FOCUS 2025: Concentrated investing in U.S. equities – Stephen DuFour
Stephen DuFour takes the stage at FOCUS to share his thoughts on concentrated investing and where he’s finding opportunities in U.S. equities.
Transcript
[00:00:17.283]
Steve, it's good to have you up here.
[00:00:19.319]
Thank you for having me.
[00:00:20.120]
He was just telling me how impressed he was with the room and with the crowd.
[00:00:22.789]
He can't see everybody through the camera but that's a big crowd too.
[00:00:26.292]
You should take a picture for your kids before we get off stage.
[00:00:29.596]
I saw Steve back in September in Boston
[00:00:33.900]
and he said, I can't wait to come down to Florida.
[00:00:36.269]
I said, great, particular reason?
[00:00:38.638]
He said, because it's named after my fund.
[00:00:40.874]
I said, what do you mean? He says, well, I run U.S. Focus Stock Fund and this
[00:00:43.443]
is FOCUS Palm Beach so we can go with that.
[00:00:47.781]
I wanted to start with the fact that this session that we're doing for the next
[00:00:51.851]
30 minutes is about concentrated investing in U.S.
[00:00:54.788]
equities. I know there's a lot of concentration behind what you do
[00:00:58.825]
but there's also a concentration in equity selection.
[00:01:01.361]
You've got 40 stocks in this big market.
[00:01:04.931]
36.
[00:01:05.832]
Let's start there.
[00:01:08.401]
Tell us all about it. Let's unpack it.
[00:01:11.371]
The way I look at it, my one advantage ...
[00:01:15.008]
couple things, stocks follow earnings.
[00:01:18.244]
My one advantage is I work at Fidelity and we have access to
[00:01:22.348]
companies and able to probe their growth
[00:01:26.686]
potential, their earning potential.
[00:01:28.521]
I use that advantage
[00:01:33.626]
to go through the S&P 500 and quickly get rid of things that we cannot
[00:01:37.630]
own in a concentrated manner, companies that are over levered, companies
[00:01:41.701]
that don't earn money, companies that don't grow the revenues, and it leaves a
[00:01:46.739]
group of stocks that I then focus my time on.
[00:01:49.742]
You run a concentrated
[00:01:53.713]
fund, as I told audiences before,
[00:01:58.084]
my goal is to crush the S&P 500 and
[00:02:02.255]
not lose my job.
[00:02:05.091]
You can crush the S&P 500 one year and then get
[00:02:09.229]
fired the next year if you own two different
[00:02:14.901]
types of stocks.
[00:02:16.236]
I tend to own stocks that are kind of down the fairway.
[00:02:20.373]
Companies that are growing their revenues, companies that are growing their
[00:02:23.243]
earnings faster than the market and they're trading at reasonable
[00:02:27.247]
multiples. What I do is as they appreciate
[00:02:31.184]
in things I recycled the money and put it in the next name.
[00:02:35.088]
It keeps the fund associated
[00:02:39.058]
usually with some very good secular growth themes, not
[00:02:43.630]
because I'm saying I want to buy these growth themes because you never want to
[00:02:47.133]
buy a growth theme, you want to follow the earnings.
[00:02:50.103]
If you follow the earning the fund usually has some good growth themes in it.
[00:02:54.707]
That's what I do every day.
[00:02:56.543]
Where did you come up with 36, and what's the range?
[00:03:00.680]
Well, the range, I can go to 60.
[00:03:05.151]
36 as I've told people is ...
[00:03:08.121]
and I wish I could tell you it's some type of logarithm and I've got this
[00:03:12.559]
thing but basically I have a screen on my desk.
[00:03:16.563]
I run five different funds.
[00:03:18.865]
For this fund and the U.S.
[00:03:21.901]
version of it, basically, I decided I'm going to do one
[00:03:25.939]
column on my spreadsheet, so 36 is
[00:03:30.076]
one column. I know if I get outside of the column I
[00:03:34.013]
need to get rid of a name.
[00:03:38.251]
That's how I do it.
[00:03:39.953]
If somebody buys you a bigger monitor does the fund get larger?
[00:03:42.755]
A bigger monitor or if I change the font.
[00:03:46.259]
I'll be back here next year it could be 44 names.
[00:03:49.729]
If I go from 10 font to 12 or 9 font, whatever, it
[00:03:53.733]
could go up. That's what I do.
