FidelityConnects: Factor investing – the quant edge for today’s markets

00:07.007 --> 00:08.775
Hello, and welcome to Fidelity Connects.

00:08.775 --> 00:12.846
I'm Pamela Ritchie. Global earnings estimates are climbing and that is giving

00:12.846 --> 00:16.683
value, as a factor, investing a fresh tailwind.

00:16.683 --> 00:20.720
For the first time since 2022 our next guest today is upgrading

00:20.720 --> 00:24.891
value and he says it's also a powerful hedge against

00:24.891 --> 00:26.626
momentum as a factor.

00:26.626 --> 00:30.630
What is driving this shift, and which data points are he and his team focused

00:30.630 --> 00:34.801
on right now? Joining us here today from the edge that Fidelity's

00:34.801 --> 00:38.805
team shows with quantitative research to the factors and

00:38.805 --> 00:43.376
Fidelity ETFs that may stand out in today's market is Bobby Barnes.

00:43.376 --> 00:46.679
He is Fidelity's head of Quantitative Index Solutions.

00:46.679 --> 00:49.516
Warm welcome to you, Bobby. We've been dying to ask you so many different

00:49.516 --> 00:51.317
questions so I'm glad you're joining us here today.

00:51.317 --> 00:52.318
How are you?

00:52.318 --> 00:54.421
Thank you. Good, good. Thanks for having me.

00:54.421 --> 00:57.490
We'll invite everyone to send their questions in for Bobby Barnes over the next

00:57.490 --> 01:01.528
half hour or so. What's going on in the markets right now

01:01.528 --> 01:05.665
in terms of the factor story is it seems like

01:05.665 --> 01:09.702
AI trumps everything. Is that fair to say?

01:09.702 --> 01:11.404
Absolutely.

01:11.404 --> 01:15.508
AI has been a major driver of stock returns over

01:15.508 --> 01:17.710
the past year, 2025 in particular.

01:17.710 --> 01:22.415
Depending on your portfolio's exposure to

01:22.415 --> 01:27.287
AI that in a very nice linear fashion determined how

01:27.287 --> 01:31.357
well your performance was versus the overall market.

01:31.357 --> 01:35.495
To put rough numbers around it I think the 200 stocks that

01:35.495 --> 01:39.632
had the highest correlation to AI last year on a sector neutral

01:39.632 --> 01:44.604
basis, not just overweight tech, that basket had

01:44.604 --> 01:48.908
a total absolute performance of about 45%, well above the

01:48.908 --> 01:53.580
17 or so that you got from the S&P 500.

01:53.580 --> 01:56.983
The other side of that, obviously, were the stocks that had a very low

01:56.983 --> 02:01.221
correlation to the AI trade, those ended up having

02:01.221 --> 02:06.826
low single-digit performance over the course of 2025, again,

02:06.826 --> 02:08.862
underperforming the S&P.

02:08.862 --> 02:11.898
Now, year-to-date is a different story but I would...

02:11.898 --> 02:15.735
It really is, I mean, my goodness, what's going on year-to-date.

02:15.735 --> 02:20.173
Take us there and what you do with a story of factors, or

02:20.173 --> 02:22.876
even sectors.

02:22.876 --> 02:24.878
Here's what I'll say about year-to-date.

02:24.878 --> 02:28.214
I'll start with the punchline first which is I want you to ignore it, what

02:28.214 --> 02:31.518
you've seen, and then I'll explain why.

02:31.518 --> 02:35.755
The reason why is every year there's an

02:35.755 --> 02:39.459
effect that, if you Google it it's called the January effect, what the January

02:39.459 --> 02:43.530
affect is, usually at the beginning of the year, whatever worked last

02:43.530 --> 02:45.865
year you get a short term reversal.

02:45.865 --> 02:49.435
Kind of think about it as rebalancing, where small-caps underperformed

02:49.435 --> 02:51.838
large-caps last year.

02:51.838 --> 02:55.542
You look year-to-date, you got that exact reversal that I'm describing.

02:55.542 --> 02:59.979
Same thing across sectors. Last year tech, comm services

02:59.979 --> 03:04.417
were the best performing sectors. Energy was the biggest lagger.

03:04.417 --> 03:08.655
Year-to-date you're seeing that reversal as well.

03:08.655 --> 03:12.659
I'm inclined to attribute that behaviour to the January

03:12.659 --> 03:14.360
effect.

03:14.360 --> 03:18.531
Just to put a finer point on it, you never want to see a

03:18.531 --> 03:22.769
stock performance up or down that's not also confirmed by

03:22.769 --> 03:26.372
the fundamentals or the earnings revisions, year-to-date that's what's been

03:26.372 --> 03:30.843
happening. You're seeing what looks like a broadening out into these left for

03:30.843 --> 03:34.847
forgotten sectors and reversal of factors but the fundamentals

03:34.847 --> 03:38.384
aren't corroborating that.

