FOCUS 2025: Harnessing quality across global markets – Patrice Quirion

Patrice Quirion takes the stage at FOCUS to talk about harnessing quality across global markets.

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

[00:00:12.912]

Well, wasn't that the video? That's great!

[00:00:15.415]

Always makes us nervous to see ourselves on videos.

[00:00:18.051]

Absolutely. Welcome back from break everyone.

[00:00:20.587]

Hope you had a chance to step out into some sunshine.

[00:00:23.289]

For those of you online thank you for joining us.

[00:00:27.260]

Curiosity, a lot has happened in the last year.

[00:00:29.829]

How many advisors here and online, feel free to raise your hand, have

[00:00:34.300]

pivoted or added to some international exposure.

[00:00:40.106]

Look at those hands, how things have changed over the years.

[00:00:43.610]

You're all lucky that we have Patrice Quirion here joining us today to discuss

[00:00:47.147]

all things international, all things global.

[00:00:49.916]

You just saw the list of mandates that you manage on behalf of Fidelity.

[00:00:53.386]

Very exciting. If we think a year ago, you were shouting

[00:00:57.557]

from the rooftops about why people should be pivoting to international, why we

[00:01:01.394]

should be increasing our exposure, getting out of the U.S., really

[00:01:05.432]

diversifying our holdings. Take us back to why

[00:01:09.369]

that is still increasingly important and really why and how

[00:01:13.740]

that shift has occurred. Take us maybe from the top down and we'll work our way

[00:01:17.677]

down the ladder there.

[00:01:20.780]

First, happy to be here, good to see all of you.

[00:01:25.718]

If we think back of the past number of years where international was

[00:01:29.789]

really out of favour, I think ultimately led

[00:01:33.726]

to an overreaction in the market.

[00:01:35.962]

As a contrarian investor I'm always coming back to the investment philosophy,

[00:01:39.966]

two core beliefs where the markets tend to

[00:01:44.270]

ultimately overreact.

[00:01:46.573]

Tendencies get over recognized too much, crowding

[00:01:50.710]

takes place on both sides, on the positive side and on the negative

[00:01:54.848]

side as well. That can create opportunity. The other core belief I have

[00:01:58.952]

is pretty much everything follows a cycle.

[00:02:02.355]

We think of cycles as cyclical stocks but in reality there's

[00:02:06.593]

cycles across most big economic trends Some are shorter,

[00:02:10.730]

some are longer. The longer ones are easy to get confused

[00:02:14.868]

with structural changes that will never mean revert.

[00:02:17.704]

I think when it's been going on for too long you get that combination

[00:02:22.308]

... a little bit like Ramona alluded to ...

[00:02:24.244]

the emotional aspect, the crowding aspects or

[00:02:28.214]

the sort of leaving aside aspect of investor behaviour.

[00:02:33.153]

You put that with very long cycles that in the case of international

[00:02:37.190]

equities have been sort of going against them since really the European

[00:02:40.627]

financial crisis in 2013 and it led to an

[00:02:44.931]

incredible divergence of expectations, valuations.

[00:02:48.801]

From an investment standpoint what do we really think

[00:02:53.039]

about the value of a business?

[00:02:54.874]

Ultimately, we can think of investing as trading stock certificates

[00:02:59.546]

but, ultimately, investing is about buying a stake in a business for the

[00:03:03.516]

next generation. To get the right price we pay for that business

[00:03:07.887]

is the core of what we do, in my eyes.

[00:03:11.591]

When the markets diverge too much it creates those opportunities where patience

[00:03:15.328]

might be required but where, ultimately, those gravitational forces

[00:03:19.666]

to mean reversion should have

[00:03:23.770]

an impact. That's been the case for quite a few years.

[00:03:27.507]

I think what has changed late last year, early this year is

[00:03:31.644]

two things.

[00:03:33.646]

One, I think there's starting to be a little bit more

[00:03:39.085]

potential catalysts on international equities.

[00:03:41.888]

If we think of Europe we are potentially moving closer to

[00:03:45.858]

a resolution of the Ukraine conflict, although there's still no line

[00:03:49.929]

of sight on there.