[00:03:56.436]
It's a good point. I was talking earlier before I came up here,
[00:04:00.373]
I run zero cash.
[00:04:02.976]
Well, you can't run zero cash, I have 0.2 cash because you have flows
[00:04:07.213]
coming in and out.
[00:04:10.049]
A name has to win its way on the team.
[00:04:13.686]
As I look at my 36 stocks and today, not today, I'll be on a plane,
[00:04:18.258]
but tomorrow when I'm meeting with a company as I look at it and I look at the
[00:04:22.028]
upside downside I'm like, is this team, is this player better
[00:04:26.032]
than something in the fund exists that I already have?
[00:04:29.102]
When something happens I have two trades.
[00:04:31.704]
One comes out and one comes in because it makes me ...
[00:04:35.308]
I don't want to have name creep.
[00:04:40.113]
I want to keep it in the best names.
[00:04:42.548]
There's a lot of times when we go into things,
[00:04:47.053]
electricity is a big thing with AI and stuff like that, there's about seven
[00:04:51.157]
or eight great ways to play electricity.
[00:04:53.593]
I've got to pick one.
[00:04:56.162]
There's five or six good ways to play connectivity.
[00:05:00.433]
I've got to pick one.
[00:05:02.302]
It makes me not only get the earnings right,
[00:05:06.839]
the trajectory right, but then I've got to pick, hopefully, the
[00:05:11.144]
name right within the group.
[00:05:13.146]
Let's talk more about that scrutiny of picking names.
[00:05:15.982]
You said about meeting with companies, which you'll do tomorrow, I'm sure.
[00:05:19.552]
You're on the 11th floor, the 14th floor is where all the companies come in.
[00:05:23.489]
You can go up and see anybody you want.
[00:05:25.425]
That's true of anybody, any investment professional at the firm.
[00:05:29.329]
When you go in to see a CEO or whoever is sent to talk to Fidelity
[00:05:33.433]
what kind of questions are you asking these days, especially in this
[00:05:36.302]
environment, in general.
[00:05:44.010]
Depending on what industry they're in you're asking what the core of their
[00:05:46.579]
business like this and then you stop and you say, okay, AI,
[00:05:51.284]
is it going to be a benefit or a threat, and what are
[00:05:55.288]
you doing? Not only is AI the number one investment
[00:05:59.459]
theme for most people running growth money in the U.S., the
[00:06:03.930]
next leg of AI is going to be which companies
[00:06:07.900]
adopt it the fastest and the best.
[00:06:13.139]
Whether you're running a hospital, whether you're running an insurance company,
[00:06:16.642]
we just talked to an insurance company, the stuff that AI is going to do for
[00:06:19.979]
the collection of data before
[00:06:24.283]
they make the underwriting decision.
[00:06:26.719]
He went through, this company went through how they're underwriting all the
[00:06:29.889]
hotels owned by Marriott around the world.
[00:06:31.858]
It usually took them three months to get the data into a folder
[00:06:35.828]
where they could sit down and decide this is going to be our price.
[00:06:39.732]
Basically, he goes we're doing that now in one day.
[00:06:45.171]
Things like that, it's going to save a lot of people money.
[00:06:49.208]
Basically, this is not a very hard business.
[00:06:53.646]
How fast your revenue is growing, are your margins going flat down or up, how's
[00:07:00.520]
your balance sheets interest expense, any change in the tax rate, are you
[00:07:04.023]
buying back shares, issuing shares, and how much capex are you spending, and
[00:07:08.761]
what are you using your free cash flow for? The process
[00:07:13.132]
of going through companies is the same but now
[00:07:17.136]
we have a new tool, no different than
[00:07:21.174]
the cotton gin or the Gutenberg press or the internet.
[00:07:25.011]
We have a new tool that people can enter into their system.
[00:07:28.414]
For some people it's going to be great, for some people it's going to be
[00:07:31.617]
really, really bad.
[00:07:32.952]
You see AI as something to amplify what teams do versus
[00:07:37.323]
something that's going to get in the way if they adopt it correctly.
[00:07:40.426]
Correct.
[00:07:42.028]
Hello, investors. We'll be back to the show in just a moment.
[00:07:45.231]
I wanted to share that here at Fidelity, we value your opinion.
[00:07:48.801]
Please take a few minutes to help us shape the future of Fidelity Connects
[00:07:51.103]
podcasts. Complete our listener survey by visiting fidelity.ca/survey,
[00:07:56.209]
and you could win one of our branded tumblers.