03:38.384 --> 03:42.488
We're approaching the end of earning season now, as

03:42.488 --> 03:46.526
we get into March and start the rest of our year I think you'll see a

03:46.526 --> 03:49.762
give-back of a lot of the different dynamics that we've seen thus far

03:49.762 --> 03:51.097
yea-to-date.

03:51.097 --> 03:55.301
Thus far year-to-date we have seen, as you say, sort of lots

03:55.301 --> 03:59.339
of different industries get taken out, concerns of how AI will disrupt

03:59.339 --> 04:04.244
them. That said, you have shifted, as we mentioned in the introduction,

04:04.244 --> 04:07.013
to a value outlook which is fascinating.

04:07.013 --> 04:11.017
This fits into the story of the old economy being revived

04:11.017 --> 04:15.021
by AI and what they can offer, it fits into the

04:15.021 --> 04:18.491
global race for resources and many of these different themes.

04:18.491 --> 04:22.495
Value companies, none of that is baked in, priced in?

04:22.495 --> 04:26.799
Tell us a bit about the value story.

04:26.799 --> 04:32.805
There are a couple of things driving me to that upgrade of value.

04:32.805 --> 04:38.945
Just to list them quickly in three, there is rising estimates.

04:38.945 --> 04:41.981
At the aggregate level what you have to understand about the stock market is

04:41.981 --> 04:45.418
that when you roll up all the earnings forecast for the individual companies

04:45.418 --> 04:49.689
and look at the top level be it for the S&P 500, the TSX,

04:49.689 --> 04:53.526
so on and so forth, the natural progression throughout the year is for

04:53.526 --> 04:57.864
estimates go down.

04:57.864 --> 05:02.969
It's actually rare that you have estimates rising for the top level indices.

05:02.969 --> 05:06.673
When you do have them, however, it ends up being a very strong tailwind for

05:06.673 --> 05:10.710
your pro cyclical factors which tend to be value and small

05:10.710 --> 05:14.747
size. As it turns out we are in an environment where the earnings

05:14.747 --> 05:18.685
estimates across the globe, for emerging markets, the S&P

05:18.685 --> 05:21.754
500 and for EAFE, they're all rising.

05:21.754 --> 05:26.359
That's part of why I think that's going to be a tailwind for value.

05:26.359 --> 05:31.230
The second reason is what I call the value of value.

05:31.230 --> 05:33.633
Just to quickly explain, what does that mean?

05:33.633 --> 05:37.637
Well, when you buy a basket of cheap stocks by definition it's going to be

05:37.637 --> 05:40.273
cheaper than the market because that's what you did.

05:40.273 --> 05:44.877
However, what you can do is look at, well, how cheap is it versus

05:44.877 --> 05:49.215
how cheap it is normally, That's what I mean by the value

05:49.215 --> 05:53.386
of value. When you observe that right now we are

05:53.386 --> 05:57.490
at a cheapness or a discount to the market that

05:57.490 --> 05:59.625
is rare throughout history.

05:59.625 --> 06:03.730
In fact, there are only a handful of other times where value has been as

06:03.730 --> 06:07.467
cheap versus the market as it is today.

06:07.467 --> 06:11.738
The third reason why I'm constructive on value is

06:11.738 --> 06:15.975
for the cost of money and the availability

06:15.975 --> 06:18.311
of money, more so in the former.

06:18.311 --> 06:22.515
The cost of money, we've been in a Fed rate

06:22.515 --> 06:25.952
cycle, a renormalization of Fed rate policy.

06:25.952 --> 06:29.455
The last, call it, 24 months there've been several rate cuts.

06:29.455 --> 06:33.526
As I've said to our viewers many times in the past, when you reduce

06:33.526 --> 06:37.597
rates it does exactly what it's supposed to do but with a lag.

06:37.597 --> 06:41.234
Put a rough number around that it's around 15 to 18 months.

06:41.234 --> 06:45.905
I think that that's going to provide some stimulus that'll

06:45.905 --> 06:48.808
help increase economic activity.

06:48.808 --> 06:52.412
All those things, those three things combined, end up being a tailwind for

06:52.412 --> 06:55.748
value. I think that's a key differentiator.

06:55.748 --> 07:00.453
If anyone has listened to me speak over the last, call it, four years

07:00.453 --> 07:03.856
I've been negative on value since 2022.

07:03.856 --> 07:07.894
This is the first time where I'm seeing a fertile ground for that

07:07.894 --> 07:09.228
factor.

07:09.228 --> 07:13.232
But as we started out this discussion the AI theme and how

07:13.232 --> 07:17.336
it affects many of these companies that would be rated value is still

07:17.336 --> 07:19.539
the biggest thing.

07:19.539 --> 07:23.676
Yeah, so here's the interesting thing about value.

07:23.676 --> 07:27.747
In addition to those three tailwinds I mentioned we are in an AI

07:27.747 --> 07:29.515
trickle-down economy.

07:29.515 --> 07:34.487
What that's doing is, you know, we all associate AI as being a tech-led

07:34.487 --> 07:38.524
phenomenon. It certainly is but it turns out you need a lot of old economy

07:38.524 --> 07:40.960
stuff in order to make it work.

