 01:23.583

Funny, because I asked him that ...

 

01:23.583 --> 01:26.186

he was going on about this bourbon yesterday and I said is

 

01:26.186 --> 01:27.754

it a micro-cap stock?

 

01:27.754 --> 01:30.690

He said, no, it was bought by Diageo. I kind of felt like a

 

01:30.690 --> 01:32.459

fundamental analyst for a couple of minutes there.

 

01:32.459 --> 01:35.028

I won't send my resumé in, don't don't worry about that.

 

01:35.028 --> 01:38.064

It brings us to the point

 

01:38.064 --> 01:41.367

of this is about global micro-caps which sounds scary

 

01:41.367 --> 01:42.368

on first blush. What's fascinating

 

01:44.704 --> 01:47.774

to me is that the companies that are in the space that you

 

01:47.774 --> 01:51.044

analyze have products represented all around,

 

01:51.044 --> 01:52.412

and we're going to explore that today.

 

01:52.412 --> 01:53.413

It's pretty exciting.

 

01:54.714 --> 01:57.283

Yesterday we talked a lot about fundamental analysis, we

 

01:57.283 --> 01:59.819

talked about quantitative analysis.

 

01:59.819 --> 02:02.222

Fidelity, of course, having the fundamental, quantitative

 

02:02.222 --> 02:03.523

and technical.

 

02:03.523 --> 02:06.659

You represent a portfolio manager who looks at insights

 

02:06.659 --> 02:09.496

from fundamental and quantitative so it's a great – I'm

 

02:09.496 --> 02:12.398

glad that you're speaking today after we heard about so

 

02:12.398 --> 02:13.700

many of the resources yesterday.

 

02:13.700 --> 02:16.703

Why don't we start with you

 

02:16.703 --> 02:19.806

defining micro-cap because I'm sure it does make

 

02:19.806 --> 02:21.774

some people feel a little bit nervous.

 

02:22.775 --> 02:26.546

Just from a cap perspective, I

 

02:26.546 --> 02:29.616

tend to have a pretty broad range as I define micro-caps.

 

02:30.650 --> 02:32.619

If you look at the middle of the fund, the weighted median

 

02:32.652 --> 02:35.788

market cap, it's about a billion USD so about half the

 

02:35.788 --> 02:37.757

portfolio is smaller than that.

 

02:37.757 --> 02:40.727

I've owned a company as small as 18 million.

 

02:40.727 --> 02:43.897

Right now the biggest stock is about 9 or 9 billion, not

 

02:43.897 --> 02:47.167

because I bought it at that price but it's appreciated

 

02:47.167 --> 02:48.935

significantly so I don't have to sell it.

 

02:50.103 --> 02:53.306

I'd say the billion figure is a good middle number

 

02:53.306 --> 02:54.707

for the fund for people to go on.

 

02:54.707 --> 02:57.911

I tend to initiate positions in the bottom half of the MSCI

 

02:57.911 --> 03:00.547

World small-cap all the way down into the smallest of

 

03:00.547 --> 03:01.548

micro-caps.

 

03:01.848 --> 03:04.918

On the risk question, if there's one takeaway I would like

 

03:04.918 --> 03:08.221

people to home with is that micro-caps can

 

03:08.221 --> 03:10.590

be risky but they do not have to be risky.

 

03:10.590 --> 03:12.525

I'm trying to invest in them in a way

 

03:14.027 --> 03:16.129

that invests in high quality micro-caps.

 

03:16.129 --> 03:19.165

The dividend yield on the fund is

 

03:19.165 --> 03:22.168

actually 3.4% which many people are surprised

 

03:22.168 --> 03:25.171

at. It's doubled out of the S&P 500.

 

03:26.639 --> 03:30.410

I tend to invest in cheap micro-caps,

 

03:30.410 --> 03:33.947

high quality, low leverage, not speculative,

 

03:33.947 --> 03:36.216

a very consistent track record of profitability.

 

03:37.550 --> 03:40.553

I think if people know a neighbour or friend or

 

03:40.553 --> 03:44.090

even a client that has a small business they probably

 

03:44.090 --> 03:45.458

run it pretty conservatively.

 

03:45.458 --> 03:48.194

They don't lever up. They might have good years and bad

 

03:48.194 --> 03:51.464

years but they're probably

 

03:51.464 --> 03:54.133

making a lot of money and doing it pretty consistently over

 

03:54.133 --> 03:56.302

time. That's how I think about micro-cap investing.

 

03:56.302 --> 03:59.205

These are companies that are specialty companies and

 

03:59.205 --> 04:01.474

they're a little niche. They're not trying to be global

 

04:01.474 --> 04:05.044

necessarily or all over the world in many cases

 

04:05.044 --> 04:07.647

or try to do everything. They do a really good job at what

 

04:07.647 --> 04:10.350

they do and many actually have good management teams.

 

04:10.350 --> 04:13.419

That's kind of the first part of micro-cap

 

04:13.419 --> 04:14.087

investing.

 

04:14.087 --> 04:15.755

When we were out on the West coast, Glen, you had talked

 

04:15.755 --> 04:18.858

about the old Vancouver stock exchange which I hadn't

 

04:18.858 --> 04:22.061

heard of. The reason people think of micro-caps

 

04:22.061 --> 04:23.563

as risky is many of them are.

 

04:23.563 --> 04:25.999

The companies that listed there I think were often very

 

04:25.999 --> 04:28.901

speculative. Maybe they listed in Canada and were based in

 

04:28.901 --> 04:32.505

the Caymans and had mining operations in Chile and

 

04:32.505 --> 04:36.009

didn't have any revenues but if their gold deposits

 

04:36.009 --> 04:38.411

proved that they could get them out of the ground it would

 

04:38.411 --> 04:39.912

be a 10X.

 

04:39.912 --> 04:43.249

The problem is most of those companies go to zero and

 

04:43.249 --> 04:45.084

that's not the type of companies I invest in.

 

04:46.152 --> 04:49.122

The other key to micro-caps is diversification.

 

04:49.122 --> 04:52.191

Individually one micro-cap company can

 

04:52.191 --> 04:53.192

be very volatile.

 

04:54.160 --> 04:55.662

They're niche companies.

 

04:55.662 --> 04:58.631

I would not put a significant part of client's money in one

 

04:58.631 --> 04:59.632

micro-cap stock.

 

05:00.566 --> 05:03.736

But if you diversify over several hundred micro

 

05:03.736 --> 05:06.739

caps you kind of take out all that stock specific

 

05:06.739 --> 05:10.043

risk and are left with, if you buy good companies, a pretty

 

05:10.043 --> 05:13.346

high quality portfolio. So the MSCI World Micro-Cap Index,

 

05:13.346 --> 05:16.683

my benchmark, actually has a lower volatility than

 

05:16.683 --> 05:18.718

that of the MSC World mid and large-caps.

 

05:20.186 --> 05:21.287

Lower volatility profile, doesn't

 

05:23.356 --> 05:24.357

have to involve undue risk.

 

05:25.425 --> 05:28.094

You've just made everybody feel a lot better o that's good.

 

05:28.094 --> 05:31.564

I hope so. We have our three-year number in May

 

05:31.564 --> 05:33.199

coming up.

 

05:33.199 --> 05:34.734

I think we're rated medium right now.

 

05:34.734 --> 05:37.370

I don't really understand the Canadian risk system but they

 

05:37.370 --> 05:40.106

tell me if the vol's low enough maybe it can go down to a

 

05:40.106 --> 05:42.608

low risk rating which I think would be kind of cool.

 

05:42.608 --> 05:43.609

I don't know what it means but it sounds cool.

 

05:44.711 --> 05:46.379

Perhaps your wish will come true.

 

05:46.379 --> 05:50.016

Your performance, because as you suggested

 

05:50.016 --> 05:52.919

you'll be three years next May, I think when you launched

 

05:52.919 --> 05:56.155

we were in Beverly Hills

 

05:56.155 --> 05:59.392

when you launched at a due diligence

 

05:59.392 --> 06:02.061

What do you attribute the success to?

 

06:02.061 --> 06:03.963

I think it's really just about finding little niche

 

06:03.963 --> 06:06.833

companies that are off people's radar and that they're

 

06:06.833 --> 06:09.936

ignoring, whether they're too boring or they're not

 

06:09.936 --> 06:12.338

covered by brokers or they're just too illiquid for people

 

06:12.338 --> 06:13.339

to bother with.

 

06:14.974 --> 06:17.443

You've heard the old adage turning over every stone.