[00:07:58.177]
Periodic draws ending by March 30th, 2026.
[00:08:01.247]
And don't forget to listen to Fidelity Connects, the Upside, and French
[00:08:04.851]
DialoguesFidelity podcasts available on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever
[00:08:08.888]
else you get your podcasts. Now back to today's show.
[00:08:14.293]
Earnings season's begun.
[00:08:17.263]
I just want to preface it actually by saying, I think I saw this morning on
[00:08:20.633]
CNBC, CEO confidence seems to be faltering.
[00:08:23.369]
Do you sense that or have you sensed that in meetings that you're doing?
[00:08:27.406]
Just depends what industry you're in.
[00:08:29.141]
I don't really look at
[00:08:33.312]
pools of things like that because if you're trying
[00:08:37.517]
to sell boats, RVs, cars,
[00:08:43.289]
anything that is over 50 — and even houses — anything that's over
[00:08:47.226]
55 to 70% financed,
[00:08:51.664]
and you ask them how business is, business is really bad.
[00:08:56.636]
But then if you go over here and you talk to people that are doing HVAC
[00:09:00.773]
for data centres, electricity for data centres, anything for data
[00:09:04.944]
centres, it's never been better.
[00:09:10.182]
Even in some of the exciting new GLP-1 drugs and stuff
[00:09:14.220]
like that, they can't build the factories fast enough.
[00:09:17.023]
When you take a survey of all of them and say it's going like this,
[00:09:21.193]
as a focused fund manager I really could care less.
[00:09:24.497]
I feel bad for them but I could care less about what's happening over here
[00:09:27.500]
because most of my names I own are,
[00:09:32.138]
as you'll see Will Danoff later today, are smiley face type companies.
[00:09:38.744]
You mentioned AI data centres, those are bigger than Amazon warehouses,
[00:09:42.982]
they're one to two million square feet.
[00:09:45.551]
They're popping up all over the place and they have a lot of inputs.
[00:09:48.454]
I'm sure you see so many companies that are supplying widgets and
[00:09:52.625]
all sorts of things for these data centres.
[00:09:54.493]
How does that affect you from a concentration standpoint?
[00:09:57.330]
You want to keep your 36 to 60 names but now there's all these interesting
[00:10:01.167]
companies that have got a new business supplying data centres as an example.
[00:10:05.004]
That's a great question.
[00:10:08.975]
As a new name comes in you're like, what is this doing for our stew?
[00:10:13.112]
I look at the fund a lot of different ways and one way is it's a nice beef
[00:10:16.682]
stew. You don't want the beef stew to have too much potatoes,
[00:10:20.653]
have too much meat or too spicy, it's
[00:10:24.991]
got to be right there. So you can go all in and have all AI
[00:10:29.095]
but then you've got too much Tabasco sauce.
[00:10:32.198]
Basically, as you look at this thing you have to understand, a new name, what
[00:10:36.802]
is it doing for the portfolio?
[00:10:39.905]
Yes, it may be coming in connectivity but it's not
[00:10:44.410]
the correlation with doing HVAC and connectivity or
[00:10:49.248]
transformers versus HVAC.
[00:10:52.518]
It's really the same, it's the same capex dollar.
[00:10:56.222]
The fact that you're adding a name but at the expense of something that has to
[00:10:59.525]
come out you must digest an incredible amount of information that comes through
[00:11:03.129]
you. How do you deal with that as a portfolio manager?
[00:11:07.466]
That's a very good question.
[00:11:10.002]
The biggest thing I wish we could go back in
[00:11:14.073]
time and get rid of is email.
[00:11:16.375]
I really hate email.
[00:11:18.744]
I think it was one of the worst inventions we've ever had.
[00:11:22.548]
I get 1,000 emails a day.
[00:11:25.785]
Even when you're on the road you get up early, you open your thing and you sit
[00:11:29.488]
there with the delete button going t-t-t-t-t-. Then you read
[00:11:33.793]
three or four out of a thousand. Data
[00:11:39.498]
processing is what I do.
[00:11:44.003]
I have that, I have our internal research, I have the street research
[00:11:48.107]
and then you have the conference call.
[00:11:52.344]
One of our top 10 holdings, Bank of New York, reported this morning
[00:11:56.615]
in a 07:30 conference call.