07:40.960 --> 07:44.430
Like resources in Canada.

07:44.430 --> 07:48.634
Yes, the resources and then even within, say,

07:48.634 --> 07:53.072
the tech sector AI is very computationally intensive.

07:53.072 --> 07:56.642
To do the computations you need microchips, semiconductors.

07:56.642 --> 08:00.613
Semiconductors, on a relative basis, are cheaper versus other tech companies

08:00.613 --> 08:03.683
because they're more asset intensive.

08:03.683 --> 08:07.920
Generally speaking, more asset intensive industries are

08:07.920 --> 08:13.493
cheaper than their less asset intensive counterparts, say, like software.

08:13.493 --> 08:17.497
Here again we're in a position where fundamentally, the

08:17.497 --> 08:20.399
fundamentals for the semiconductor companies, as an example, are off the

08:20.399 --> 08:23.970
charts. They can't build those things fast enough.

08:23.970 --> 08:27.139
They need to expand capacity so that's a driver there.

08:27.139 --> 08:31.077
Pipelines are full, I mean, as you say, they cannot get them out

08:31.077 --> 08:34.013
there fast enough.

08:34.013 --> 08:37.683
But the trickle down happens when you look at, okay, the first step is to buy a

08:37.683 --> 08:41.287
bunch of chips, now you want to put them in a warehouse.

08:41.287 --> 08:44.857
These chips stacked together get very hot so now I need world-class cooling.

08:44.857 --> 08:49.462
Well, that's just an HVAC company that's an industrial company.

08:49.462 --> 08:55.067
Then you need to power the whole thing so you've got, again, industrial

08:55.067 --> 08:59.105
companies that have always specialized in providing power

08:59.105 --> 09:03.276
so those are in the value bucket and they are participating

09:03.276 --> 09:06.312
in this AI-dominated market.

09:06.312 --> 09:08.648
And then you've got to wire all this stuff up together.

09:08.648 --> 09:12.351
I think you mentioned the word commodities, okay, now we need a whole bunch of

09:12.351 --> 09:16.789
copper because we need copper to connect all these things together.

09:16.789 --> 09:20.826
This is what I'm seeing that's driving some of the fundamental earnings

09:20.826 --> 09:24.096
revisions for what are otherwise cheap stocks.

09:24.096 --> 09:27.733
What happens when, and some of this has been played out over the course of the

09:27.733 --> 09:31.837
last week and a half where we've seen industries get completely rattled by

09:31.837 --> 09:35.875
the effects that AI may have on insurance, on software, obviously, and others,

09:35.875 --> 09:41.414
what happens when companies like, for instance, the hyperscalers,

09:41.414 --> 09:45.952
become a little bit of old world companies in the sense that they become more

09:45.952 --> 09:50.189
asset heavy. I mean, you've got hyperscalers investing and

09:50.189 --> 09:54.293
ultimately looking to own potentially nuclear plants, things

09:54.293 --> 09:58.364
that are major capital stories in terms of heavy assets and

09:58.364 --> 10:01.534
so on. What happens if the companies transform a bit?

10:01.534 --> 10:05.738
I guess just from a factor perspective does that change the buckets

10:05.738 --> 10:09.075
that some of these companies fit into.

10:09.075 --> 10:13.079
It certainly does. A couple of things happen with

10:13.079 --> 10:16.682
the hyperscalers.

10:16.682 --> 10:21.587
The first thing it does is it affects our valuation factor.

10:21.587 --> 10:25.891
The biggest effect is in our free cash flow yield which is one of the

10:25.891 --> 10:28.461
measures we look at to assess valuation.

10:28.461 --> 10:33.165
The more you spend on CapEx the less there is that forecast free cash flow.

10:33.165 --> 10:37.269
Hence, on our valuation models, the hyperscalers on

10:37.269 --> 10:40.773
balance are getting more expensive because their free cash flow, and hence

10:40.773 --> 10:44.477
their free cash flow yield, is deteriorating.

10:44.477 --> 10:49.582
That's going to cause, on balance, that factor to sell those stocks.

10:49.582 --> 10:53.686
Similarly, perhaps on the quality dimension

10:53.686 --> 10:56.989
it'll take a little bit longer but we assess quality, one of the principle ways

10:56.989 --> 11:01.827
we do it is on return on invested capital.

11:01.827 --> 11:04.630
Now, to the extent that that deteriorates because that's one of the big

11:04.630 --> 11:08.434
questions that everybody's asking about with the Mag-7,  are they going to get

11:08.434 --> 11:11.103
a return on all this AI investment?

11:11.103 --> 11:13.305
It's a fair question to ask but I think it's too early.

11:13.305 --> 11:17.043
I think there's no way to answer it now.

11:17.043 --> 11:21.047
I also think that you should ignore trying to answer that question and focus

11:21.047 --> 11:25.685
on other areas which are where's all this money going?