[00:03:51.664]

We have the fiscal spending out of Germany which could act as

[00:03:56.236]

a meaningful catalyst to business and consumer confidence to

[00:04:00.306]

the construction industry.

[00:04:04.110]

If we look at Asia we are starting to, finally, after quite

[00:04:08.314]

a few years, maybe see signs of stabilization in the

[00:04:12.485]

Chinese real estate market and the consumer confidence over

[00:04:16.489]

there. That's one thing where from very depressed levels you're starting

[00:04:20.460]

to see maybe light at the end of the tunnel for Europe and

[00:04:24.664]

China, which are what matters most internationally.

[00:04:28.201]

I was going to say, and we're going to dive into both of those a little bit

[00:04:30.236]

later because those are two markets that have been key pieces into your

[00:04:33.406]

portfolios.

[00:04:34.841]

Exactly. At the same time I think the level

[00:04:39.045]

of optimism around the U.S.

[00:04:41.447]

market that sort of culminated right after the U.S.

[00:04:44.083]

election last November, I think is starting

[00:04:48.121]

to maybe have played its

[00:04:52.158]

course. I think the U.S. market is still performing well but is increasingly

[00:04:56.129]

driven by a limited number of stocks tied to the AI

[00:05:00.433]

dynamic or semiconductors data centre.

[00:05:03.770]

I think for investors who are starting to get worried about where we are

[00:05:07.740]

in that AI cycle I think diversifying

[00:05:11.778]

away out of the U.S., the S&P 500 or

[00:05:15.948]

the NASDAQ, more into international markets that are less exposed

[00:05:20.053]

to that potentially peakish trend brings

[00:05:24.157]

some diversification. I think this has been gathering momentum so far

[00:05:28.227]

this year but I don't think it's done is the message.

[00:05:31.898]

Absolutely. You mentioned two things, the catalyst in Europe and Asia,

[00:05:36.169]

pivoting away from the U.S., all contributors, you did mention

[00:05:40.606]

the conflict in Ukraine.

[00:05:42.442]

There's the trade wars that have been going on globally.

[00:05:45.712]

What has been ...

[00:05:47.513]

this is a very broad question but the global market impact because of all of

[00:05:51.317]

that. This will maybe be a lead into the opportunities that you're starting to

[00:05:55.321]

see.

[00:05:56.723]

Obviously, the trade wars that

[00:06:00.660]

are still with us today have been grabbing a lot of attention.

[00:06:07.367]

A few points that I keep in mind, I think first,

[00:06:11.738]

initially, it tends to be the case, the market has potentially overreacted

[00:06:16.342]

to what the actual impact would be.

[00:06:19.579]

The reality is there will be some impacts but

[00:06:23.616]

the extent to which supply change will change overnight has probably

[00:06:27.820]

been exaggerated.

[00:06:29.555]

It's really hard to move entire supply chains.

[00:06:32.825]

It's been happening for a number

[00:06:36.829]

of years.

[00:06:40.299]

Multinationals manufacturing in Asia exporting to North America

[00:06:44.704]

have been diversifying away from China for a number of years so does that

[00:06:48.841]

accelerate it a little bit?

[00:06:50.743]

Potentially. I think we're at a stage where a lot of what is manufactured

[00:06:55.047]

there is manufactured there for reasons.

[00:06:58.851]

The impact was maybe exaggerated.

[00:07:02.054]

Secondly, we need to think of the impact not only on those supply chains

[00:07:06.192]

but the impact on inflation.

[00:07:08.861]

At the moment the market is, I think, declaring victory on that.

[00:07:14.066]

The data suggests it but deep down I

[00:07:18.237]

remain a little bit nervous about that, for a couple of

[00:07:22.341]

reasons. I think we've seen inflation easing probably

[00:07:26.879]

in part because the economies are cooling off to some extent.

[00:07:31.350]

Also, I don't think we've seen the full impact of

[00:07:35.555]

the inflationary pressure that tariffs will cause.

[00:07:39.425]

I think we will see a lot more of that impact with the back to school,

[00:07:43.529]

with the holiday season for the only reason that

[00:07:47.633]

a lot of what we've been buying for the past four or five months since the

[00:07:51.804]

tariffs have been in place was already on U.S.