 

06:17.443 --> 06:20.880

I'm out in the woods far, far away turning over stones and

 

06:20.880 --> 06:22.715

companies that nobody else is looking at.

 

06:22.715 --> 06:25.318

I think that provides the key advantage.

 

06:28.554 --> 06:31.991

I think being able to

 

06:31.991 --> 06:34.994

go globally, invest in these kind of niche good

 

06:34.994 --> 06:38.331

companies and identify them is a big help in

 

06:38.331 --> 06:40.833

terms of generating alpha in areas other people aren't

 

06:40.833 --> 06:44.036

looking to. It's kind of easy to generate

 

06:44.036 --> 06:46.806

good returns in an up-market when everything is going up.

 

06:46.806 --> 06:50.076

I do encourage people not only to understand the

 

06:50.076 --> 06:53.079

profile and the risk of it but look at the actual return.

 

06:53.079 --> 06:55.314

I think seeing a Sharpe ratio of the fund is really

 

06:55.314 --> 06:58.418

helpful, that it actually has protected quite a bit on

 

06:58.418 --> 06:59.419

the downside.

 

07:00.052 --> 07:03.055

While the NASDAQ 100 might have been up

 

07:03.055 --> 07:06.225

20 or 30% some quarters or down 10% some

 

07:06.225 --> 07:07.293

quarters since launch.

 

07:07.293 --> 07:09.395

I think that kind of speaks to its overall

 

07:09.395 --> 07:11.464

ability to be an uncorrelated asset.

 

07:11.464 --> 07:13.966

It is actually very diversifying

 

07:15.168 --> 07:18.237

to areas that people are often very crowded in,

 

07:18.237 --> 07:19.705

large-cap, growth, US.

 

07:21.240 --> 07:24.343

The correlation to the NASDAQ, I think, is kind of low

 

07:24.343 --> 07:26.412

double-digits, like teens.

 

07:26.412 --> 07:29.348

It's a very good alpha producing strategy

 

07:29.348 --> 07:32.418

without undue risk and also uncorrelated to

 

07:32.418 --> 07:34.654

many of the other areas people are invested in.

 

07:34.654 --> 07:37.657

You talked about global diversity, that's in the name with

 

07:37.657 --> 07:40.359

Global Micro-Cap. Where are you finding opportunities

 

07:40.359 --> 07:41.360

today?

 

07:42.228 --> 07:44.497

I brought a slide with me.

 

07:44.497 --> 07:46.265

If I have to press the button we'll do that.

 

07:46.265 --> 07:48.401

It shows the geographic diversification.

 

07:48.401 --> 07:50.803

Not that one, the next one, please.

 

07:53.773 --> 07:56.876

I think this is a takeaway that people really should focus

 

07:56.876 --> 07:59.912

on. The really big

 

07:59.912 --> 08:02.815

bar you see that stands out there is the MSCI World

 

08:02.815 --> 08:05.718

Small-Cap Index. It's over 60% US.

 

08:06.719 --> 08:09.689

If you look at MSCI World, so

 

08:09.689 --> 08:11.724

global large-caps, it's over 70% US.

 

08:11.724 --> 08:14.694

The micro-cap benchmark, which is in green, is

 

08:14.694 --> 08:17.763

only about 30% US and my fund is

 

08:17.763 --> 08:19.031

about 20% US.

 

08:19.031 --> 08:21.901

I'm underweight the US by about a thousand basis points

 

08:21.901 --> 08:24.871

right now, one of the largest it's been,

 

08:24.871 --> 08:27.573

but also the key takeaway is that this is true global

 

08:27.573 --> 08:30.109

diversification. It's not just a global fund that has

 

08:30.109 --> 08:31.110

almost everything in the

 

08:34.213 --> 08:34.614

US.

 

08:34.614 --> 08:36.883

Kind of going from left to right Japan is the biggest

 

08:36.883 --> 08:37.884

weight in the fund.

 

08:38.784 --> 08:41.888

It was actually about a third of the fund about a year ago.

 

08:41.888 --> 08:44.257

It's come in a little bit but I still continue to like

 

08:44.257 --> 08:46.392

Japan quite a bit.

 

08:46.392 --> 08:48.895

It's the cheapest stocks in the developed world, still some

 

08:48.895 --> 08:51.497

of the easiest monetary policy in the developed world.

 

08:52.565 --> 08:55.701

Companies, some of which have half their market cap in cash

 

08:55.701 --> 08:57.270

on the balance sheet.

 

08:57.270 --> 08:59.572

The problem historically with Japan has been corporate

 

08:59.572 --> 09:02.408

governance and the management teams not really caring about

 

09:02.408 --> 09:05.711

shareholder returns. That is starting to change slowly

 

09:05.711 --> 09:07.013

but surely in Japan.

 

09:07.013 --> 09:09.882

They created a high ROE index.

 

09:09.882 --> 09:12.485

The government's gotten behind companies being more

 

09:12.485 --> 09:14.754

shareholder-friendly and you're actually seeing a lot more

 

09:14.754 --> 09:17.223

takeovers, private equity offers, activists in Japan.

 

09:17.223 --> 09:20.426

I think going from really terrible

 

09:20.426 --> 09:23.596

to okay corporate governance can really unlock

 

09:23.596 --> 09:27.166

a lot of value in Japan. That's an area I'm excited about.

 

09:27.166 --> 09:30.269

Then Europe, it looks like I'm about equal

 

09:30.269 --> 09:33.139

to Europe but this is the first time I've been neutral to

 

09:33.139 --> 09:36.275

overweight. If you take Europe and the UK together that's

 

09:36.275 --> 09:39.145

another roughly, I guess, quarter of the fund or so.

 

09:39.145 --> 09:41.247

That's kind of where I'm finding the most opportunities

 

09:41.247 --> 09:42.248

today.

 

09:44.116 --> 09:47.153

Japan is a great place to invest but it's

 

09:47.153 --> 09:50.156

had a good run. Europe, actually, year-over-year is about

 

09:50.156 --> 09:53.225

flat whereas most major geographies are up

 

09:53.225 --> 09:54.226

double-digits.

 

09:55.461 --> 09:58.397

Stocks have gotten cheaper and I think the issues are

 

09:58.397 --> 10:00.900

that they are affected by higher energy prices.

 

10:02.001 --> 10:04.737

They tend to kind of have more industrial economies.

 

10:04.737 --> 10:07.673

While the

 

10:07.707 --> 10:10.776

US, and then Asia recently, has been caught up in

 

10:10.776 --> 10:13.779

some of the AI tech trades, especially Asia with

 

10:13.779 --> 10:16.782

the hardware stocks, Europe just doesn't have as many

 

10:16.782 --> 10:19.385

kind of tech AI-related companies.

 

10:19.385 --> 10:22.088

A rising tide lifts all boats and Europe's been left behind

 

10:22.088 --> 10:24.624

a little bit. I'm finding a lot of opportunities there from

 

10:24.624 --> 10:26.993

a value perspective, from a contrarian perspective

 

10:28.260 --> 10:29.762

which is kind of something I like to do, basically

 

10:31.530 --> 10:33.866

buy fear or apathy and sell greed.

 

10:35.134 --> 10:38.104

When you do your filtration process on

 

10:38.104 --> 10:40.339

the 7,000 stocks or so that you're monitoring

 

10:41.540 --> 10:44.510

are you looking at it ... are you biassing geographically

 

10:44.510 --> 10:46.412

because you've talked very glowingly about a few of these

 

10:46.412 --> 10:49.849

markets, or are you

 

10:49.849 --> 10:52.918

selecting certain companies that tend to aggregate in

 

10:52.918 --> 10:53.919

those economies?

 

10:55.955 --> 10:57.790

It's all a bottoms-up process.

 

10:57.790 --> 11:00.960

I'm picking stocks and then when we come on stage and meet

 

11:00.960 --> 11:04.363

I have to say why is my Europe weight increasing

 

11:04.363 --> 11:05.765

so much?

 

11:05.765 --> 11:07.600

That's when I try to figure out why.

 

11:07.600 --> 11:09.935

It's not me going and saying, oh, suddenly Europe looks

 

11:09.935 --> 11:13.005

attractive. It's actually because I've been happening to

 

11:13.005 --> 11:15.741

find a lot more opportunities there and then I figure out a

 

11:15.741 --> 11:18.878

way to explain it. It's a bottoms-up stock picking process.

 

11:18.878 --> 11:20.246

Thank you for clarifying.

 

11:20.246 --> 11:23.149

Earlier in the year you talked about buying AI disruptors.