11:25.685 --> 11:30.523
That's fascinating.

11:30.523 --> 11:33.759
That's sort of where the value story picks up from there.

11:33.759 --> 11:35.795
How do you take a look at momentum?

11:35.795 --> 11:39.899
We mentioned at the beginning that since 2022 you haven't really been looking

11:39.899 --> 11:44.336
at value as an out performer and that's because momentum's been in there.

11:44.336 --> 11:46.272
Momentum's just been ... and also quality ...

11:46.272 --> 11:50.276
but momentum has been unstoppable until I don't know,

11:50.276 --> 11:53.579
now, or you tell us.

11:53.579 --> 11:57.850
Momentum is, you know, to use an old adage,

11:57.850 --> 12:01.554
the trend is your friend. That's what the momentum factor picks up on it.

12:01.554 --> 12:05.257
Looks at whatever worked and assuming that you're in a trending environment

12:05.257 --> 12:09.395
with no major rotations then

12:09.395 --> 12:14.500
those, whatever worked is more likely to continue to work.

12:14.500 --> 12:19.205
If you rewind the clock we kind of went through 2022,

12:19.205 --> 12:23.142
which was when inflation rose, but then from 2023

12:23.142 --> 12:27.179
onward we're in a growing economic

12:27.179 --> 12:31.350
environment but growing at a slower rate than what we experienced coming right

12:31.350 --> 12:33.185
out of COVID.

12:33.185 --> 12:37.223
That was why I had been prescribing for a momentum overweight during

12:37.223 --> 12:41.127
that time, which has played out as expected.

12:41.127 --> 12:45.197
Pre-COVID we had FAANG, that's the other thing to

12:45.197 --> 12:48.134
remember, we were in a trending environment pre-Covid as well.

12:48.134 --> 12:52.138
The FAANG stocks, many of which became the Mag-7 stocks, they went

12:52.138 --> 12:56.175
on to do very well in that trending positive

12:56.175 --> 13:00.813
but lower growth environment.

13:00.813 --> 13:04.917
My prescription, to be clear, I'm still prescribing an overweight to momentum

13:04.917 --> 13:09.488
and quality which is what I had been prescribing for the last four years.

13:09.488 --> 13:14.426
It's really just the addition of value along

13:14.426 --> 13:16.095
with those two.

13:16.095 --> 13:19.298
Hello, investors. We'll be back to the show in just a moment.

13:19.298 --> 13:22.868
I wanted to share that here at Fidelity, we value your opinion.

13:22.868 --> 13:25.171
Please take a few minutes to help us shape the future of Fidelity Connects

13:25.171 --> 13:30.276
podcasts. Complete our listener survey by visiting fidelity.ca/survey,

13:30.276 --> 13:32.244
and you could win one of our branded tumblers.

13:32.244 --> 13:35.314
Periodic draws ending by March 30th, 2026.

13:35.314 --> 13:38.918
And don't forget to listen to Fidelity Connects, the Upside, and French

13:38.918 --> 13:42.955
DialoguesFidelity podcasts available on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever

13:42.955 --> 13:47.726
else you get your podcasts. Now back to today's show.

13:47.726 --> 13:51.864
Can you tell us a little bit about low vol? When certain investors have

13:51.864 --> 13:55.501
run for the hills over the course, again, of maybe the January effect, sort of

13:55.501 --> 13:59.738
the February effect last week and a half, low vol maybe looks more

13:59.738 --> 14:03.909
interesting as a place to hide out in. There's

14:03.909 --> 14:07.947
been a little of a run to defence so I wonder what role you

14:07.947 --> 14:11.183
see low vol playing going forward.

14:11.183 --> 14:14.520
Is it a longer term trade? Is that just a quick, oh-oh, hide behind the tree

14:14.520 --> 14:17.857
for now? What do you think?

14:17.857 --> 14:22.161
That's another great question. Low vol is going to do what it's

14:22.161 --> 14:25.564
designed to do when it's designed to do it.

14:25.564 --> 14:29.702
If there's sentiment that people are running for the hills and

14:29.702 --> 14:33.806
wanting to get defensive low vol is gonna do that more

14:33.806 --> 14:36.475
effectively than any other factor, hands down.

14:36.475 --> 14:40.479
Having said that, however, I'm not of the view

14:40.479 --> 14:44.516
right now that we're going to, over the course of 12 months we're

14:44.516 --> 14:46.952
going to be in an environment where you need to run for the hills.

14:46.952 --> 14:50.923
As I mentioned at the outset with earnings revisions at the

14:50.923 --> 14:55.127
top level rising that, all things being equal, is

14:55.127 --> 14:57.997
an indicator that you're going be in a rising market as opposed to a falling

14:57.997 --> 15:00.699
one.

15:00.699 --> 15:04.970
The way that I think about low vol, if you're

15:04.970 --> 15:09.108
wanting to own it for insurance, like the in case something happens,

15:09.108 --> 15:13.245
then for me the better way to play that would be to

15:13.245 --> 15:17.249
own quality, with the reason being that, okay, there's going to be more

15:17.249 --> 15:21.220
upside participation in the factor if, you know, think the bottom

15:21.220 --> 15:26.025
doesn't fall out.