[00:07:55.608]

soil, was in inventory and was not subject to tariffs.

[00:07:59.745]

Now companies have been sort of buying over the past quarter or so

[00:08:04.484]

goods that are subject to tariff which will be on the shelves like this fall

[00:08:08.621]

as we go into the holiday season.

[00:08:12.124]

Let's keep in mind that the inflation impact is maybe not fully in yet.

[00:08:17.497]

As always, as active managers when there's a lot of volatility, when there is

[00:08:20.900]

potentially overreactions in the market it creates opportunities and

[00:08:24.971]

we should be active around that.

[00:08:28.774]

It's not only the impact on the fundamentals, which is what

[00:08:32.712]

we tend to focus on. Fidelity, I think of us as an army of

[00:08:36.749]

analysts trying to really understand the impact on companies but

[00:08:40.786]

there's also the bigger impact of risk-on versus risk-off

[00:08:44.924]

which is, I think, becoming increasingly important in this market, a lot of

[00:08:49.428]

systematic movements, a lot correlation into the markets.

[00:08:53.499]

When you get some risk-off periods it tends

[00:08:57.436]

to create opportunities that we've tried to seize not necessarily

[00:09:01.807]

on the companies that were most impacted by tariffs but if we go back

[00:09:05.745]

to the correction in April one of the hardest hit sector

[00:09:09.916]

was the technology sector which is one of the least impacted by

[00:09:13.986]

tariffs but was one of most risk-on part of the market

[00:09:17.924]

which came off. It can present opportunities in parts of the

[00:09:21.928]

market that maybe you wouldn't expect.

[00:09:24.463]

Maybe that's a good segue because your top 10 just came out yesterday.

[00:09:27.833]

As of September 30th we have a new top 10, if you want to check that out on

[00:09:31.737]

fidelity.ca, but Intel creeped into your top 10.

[00:09:35.841]

Maybe just going a little bit down that technology path talk to us about Intel

[00:09:40.246]

and how that made its way into your top 10.

[00:09:43.182]

Maybe to set the ground for the ones who've heard me speak for the past number

[00:09:47.153]

of years, I am not the investor who will be chasing that

[00:09:51.591]

AI infrastructure boom.

[00:09:54.527]

I think it's great at the moment. I think it's an open question how long does

[00:09:58.531]

it last for but I remain of the view that this is

[00:10:02.935]

likely to end badly on the hardware side of things.

[00:10:08.040]

It's so much of the market cap in the U.S.

[00:10:11.344]

but even in global markets which is certainly not cheap on normalized

[00:10:15.581]

earnings, which is my approach.

[00:10:17.783]

Ot's the sector that I've been largely underweight for a

[00:10:21.821]

long period of time.

[00:10:24.590]

If we go back in 2022 after the

[00:10:28.594]

tech sell-off, if we go back in April to a lesser extent and shorter

[00:10:32.665]

duration it creates opportunities and the positioning becomes

[00:10:36.669]

a little bit less extreme in the market.

[00:10:38.771]

The deltas become a little less extreme.

[00:10:41.641]

As a result I will make the portfolio positioning a little bit less extreme.

[00:10:45.311]

It means adding to the sectors that sell off quite a bit in a very typical

[00:10:49.582]

sort of contrarian fashion.

[00:10:52.418]

A couple of names on that.

[00:10:55.588]

You'll see top position of the portfolio is now Microsoft.

[00:10:58.658]

I'm still largely underweight the Magnificent

[00:11:02.628]

Seven but within that group I think the higher quality,

[00:11:06.932]

more software-driven, higher cash flow generation businesses

[00:11:11.637]

is where I'll find interest. This is the one name that I picked to get a

[00:11:15.608]

little bit of exposure on the back of what happened in April.

[00:11:19.478]

That was before April but over the past few years there's a couple stocks

[00:11:23.849]

within the tech sector that ...

[00:11:25.651]

it's always not a blanket statement

[00:11:30.222]

but you find opportunities within a sector.

[00:11:34.160]

I'll bring two that are in a portfolio that are becoming bigger in

[00:11:38.164]

weights because the stocks are working now, Intel and I'll put Samsung

[00:11:42.368]

Electronics in there.

