The Upside: Demystifying alternative investments – Practical insights for modern portfolios

What does “alternative investments” mean, and why do they matter now? Join Rory Poole, Director, Alternatives, as he demystifies alternatives, looks at their role in a portfolio, explains how you can access alternatives and addresses common misconceptions. 

Play Video
Click to play video
Transcript

1

00:00:21,821 --> 00:00:23,890

Hello, and welcome to The Upside.

 

2

00:00:23,890 --> 00:00:28,261

I'm Lauren Gardy. Today we're talking about alternative investments and

 

3

00:00:28,261 --> 00:00:32,232

I'm joined by our in-house product expert, Rory Poole.

 

4

00:00:32,232 --> 00:00:35,235

Rory, why don't you kick off by telling us exactly what you and your team do

 

5

00:00:35,235 --> 00:00:36,069

here at Fidelity?

 

6

00:00:36,069 --> 00:00:39,773

For sure, Lauren. Thanks a lot for having me today.

 

7

00:00:39,773 --> 00:00:44,110

So myself and a team of folks are responsible for

 

8

00:00:44,110 --> 00:00:48,081

really all the research and development that we do around the various

 

9

00:00:48,081 --> 00:00:52,952

alternative strategies or funds that we offer to investors.

 

10

00:00:52,952 --> 00:00:57,190

Happy to unpack some concepts today and talk a little bit about

 

11

00:00:57,190 --> 00:01:01,227

maybe a part of investing that investors at home

 

12

00:01:01,227 --> 00:01:06,066

are a little bit less familiar with but, hopefully, in the future

 

13

00:01:06,066 --> 00:01:07,600

will warm up to a little bit more.

 

14

00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:09,869

Great. Let's start from the basics.

 

15

00:01:09,869 --> 00:01:13,773

I, myself, I'm just at the beginning of my investment journey, long term time

 

16

00:01:13,773 --> 00:01:16,676

horizon, I've been hearing a lot about alternatives.

 

17

00:01:16,676 --> 00:01:20,146

There's a lot of buzz around them, seemingly on a lot of investors' minds.

 

18

00:01:20,146 --> 00:01:24,217

I'm curious, what actually is classified as an alternative and why

 

19

00:01:24,217 --> 00:01:28,621

are so many people interested in them today?

 

20

00:01:28,621 --> 00:01:32,659

There's a couple questions within that but maybe we'll just start with

 

21

00:01:32,659 --> 00:01:38,231

the simple concept of what is an alternative?

 

22

00:01:38,231 --> 00:01:42,435

I think the best way that I would explain it to folks is it's just

 

23

00:01:42,435 --> 00:01:46,906

something different. You probably ask, okay, well, different relative to what?

 

24

00:01:46,906 --> 00:01:51,277

Different relative to the three kind of core traditional areas that investors

 

25

00:01:51,277 --> 00:01:55,882

tend to have capital invested within their portfolio,

 

26

00:01:55,882 --> 00:02:00,253

whether that's stocks, bonds or cash.

 

27

00:02:00,253 --> 00:02:04,257

To be a little bit more specific, they're different in terms

 

28

00:02:04,257 --> 00:02:07,527

of how they behave within the portfolio.

 

29

00:02:07,527 --> 00:02:11,531

There may be times when your stock portfolio or

 

30

00:02:11,531 --> 00:02:15,869

your bond portfolio is going up, down or sideways, and an alternative

 

31

00:02:15,869 --> 00:02:19,873

that you own within that portfolio may be doing something different.

 

32

00:02:19,873 --> 00:02:23,042

The benefit of that, which I think we'll probably talk a little bit more about

 

33

00:02:23,042 --> 00:02:27,080

today, is that it provides a little bit of an added layer

 

34

00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:31,451

of diversification within folks' portfolios to varying

 

35

00:02:31,451 --> 00:02:32,719

degrees.