15:26.025 --> 15:30.095
It is actually part of the reason why I am still overweighting or recommending

15:30.095 --> 15:34.533
an overweight to quality as opposed to

15:34.533 --> 15:39.238
utilizing low vol for that insurance part of your portfolio.

15:39.238 --> 15:42.508
Bobby, as a scientist, you're a rocket scientist, we often introduce you that

15:42.508 --> 15:47.046
way, what is fascinating to you, to your team,

15:47.046 --> 15:51.183
about the AI tools that they're allowed to play around with, use,

15:51.183 --> 15:55.287
put into their own analysis to get you where you are right now.

15:55.287 --> 15:57.022
Tell us just a little bit about ...

15:57.022 --> 15:59.291
I think we've asked you more about what's exciting about AI but now you're

15:59.291 --> 16:01.727
actually seeing people using it.

16:01.727 --> 16:04.630
What's the newest there?

16:04.630 --> 16:08.734
You're right. As an engineer and scientist I am absolutely

16:08.734 --> 16:12.938
impressed and I find it mind boggling

16:12.938 --> 16:15.107
what AI is able to do.

16:15.107 --> 16:19.478
I would also share with you that I think we're extremely early.

16:19.478 --> 16:23.449
Just from my own personal network people are starting to use it but

16:23.449 --> 16:27.920
it's not ubiquitous. It's not the case that it's everywhere and everybody's

16:27.920 --> 16:30.255
kicking the tires.

16:30.255 --> 16:34.593
Anecdotally, among my crew of scientists and engineers

16:34.593 --> 16:39.164
and quantitative analysts and PMs, the people that are using it are

16:39.164 --> 16:41.667
describing it as life-changing.

16:41.667 --> 16:45.704
Just last week one of the quantitative analysts that I work with was

16:45.704 --> 16:50.609
using, I think Claude Code was the AI tool that she had just gotten access to.

16:50.609 --> 16:54.079
She said, this is going to fundamentally change the way that I forever write

16:54.079 --> 16:55.948
code moving forward.

16:55.948 --> 17:00.019
Those are very profound words to be hearing from people who are experts

17:00.019 --> 17:04.390
in coding and the like.

17:04.390 --> 17:08.327
Another point that I will make is that what she's experiencing

17:08.327 --> 17:11.463
right now. she's experiencing the worst that it's going to be.

17:11.463 --> 17:17.669
It's only going to get better from this baseline that she used today.

17:17.669 --> 17:20.105
I think it's a very exciting moment in time.

17:20.105 --> 17:24.543
It's going to lead, in my mind, to, I think, the largest industrial buildout

17:24.543 --> 17:26.211
of our lifetime.

17:26.211 --> 17:32.384
Do we have a factor for that?

17:32.384 --> 17:35.387
We talked about momentum and how it's the trend is your friend.

17:35.387 --> 17:38.724
The stocks that will benefit from AI, it already captures them and it will

17:38.724 --> 17:40.626
continue to capture them.

17:40.626 --> 17:44.696
The other way that I would think about playing it though

17:44.730 --> 17:46.932
would be ...

17:46.932 --> 17:50.636
you sometimes meet with one of my counterparts, Denise Chisholm, who's our all

17:50.636 --> 17:53.939
things sector and industry expert but I actually think that sector and

17:53.939 --> 17:58.677
industries would be the most efficient way to

17:58.677 --> 18:03.182
play an industrial buildout where you want to overweight some cyclicals

18:03.182 --> 18:07.419
like industrials, or we talked about commodities and how there's

18:07.419 --> 18:11.523
going to be demand for those as you build out data centres

18:11.523 --> 18:15.961
and the like. You've got the factor play but I like the

18:15.961 --> 18:20.232
industry or sector play as well as a way of participating

18:20.232 --> 18:22.901
in that trend.

18:22.901 --> 18:24.903
That's really fascinating.

18:24.903 --> 18:28.907
Back to the international story that was tied to international revisions

18:28.907 --> 18:30.943
of earnings which are going up.

18:30.943 --> 18:35.180
It's an international story, it seems to be, as you noted, across the

18:35.180 --> 18:39.418
globe. I'm not sure what you put into the reasoning behind

18:39.418 --> 18:43.555
last year's, by all accounts, pivot ultimately to

18:43.555 --> 18:47.693
international but the dollar, certainly,

18:47.693 --> 18:51.763
and the so-called sell America trade, and therefore the dollar

18:51.763 --> 18:54.666
dropping a bit in terms of value, was part of it.

18:54.666 --> 18:59.905
Where do you see that piece of the international trade going?

18:59.905 --> 19:03.976
There are a couple of things that I think go unappreciated when thinking about

19:03.976 --> 19:08.113
the international trade.