[00:11:44.603]

Both are sort of historical leaders, strategic assets that

[00:11:49.809]

basically things don't go their way either for technology side of things at

[00:11:53.846]

Intel, missing the memory for

[00:11:58.084]

data centres for GPU at Samsung.

[00:12:02.221]

When the market capitulates on those names and you're not paying for

[00:12:06.692]

... or paying very little for the options of things

[00:12:10.763]

going right when you know they are strategic assets it

[00:12:15.134]

leads to a situation where you might not see the catalyst immediately

[00:12:19.805]

but if you're patient things tend to happen.

[00:12:22.441]

We've seen it with Intel, now the U.S.

[00:12:24.844]

government being involved, a lot of the big semiconductor

[00:12:28.914]

companies taking stakes in the business.

[00:12:31.617]

Suddenly the market's excited about the optionality of them closing

[00:12:35.621]

the gap on fabs versus TSMC, essentially.

[00:12:39.792]

Hello, investors. We'll be back to the show in just a moment.

[00:12:42.995]

I wanted to share that here at Fidelity, we value your opinion.

[00:12:46.565]

Please take a few minutes to help us shape the future of Fidelity Connects

[00:12:48.868]

podcasts. Complete our listener survey by visiting fidelity.ca/survey,

[00:12:53.973]

and you could win one of our branded tumblers.

[00:12:55.941]

Periodic draws ending by March 30th, 2026.

[00:12:59.011]

And don't forget to listen to Fidelity Connects, the Upside, and French

[00:13:02.615]

DialoguesFidelity podcasts available on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever

[00:13:06.652]

else you get your podcasts. Now back to today's show.

[00:13:10.856]

You just mentioned contrarian, for those of you that don't know Patrice that is

[00:13:14.693]

what he is. He and Hugo, I would say, are good friends, manage contrarian

[00:13:18.931]

in very different ways but anti-glamour actually just resonated with me from

[00:13:22.334]

Ramona's session because I would say you also maybe are searching for the

[00:13:25.671]

anti-glamour in that.

[00:13:27.439]

Talk to us, and let's maybe take a step back into the regional allocation of

[00:13:30.743]

the portfolios. Global Concentrated Equity, International

[00:13:34.880]

Concentrated Equity have beaten 100% of peers year-to-date.

[00:13:38.717]

They're having a fantastic year.

[00:13:40.886]

I think that's been part of your strategic weightings to the certain specific

[00:13:44.924]

regions. Right now you have a significant underweight to the U.S.

[00:13:47.960]

and, obviously, international would have that stripped in

[00:13:52.331]

your global. Talk to us about some of these more international markets.

[00:13:55.835]

You've talked about Europe, let's start there and what you're seeing in Europe.

[00:14:00.472]

Europe has been the big overweight into the portfolios for the past

[00:14:04.610]

few years.

[00:14:07.947]

It was, essentially, based on the fact that you were looking, we were looking,

[00:14:12.251]

at very similar companies in the European

[00:14:16.388]

continent relative to close peers in the U.S., a lot of multinationals.

[00:14:21.527]

The European names were sort of systematically trading at a

[00:14:25.564]

discount to the U.S. names.

[00:14:27.833]

If you are limited to one market that doesn't matter but in my case

[00:14:32.004]

where I can really move assets, and we do it very actively and we

[00:14:36.141]

move things materially, it was just

[00:14:40.279]

more compelling to buy the very similar business in Europe versus the

[00:14:44.416]

similar one in the U. S., either because of better fundamentals, in most

[00:14:48.487]

cases, because the valuations were very different.

[00:14:51.991]

That was part of it.

[00:14:54.159]

The other part of it is there are some big sectors where I was finding

[00:14:59.231]

sort of what is priced into those stocks just way

[00:15:03.168]

less demanding in Europe versus the U.S.

[00:15:05.871]

Let's think of financials.

[00:15:08.307]

For years I had my banking exposure within the portfolios

[00:15:12.811]

where, again, some global funds will say, well, I own

[00:15:16.782]

a little bit of financials in the U.S., a little bit in Europe, a little bit in

[00:15:19.885]

Asia and we'll try to pick the best one within each region.