 

36

00:02:32,719 --> 00:02:36,756

The second part of your question was kind of

 

37

00:02:36,756 --> 00:02:40,093

hinting at the fact like, hey, these are becoming a little more popular, a

 

38

00:02:40,093 --> 00:02:43,496

little but more mainstream. Why is that the case?

 

39

00:02:43,496 --> 00:02:46,432

I think from my perspective there's really two answers to that.

 

40

00:02:46,432 --> 00:02:49,369

The first is simply access.

 

41

00:02:49,369 --> 00:02:53,740

Access to alternative solutions or alternative investments

 

42

00:02:53,773 --> 00:02:58,111

has gotten dramatically better for the end investor over

 

43

00:02:58,111 --> 00:03:01,347

the course of the past 5 to 10 years.

 

44

00:03:01,347 --> 00:03:05,451

There's a number of reasons as to why that's the case but

 

45

00:03:05,451 --> 00:03:09,856

simply put, it is a lot more feasible, attainable,

 

46

00:03:09,856 --> 00:03:13,826

scalable for an investor to actually hold some of these

 

47

00:03:13,826 --> 00:03:17,864

options within their portfolio if they choose to do so

 

48

00:03:17,864 --> 00:03:20,466

relative to maybe the decades past.

 

49

00:03:20,466 --> 00:03:24,771

I think on top of that, like many

 

50

00:03:24,771 --> 00:03:28,908

facets of our lives nowadays, there's a big influence

 

51

00:03:28,908 --> 00:03:33,012

from the tension that comes from the media as a result of

 

52

00:03:33,012 --> 00:03:37,116

that. More access, more options for investors, well,

 

53

00:03:37,116 --> 00:03:41,221

the Bloombergs, the CNBCs, whatever investors

 

54

00:03:41,221 --> 00:03:45,658

use for the purposes of their financial news will pick that up.

 

55

00:03:45,658 --> 00:03:50,563

One of the best examples of that, which is an alternative investment, is

 

56

00:03:50,563 --> 00:03:54,934

the emergence of cryptocurrency over the course of the past five or so years.

 

57

00:03:54,934 --> 00:03:59,072

You really can't go a day without looking at one of

 

58

00:03:59,072 --> 00:04:03,109

these financial websites or financial forums that does not

 

59

00:04:03,109 --> 00:04:07,146

necessarily mention that. I think it's the combination of

 

60

00:04:07,146 --> 00:04:11,150

end investors having a greater ability to actually own

 

61

00:04:11,150 --> 00:04:15,488

some of these things coupled with the fact that media is

 

62

00:04:15,488 --> 00:04:17,223

so influential in our day-to-day lives.

 

63

00:04:17,223 --> 00:04:21,494

I'm sure we've all experienced how much media influence can impact

 

64

00:04:21,494 --> 00:04:23,630

broader decisions too.

 

65

00:04:23,630 --> 00:04:27,233

I wanted to dive into something you mentioned about fitting alternatives into a

 

66

00:04:27,233 --> 00:04:31,170

portfolio. As I mentioned, I have a long term time horizon compared to someone

 

67

00:04:31,170 --> 00:04:35,308

who's more of a retiree, maybe has short term cash needs, how would

 

68

00:04:35,308 --> 00:04:39,112

you sort of universally describe alternatives fitting into portfolios and how

 

69

00:04:39,112 --> 00:04:42,482

do they work amongst different investors,

 

70

00:04:42,482 --> 00:04:46,753

I think that alternatives come in so many different

 

71

00:04:46,753 --> 00:04:48,621

shapes and sizes.

 

72

00:04:48,621 --> 00:04:52,925

I think there's really something out there for everyone.

 

73

00:04:52,925 --> 00:04:57,063

Let's use your comparisons specifically to

 

74

00:04:57,063 --> 00:05:00,600

talk about that a little bit more.

 

75

00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:05,238

Let's say, Lauren, that, as you mentioned, you are a long term investor,

 

76

00:05:05,238 --> 00:05:09,709

maybe you have a slightly higher risk tolerance, there are plenty

 

77

00:05:09,709 --> 00:05:13,780

of alternative options out there for folks that may target

 

78

00:05:13,780 --> 00:05:17,850

or aim to generate higher returns than that of what you might

 

79

00:05:17,850 --> 00:05:20,553

get within a traditional stock portfolio.