19:08.113 --> 19:12.551
I did a deep dive on what drove the performance

19:12.551 --> 19:16.522
of EAFE to developed international and emerging markets

19:16.522 --> 19:22.561
versus the US. If you start with EAFE or developed international,

19:22.561 --> 19:26.832
rough numbers it had like 30% performance last year,

19:26.832 --> 19:31.403
whereas the SAP 500 was at 17.

19:31.403 --> 19:35.073
Actually, most of that was due to the depreciation of the dollar, all of which

19:35.073 --> 19:37.309
happened in the first six months.

19:37.309 --> 19:40.846
If you unwind that piece of it and look at the performance of developed

19:40.846 --> 19:44.950
international on local currency conditions instead

19:44.950 --> 19:49.321
of bringing it back to North America, just that alone gave

19:49.321 --> 19:52.491
you a market performance that was equal to the US.

19:52.491 --> 19:54.092
Having said that...

19:54.092 --> 19:55.994
That's really interesting.

19:55.994 --> 20:00.766
People aren't necessarily looking at it that way.

20:00.766 --> 20:05.437
People aren't looking at it that way which is why I think it's important to

20:05.437 --> 20:09.007
have that understanding as you think about, okay, moving forward where do I

20:09.007 --> 20:13.011
want to allocate capital, and do I think that this outperformance is going to

20:13.011 --> 20:15.547
be sustainable moving forward?

20:15.547 --> 20:19.685
Implied with that you would also have a view that

20:19.685 --> 20:23.755
the dollar's going to depreciate. I'm not a currency expert, that's not

20:23.755 --> 20:26.758
my sandbox, my wheelhouse. I think currencies are hard.

20:26.758 --> 20:30.796
If that's an implicit part of your bet you

20:30.796 --> 20:33.365
should know that and should be deliberate about that

20:33.365 --> 20:36.301
Okay, that's interesting. It is such a fascinating part of the market, the

20:36.301 --> 20:39.504
currency side of things. Some great questions coming in.

20:39.504 --> 20:42.040
Some of these topics you've touched on slightly but maybe just we could add a

20:42.040 --> 20:46.144
bit more. Should we expect any changes to the strategic weight of U S.

20:46.144 --> 20:48.680
positioning, which is what you were just talking about, in the All-in-One

20:48.680 --> 20:52.818
portfolios? Some of that, I think, you'd leave to the team in

20:52.818 --> 20:57.189
Canada  but maybe you can just speak to that.

20:57.189 --> 21:01.326
The All-in-One portfolios are a one-stop shop, single ticket,

21:01.326 --> 21:05.497
that does your complete asset allocation for

21:05.497 --> 21:09.434
you. Now, having said that, the way I think

21:09.434 --> 21:13.538
about them is the stock picking is what we would describe as

21:13.538 --> 21:16.375
active by design but passive by implementation.

21:16.375 --> 21:20.245
You're getting the best thinking of how do we define value or momentum and

21:20.245 --> 21:24.716
quality within each of the regions that it's allocating to.

21:24.716 --> 21:28.687
If you take a click higher, though, and look at your

21:28.687 --> 21:32.858
regional allocation there's no active management

21:32.858 --> 21:37.763
happening there. You're mostly getting a strategic

21:37.763 --> 21:41.867
allocation to the

21:41.867 --> 21:43.735
US and EAFE.

21:43.735 --> 21:47.572
The same thing across asset classes, you're getting a strategic allocation to

21:47.572 --> 21:51.543
equities versus fixed income.

21:51.543 --> 21:55.814
Because we intentionally don't do active management at that level I

21:55.814 --> 22:00.052
wouldn't anticipate a change in the allocation of

22:00.052 --> 22:04.122
your equity portfolio as it pertains to how much EAFE you

22:04.122 --> 22:06.591
own versus the US and Canada.

22:06.591 --> 22:10.929
That's fascinating. This next question touches on smaller companies

22:10.929 --> 22:15.033
and ultimately maybe how you look to invest in them but also just

22:15.033 --> 22:18.904
sort of the story there. Can you discuss how AI is being used as a tool to

22:18.904 --> 22:27.012
predict and take advantage of micro stock movements.

22:27.012 --> 22:31.683
We haven't touched on, at least internally, using AI to

22:31.683 --> 22:34.353
pick stocks.

22:34.353 --> 22:37.989
The way I like to think of it is we're mostly using it as a way of making you

22:37.989 --> 22:40.726
more efficient at the job that you are doing.

22:40.726 --> 22:45.197
I mentioned the one analyst on my extended team who's

22:45.197 --> 22:50.035
using AI and it helped her code

22:50.035 --> 22:53.672
some stuff that she was coding. Similar on the fundamental side, our

22:53.672 --> 22:57.676
fundamental counterparts at Fidelity are using AI to,

22:57.676 --> 23:01.847
say, read through all of the earnings call transcripts and provide a summary

23:01.847 --> 23:04.416
of the key points and relevant information.

23:04.416 --> 23:08.387
That's very different and distinct from

23:08.387 --> 23:10.822
saying, hey, AI picked this stock for me.