[00:15:24.056]

Okay, it's one way of doing things but I don't think that really expresses your

[00:15:27.626]

highest conviction. In my case, I take a sector like banks

[00:15:31.864]

and let's go around the world and where does it look most compelling right now.

[00:15:35.434]

I don't need to be in the other regions where it is less compelling.

[00:15:39.872]

Over the past number of years European banks, to me, felt a lot more compelling

[00:15:44.209]

because of the rate sensitivity they're gearing in earnings

[00:15:48.480]

from rates going from negative for a very long period of time

[00:15:52.418]

in Europe to sort of rates that have renormalized.

[00:15:57.156]

If you were spending the time to understand the earnings impact of what rates

[00:16:00.826]

at 2, 2 1/2, 3% meant for European banks' profitability

[00:16:05.798]

you were starting to make cases where earnings will double, triple, quadruple,

[00:16:09.735]

not plus 10%, massive step changes.

[00:16:13.372]

The market was sort of slow to realize that.

[00:16:16.108]

I've been there for a period of time.

[00:16:19.578]

Now, by the way, I think this is being a lot more recognized and I've

[00:16:23.582]

moving my banks exposure away from Europe and now into

[00:16:27.686]

Japan. We can talk about that later.

[00:16:31.190]

It's a combination of sectors that are more domestically geared that may look

[00:16:35.327]

to have better fundamentals with some valuation differentials.

[00:16:40.032]

Lastly, I'll just make a quick sort of side note on my

[00:16:44.136]

comment. I think everything follows a cycle.

[00:16:47.006]

I think one thing that I find extremely useful as

[00:16:51.076]

a long term investor is to ask yourself

[00:16:55.014]

not only what's doing well globally, what sector, what company,

[00:16:59.184]

what country, but where are we on those cycles.

[00:17:01.754]

I remain of the view that the U.S.

[00:17:05.758]

is probably more towards the up-cycle part both on

[00:17:09.862]

consumer spending, fiscal spending and corporate spending

[00:17:13.899]

with the AI boom that we are seeing right now.

[00:17:16.535]

As opposed to you go to Europe and we are more, I would say, mid-cycle

[00:17:20.939]

in some areas like government spending, corporate

[00:17:24.910]

spending and we are potentially closer to the bottom on consumer

[00:17:29.048]

spending. It's been tough for a long time in European consumer

[00:17:33.285]

confidence. That brings up a whole bunch of opportunities, especially

[00:17:37.456]

in smaller cap stocks that are more domestically geared to

[00:17:41.927]

consumption or construction or housing and things like that, all the things

[00:17:45.898]

that could potentially cyclically rebound is a question

[00:17:49.868]

of when, not a question of if.

[00:17:51.770]

I don't think 10 years from now those will still be at depressed levels.

[00:17:56.341]

It's a combination of all that that led me to Europe.

[00:17:59.545]

I think where we'll go next is, to me, that has

[00:18:03.615]

partly played out and there are some sectors, I talked

[00:18:07.586]

about financials, but other areas like anything tied to defence, for instance,

[00:18:12.057]

that the market now really acknowledges is no longer contrarian,

[00:18:16.261]

is no longer mispriced, in my opinion, and as a result we

[00:18:20.332]

are starting to look elsewhere. Elsewhere means still Asia,

[00:18:24.403]

especially China, and to some extent coming back in

[00:18:28.340]

the U.S. into the parts of the market, call it the S&P 490

[00:18:33.045]

which has not done nearly as well as the rest where there are pockets

[00:18:37.149]

of weakness that may become cyclically interesting here.

[00:18:41.153]

You've already taken us there so I'll just guide you along the way.

[00:18:44.656]

Let's go to China.

[00:18:46.592]

Consumer discretionary I know has been of interest, travel has been of interest

[00:18:49.695]

to you, maybe quickly if you want to touch on what that looks like, and then

[00:18:53.465]

you did make an interesting point there at the end, coming back to the U.S.

[00:18:57.002]

We know people have been retreating but what else other than

[00:19:01.140]

the Mag Seven is there to see?