 

80

00:05:20,553 --> 00:05:24,691

There's some compensations that you potentially have to pay for those

 

81

00:05:24,691 --> 00:05:28,628

higher returns, whether it's through things like fees or whether it is

 

82

00:05:28,628 --> 00:05:32,932

through things like liquidity, but most certainly

 

83

00:05:32,932 --> 00:05:35,368

that can be suitable for an investor of that type.

 

84

00:05:35,368 --> 00:05:39,472

On the flip side, If you are a retiree or

 

85

00:05:39,472 --> 00:05:43,543

someone that's getting closer to retirement, as you mentioned, maybe

 

86

00:05:43,543 --> 00:05:47,747

you're someone that has a higher need for

 

87

00:05:47,747 --> 00:05:51,684

cash flow within your portfolio, maybe you're someone that is a little bit

 

88

00:05:51,684 --> 00:05:53,553

more risk-averse. Well, guess what?

 

89

00:05:53,553 --> 00:05:57,590

There's options out there in terms of alternatives that

 

90

00:05:57,590 --> 00:06:02,095

can potentially produce more income for your portfolio based

 

91

00:06:02,095 --> 00:06:06,366

on the different techniques or portfolio manager approaches that

 

92

00:06:06,366 --> 00:06:08,101

can be utilized.

 

93

00:06:08,101 --> 00:06:12,071

There's also options out there that use different

 

94

00:06:12,071 --> 00:06:16,242

measures to potentially dampen volatility or reduce correlation,

 

95

00:06:16,242 --> 00:06:20,213

meaning the relationship between the big three that I talked

 

96

00:06:20,213 --> 00:06:25,318

about before, stocks, bonds and cash in your portfolio, and guess what, you

 

97

00:06:25,318 --> 00:06:29,689

don't necessarily have to lock your money away or

 

98

00:06:29,689 --> 00:06:33,760

sacrifice the liquidity aspect that I just alluded to in the prior

 

99

00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:38,631

example. That's a long-winded way of saying when

 

100

00:06:38,631 --> 00:06:41,968

looking at different types of investors I don't think it's like a red light,

 

101

00:06:41,968 --> 00:06:46,372

green light type of answer or question,

 

102

00:06:46,372 --> 00:06:50,810

for that matter. It's more so investors asking themselves,

 

103

00:06:50,810 --> 00:06:54,147

what's the best alternative for me?

 

104

00:06:54,147 --> 00:06:56,382

That's great, Rory, and you're piquing my interest here.

 

105

00:06:56,382 --> 00:07:00,386

I'm curious, if I were to invest in a liquid or alternative I can

 

106

00:07:00,386 --> 00:07:04,023

do that either through an advisor or directly with the asset manager.

 

107

00:07:04,023 --> 00:07:07,360

Could you compare and contrast the differences between those two avenues?

 

108

00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:11,397

For sure, and we just talked a little bit about it but I

 

109

00:07:11,397 --> 00:07:15,768

think that without getting into the minutiae

 

110

00:07:15,768 --> 00:07:19,839

of all of the different types of alternative strategies or funds

 

111

00:07:19,839 --> 00:07:24,310

that are available out there to investors

 

112

00:07:24,310 --> 00:07:28,281

I'll more so just be generic and focus on what I mentioned

 

113

00:07:28,281 --> 00:07:31,083

and what you were, I think, kind of hinting at there, which is the difference

 

114

00:07:31,083 --> 00:07:35,588

between a liquid and an illiquid alternative.

 

115

00:07:35,588 --> 00:07:40,827

A liquid alternative, as the name indicates,

 

116

00:07:40,827 --> 00:07:45,231

will typically provide investors with a relatively high degree of liquidity.