23:10.822 --> 23:14.860
I think, at least for our part, our company, we're never going to use it

23:14.860 --> 23:17.729
in that way. There's always going to be a human in the loop who's going to be

23:17.729 --> 23:23.468
responsible for the investment decisions on behalf of our shareholders.

23:23.468 --> 23:27.339
The other thing I would say while we're on the topic of small size, there's a

23:27.339 --> 23:31.309
subtle nuance to some of what we've talked about where you

23:31.309 --> 23:33.278
would think on its surface ...

23:33.278 --> 23:37.816
Bobby said earnings are rising across the globe, that

23:37.816 --> 23:43.188
implies rising economic activity and that backdrop is good for value.

23:43.188 --> 23:45.991
Typically, it's also good for small size.

23:45.991 --> 23:49.294
Interestingly, I am not in favour ...

23:49.294 --> 23:53.498
I haven't been in favour of small size ever since 2022

23:53.498 --> 23:55.967
but I'm actually not now.

23:55.967 --> 24:00.572
Although I'm upgrading value I'm not upgrading small size, the

24:00.572 --> 24:04.509
reason being is that I'm seeing in the data the

24:04.509 --> 24:06.244
K-shaped economy.

24:06.244 --> 24:10.415
Large-cap value stocks have these tailwinds that we've already talked about but

24:10.415 --> 24:14.553
when I look at small-cap companies they don't have this mixed exposure to

24:14.553 --> 24:18.490
AI. When I looked at their fundamentals, which is my

24:18.490 --> 24:22.527
key guidepost for what parts of the

24:22.527 --> 24:26.932
market to be overweight in,

24:26.932 --> 24:28.934
it is the case that small-cap earnings revisions are actually declining.

24:28.934 --> 24:33.004
Despite that the top level S&P are rising

24:33.004 --> 24:37.843
small-cap earnings revisions have declined in all of 2025,

24:37.843 --> 24:41.913
and even though it's early innings in 2026, we're only a month and a half into

24:41.913 --> 24:45.750
it, I'm continuing to see that be the case.

24:45.750 --> 24:49.521
I think that putting it all together we are still going to be in a K-shaped

24:49.521 --> 24:53.725
economy moving forward, hence I'm not an advocate

24:53.725 --> 24:57.696
for overweight in small size, even though it's outperformed

24:57.696 --> 25:01.466
year-to-date, but again, I mentioned the January effect, and that's I'm

25:01.466 --> 25:03.034
attributing it.

25:03.034 --> 25:05.837
That's so helpful and so interesting.

25:05.837 --> 25:10.141
You have said before don't worry about where AI is going, worry

25:10.141 --> 25:14.279
about the money that's investing in AI and where it's going and invest there.

25:14.279 --> 25:16.882
Don't try and figure out what the killer app is.

25:16.882 --> 25:19.484
That said, I'm going to ask you ...

25:19.484 --> 25:22.320
because you're a rocket scientist and we want to know just your thoughts

25:22.320 --> 25:26.725
broadly ... something along the lines of the connectivity that we're already

25:26.725 --> 25:30.328
seeing. The companies that we think are coming to market over the course of the

25:30.328 --> 25:35.901
next year, certainly our connectivity in space, satellites,

25:35.901 --> 25:40.171
finding new problems to solve probably, maintaining

25:40.171 --> 25:42.107
things in space.

25:42.107 --> 25:46.211
What do you see 10 years from now based on what it looks like lots of seeds

25:46.211 --> 25:49.614
are being planted at this point?

25:49.614 --> 25:52.450
I think the future is very exciting.

25:52.450 --> 25:56.721
I can't be a former rocket scientist and not be excited

25:56.721 --> 26:01.059
about putting data centres in space and the connectivity and

26:01.059 --> 26:02.827
so on and so forth.

26:02.827 --> 26:07.399
That being said, if I take my rocket scientist hat off and put my investor

26:07.399 --> 26:11.503
hat back on I think that there is a lot of

26:11.503 --> 26:17.108
hype around some of these things.

26:17.108 --> 26:21.112
Ten years into the future the question will remain how much of

26:21.112 --> 26:26.718
this stuff will be economically profitable.

26:26.718 --> 26:30.855
Data centres in space is an interesting one because I understand the science

26:30.855 --> 26:34.826
for why that's attractive. For example, your energy coming from the sun

26:34.859 --> 26:38.930
is free and there are a lot of other detailed things like that that

26:38.930 --> 26:43.034
make it make sense. But in my mind as an engineer and an

26:43.034 --> 26:45.503
investor it's a maintenance nightmare.

26:45.503 --> 26:48.907
When something breaks I'm not going to send an astronaut with a wrench up into

26:48.907 --> 26:52.844
space and try to reconnect these pipes.

26:52.844 --> 26:56.081
Ten years from now it will be interesting to see how these companies as they

26:56.081 --> 27:00.085
become public and continue to grow, how

27:00.085 --> 27:01.319
that part of it evolves.