[00:11:59.218]
I didn't listen to it, I was doing a photo shoot outside.
[00:12:03.756]
You've got to have priorities in life.
[00:12:10.796]
That's what I do, I have to prioritize my time on
[00:12:15.401]
where to go.
[00:12:17.737]
I'm going to repeat myself again.
[00:12:19.538]
I need to go through, there's 504 stocks in the SP 500, at
[00:12:23.943]
the end of every quarter I have a massive spreadsheet and I sit down and I have
[00:12:27.913]
a price target of upside and downside for all 504.
[00:12:31.917]
Some are based on dividend yields, some are price-to-sales, some are
[00:12:35.554]
price-to-earnings, some are a price-to-book, some are just have to make up
[00:12:38.891]
because they have no revenues, earnings or anything.
[00:12:41.961]
Basically, as I go through that I have piles of ...
[00:12:45.631]
it's like fishing. You're like, no one has ever caught a fish over here, do not
[00:12:49.468]
fish here. Sometimes you catch a fish here, take a little look, but
[00:12:53.439]
the fishing is good right here.
[00:12:56.008]
I spend my time in this pile.
[00:12:58.444]
Each quarter and every day I'm basically trying to figure out what
[00:13:02.515]
stuff is moving from the do not fish into the fish, and what is going from
[00:13:06.619]
fish into everyone's already caught up with the fish.
[00:13:09.355]
As I look at this thing, it's a game and I'm basically
[00:13:13.626]
moving the parts around to make sure we have the best 36 players.
[00:13:18.030]
I don't know what I want to have for lunch, beef, stew or fish but we'll figure
[00:13:20.699]
that out later.
[00:13:24.403]
Neil Constable is going to be up speaking later. He heads up QRI, Quantitative
[00:13:27.506]
Research and Investing. Does that factor into helping you
[00:13:31.811]
filter names, the whole quantitative ...
[00:13:34.046]
this is kind of new stuff for the industry but for Fidelity it's a big
[00:13:37.583]
expenditure. How does that help?
[00:13:39.552]
Oh, it helps a lot.
[00:13:43.022]
I'm greedy so I wish it was going faster.
[00:13:45.891]
I don't know if Neil's out there. As I look at my
[00:13:50.062]
stuff I have now different ways of looking
[00:13:54.033]
at this information. I found someone who is going
[00:13:58.170]
through all of the research notes and giving me a score based
[00:14:02.641]
on the words that are used in the research note to determine whether it's a
[00:14:06.445]
happy face or a frown.
[00:14:08.614]
I have someone else that is going through and doing changes so
[00:14:13.085]
in your model if you change anything it's a red flag, said, ooh,
[00:14:17.356]
they changed their margin. If you look at these spreadsheets ...
[00:14:19.458]
you talk about 36 names 10 font, these
[00:14:23.596]
things are 6 font and you're like this going, who can read that number?
[00:14:29.602]
I've gotten another person doing screens.
[00:14:31.303]
This morning
[00:14:35.708]
Bank of New York was supposed to earn $1.74 and they earned $1,91,
[00:14:40.045]
earnings up 23% so the out-year earning changes.
[00:14:43.983]
I have something that's automatically showing me what the '26 and '27
[00:14:48.354]
earnings changes are and it gives me the next day.
[00:14:51.957]
I get the list of companies who's earned ...
[00:14:54.894]
because stocks follow earnings so I've got people watching
[00:14:58.898]
the earnings, the sentiment, and going through my
[00:15:03.068]
data that I can't process.
[00:15:05.004]
Wow. You said stocks follow earnings, Will Danoff talks about that a lot.
[00:15:08.340]
I think you sit beside him office-wise.
[00:15:10.943]
Two doors down.
[00:15:12.578]
What have you learned from Will? What's it like working with him, who has a
[00:15:16.215]
larger number of holdings than you do as well.
[00:15:23.289]
Oh, he has 22 times more holdings than I do, roughly.
[00:15:27.159]
Yeah, that's my math too.
[00:15:32.298]
Will and I have worked together for 34 years and it's
[00:15:38.437]
his energy and he goes to the next meeting.
[00:15:43.175]
He's doing it.
[00:15:45.811]
I'll be sitting in my office, it's getting late in the day, I'm thinking which
[00:15:49.281]
train am I going to catch going home? He comes by and he goes, so-and-so's in.