 

11:23.149 --> 11:25.351

Let's explore your thoughts on AI right now.

 

11:25.351 --> 11:28.487

That's the next slide I have that they put up and took down

 

11:28.487 --> 11:30.089

so they want to go back to that.

 

11:30.089 --> 11:31.691

This is actually fascinating.

 

11:31.691 --> 11:35.528

I've never shown the slide before because it's

 

11:35.528 --> 11:38.764

kind of a new thing. If you remember back in

 

11:38.764 --> 11:41.600

February, March, end of the first quarter there was a huge

 

11:41.600 --> 11:44.103

AI disruption sell-off in the market.

 

11:45.504 --> 11:49.075

This slide isn't just generically showing that.

 

11:49.075 --> 11:52.144

The green line is my benchmark, the MSCI World

 

11:52.144 --> 11:55.414

Micro-Cap, the blue line is actually a basket of 20 stocks

 

11:55.414 --> 11:57.817

that I bought in Global Micro-Cap at the end of the first

 

11:57.817 --> 12:01.187

quarter. This wasn't just software stocks

 

12:01.187 --> 12:03.456

which got sold off a lot, many of which were software

 

12:03.456 --> 12:06.525

stocks, it was also trucking logistics,

 

12:06.525 --> 12:09.562

insurance brokers, real estate brokers, really anything

 

12:09.562 --> 12:12.665

that dealt with data and logistics that suddenly the

 

12:12.665 --> 12:15.367

market said AI was gonna replace all these businesses,

 

12:15.367 --> 12:18.637

which I and my analysts

 

12:18.637 --> 12:21.340

that work with me all thought this is kind of strange

 

12:21.340 --> 12:24.477

because ultimately many of these companies

 

12:24.477 --> 12:27.113

are actually the ones who could benefit the most.

 

12:27.113 --> 12:30.382

Yes, it might disrupt them, some of them, but actually

 

12:30.382 --> 12:33.853

a trucking logistics company that has all the data actually

 

12:33.853 --> 12:36.889

could use AI a lot more effectively than a generic

 

12:36.889 --> 12:39.792

company that's kind of starting up and trying to use AI.

 

12:39.792 --> 12:43.095

We actually felt like the risks were at worst neutral

 

12:43.095 --> 12:46.098

and maybe actually beneficial to this

 

12:46.098 --> 12:49.201

kind of basket of stocks that was being sold off.

 

12:49.201 --> 12:51.437

what you actually saw is the market ...

 

12:51.470 --> 12:53.706

maybe it was the situational awareness hedge fund that blew

 

12:53.706 --> 12:56.876

up, maybe it with shorting baskets and baskets of

 

12:56.876 --> 12:58.210

these and ultimately had to cover, but

 

13:00.346 --> 13:03.516

kind of through, I guess this is the end of August, this

 

13:03.516 --> 13:06.585

basket of AI losers has rebounded

 

13:06.585 --> 13:08.988

and is kind of a market performer year-to-date now.

 

13:08.988 --> 13:12.091

The key is to be opportunistic, which is what

 

13:12.091 --> 13:15.060

I like to do, and buy the stocks when there's fear,

 

13:15.060 --> 13:17.696

when there's this kind of massive

 

13:20.566 --> 13:23.636

trade that's encompassing lots of different

 

13:23.636 --> 13:27.139

companies, that's maybe fundamental based

 

13:27.139 --> 13:29.275

but a lot more hype than reality.

 

13:29.275 --> 13:32.278

I try to be opportunistic in these instances

 

13:32.278 --> 13:33.679

and take the other side of that.

 

13:33.679 --> 13:37.316

A great example

 

13:37.316 --> 13:40.653

in this that I like to highlight was Simulations Plus.

 

13:40.653 --> 13:44.490

It's a company that was at the epicentre of this trade.

 

13:44.490 --> 13:48.027

It dealt with healthcare, data, clinical trials,

 

13:48.027 --> 13:50.830

drug discovery. They made software for doing those types of

 

13:50.830 --> 13:53.866

things. It was software and data and

 

13:53.866 --> 13:55.668

healthcare and clinical trials.

 

13:55.668 --> 13:59.405

Ultimately it rebounded and got bought by private equity.

 

13:59.405 --> 14:02.508

These are real businesses, they actually do really good

 

14:02.508 --> 14:05.644

things and they're actually possibly beneficiaries

 

14:05.644 --> 14:06.779

of AI and not losers.

 

14:08.080 --> 14:11.317

You are a very quantitatively minded person.

 

14:11.317 --> 14:14.353

How do you explore that 7,000

 

14:14.386 --> 14:17.323

universe stock pool and

 

14:17.323 --> 14:19.458

make decisions on what goes into the portfolio?

 

14:21.994 --> 14:23.996

It's a complicated process.

 

14:25.397 --> 14:27.499

I try to use every tool in the toolbox.

 

14:28.534 --> 14:31.637

That includes fundamental analysis, quantitative

 

14:31.637 --> 14:34.607

models that I've built, some of which I built when I worked

 

14:34.607 --> 14:37.743

with Joel Tillinghast managing Global Intrinsic Value and

 

14:37.743 --> 14:40.980

Low Price Stock Fund, and then trading very carefully to

 

14:40.980 --> 14:43.015

try to get very low trading costs.

 

14:43.015 --> 14:46.085

On the fundamental side our analysts actually

 

14:46.085 --> 14:49.455

write thousands of notes every month

 

14:49.455 --> 14:51.991

on companies all the way from large-caps down to

 

14:51.991 --> 14:52.992

micro-caps.

 

14:53.425 --> 14:55.928

Sometimes they'll go to a conference and meet with 30 or 40

 

14:55.928 --> 14:58.964

companies, put a note in the system with a paragraph

 

14:58.964 --> 15:00.132

or two on each company.

 

15:01.200 --> 15:04.603

What I built in 2023 was actually an agentic AI process

 

15:04.603 --> 15:06.939

to wake up three times a day and read all these notes.

 

15:08.240 --> 15:11.343

Joel famously would go with his stack of research notes

 

15:11.343 --> 15:13.646

often to broker events.

 

15:13.646 --> 15:16.315

There's a story he went to a rock concert and he was in the

 

15:16.315 --> 15:19.118

front row with his research notes reading the research

 

15:19.118 --> 15:21.120

notes. I no longer have to do that.

 

15:21.120 --> 15:23.622

I have a much more efficient way to kind of consume all

 

15:23.622 --> 15:25.491

those thousands of research notes.

 

15:26.558 --> 15:28.861

What I like to do is the fundamental analysts are really

 

15:28.861 --> 15:31.463

good at being forward looking, analyzing the industry

 

15:31.463 --> 15:34.333

structure, meeting with management teams, saying if they're

 

15:34.333 --> 15:37.836

good or bad or not, understanding the competitive dynamics.

 

15:39.605 --> 15:41.240

They can identify good companies.

 

15:41.240 --> 15:42.675

So that's kind of the base case.

 

15:42.675 --> 15:45.577

Then I feed their sentiment, which I get from the large

 

15:45.577 --> 15:48.180

language models reading their research notes, and combine

 

15:48.180 --> 15:50.716

that with my quantitative process, which is really good at

 

15:50.716 --> 15:54.086

identifying the right times to buy and sell,

 

15:54.086 --> 15:56.822

keeping guardrails on the portfolio to have a value,

 

15:56.822 --> 15:59.091

quality, discipline, companies that are returning to

 

15:59.091 --> 16:01.327

capital shareholders. All those kind of statistical

 

16:01.327 --> 16:04.563

measures are easy to capture from financial data.

 

16:04.563 --> 16:07.700

I also use many other short interest data insider buying.

 

16:07.700 --> 16:10.169

We have a corporate events model that has companies that

 

16:10.169 --> 16:13.906

are filing late. There's probably about 100 different

 

16:13.906 --> 16:17.109

data points that I'm calculating across

 

16:17.109 --> 16:19.578

7,000+ stocks twice a day.

 

16:19.578 --> 16:21.814

That's a million and a half data points I'm looking at

 

16:21.847 --> 16:25.884

every day, in addition to feeding in the fundamental views.

 

16:25.884 --> 16:28.554

That gives me the timing to say, hey, these trucking

 

16:28.554 --> 16:31.357

companies and these insurance brokers and these software,

 

16:31.357 --> 16:32.858

they're all blowing up.

 

16:32.858 --> 16:35.561

Suddenl,y the valuation has come in significantly, a lot of

 

16:35.561 --> 16:38.163

these, on good companies that our analysts like.