 

117

00:07:45,231 --> 00:07:49,502

All that means is that their ability to turn

 

118

00:07:49,502 --> 00:07:53,573

an investor's investment into cash, if

 

119

00:07:53,573 --> 00:07:56,742

they so choose, is fairly high.

 

120

00:07:56,742 --> 00:08:01,147

What that means in practice is that typically on

 

121

00:08:01,147 --> 00:08:05,084

a daily basis if said investor were to want to

 

122

00:08:05,084 --> 00:08:09,155

sell that alternative investment and receive cash

 

123

00:08:09,155 --> 00:08:13,159

from that sale, the manager has the ability to

 

124

00:08:13,159 --> 00:08:17,597

do it. There's plenty of liquid alternative solutions that are out there

 

125

00:08:17,597 --> 00:08:21,767

that cater towards different aspects

 

126

00:08:21,767 --> 00:08:23,503

of investor portfolios.

 

127

00:08:23,503 --> 00:08:27,907

On the flip side, there's what I would say are kind of liquid investments,

 

128

00:08:27,907 --> 00:08:33,312

or illiquid investments, and those are investments in,

 

129

00:08:33,312 --> 00:08:37,450

potentially, assets or strategies where it's a little bit more difficult, or

 

130

00:08:37,450 --> 00:08:41,521

it takes maybe a little bit more time to turn that investment into

 

131

00:08:41,521 --> 00:08:46,025

cash. A good example of that would be

 

132

00:08:46,025 --> 00:08:50,263

a private real estate type of fund that investors may

 

133

00:08:50,263 --> 00:08:53,866

wish to hold. There's a lot of benefits with potentially holding a private real

 

134

00:08:53,866 --> 00:08:58,037

estate fund, the difficult thing is that when you invest your

 

135

00:08:58,037 --> 00:09:02,174

capital with that manager, what they're doing is they're going out and,

 

136

00:09:02,174 --> 00:09:06,979

potentially, buying physical assets like buildings or

 

137

00:09:06,979 --> 00:09:10,449

shopping centres or you name it.

 

138

00:09:10,449 --> 00:09:14,420

As a result of that, as you can imagine, it's not so

 

139

00:09:14,420 --> 00:09:18,424

easy to necessarily sell that apartment

 

140

00:09:18,424 --> 00:09:22,929

building or that shopping centre overnight and then return cash to investors.

 

141

00:09:22,929 --> 00:09:26,866

Not to say it can't be done, it certainly can, but it takes a little bit

 

142

00:09:26,866 --> 00:09:29,068

longer to do that.

 

143

00:09:29,068 --> 00:09:33,239

When investors are shopping around or talking to their advisor about

 

144

00:09:33,239 --> 00:09:37,209

what is best for me, that kind of liquidity

 

145

00:09:37,209 --> 00:09:41,213

conversation or am I best suited to own something that

 

146

00:09:41,213 --> 00:09:45,551

is a liquid asset or am I a little bit more interested for

 

147

00:09:45,551 --> 00:09:49,855

a portion of my portfolio to own something that's less liquid, is certainly

 

148

00:09:49,855 --> 00:09:52,024

something that should be top of mind.

 

149

00:09:52,024 --> 00:09:54,627

That's very helpful, thank you for level setting that.

 

150

00:09:54,627 --> 00:09:58,464

You touched on fees earlier, I'm curious, I've heard lots of jargon thrown

 

151

00:09:58,464 --> 00:10:02,068

around in terms of various fee structures.

 

152

00:10:02,068 --> 00:10:05,671

Seemingly, these different types of alternatives have different structures as

 

153

00:10:05,671 --> 00:10:09,508

well and each provider maybe changes how they charge fees a little bit

 

154

00:10:09,508 --> 00:10:13,579

differently. How would you best summarize, if we can, how fees apply across

 

155

00:10:13,579 --> 00:10:17,583

alternatives?

 

156

00:10:17,583 --> 00:10:22,121

You made mention of the fact that there's just tons of variability out there.