[00:15:53.052]
I'm like, oh, yeah, they are, aren't they?
[00:15:56.055]
Next thing you know I've got my clipboard, we're upstairs at the meeting.
[00:15:58.824]
I'm thinking I could have missed that one.
[00:16:02.795]
What I've learned from him is go see everything.
[00:16:06.799]
The key, so I told you I'm avoiding this and buying this
[00:16:10.869]
but you don't know how good this is without
[00:16:15.040]
knowing how bad that is.
[00:16:17.943]
You have to see the whole spectrum of stocks to know that, you know what,
[00:16:22.381]
that's awful and it's trading at 8.8 times EBITDA.
[00:16:26.986]
That's medium bad and that's at 9.6 times.
[00:16:30.289]
That's okay and it's at 10.7.
[00:16:32.958]
This is awesome and it's only at 11.
[00:16:36.328]
You need the whole spectrum to do valuation.
[00:16:38.263]
From Will, it's go see another company,
[00:16:42.668]
go see another company.
[00:16:44.336]
No one sees more companies than him.
[00:16:47.106]
And he drags you along.
[00:16:48.407]
Well, only now and then because he knows what industries I used to cover.
[00:16:53.679]
Newspapers, printing, cheque printing, railroads, trucking, shipping, cable,
[00:16:57.549]
cable equipment, and energy.
[00:16:59.752]
He, as an analyst, he'll come in and go,
[00:17:03.889]
oh, CSX Railroad's in. I'm like, I'm not going to buy CSX railroad.
[00:17:08.427]
I'm like, okay, I'm going, I'm up there. When he sees something that he knows I
[00:17:11.964]
have covered in the past, but that was
[00:17:15.934]
in 1992.
[00:17:18.437]
I try to remind him, Will, that was in 1992 which is a long time ago.
[00:17:23.242]
It brings up a great point that analysts cover a
[00:17:27.679]
vast amount of sectors before becoming a diversified portfolio manager.
[00:17:31.083]
What was your favourite sector when you were an analyst, if you think back to
[00:17:34.219]
that time?
[00:17:38.424]
Railroads. They just changed the rules on pricing
[00:17:43.695]
which they just started earning money and then that set off
[00:17:48.200]
the ... it was the Staggers Act and they basically were able to change
[00:17:52.371]
the way they did pricing.
[00:17:54.106]
Then what happened it set off all the mergers.
[00:17:58.243]
Burlington Northern bought Santa Fe, Union Pacific bought Southern
[00:18:02.614]
Pacific, Norfolk Southern and
[00:18:07.186]
CSX, they split Conrail.
[00:18:09.054]
It's fascinating, for everyone watching this,
[00:18:14.026]
I think the initial bid was 55, the next one bid 60, 65,
[00:18:18.263]
70, 75, 80, 90, they got to 100 and they said, okay, let's just
[00:18:22.367]
split it. So they paid twice as much as they should have paid and they only
[00:18:26.338]
got half. It was an exciting time because not only was the
[00:18:30.342]
business model changing ... because you've got to remember they had an
[00:18:32.811]
operating ratio which is the inverse of operating income.
[00:18:35.747]
They had operating ratios of kind of 92 to 93 and now the industry
[00:18:39.718]
is at 63.
[00:18:41.453]
That 30 points, 30 points of operating margin happened
[00:18:45.991]
mostly during that period and that's why they were doing mergers, and they
[00:18:48.927]
continue to do mergers because they can go in and cut a lot of costs.
[00:18:52.865]
You remembered a lot of detail from the '90s.
[00:18:54.633]
That was great. That shows how it formed a lot of your thinking today.
[00:18:58.370]
Question's just come in, a lot of people saying the market is very expensive
[00:19:02.074]
but our audience are asking about how do you assess current valuations, where
[00:19:05.444]
they are right now, or how are you assessing current valuations and which
[00:19:09.381]
risks are most important to monitor.
[00:19:16.922]
There's a lot of risks. Tariff risk, location risk, currency risk, there's
[00:19:22.861]
a lot of risks right now which we saw earlier in the year.
[00:19:26.298]
I'm monitoring all of them.
[00:19:28.600]
You have to know what you own and what risks you have.
[00:19:33.972]
Valuation does not bother me right now.
[00:19:37.476]
As I said, please stay away from questions on gold prices
[00:19:41.813]
or currencies or oil price, I know none of this stuff.