 

16:38.163 --> 16:39.965

Combining those two things I think is

 

16:41.667 --> 16:44.670

really beneficial because our financials analyst who covers

 

16:44.670 --> 16:47.806

banks in Norway has a really

 

16:47.806 --> 16:50.476

difficult time. He knows his companies really well but can

 

16:50.476 --> 16:53.112

he really compare it to an auto parts company in Japan and

 

16:53.112 --> 16:55.280

say which should you buy today?

 

16:55.280 --> 16:57.516

That's kind of my job as the portfolio manager.

 

16:57.516 --> 17:00.285

Through implementation with our trading desk

 

17:01.587 --> 17:03.889

every day I put in three to four times the number of orders

 

17:03.889 --> 17:05.791

I actually expect to get executed.

 

17:05.791 --> 17:07.926

I'm using tight limit orders.

 

17:07.926 --> 17:10.062

Every now and then we have some opportunities to actually

 

17:10.062 --> 17:11.897

buy with a negative transaction cost.

 

17:12.965 --> 17:15.768

A week and a half ago there were actually three companies I

 

17:15.768 --> 17:17.703

owned where brokers came to us.

 

17:17.703 --> 17:19.872

We're often the first call they make when they have a large

 

17:19.872 --> 17:22.374

block that they need to trade and we can often buy at a

 

17:22.374 --> 17:25.477

discount. There was a company I already owned, I was

 

17:25.477 --> 17:28.647

looking to add more. I doubled the position at a 9%

 

17:28.647 --> 17:31.183

discount because Fidelity stepped up and bought a large

 

17:31.216 --> 17:33.852

block of stock, me and some other portfolio managers at the

 

17:33.852 --> 17:34.853

firm.

 

17:35.054 --> 17:38.190

A negative trading cost day is a very happy day for me

 

17:38.190 --> 17:39.825

and for our shareholders.

 

17:39.825 --> 17:42.261

I try to combine all those things with all the moving

 

17:42.261 --> 17:44.730

pieces across 7,000 stocks.

 

17:44.730 --> 17:47.766

Most portfolio managers of Fidelity consider themselves

 

17:47.766 --> 17:49.268

stock pickers.

 

17:49.268 --> 17:51.503

I like to think of myself more like air traffic control.

 

17:51.503 --> 17:54.606

There's a lot of planes in the air wanting to land and

 

17:54.606 --> 17:57.276

take off, there's the ground equipment and the passengers

 

17:57.276 --> 17:59.945

and the weather and the wind, there's just a lot moving

 

17:59.945 --> 18:02.414

pieces. I'm trying to kind of do everything and keep

 

18:02.414 --> 18:05.050

everything moving without too many casualties.

 

18:05.050 --> 18:08.053

The list of signals that you look for, it makes me think of

 

18:08.053 --> 18:11.423

Gil Haddad yesterday from QRI, one of your colleagues,

 

18:11.423 --> 18:14.059

talking about the myriad of signals.

 

18:14.059 --> 18:16.628

That's gonna keep adding up as well.

 

18:16.628 --> 18:19.865

You utilize that, you utilize the fundamental analysts

 

18:19.865 --> 18:22.201

for all of their research reports, as you said.

 

18:22.201 --> 18:24.770

You process that through your models.

 

18:24.770 --> 18:27.940

You travel the world but what I was interested that

 

18:27.940 --> 18:30.175

you told me once was you don't travel the world to go and

 

18:30.175 --> 18:32.611

visit companies because you rely on the army of people to

 

18:32.611 --> 18:33.946

do that.

 

18:33.946 --> 18:35.447

You visit the traders.

 

18:35.447 --> 18:36.748

That's a very important part of your process.

 

18:36.748 --> 18:39.051

Absolutely. I've been to our London, our Tokyo, our Hong

 

18:39.051 --> 18:41.954

Kong offices and I spend about half the time sitting down

 

18:41.954 --> 18:44.389

with the analysts and kind of combing through their

 

18:44.389 --> 18:47.226

micro-cap ideas, things they've published on as well as

 

18:47.226 --> 18:49.728

things they haven't, and then half the time sitting with

 

18:49.728 --> 18:52.264

our traders and trying to find liquidity strategies to be

 

18:52.264 --> 18:54.500

able to source liquidity cheaply.

 

18:54.500 --> 18:57.069

Ultimately, in the micro-cap space you don't want to

 

18:57.069 --> 19:00.105

destroy the alpha that you're earning by

 

19:00.105 --> 19:02.641

trading. You do have to be very careful.

 

19:02.641 --> 19:05.611

That's probably what I spend a third

 

19:05.611 --> 19:08.347

of my time doing day-to-day is just kind of managing that

 

19:08.347 --> 19:11.049

order flow and kind of figuring out what to buy and at what

 

19:11.049 --> 19:13.418

prices and how to trade them and work with our trading desk

 

19:13.418 --> 19:14.853

to do that.

 

19:14.853 --> 19:17.856

You also like to look for boring companies, ones that

 

19:17.856 --> 19:19.725

are off people's radar. Give us a few examples.

 

19:23.562 --> 19:26.632

If you were to put up the top 10 I feel like a lot of

 

19:26.632 --> 19:27.633

these are really boring.

 

19:28.534 --> 19:30.169

The first one, Sabre Insurance, it's a quite

 

19:32.871 --> 19:36.108

small auto insurance company

 

19:36.108 --> 19:37.109

in the UK.

 

19:39.344 --> 19:42.381

They're one of the smallest in the industry so they

 

19:42.381 --> 19:44.616

do kind of have a niche in their little space.

 

19:46.285 --> 19:49.354

Post-COVID a lot of car insurance companies,

 

19:49.354 --> 19:51.423

auto insurance went through a tough time because there was

 

19:51.456 --> 19:54.626

a lot inflation and they had written premiums

 

19:54.626 --> 19:56.828

at lower prices. As kind of pretty

 

19:58.697 --> 20:01.700

high inflation happened they had trouble paying off

 

20:01.700 --> 20:04.169

all the claims because it was a lot more expensive to

 

20:04.169 --> 20:07.206

repair cars. A lot of auto insurance companies went

 

20:07.206 --> 20:10.275

through a really poor cycle

 

20:10.275 --> 20:11.543

for about two to three years.

 

20:12.578 --> 20:14.179

Now they're starting to come out of that.

 

20:14.179 --> 20:15.647

They've priced their policies well.

 

20:15.647 --> 20:17.816

Competition in the market has dropped off.

 

20:17.816 --> 20:20.953

When I bought it the stock was yielding 8% to 9%, it's

 

20:20.953 --> 20:23.956

gone up a bit and now it's yielding about 7% but is

 

20:23.956 --> 20:26.091

still trading at a 10 times P/E which is reccently

 

20:27.793 --> 20:29.728

cheaper than some of their competitors.

 

20:29.728 --> 20:33.332

Beazley recently got bought out at a 30% premium to that

 

20:33.332 --> 20:35.834

so there's some buyout potential here but that's not

 

20:35.834 --> 20:39.004

necessarily how I'm investing

 

20:40.239 --> 20:43.041

in the stock to kind of predict the buyouts.

 

20:43.041 --> 20:45.777

I'm just investing in Sabre, a good company with a good

 

20:45.777 --> 20:47.813

pricing cycle coming up and profits should come.

 

20:47.813 --> 20:50.482

They've been releasing a lot of reserves and paying out a

 

20:50.482 --> 20:53.318

lot their capital. Jst a great boring stock that I think

 

20:53.318 --> 20:54.853

can compound over time.

 

20:54.853 --> 20:57.990

Do you want to talk as far as disclosed companies

 

20:57.990 --> 21:00.592

areas that you've got pretty high conviction in?

 

21:00.592 --> 21:02.127

Yeah, a lot of the stocks on this list ...

 

21:02.127 --> 21:05.564

I tend to run a pretty flat portfolio so

 

21:05.564 --> 21:08.300

a lot them kind of end up in the top 10 because they've

 

21:08.300 --> 21:11.136

gone up a lot. They tend to be the more liquid, some of the

 

21:11.136 --> 21:12.571

larger market cap stocks.

 

21:14.106 --> 21:15.641

I just have a question for you, Glen.

 

21:15.641 --> 21:18.410

Do you like airline food and do you look forward to your

 

21:18.410 --> 21:20.679

flight today or tomorrow so you can eat the food?

 

21:20.679 --> 21:22.381

No, not at all.

 

21:22.381 --> 21:24.349

It's good to know. That's actually the first time ...