[00:19:03.709]

Maybe first on China, I was talking of where are we in the cycle in Europe?

[00:19:07.312]

I think if you look at where are we in the cycle in China

[00:19:11.450]

I think across the board we are close to the bottom

[00:19:15.020]

which--

[00:19:16.021]

Which is great upside.

[00:19:16.388]

--doesn't tell you when things will turn but tells you the risk-reward over

[00:19:20.359]

time is probably tilted in your favour, especially when

[00:19:24.630]

the stocks are that cheap. The interesting thing is usually when you're close

[00:19:28.167]

to the peak, sort of Finance 101, what you learn on school benches,

[00:19:32.871]

when you're close to the peak you should pay a lower multiple because things

[00:19:35.774]

will eventually go the other way. It's not how the market works.

[00:19:38.977]

When you're closer to peak people are excited, valuation goes even higher

[00:19:43.182]

even if it's on peak-ish earnings.

[00:19:45.884]

The inverse happens when the market's really out of favour, not only

[00:19:49.821]

are earnings lower, expectations for growth lower but

[00:19:53.792]

stocks are also on lower multiples.

[00:19:55.460]

That was absolutely the case in China, if we go back 12,

[00:19:59.565]

18 months ago.

[00:20:00.432]

This is starting to change.

[00:20:03.335]

The Chinese market has been performing better year-to-date and actually

[00:20:07.639]

started in the second half of last year.

[00:20:10.075]

I think it's still cheap but the market is starting to realize that now we are

[00:20:14.446]

apparently bottoming.

[00:20:16.515]

I'm not going and buying sort of across the board.

[00:20:19.151]

There's still some issues. There's still some structural issues around real

[00:20:22.854]

estate. I think the banks are still black boxes

[00:20:26.959]

to a very large extent.

[00:20:30.896]

There's a bunch of industries with overcapacity which creates not only domestic

[00:20:35.133]

issues but global issues and I think part of the reason why we are in this

[00:20:38.804]

tariff environment.

[00:20:41.440]

If you think of what will be driving the Chinese economy over the next 5 to

[00:20:45.410]

10 years, I think it's the story of rebalancing.

[00:20:47.746]

Again, back to the cycles, everything

[00:20:51.783]

follows a cycle. Cycle a number of years ago was boom in infrastructure

[00:20:56.054]

and real estate. Cycle over the past few years was boom in manufacturing

[00:21:00.058]

capacity, increasing quality of a variety of products, taking

[00:21:04.062]

leadership in a bunch of industries which led to overcapacity.

[00:21:08.200]

I think the story for the next 5 to 10 years will be let's rebalance the

[00:21:11.503]

economy away from infrastructure, away from manufacturing, more towards

[00:21:14.940]

domestic consumption, service economy.

[00:21:17.476]

I think that's what's needed. If you believe that takes place you

[00:21:21.446]

have a bunch of Now very well established domestic

[00:21:26.518]

champions in e-commerce and travel and consumer

[00:21:30.622]

goods.

[00:21:32.524]

I still have a lot of conviction on that thematic over the next number of

[00:21:35.727]

years.

[00:21:36.128]

You'll see the biggest positions in the portfolio are companies like Alibaba,

[00:21:40.399]

like Prosys which is a holding company where the value is Tencent.

[00:21:43.802]

But alternatives to what we would typically know here over in North America

[00:21:47.072]

that could really take off and add growth to the portfolios.

[00:21:50.542]

Excellent. You mentioned Japan really quickly.

[00:21:52.778]

I know you recently travelled there.

[00:21:54.646]

I think everyone's been travelling to Japan recently, it seems like in my

[00:21:58.717]

talks. I know you were racking up the Aeroplan miles.

[00:22:02.521]

One of my colleagues gave me a stat. You've earned so many I think it could

[00:22:05.457]

take you around the world 50 times.

[00:22:07.926]

You are such a frequent flyer.

[00:22:09.861]

Tell us about Japan. Tell us about what's drawing you there.

[00:22:13.498]

I know you along with Salim and other global investors are really seeing it as

[00:22:17.869]

a hotbed for opportunity.