[00:19:45.017]
I follow earnings.
[00:19:47.953]
I am paying 2.6 P/E points.
[00:19:51.356]
You take the P/E of the S&P 500,
[00:19:55.561]
my fund is 2.6 points higher than the S& P 500.
[00:20:00.232]
The S&P 500 earnings looking out by the estimates is,
[00:20:04.803]
I believe, 14.7 but
[00:20:08.807]
the estimates for my stocks are over 30.
[00:20:11.743]
I'm paying two points for twice the earnings
[00:20:15.914]
growth of the market.
[00:20:18.517]
That's Nirvana.
[00:20:21.420]
People go, well, the forward P/E or the History P/E,
[00:20:25.457]
really interesting to me but I don't spend any time on that.
[00:20:28.427]
I just need one new name.
[00:20:30.562]
I get up, I write on my paper thing, Focus Fund, one
[00:20:34.533]
new name on top of my yellow page. I am a
[00:20:38.870]
shopper. Who's ever shopped at T.J.
[00:20:41.173]
Maxx or Marshalls?
[00:20:44.843]
I am a T.J. Maxx shopper.
[00:20:47.846]
The store is filled with lots of stuff.
[00:20:50.415]
I get up in the morning and what got delivered last night that is mispriced.
[00:20:55.454]
I'm going through there and trying to find something that is great,
[00:21:00.158]
that is what I do. If I can find one new name I've had a good day, or
[00:21:04.663]
a good week, a good month.
[00:21:07.699]
Interesting. Speaking of new names, there's a question about turnover.
[00:21:09.935]
Are you happy if you go through a year you don't find anything that needs to be
[00:21:13.472]
replaced, that the portfolio is consistent a year later, or
[00:21:18.543]
is there a frequency that you look for?
[00:21:22.581]
I don't solve for turnover.
[00:21:25.851]
There's great turnover which is, I bought the stock at
[00:21:30.155]
30, it's now at 92 and
[00:21:34.159]
it's now reached where we're price [indecipherable] and I don't stay
[00:21:38.297]
too late at the party. Rule number two, which
[00:21:42.501]
is don't get fired, as things get expensive
[00:21:47.739]
I try and keep my ratio of P/E to the market in
[00:21:52.144]
band and as things do appreciate I recycle that money and
[00:21:56.315]
put it down and put a new name in. You talk about
[00:22:00.385]
the Toronto Blue Jays, I basically am owning these stocks
[00:22:04.456]
from inning three or four to inning six or seven.
[00:22:08.393]
I don't buy them in inning one two or three and I don't own them in inning
[00:22:12.364]
eight and nine. I am right here.
[00:22:15.367]
Your business is getting better, I think it can last longer or be higher
[00:22:19.004]
magnitude, as people start writing reports about how that's
[00:22:23.108]
going to happen I'm saying, all right, people know it and then I take the money
[00:22:26.712]
and I recycle it in the next name.
[00:22:30.615]
That's good.
[00:22:31.416]
The bad turnover, which we had some earlier this year, it was
[00:22:35.587]
bad, would be you have a story
[00:22:40.292]
... we had one company that was an incredible company but
[00:22:44.396]
they did a lot of government contracting.
[00:22:47.666]
When you have Elon Musk on stage with a chainsaw saying he's going to
[00:22:51.970]
rip up all government contracts that usually is not good for a
[00:22:55.907]
government contracting company.
[00:22:59.745]
That one could not foresee and that one
[00:23:04.216]
irks me. Still irks me.
[00:23:06.785]
Sorry about that, sorry for that question.
[00:23:10.489]
Let's move along. If you look at the top ten one of the companies is
[00:23:14.493]
DraftKings. There must be a story behind that.
[00:23:17.863]
You couldn't do online gambling in the United States until the
[00:23:21.967]
Supreme Court changed the rules in 2018.
[00:23:25.103]
Took people a little while from getting approval to get
[00:23:29.074]
going and then basically what they decided, each state kind of came up with
[00:23:33.078]
their rules but one of the main rules was if you have an existing casino
[00:23:37.349]
you get an online licence with it.
[00:23:42.721]
You all probably didn't get bombarded ...
[00:23:45.023]
we spent the next two years with just all the advertising
[00:23:49.094]
on TV. Now it's all drugs and
[00:23:53.398]
it's all drug stocks but back then it was basically
[00:23:57.536]
... and they all fought it out.