 

21:24.349 --> 21:26.418

every time I get up here  I ask you a question and you've

 

21:26.418 --> 21:28.487

never actually answered it except for today.

 

21:29.688 --> 21:31.657

You answered your first question for me today.

 

21:34.026 --> 21:37.062

One stock that I think is quite timely now,

 

21:37.062 --> 21:40.098

because it's been hit by high fuel

 

21:40.098 --> 21:43.135

costs and the travel industry and the airline stocks have

 

21:43.135 --> 21:46.738

been a bit hit, is a company called Do&Co.

 

21:46.738 --> 21:49.574

It's spelled D-O ampersand C-O.

 

21:50.842 --> 21:53.945

They're in the business of making premium,

 

21:53.945 --> 21:55.914

fresh, healthy food for airlines.

 

21:57.349 --> 22:00.419

It's not an oxymoron, it's actually true.

 

22:00.419 --> 22:02.754

I talked about this stock at some of the events in the

 

22:02.754 --> 22:05.991

spring when oil prices first spiked on the

 

22:05.991 --> 22:08.427

Iran war. Now they've spiked again so the stock has pulled

 

22:08.427 --> 22:11.396

back. It's one of those times when great

 

22:11.396 --> 22:14.499

company but the market's,

 

22:14.499 --> 22:17.669

probably rightly so, pricing in some short term headwinds

 

22:17.669 --> 22:19.137

to the travel industry and to airlines.

 

22:21.573 --> 22:24.009

Co&Co has a premium product. They've been growing

 

22:24.009 --> 22:27.112

double-digits for 10 or 20 years.

 

22:29.214 --> 22:30.549

Our analyst loves it.

 

22:30.549 --> 22:33.685

I actually brought a picture to

 

22:33.685 --> 22:35.821

share with you. Our analyst has done some great work on

 

22:35.821 --> 22:39.324

this. If you think of Gategroup and Sky Chef,

 

22:39.324 --> 22:40.959

they're some of the traditional companies. You might see

 

22:40.959 --> 22:43.795

their trucks servicing the planes but they're more like

 

22:43.795 --> 22:45.464

distribution companies.

 

22:45.464 --> 22:47.699

They don't actually make food, they just kind of deliver

 

22:47.699 --> 22:50.836

some calories to the plane to get you by.

 

22:50.836 --> 22:53.805

Do&Co is taking significant market share from these legacy

 

22:53.805 --> 22:57.175

players and they just keep winning contracts.

 

22:57.175 --> 23:00.178

I brought this picture I

 

23:00.178 --> 23:02.481

thought you'd like. I don't know if everybody can see it

 

23:02.481 --> 23:05.917

but it's basically a mouse in

 

23:05.917 --> 23:07.986

a bread basket, apparently.

 

23:07.986 --> 23:09.187

You can Google this.

 

23:09.187 --> 23:10.956

It says Air Canada at the bottom, I think.

 

23:10.956 --> 23:14.126

No, this is an American, apparently, out of Heathrow.

 

23:15.427 --> 23:19.264

This was not Do&Co but they benefited from this.

 

23:19.264 --> 23:21.166

You can Google it, this is public information.

 

23:21.166 --> 23:24.336

Our analyst has kind of done some sleuthing to figure

 

23:24.336 --> 23:27.406

out that Do&Co may have gotten some American

 

23:27.406 --> 23:30.208

Airlines work as they've tried to upgrade their food

 

23:30.208 --> 23:32.110

company. They may be getting the Chicago Hub.

 

23:32.110 --> 23:35.714

Do&Co does a lot of work for

 

23:35.714 --> 23:38.417

British Airways out of Heathrow already, Turkish Airlines.

 

23:39.718 --> 23:43.288

A year or two ago they got the Delta Hub in Boston.

 

23:43.288 --> 23:44.823

I'm usually a pretty frugal person.

 

23:44.823 --> 23:47.259

I don't like to spend a lot my own money or Fidelity's

 

23:47.259 --> 23:49.661

money so I don't often fly business class.

 

23:49.661 --> 23:53.064

But on a trip last spring out of Boston

 

23:53.064 --> 23:55.367

I was like, okay, I'm going to buy a business class seat so

 

23:55.367 --> 23:56.968

I can try the food from Do&Co.

 

23:59.304 --> 24:01.907

The fundamental work isn't something I do very often but it

 

24:01.907 --> 24:04.676

checked all the boxes from the analyst, from the quant

 

24:04.676 --> 24:07.078

models, very consistent, high quality company generating

 

24:07.078 --> 24:08.413

good free cashflow.

 

24:08.413 --> 24:10.916

Let me check it out. I flew Delta.

 

24:10.916 --> 24:13.919

I was going to Edmonton at the time to do a Fidelity

 

24:13.919 --> 24:14.920

Canada event.

 

24:16.421 --> 24:19.624

I got on for breakfast, I saw the Do& Co truck servicing

 

24:19.624 --> 24:22.227

my plane so I knew I was in the right place.

 

24:22.227 --> 24:23.495

The food was amazing.

 

24:23.495 --> 24:26.565

I had this smoked salmon bagel and a little

 

24:26.565 --> 24:29.301

lemon flavour to the smoked salmon and the cream cheese.

 

24:29.301 --> 24:32.037

You wouldn't think cream cheese makes a big difference but

 

24:32.037 --> 24:34.606

it was like the freshest, best tasting cream cheese I've

 

24:34.606 --> 24:36.608

ever had. It was just a wonderful breakfast.

 

24:36.608 --> 24:38.844

I got off the plane very happy.

 

24:38.844 --> 24:41.346

In Minneapolis-St. Paul, because there's no direct flights,

 

24:41.346 --> 24:42.347

I switched to WestJet.

 

24:44.449 --> 24:45.917

That was not a good experience.

 

24:47.452 --> 24:47.619

How was the cream cheese?

 

24:47.619 --> 24:50.021

My son can make better pasta than I had on WestJet.

 

24:51.289 --> 24:54.726

I do think Do&Co has a really good product.

 

24:54.726 --> 24:56.828

Not a whole lot of other people are doing this and the legacy

 

24:56.828 --> 24:59.498

players are just trapped in the old way.

 

24:59.498 --> 25:01.566

They haven't been able to evolve enough.

 

25:02.634 --> 25:05.237

The stock's a little bit more expensive than I like to buy.

 

25:05.237 --> 25:08.139

It's kind of a mid to high teens P/E ratio but they have

 

25:08.139 --> 25:11.076

the growth to substantiate that and a good product.

 

25:11.076 --> 25:13.211

I encourage everybody to fly out of Delta next time you're

 

25:13.211 --> 25:13.879

in Boston.

 

25:13.879 --> 25:15.981

And avoid this picture.

 

25:15.981 --> 25:17.048

That's right.

 

25:17.048 --> 25:19.985

When we look at that top 10, I'm sure everybody has heard

 

25:19.985 --> 25:20.986

of Watches of Switzerland.

 

25:22.153 --> 25:24.155

There's a couple of names, Crocs, that stand out.

 

25:24.155 --> 25:26.825

The other companies are more obscure to many of us, I'm

 

25:26.825 --> 25:29.794

sure. What happens when those companies become greater

 

25:29.794 --> 25:30.795

than a micro-cap?

 

25:31.730 --> 25:34.966

Is it in the prospectus that you have divest of them?

 

25:34.966 --> 25:37.269

That's why I mentioned some of the market caps you might

 

25:37.269 --> 25:39.738

see in the fund. I think the biggest is actually nine

 

25:39.771 --> 25:42.407

billion right now but it's just because it's gone up a lot

 

25:42.407 --> 25:43.575

and I don't have to sell it.

 

25:44.976 --> 25:48.146

Two years ago I bought a lot of cheap Japanese

 

25:48.146 --> 25:52.417

banks and they've all gone up singles,

 

25:52.417 --> 25:53.718

triples, things like that because

 

25:55.854 --> 25:58.690

interest rates have come up. Kind of buying cheap stocks

 

25:58.690 --> 26:02.093

you have that optionality. I think Joel, famously,

 

26:02.093 --> 26:05.230

bought Monster Beverage when it was Hansen Natural as a

 

26:05.230 --> 26:08.433

micro-cap and it went up 75,000%

 

26:08.433 --> 26:10.335

over 25 years until he retired.

 

26:11.937 --> 26:15.173

If we can ever have a 40 million

 

26:15.173 --> 26:18.209

micro-cap stock go to a 100 billion market cap in the

 

26:18.209 --> 26:21.313

fund that would be a great celebration for

 

26:21.313 --> 26:22.314

shareholders.