[00:22:20.038]

What's your view?

[00:22:21.239]

It's a fairly mixed view, to be fair.

[00:22:22.941]

I think from a shorter term perspective, I talked about the financial sector, I

[00:22:27.245]

think there's opportunities as the country is finally lifting from

[00:22:31.550]

decades of deflation.

[00:22:34.086]

Now inflation is there. I think they are slow to acknowledge

[00:22:38.423]

that it is becoming more systemic,

[00:22:42.627]

notably because working age population is in pretty fast decline

[00:22:46.698]

right now. There's labour shortages across the board, wages are going up and

[00:22:50.535]

driving the price of everything else.

[00:22:52.204]

The weak yen has been driving a lot of imported goods inflation and

[00:22:56.141]

Japan is sort of that insular island.

[00:22:57.909]

They import pretty much every raw commodities, materials.

[00:23:02.180]

I am of the view that inflation is more systemic there and

[00:23:06.318]

as a result that era of zero interest rates is

[00:23:10.589]

gone. If that's the case, just like we've seen in Europe, the

[00:23:14.626]

impact on bank profitability could be very material.

[00:23:18.029]

That's one sector of interest.

[00:23:19.064]

There's interest from a corporate governance or company

[00:23:23.602]

structure perspective where historically it's been

[00:23:27.773]

a very inefficient corporate structure, lazy balance sheets,

[00:23:31.910]

a lot of cross-shareholdings, companies that are not always optimizing

[00:23:35.914]

returns and margins.

[00:23:39.084]

There's been talk that this is changing for a long time and

[00:23:43.121]

I think there's starting to be increasing signs or examples of things changing,

[00:23:47.759]

although it's case by case.

[00:23:50.529]

This is two positives.

[00:23:53.165]

The one big negative, I'll leave you with a high level thought, Chinese

[00:23:58.603]

competition across a variety of industries is real.

[00:24:02.607]

We are starting to see it. I think starting is the right word.

[00:24:07.846]

If you think of markets, to come to the U.S.

[00:24:12.050]

there will be barriers like tariffs and others but to go to emerging markets,

[00:24:17.155]

think Southeast Asia, India, Africa, Middle East, LatAm,

[00:24:21.259]

I think we are sort of entering an era where Chinese

[00:24:25.997]

dominance or high competition in those markets, we're

[00:24:30.101]

going to gravitate towards that.

[00:24:32.304]

We need to ask ourselves who has to lose.

[00:24:34.606]

In a lot of cases those Japanese multinationals were the market

[00:24:38.643]

leaders in those markets across cars, technology,

[00:24:43.181]

et cetera, and are at risk.

[00:24:45.283]

I think we need to be careful of buying Japan at large because there's

[00:24:49.421]

a lot of structural headwinds as well.

[00:24:51.590]

Interesting. Great thoughts to have here.

[00:24:53.325]

This is just a taste, I would say, of what's available on the global scale.

[00:24:57.062]

You cover 31 countries, there's endless research I know that you

[00:25:01.132]

sift through day to day and trying to find the best opportunities, turning

[00:25:05.203]

over those rocks as many people use. Before we pivot into

[00:25:09.474]

kind of the grand finale, if you will, weaving in our rapid fire, we

[00:25:13.445]

are keeping ours short and sweet, but just a little bit on travel.

[00:25:16.515]

If you have to personally pick between Europe and Asia right now where are you

[00:25:20.085]

going?

[00:25:21.820]

Personally, I love Japan. I think it's a fantastic culture.

[00:25:24.656]

I can  understand why people...

[00:25:25.423]

So you're on the hype, got it.

[00:25:27.325]

If you are in Japan are you at a beach or are you in the city?

[00:25:30.695]

I'm more a city guy. I like to see the economy and how business

[00:25:34.799]

works. You don't see that on the beach.

[00:25:36.468]

Excellent. I know it's not KPop Demon Hunters

[00:25:40.639]

like me and Ramona as our last movie watched, but what's yours?

[00:25:45.243]

If I have to pick a movie I'll go with any of the James Bond movies, really,

[00:25:49.180]

for me. By the way, FID 007 as a fund code that leads you

[00:25:53.151]

to Global Concentration.