[00:23:59.838]
What happened is we went from MGM, Caesars,
[00:24:05.010]
PENN gaming, blah, blah, blah, blah, down to two players, FanDuel and
[00:24:09.147]
DraftKings. I owned a few of the casinos as I was learning this
[00:24:13.084]
area because they made money.
[00:24:17.155]
DraftKings did not make money but I started getting interested when they
[00:24:21.193]
turned profitable.
[00:24:23.028]
What's happening is when you do a single bet for gambling they earn a
[00:24:27.199]
4% hold.
[00:24:29.301]
That is pretty good. Right now the growth is in parlay where you put
[00:24:33.371]
three things together and the hold is 14%.
[00:24:36.575]
As their business mix changes they have less competition, the promotion cost
[00:24:40.712]
is going down, they're earning money, buying back stock, it's
[00:24:45.383]
good. Now
[00:24:50.722]
I have to worry about prediction markets but that's tomorrow's problem.
[00:24:53.091]
Which market?
[00:24:53.792]
Prediction.
[00:24:56.628]
As I tell people there is no perfect stock.
[00:24:59.764]
You're giving up something,
[00:25:03.869]
you have to compromise on something.
[00:25:05.670]
I love listening to people and they say I only buy stocks with
[00:25:09.741]
great management, good blah, blah, blah, blah.
[00:25:11.676]
I go, that's great, what stock is that?
[00:25:14.913]
Because if you have all that then the valuation's too high.
[00:25:18.350]
We're going to wrap up soon but I wanted to go back to AI for a second because
[00:25:23.622]
I saw today that also Apple lost a senior exec to
[00:25:27.926]
Meta and that's probably something that's going on a lot from an AI standpoint.
[00:25:32.097]
Is that something that you see, a lot of poaching, if you will, from firm to
[00:25:35.500]
firm?
[00:25:36.668]
Correct.
[00:25:38.203]
Is that a concern?
[00:25:40.939]
It all depends. If you're losing people it's
[00:25:45.176]
a little concern. It's kind of like the PGA golf tour.
[00:25:50.448]
Some of these players left, went to live ...
[00:25:54.119]
and you sit there going, ah, does that mean PGA is over?
[00:25:56.388]
You can't look at that.
[00:25:57.989]
Some of the contracts that Meta is giving these people you're like
[00:26:02.193]
... but if you are losing people you need to watch it.
[00:26:04.796]
A number of these people say there's basically 135
[00:26:09.467]
AI gurus
[00:26:13.505]
and they're all fighting for these 135 people.
[00:26:18.510]
As they're all changing seats the money they're getting is astronomical.
[00:26:23.682]
I don't know, some of these football teams, if you look at them they have
[00:26:27.719]
a great quarterback, great running back but they lose.
[00:26:32.357]
Just because you go and get these people doesn't mean you're going to win.
[00:26:36.027]
I mean, Notre Dame is playing USC this weekend, not that I care, love Notre
[00:26:39.731]
Dame, but USC every year has three
[00:26:44.002]
times as many people go to the NFL as Notre Dame.
[00:26:46.705]
You sit there, their quarterback looks good, he's gonna go play, they're
[00:26:50.141]
running like this but they lose because they're not a team, they're
[00:26:53.578]
individuals.
[00:26:54.312]
Just 'cause you're going out and paying all these people money, and they all
[00:26:57.616]
have egos, kind of like portfolio managers, and you put them all on the thing
[00:27:01.086]
like this, doesn't mean you're going to have a great stew.
[00:27:04.756]
Just because you've got somebody doesn't mean, wow, you're going to be a
[00:27:07.592]
winner. I've seen a lot of teams with great players that just don't ...
[00:27:11.630]
it's not a team.
[00:27:13.565]
It's like NBA playing in the Olympics and stuff like that.
[00:27:17.602]
Our team is 100% better but some of these teams that have been playing together
[00:27:20.338]
actually are a lot better than the prima donna NBA players.
[00:27:23.608]
You have a lot of great analogies. You also have a a lot on your plate but you
[00:27:26.444]
seem to be processing it all very, very well which is why there's been such
[00:27:29.314]
great success. Congratulations on that.
[00:27:31.616]
We have to go to, before we shut down, five fun questions
[00:27:35.754]
about you. This is something new and this is something that's going to be
[00:27:38.456]
unrelated to what's in the portfolio. First question, hidden talent.