 

26:22.881 --> 26:24.282

Don't be afraid to see that.

 

26:24.282 --> 26:26.651

I'm not initiating positions in the larger ones but I will

 

26:26.651 --> 26:29.621

let them run if they're still good companies and still

 

26:29.621 --> 26:30.622

decently valued.

 

26:31.323 --> 26:33.658

Excuse the pun but I know you really value your time

 

26:33.692 --> 26:36.728

working with Joel Tillinghast as co-manager, and I know

 

26:36.728 --> 26:38.430

that you still are connected with him.

 

26:38.430 --> 26:40.165

What are some of the lessons that you learned from working

 

26:40.165 --> 26:41.166

with Joel?

 

26:42.200 --> 26:45.437

I think it's just to have a process, stick with

 

26:45.437 --> 26:48.373

it. I think we're both a little bit

 

26:48.373 --> 26:50.342

unemotional when it comes to investing.

 

26:50.342 --> 26:52.711

I think there's probably a diagnosis for that but we

 

26:52.711 --> 26:54.913

haven't officially been diagnosed.

 

26:54.913 --> 26:57.616

My wife complains that I'm a little too logical and too

 

26:57.616 --> 27:00.685

rational and too regimented but I think when you're a value

 

27:00.685 --> 27:03.321

investor, when you are in these kinds of stocks you really

 

27:03.321 --> 27:06.224

can't get sidetracked by stories.

 

27:06.224 --> 27:09.260

So it's really about, yes, it's great if it

 

27:09.260 --> 27:12.030

has a good story but really also investing on the numbers

 

27:12.030 --> 27:14.466

and not being influenced by emotion.

 

27:14.466 --> 27:16.368

I think that's a big fact.

 

27:16.368 --> 27:19.638

I also think being a value manager is a certain

 

27:19.638 --> 27:20.705

personality type.

 

27:21.873 --> 27:24.943

When I joined Fidelity there was the joke that

 

27:24.943 --> 27:27.979

the growth managers drive to work, or take cabs

 

27:27.979 --> 27:31.383

at the time before Uber, and the value managers

 

27:31.383 --> 27:34.452

walk to work or take public transportation.

 

27:34.452 --> 27:36.354

I was like, okay. I looked around, I was like, that's kind

 

27:36.354 --> 27:38.356

of right. Joel actually didn't own a car and walked to

 

27:38.356 --> 27:41.860

work. I have one 2015 Honda CR-V

 

27:41.860 --> 27:43.294

for my whole family.

 

27:45.063 --> 27:46.464

I tend to live very frugally.

 

27:46.464 --> 27:48.233

I love to find deals.

 

27:48.233 --> 27:50.301

One of my favourite things to do each week is to look at

 

27:50.301 --> 27:52.871

the grocery store ads and see what's on sale and plan our

 

27:52.871 --> 27:55.173

menu for the week because I'm finding a deal.

 

27:55.173 --> 27:57.575

I found out Joel used coupons. It's actually not worth our

 

27:57.575 --> 28:00.245

time but we really enjoy the hunt, right?

 

28:00.245 --> 28:02.113

So I'm hunting for micro-caps.

 

28:02.113 --> 28:03.615

I really like finding value.

 

28:06.651 --> 28:09.788

I like to find win-win situations, finding something

 

28:09.821 --> 28:12.891

that's cheap, might be high

 

28:12.891 --> 28:14.559

quality, might actually be better.

 

28:14.559 --> 28:16.194

That trip I took to Edmonton,

 

28:18.063 --> 28:20.398

everybody else was flying to Calgary the next day for an

 

28:20.398 --> 28:22.434

event we had to do. I took the Red Arrow bus

 

28:23.535 --> 28:25.336

because I did my research.

 

28:25.336 --> 28:28.206

I was like t's a little bit cheaper, not a lot, but I get

 

28:28.206 --> 28:31.076

my own big seat. I get free Wi-Fi.

 

28:31.076 --> 28:32.777

I don't have to take an Uber on each end.

 

28:32.777 --> 28:35.580

I just walked from the convention centre to the bus

 

28:35.580 --> 28:38.650

terminal and then to my hotel in downtown Calgary, downtown

 

28:38.650 --> 28:39.651

to downtown.

 

28:40.418 --> 28:43.421

The other folks that flew had turbulence, their flight was

 

28:43.421 --> 28:46.191

late, they have to go through security and I was just

 

28:46.191 --> 28:49.260

enjoying the countryside between Edmonton and

 

28:49.260 --> 28:52.464

Calgary sitting in style on

 

28:52.464 --> 28:55.433

the bus with free snacks in the back by

 

28:55.433 --> 28:56.067

the bathroom.

 

28:56.067 --> 28:57.068

Were they from Do&Co?

 

28:58.837 --> 29:01.239

No, it was not premium snacks.

 

29:01.239 --> 29:03.575

Free bottled water, it was nice.

 

29:03.575 --> 29:06.711

Very good. Let's talk about resiliency, or lack of, for

 

29:06.711 --> 29:09.681

micro-cap stocks when it comes to trade disruptions.

 

29:10.915 --> 29:12.717

The resiliency in terms of...

 

29:12.717 --> 29:14.252

Are they resilient or are they not?

 

29:14.252 --> 29:16.421

I mean, you consider what's happening between Canada and

 

29:16.421 --> 29:16.454

the United States or all around the world.

 

29:16.454 --> 29:19.324

I think we need big risk-off periods in the market.

 

29:19.324 --> 29:22.727

People are actually surprised that micro-caps don't

 

29:22.727 --> 29:26.664

often go down the most because what do people sell first

 

29:26.664 --> 29:28.066

when they need to raise cash?

 

29:28.066 --> 29:30.201

It's their largest, most liquid positions.

 

29:30.201 --> 29:33.138

They're not suddenly trying to sell their micro-cap stocks

 

29:33.138 --> 29:35.340

that is gonna take them weeks to sell.

 

29:35.340 --> 29:37.642

They're selling the things they can move in a few hours or

 

29:37.642 --> 29:38.777

a day, right?

 

29:40.545 --> 29:42.847

Kind of like private equity where they value it

 

29:42.847 --> 29:45.350

occasionally, micro-caps often trade by appointment

 

29:46.518 --> 29:49.687

and don't necessarily have as

 

29:49.687 --> 29:52.390

much volatility day-to-day as you might expect.

 

29:53.825 --> 29:56.895

Often we hear that even small-cap stocks are

 

29:56.895 --> 29:59.731

very vulnerable, very elastic relative to interest rates.

 

29:59.731 --> 30:03.334

Rates have really skyrocketed.

 

30:03.334 --> 30:06.271

How is the resiliency of the 7,000 stocks that you look

 

30:06.271 --> 30:07.939

at on the micro side?

 

30:07.939 --> 30:09.974

I think it's a little bit of a misnomer.

 

30:09.974 --> 30:13.211

I do think stocks trade more on earnings than they do on

 

30:13.211 --> 30:16.247

rates. The reason that they tend to trade down with rates

 

30:16.247 --> 30:18.850

isn't necessarily that there's a better alternative that

 

30:18.850 --> 30:20.718

people are gonna start buying bonds instead of stocks,

 

30:20.718 --> 30:22.487

which happens a little but at the margin.

 

30:22.487 --> 30:25.523

I think is more that higher rates tend to,

 

30:25.523 --> 30:28.126

on average, portend a slowdown in the economy and that's

 

30:28.126 --> 30:30.328

when all stocks get affected not just micro-caps.

 

30:30.328 --> 30:33.364

If you're buying companies

 

30:33.364 --> 30:35.767

with net cash balance sheets that don't have a lot of

 

30:35.767 --> 30:38.970

leverage like I am interest rates aren't necessarily a

 

30:38.970 --> 30:42.140

huge kind of day-to-day driver for those stocks.

 

30:42.140 --> 30:45.410

In theory, the Japan micro-cap that has 50%

 

30:45.410 --> 30:47.545

of their market cap in cash will actually benefit from

 

30:47.545 --> 30:50.315

higher rates because now suddenly they're earning interest

 

30:50.315 --> 30:51.249

on their balance.

 

30:51.249 --> 30:53.651

So that's probably the key, as you said, you look at the

 

30:53.651 --> 30:55.420

balance sheet and if there's high leverage that's going to

 

30:55.420 --> 30:58.523

be a concern but if you're screening for that it

 

30:58.523 --> 31:00.058

creates a better opportunity.