[00:25:54.319]

No one will ever forget that now.

[00:25:56.855]

There you go. You heard it here first, FID 007.

[00:26:00.926]

Everyone's got that ingrained in their brain now.

[00:26:03.461]

Maybe not the most popular series right now but...

[00:26:07.198]

That's okay. Just to finish up, we have two minutes left,

[00:26:11.136]

I think ultimately the question, especially when looking at the international

[00:26:14.205]

markets, it goes why would I buy Patrice?

[00:26:16.474]

Why would I by International Concentrated Equity versus buying just

[00:26:20.712]

a broad index? Why you?

[00:26:23.682]

I'll leave you with a couple of thoughts. I think people are starting to

[00:26:26.351]

realize that maybe the decade of leadership from U.S.

[00:26:29.721]

tech, AI more recently, I'm not saying it's coming to an end now

[00:26:33.992]

but at some point it will and leadership will move elsewhere.

[00:26:37.429]

If we ask ourself where that leadership could come I think there will

[00:26:41.533]

be potentials on China on

[00:26:45.670]

resources potentially. We're maybe starting to see early signs of that.

[00:26:49.074]

Leads you more internationally.

[00:26:51.309]

I think if you just buy general international exposure, if you

[00:26:55.880]

buy the EAFE or an EM ETF you'll

[00:26:59.818]

end up with a lot of large-cap companies, multinationals.

[00:27:05.123]

If you buy the EAFE index you'll end up with a bunch of big European pharmas.

[00:27:08.526]

You'll have SAP and ASML which are kind of back to the

[00:27:13.798]

theme of the tech extension that we're in right now.

[00:27:18.670]

I think the opportunity is much more to go underneath that and find the

[00:27:22.507]

companies that will benefit from a pick-up of general sentiment across

[00:27:26.878]

China and Europe that will lead to a better consumer, that will lead to better

[00:27:31.116]

construction activity.

[00:27:33.551]

We need to be a lot more targeted to find those.

[00:27:36.187]

This is exactly what I'm trying to do across the portfolios, not to buy

[00:27:40.125]

you the big names everybody knows about but let's find you the targeted

[00:27:43.762]

exposure that are exposed to thematic that can have legs to go, that

[00:27:49.000]

are still cheap and that is just not that easy to go find

[00:27:53.038]

on your own. I think we can play a pretty core role and also

[00:27:57.208]

try to isolate you to a good extent for

[00:28:01.846]

the day where that tech boom comes

[00:28:05.984]

to an end by being massively underweight to those

[00:28:10.221]

thematic, to those sectors, and to those correlations that run pretty large

[00:28:14.292]

as well. Contrarian take and much more targeted is what I'd leave you with.

[00:28:18.229]

And you have the Fidelity reach at your fingertips to help you in that search.

[00:28:23.001]

Patrice, thank you for joining us today.

[00:28:27.739]

Thanks for watching or listening to the Fidelity Connects

[00:28:31.676]

podcast. Now if you haven't done so already, please subscribe to Fidelity

[00:28:35.814]

Connects on your podcast platform of choice.

[00:28:38.616]

And if you like what you're hearing, please leave a review or a five-star

[00:28:41.453]

rating. Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are available by working with

[00:28:45.423]

a financial advisor or through an online brokerage account.

[00:28:48.793]

Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.

[00:28:52.497]

While on Fidelity.ca, you can also find more information on future live

[00:28:56.334]

webcasts. And don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn,

[00:29:00.472]

and Instagram.

[00:29:02.474]

We'll end today's show with a short disclaimer.

[00:29:05.343]

The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants,

[00:29:09.180]

and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or

[00:29:13.118]

its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and should not

[00:29:17.122]

be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice.

[00:29:19.657]

It is not an offer to sell or buy.

[00:29:21.960]

Or an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any entity or securities

[00:29:26.297]

cited. Read a fund's prospectus before investing, funds are not guaranteed.

[00:29:31.102]

Their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.

[00:29:34.672]

Fees, expenses, and commissions are all associated with fund investments.

[00:29:38.510]

Thanks again. We'll see you next time.

Listen to the podcast version