27:01.319 --> 27:05.724
How they make money, ultimately, for any company there.

27:05.724 --> 27:07.425
Do you have just a little bit more ...

27:07.425 --> 27:11.363
I want to go back to the value which we began with and just sort of spell

27:11.363 --> 27:15.400
out ... you mentioned what's interesting about the international

27:15.400 --> 27:19.738
trade, what's interesting about value, do we come back to

27:19.738 --> 27:23.842
large-cap in both cases, value US regionally

27:23.842 --> 27:26.645
over value still large-cap globally?

27:26.645 --> 27:32.384
I'm still curious about a little bit of the sell America that gets overdone.

27:32.384 --> 27:37.822
Regionally what do you prefer, large-cap international, large-cap US?

27:37.822 --> 27:42.494
Value in both cases.

27:42.494 --> 27:45.764
This is another subtle but very important point because a lot of people will

27:45.764 --> 27:50.201
conflate ... when you say value they'll conflate it across regions.

27:50.201 --> 27:54.639
It's not to say that they're wrong because it is true that the P/E of

27:54.639 --> 27:58.376
EAFE is lower than the P/E of the S&P 500.

27:58.376 --> 28:02.681
The reason I don't like to do it at that surface level is because

28:02.681 --> 28:06.885
a lot that difference can be attributed to simply just a difference in

28:06.885 --> 28:11.089
makeshift. The US has more tech which just structurally

28:11.089 --> 28:13.792
has a higher P/E than other sectors.

28:13.792 --> 28:17.929
EAFE's got more banks which just structurally has a lower P/E.

28:17.929 --> 28:21.132
The two aren't really comparable directly in my view that way.

28:21.132 --> 28:25.670
I think the right way to do it would be to control for sector composition.

28:25.670 --> 28:29.674
If you say, well, if I allocate the same amount of weight to each

28:29.674 --> 28:34.746
sector across each of those regions now which one is cheaper?

28:34.746 --> 28:38.249
If you're going to express valuation express it across regions I would do it

28:38.249 --> 28:41.419
that way as opposed to the way that people typically do it.

28:41.419 --> 28:44.589
And which one looks better?

28:44.589 --> 28:48.226
It is the case ... even though I've said that it is a case once you do that

28:48.226 --> 28:53.131
control that EAFE developed international is cheaper than the

28:53.131 --> 28:56.901
US. But valuation is not a catalyst for outperformance.

28:56.901 --> 29:01.372
The catalyst for outperformance is always earnings revisions and

29:01.372 --> 29:05.410
who has the highest. Value, however, has an important role to play and

29:05.410 --> 29:08.146
it dictates by how much you outperform.

29:08.146 --> 29:11.750
The first question is, do you have higher relative earnings revisions?

29:11.750 --> 29:18.990
If yes, then the amount by which you outperform is dictated by valuation.

29:18.990 --> 29:21.860
You're being careful about not giving a call there.

29:21.860 --> 29:26.097
We love your research. Bobby Barnes, thank you so much for joining us.

29:26.097 --> 29:29.067
We wish you very well and we look forward to seeing you in the months ahead.

29:29.067 --> 29:29.801
Thank you.

29:29.801 --> 29:30.602
Thanks for your time.

29:30.602 --> 29:34.539
Thanks for watching or listening to the Fidelity Connects

29:34.539 --> 29:38.676
podcast. Now if you haven't done so already, please subscribe to Fidelity

29:38.676 --> 29:41.479
Connects on your podcast platform of choice.

29:41.479 --> 29:44.315
And if you like what you're hearing, please leave a review or a five-star

29:44.315 --> 29:48.286
rating. Fidelity Mutual Funds and ETFs are available by working with

29:48.286 --> 29:51.656
a financial advisor or through an online brokerage account.

29:51.656 --> 29:55.360
Visit fidelity.ca/howtobuy for more information.

29:55.360 --> 29:59.197
While on Fidelity.ca, you can also find more information on future live

29:59.197 --> 30:03.334
webcasts. And don't forget to follow Fidelity Canada on YouTube, LinkedIn,

30:03.334 --> 30:05.336
and Instagram.

30:05.336 --> 30:08.206
We'll end today's show with a short disclaimer.

30:08.206 --> 30:12.043
The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are those of the participants,

30:12.043 --> 30:15.980
and do not necessarily reflect those of Fidelity Investments Canada ULC or

30:15.980 --> 30:19.984
its affiliates. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and should not

30:19.984 --> 30:22.520
be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice.

30:22.520 --> 30:24.823
It is not an offer to sell or buy.

30:24.823 --> 30:29.160
Or an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any entity or securities

30:29.160 --> 30:33.965
cited. Read a fund's prospectus before investing, funds are not guaranteed.

30:33.965 --> 30:37.535
Their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.

30:37.535 --> 30:41.372
Fees, expenses, and commissions are all associated with fund investments.

30:41.372 --> 30:43.675
Thanks again. We'll see you next time.