 

31:00.058 --> 31:02.627

Honestly, right now, Glen, you didn't ask but it's kind of

 

31:02.627 --> 31:04.529

related to that. I just thought of it, where am I finding

 

31:04.529 --> 31:06.231

opportunities now in the market?

 

31:06.231 --> 31:08.499

Where are you finding opportunities now in the market?

 

31:08.499 --> 31:09.968

It made me think of it because of interest rates.

 

31:09.968 --> 31:12.971

The markets have been very kind of

 

31:12.971 --> 31:14.472

risk-on recently

 

31:17.075 --> 31:20.178

despite higher rates, despite higher energy

 

31:20.178 --> 31:23.214

prices which tend to be a headwind for the global economy.

 

31:24.549 --> 31:26.084

As you just heard valuations are stretched.

 

31:26.084 --> 31:29.220

I think there's always places in the world

 

31:29.220 --> 31:32.423

to find opportunities to invest in,

 

31:32.423 --> 31:33.791

especially in the micro-cap space.

 

31:35.093 --> 31:38.129

I've been tending to tilt a

 

31:38.129 --> 31:40.431

little bit more defensively. I've been finding a lot more

 

31:40.431 --> 31:43.534

opportunities in consumer staple stocks, some consumer

 

31:43.534 --> 31:46.337

discretionary stocks, real estate.

 

31:46.337 --> 31:49.274

As rates have gone up a lot, especially in Europe, a lot of

 

31:49.274 --> 31:51.776

these REITs have sold off significantly and they have

 

31:51.776 --> 31:52.777

yields of 7, 8, 9%.

 

31:55.813 --> 31:57.749

While that's not a big bet in the fund it's where that

 

31:57.749 --> 32:00.919

marginal dollar of investment I'm finding.

 

32:00.919 --> 32:03.755

Actually, in Canada, I can't say the name because it's not

 

32:03.755 --> 32:06.891

in our disclosed list yet but there's

 

32:06.891 --> 32:09.193

a food and beverage company that's a micro-cap in Canada

 

32:09.193 --> 32:11.863

that I've actually bought a significant portion in.

 

32:11.863 --> 32:14.098

It's about 10 times earnings, couple per cent dividend

 

32:14.098 --> 32:15.433

yield.

 

32:15.433 --> 32:18.269

Next time we release our full holdings we'll see that in

 

32:18.269 --> 32:21.606

the fund. But definitely the more defensive areas.

 

32:21.606 --> 32:24.842

I do feel like that's what is

 

32:24.842 --> 32:27.278

being overlooked in the current risk-on rally.

 

32:27.278 --> 32:28.980

When there's any kind of mean reversion I think those

 

32:28.980 --> 32:30.915

companies should hold up a lot better.

 

32:30.915 --> 32:32.283

Very good. You mentioned

 

32:34.385 --> 32:37.488

earlier about companies will sometimes take out,

 

32:37.522 --> 32:41.092

like Diageo buying your favourite bourbon company.

 

32:41.092 --> 32:42.560

Does that concern you?

 

32:42.560 --> 32:45.163

Do you see more of that activity where private equity and

 

32:45.163 --> 32:47.966

other strategic buyers are picking out those micro-cap?

 

32:47.966 --> 32:49.233

It's reducing your universe.

 

32:49.233 --> 32:52.337

It's probably good for your performance if you

 

32:52.337 --> 32:55.073

own those companies but are you concerned about any of

 

32:55.073 --> 32:56.074

that?

 

32:56.074 --> 32:58.109

As many of you know we've had a lot of buyouts from the

 

32:58.109 --> 33:01.012

fund. I think we're up to 53 companies that have gotten

 

33:01.012 --> 33:03.815

buyout offers that have been owned in the fund since

 

33:03.815 --> 33:06.718

inception a little over two years ago.

 

33:06.718 --> 33:10.088

It's a fertile ground for

 

33:10.088 --> 33:13.157

strategic buyers, private

 

33:13.157 --> 33:14.158

equity buyers. Really, these

 

33:19.197 --> 33:22.166

high quality micro-caps fit really well with

 

33:22.166 --> 33:23.167

any of these companies.

 

33:24.168 --> 33:26.804

Truth be told, not all of them are run the most

 

33:26.804 --> 33:29.507

efficiently. That is a knock against micro-caps.

 

33:29.507 --> 33:33.011

When you have a private equity buyer who can come in,

 

33:33.011 --> 33:36.147

pay 30% premium, maybe increase the

 

33:36.147 --> 33:39.717

financial leverage, make it operationally more efficient,

 

33:39.717 --> 33:41.719

combine it for economies of scale with a bigger company,

 

33:41.719 --> 33:44.889

it's kind of a win-win where I get the 30%

 

33:44.889 --> 33:46.557

premium takeout. I think in the past ...

 

33:46.557 --> 33:49.560

when I worked with Joel he would always get really sad

 

33:49.560 --> 33:51.696

when his companies would get bought out because he had

 

33:51.696 --> 33:53.097

attachments to them.

 

33:53.097 --> 33:56.034

He wanted to own them for 10, 20, 50

 

33:56.034 --> 33:57.035

years.

 

33:57.869 --> 33:59.670

I don't have that same attachment.

 

33:59.670 --> 34:02.840

That's not a hang-up of mine, personally.

 

34:02.840 --> 34:05.810

Shen a company gets taken out there's

 

34:05.810 --> 34:08.780

another 6,999 companies to

 

34:08.780 --> 34:10.581

choose from. I'm okay with that.

 

34:10.581 --> 34:13.651

I think it's a cause for celebration

 

34:13.651 --> 34:16.020

and I think a reflection of the value that's in the

 

34:16.020 --> 34:19.090

micro-cap space right now with cheap high quality

 

34:19.090 --> 34:22.193

companies and being able to be taken out.

 

34:22.193 --> 34:24.695

One of the early takeouts was actually Parklawn.

 

34:24.695 --> 34:26.731

That was the first takeout we had. It was a funeral service

 

34:26.731 --> 34:29.434

company that was based in Toronto area.

 

34:30.568 --> 34:33.237

Then Western Canadian Bank was our second takeout I think

 

34:33.237 --> 34:36.441

that was one of biggest premiums for a

 

34:36.441 --> 34:37.642

bank that I've ever seen.

 

34:38.910 --> 34:40.878

Since then, we've had another, what, 51 takeouts.

 

34:42.180 --> 34:44.148

So cause for celebration for you.

 

34:44.148 --> 34:46.184

I think so. It's additive for returns

 

34:48.252 --> 34:50.788

and I think, more importantly, just a reflection of the

 

34:50.788 --> 34:52.590

value in these companies.

 

34:52.590 --> 34:55.560

What about the addition back to 7,000

 

34:55.560 --> 34:57.795

stocks? What are you seeing for IPO volume?

 

35:00.865 --> 35:03.901

In the US specifically IPOs are waiting longer

 

35:03.901 --> 35:08.039

and longer to come public.

 

35:08.039 --> 35:10.408

Somebody asked me last night if I own SpaceX.

 

35:12.977 --> 35:16.080

It's kind of come

 

35:16.080 --> 35:19.083

public and gone public at a mega-cap

 

35:20.184 --> 35:22.019

kind of market cap size.

 

35:22.019 --> 35:24.889

In the US I feel like there's actually a dearth of

 

35:24.889 --> 35:27.358

micro-caps to invest in. It tends to be a lot of

 

35:27.358 --> 35:30.228

unprofitable biotech companieswhich I think is one reason

 

35:30.228 --> 35:33.131

kind of looking across the globe is important.

 

35:34.699 --> 35:35.700

Other places in the world,

 

35:37.869 --> 35:40.838

that kind of pipeline to go in public at smaller valuations

 

35:40.838 --> 35:43.441

is still there. I think there's plenty of opportunities to

 

35:43.441 --> 35:46.477

come in. Also, stocks sometimes come down and

 

35:46.477 --> 35:48.279

have problems and there's opportunity.

 

35:48.279 --> 35:51.349

They come from being mid or large-caps down

 

35:51.349 --> 35:53.017

into the micro-cap space.

 

35:53.017 --> 35:55.253

There can sometimes be opportunities there, especially as a

 

35:55.253 --> 35:57.188

contrarian value investor.

 

35:57.188 --> 35:59.190

Around the world you're seeing more companies come to

 

35:59.190 --> 36:00.658

market, that's good.

 

36:00.658 --> 36:03.127

That's interesting, though, you have some that are actually

 

36:03.127 --> 36:05.463

reducing the market cap size.