[00:27:44.195]
Gardening.
I'd love to explore that but we don't have time.
[00:27:45.864]
Underrated vacation spot.
[00:27:47.799]
Ooh, underrated vacation spot.
[00:27:49.534]
You're not allowed to read the question.
[00:27:52.370]
Okay. Underrated vacation spot. How long do I have to think about this?
[00:27:55.206]
Three minutes.
[00:27:55.907]
Okay, wow.
[00:27:58.309]
Cape Cod.
[00:28:00.512]
Zoom calls or in person?
[00:28:02.313]
Oh, in person.
[00:28:03.848]
I like that. What's a movie or show you can watch endlessly?
[00:28:17.195]
John Wick.
[00:28:18.063]
How many times have you seen it?
[00:28:19.998]
Particularly during COVID I got to the point where my wife told me I had to
[00:28:23.134]
stop watching it because it was on ...
[00:28:25.303]
either Wick one, Wick two, Wick three, it would be on.
[00:28:27.839]
I never watched the whole thing but I always would watch 20 or 30 minutes
[00:28:31.876]
right in the middle. She would come down and I'd see her and I'd turn it off.
[00:28:35.747]
I could watch that, I could watch John Wick all the time.
[00:28:42.253]
Star Wars or Star Trek?
[00:28:44.556]
Oh, Star Trek.
[00:28:47.425]
I'm not going to explore any more of those. We have two minutes left so I do
[00:28:50.061]
want to ask, what should we be thinking of as we approach 2026
[00:28:54.065]
market-wise? Just going back to that.
[00:28:59.170]
We have green days, red days, green days, red days based on government
[00:29:03.108]
closed, government open, we hate China, we love China.
[00:29:08.480]
Rare earths, no rare earths, blah, blah, blah, this blah, blah, blah.
[00:29:10.949]
Underneath all that stuff there is a trend of a
[00:29:15.053]
new technology.
[00:29:17.355]
You turn on the TV, is it an AI bubble and blah, blah, blah, blah.
[00:29:20.725]
No. It hasn't even gotten to the companies
[00:29:24.829]
using it.
[00:29:26.865]
We still have a long way to go. There's going to be some great
[00:29:31.069]
winners and there's going to some really bad losers.
[00:29:33.371]
I've got to turn the card over
[00:29:37.475]
and say, keep, don't keep, keep, don't keep.
[00:29:43.214]
As that happens it's a fascinating time because it's going to change
[00:29:47.385]
a lot of things we do, how we process information and do stuff.
[00:29:53.291]
This is an exciting to be in the stock
[00:29:57.328]
market because you're not asking ...
[00:30:00.131]
you said, what questions are you asking, I've been doing this a long time and
[00:30:03.935]
you go into the company with no changes going like this, so how are
[00:30:08.039]
sales? Now there's just new stuff and you can see
[00:30:12.210]
some excitement. This is a great time to
[00:30:16.514]
be picking winners and losers.
[00:30:18.716]
It's fascinating to talk to you. Steve DuFour, thanks very much.
[00:30:23.188]
Thanks for watching or listening to the Fidelity Connects
[00:30:27.125]
podcast. Now if you haven't done so already, please subscribe to Fidelity
[00:30:31.262]
Connects on your podcast platform of choice.
[00:30:34.065]
And if you like what you're hearing, please leave a review or a five-star
[00:30:36.901]
rating. Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are available by working with
[00:30:40.872]
a financial advisor or through an online brokerage account.
[00:30:44.242]
Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.
[00:30:47.946]
While on Fidelity.ca, you can also find more information on future live
[00:30:51.783]
webcasts. And don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn,
[00:30:55.920]
and Instagram.
[00:30:57.922]
We'll end today's show with a short disclaimer.
[00:31:00.792]
The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants,
[00:31:04.629]
and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or
[00:31:08.566]
its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and should not
[00:31:12.570]
be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice.
[00:31:15.106]
It is not an offer to sell or buy.
[00:31:17.408]
Or an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any entity or securities
[00:31:21.746]
cited. Read a fund's prospectus before investing, funds are not guaranteed.
[00:31:26.551]
Their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.
[00:31:30.121]
Fees, expenses, and commissions are all associated with fund investments.
[00:31:33.958]
Thanks again. We'll see you next time.