 

36:05.463 --> 36:06.430

That must scare you, though.

 

36:06.430 --> 36:07.565

Hopefully before I buy them.

 

36:09.367 --> 36:12.470

Right, but then your screening must be

 

36:12.470 --> 36:14.906

even more stringent because you've gotta really figure out

 

36:14.906 --> 36:16.841

why did it reduce in size like that.

 

36:16.841 --> 36:19.477

Can you talk about, without naming names, but just an

 

36:19.477 --> 36:20.645

example, has that come to mind?

 

36:21.812 --> 36:24.248

I mean, a lot of issues I feel like are temporary.

 

36:25.316 --> 36:28.386

I mentioned Lancashire where it went through a

 

36:28.386 --> 36:31.355

really poor auto cycle and the stock came in

 

36:31.355 --> 36:32.557

quite a bit.

 

36:33.858 --> 36:36.961

Crocs is a decent size company now but I bought it

 

36:36.961 --> 36:40.164

when it was having problems with integrating the HeyDude

 

36:40.164 --> 36:41.699

acquisition.

 

36:41.699 --> 36:43.968

Maybe about three years ago they bought a company called

 

36:43.968 --> 36:45.670

HeyDude. It was a terrible acquisition.

 

36:45.670 --> 36:48.539

They had trouble integrating the company and it came down

 

36:48.539 --> 36:51.542

from more of a small mid-cap size down

 

36:51.542 --> 36:54.011

to a cap range that I could actually buy it.

 

36:54.011 --> 36:56.981

The stock was trading at almost a single digit P/E.

 

36:56.981 --> 36:58.816

I think it was just under 10 times.

 

37:00.351 --> 37:03.221

The company has kind of good staying power.

 

37:03.221 --> 37:06.390

In the US it's a bit saturated but internationally they're

 

37:06.390 --> 37:07.391

still growing.

 

37:08.259 --> 37:11.662

Once that kind of acquisition digestion happened

 

37:13.130 --> 37:16.167

comps got easier, we saw a lot of opportunities

 

37:16.167 --> 37:17.668

there and the stock was beaten up.

 

37:17.702 --> 37:19.704

That's, I think, a good example of a stock that kind of

 

37:19.704 --> 37:22.673

came in, I bought and it actually has rebounded

 

37:22.673 --> 37:23.374

quite a bit.

 

37:23.374 --> 37:27.178

That's one of the big flags that I look at is acquisitions.

 

37:27.178 --> 37:29.880

Often when companies acquire another company

 

37:31.249 --> 37:34.151

it's either for the wrong reasons, that they're just empire

 

37:34.151 --> 37:37.221

building, something's going wrong with their company

 

37:37.221 --> 37:40.024

so they have to kind of shift the focus to something else.

 

37:41.926 --> 37:44.762

Ultimately, there is a digestion period where companies

 

37:44.762 --> 37:47.698

actually have to integrate systems,

 

37:47.732 --> 37:49.867

have to ingrate people and there's this period of time

 

37:49.867 --> 37:52.970

where, on average, just going by the base rates

 

37:52.970 --> 37:55.239

and the statistics, companies underperform after large

 

37:55.239 --> 37:58.242

acquisitions. Part of my quantitative process is really

 

37:58.242 --> 38:02.179

to look at all these base rates on what Is

 

38:02.179 --> 38:05.449

driving stock returns and avoiding the things where

 

38:05.449 --> 38:08.286

the base rates are really low for stock returns and buying

 

38:08.286 --> 38:10.254

the companies where the base rates are higher and then

 

38:10.254 --> 38:12.757

combining it with the fundamental framework.

 

38:14.191 --> 38:16.260

That's actually phase two.

 

38:16.260 --> 38:19.430

This is a kind of insight into the future of my process but

 

38:19.430 --> 38:21.832

I'm using the large language models to read all the

 

38:21.832 --> 38:23.434

research notes right now.

 

38:23.434 --> 38:25.102

One of my goals is actually ...

 

38:25.102 --> 38:28.205

this is a lot more difficult and requires a lot of compute

 

38:28.205 --> 38:30.975

power and really good data scientists

 

38:32.310 --> 38:34.378

but to go back and read 20 years of Fidelity research

 

38:34.378 --> 38:35.379

notes.

 

38:36.247 --> 38:39.317

Then, basically, not only is the analyst positive but

 

38:39.317 --> 38:42.153

what are they actually saying and which of the things are

 

38:42.153 --> 38:45.089

they talking about lead to future stock price

 

38:45.089 --> 38:46.590

outperformance?

 

38:46.590 --> 38:49.860

An analyst might write about great acquisition, there's

 

38:49.860 --> 38:51.228

lots of synergies.

 

38:51.262 --> 38:54.098

I'm really excited about this acquisition.

 

38:54.098 --> 38:55.966

The company's going to double in size.

 

38:57.835 --> 39:00.805

That will come across as a positive sentiment that

 

39:00.805 --> 39:03.574

they think this is a good company to invest in, but maybe

 

39:03.574 --> 39:05.776

the large language model in AI can go in and actually

 

39:05.776 --> 39:08.913

figure out that when they say those kinds of things

 

39:08.913 --> 39:11.115

you should actually ignore that positive sentiment.

 

39:11.115 --> 39:13.718

That can not only help the fund managers of Fidelity it can

 

39:13.718 --> 39:16.854

also help the analysts become better analysts to know which

 

39:16.854 --> 39:19.857

things they might be talking about that might be

 

39:19.857 --> 39:20.391

backwards.

 

39:20.391 --> 39:23.461

Traditional fundamental, people often think high

 

39:23.461 --> 39:24.895

short interest is a good thing.

 

39:25.930 --> 39:27.598

Supply and demand.

 

39:27.631 --> 39:29.467

There's a highly shorted stock, there's a lot of shares

 

39:29.467 --> 39:31.736

borrowed, somebody's going to have to buy back those shares

 

39:31.736 --> 39:35.306

to cover their stock and it's going to send the stock price soaring.

 

39:35.306 --> 39:37.942

If you're shorting stocks you probably have some kind of

 

39:37.942 --> 39:39.844

information and you're probably a more sophisticated

 

39:39.844 --> 39:42.980

investor. Highly short stocks actually outperform

 

39:42.980 --> 39:46.484

pretty consistently except for various periodic

 

39:46.484 --> 39:49.253

short squeezes. We actually want to avoid highly shorted

 

39:49.253 --> 39:51.689

stocks. Those kinds of things I think you can learn from

 

39:51.689 --> 39:52.256

[crosstalk].

 

39:52.256 --> 39:54.592

We've got a time squeeze right now so we've got to wrap up.

 

39:54.592 --> 39:56.293

Thank you very much, Salim Hart, very interesting.

 

39:56.293 --> 39:57.294

Absolutely. Happy to be here.

 

40:01.065 --> 40:05.369

Thanks for watching or listening

to the FidelityConnects podcast.

 

40:05.369 --> 40:08.806

Now, if you haven't done so already,

please subscribe to FidelityConnects

 

40:08.806 --> 40:11.242

on your podcast platform of choice.

 

40:11.275 --> 40:15.146

And if you like what you're hearing,

please leave a review or a five-star rating.

 

40:15.146 --> 40:19.750

Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are available

by working with a financial advisor

 

40:19.784 --> 40:21.485

or through an online brokerage account.

 

40:21.519 --> 40:25.289

Visit Fidelity.ca/howtobuy

for more information.

 

40:25.289 --> 40:29.693

While on Fidelity dot CA, you can also find

more information on future live webcasts.

 

40:29.727 --> 40:34.165

Don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn, and Instagram.

 

40:35.166 --> 40:38.035

We'll end today's show with a short disclaimer.

 

40:38.035 --> 40:41.806

The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants

 

40:41.806 --> 40:46.911

and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or its affiliates.

 

40:46.911 --> 40:49.180

This podcast is for informational purposes only

 

40:49.180 --> 40:52.750

and should not be construed as investment,

tax, or legal advice.

 

40:52.750 --> 40:56.520

It is not an offer to sell or buy, or an endorsement, recommendation,

 

40:56.520 --> 40:59.990

or sponsorship of any entity

or securities cited.

 

40:59.990 --> 41:03.794

Read a funds prospectus before investing,

funds are not guaranteed.

 

41:03.794 --> 41:07.531

Their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

 

41:07.531 --> 41:11.569

Fees, expenses, and commissions are all associated with fund investments.

 

41:11.569 --> 41:14.071

Thanks again. We'll see you next time.

Listen to the podcast version