 

157

00:10:22,121 --> 00:10:26,158

I think the stigma with a lot of alternatives is that they're really

 

158

00:10:26,158 --> 00:10:30,196

expensive, and there certainly are alternative strategies and funds out

 

159

00:10:30,196 --> 00:10:34,800

there that are more costly, in some cases for very good reason, relative

 

160

00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:39,171

to a traditional fund or investment that you might own.

 

161

00:10:39,171 --> 00:10:43,242

Also, especially with the advent of these more

 

162

00:10:43,242 --> 00:10:47,446

liquid forms of alternative investing, there are

 

163

00:10:47,446 --> 00:10:51,450

lots of options out there for investors if they want to

 

164

00:10:51,450 --> 00:10:55,421

pay something that is more comparable to what they

 

165

00:10:55,421 --> 00:10:59,525

would pay as a managerial fee for owning other assets

 

166

00:10:59,525 --> 00:11:02,294

within their investment portfolio.

 

167

00:11:02,294 --> 00:11:06,365

I think that probably the most kind of polarizing of

 

168

00:11:06,365 --> 00:11:10,536

all of them is the essence of a performance fee

 

169

00:11:10,536 --> 00:11:14,507

or an incentive fee, which sometimes can exist on alternative

 

170

00:11:14,507 --> 00:11:18,544

funds, not, I would say, all of them out there.

 

171

00:11:18,544 --> 00:11:22,782

Just to explain a little bit about how that works for investors,

 

172

00:11:22,782 --> 00:11:27,453

performance fee is essentially a fee that a manager would charge for

 

173

00:11:27,453 --> 00:11:32,258

meeting certain performance criteria within the portfolio.

 

174

00:11:32,258 --> 00:11:36,429

I think the best way to maybe illustrate that for folks

 

175

00:11:36,429 --> 00:11:38,164

is to try and give a little bit of an example.

 

176

00:11:38,164 --> 00:11:42,201

The thing that comes to mind first and foremost for me is

 

177

00:11:42,201 --> 00:11:48,641

like going out to a nice restaurant for a nice dinner.

 

178

00:11:48,641 --> 00:11:52,712

It's the same kind of thing that investors think

 

179

00:11:52,712 --> 00:11:56,749

about when it comes to comparing the value or quality

 

180

00:11:56,749 --> 00:12:00,186

of something relative to the price that they actually pay for it.

 

181

00:12:00,186 --> 00:12:04,390

Using our dinner example, if I go out to a nice restaurant

 

182

00:12:04,390 --> 00:12:08,360

for dinner and the food's great and the ambiance is really

 

183

00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:12,598

nice and the service is 10 out of 10 then

 

184

00:12:12,598 --> 00:12:15,868

guess what? I'm happy to pay a higher price for that.

 

185

00:12:15,868 --> 00:12:20,072

But if I go to that restaurant a week later and

 

186

00:12:20,072 --> 00:12:24,376

for whatever particular reason the food wasn't very great or

 

187

00:12:24,376 --> 00:12:28,614

my service was really slow or it was

 

188

00:12:28,614 --> 00:12:32,852

too loud in there or for whatever a particular reason, you're probably less

 

189

00:12:32,852 --> 00:12:36,989

inclined to go back and pay that price again for

 

190

00:12:36,989 --> 00:12:39,225

that same service that you're being provided.

 

191

00:12:39,225 --> 00:12:42,161

Now, it just so happens in this instance it's a little bit more sensitive

 

192

00:12:42,161 --> 00:12:46,198

because it's your investment but, again, the assessment from

 

193

00:12:46,198 --> 00:12:50,136

a consumer's perspective of what am I

 

194

00:12:50,136 --> 00:12:54,673

willing to pay based on the value or the quality that I'm getting out of it,

 

195

00:12:54,673 --> 00:12:58,711

it carries over to this form of investing as well.

 

196

00:12:58,711 --> 00:13:02,181

You're saying you're willing to pay more for a better experience.

 

197

00:13:02,181 --> 00:13:06,952

Exactly. That's the simple way to sum it up.

 

198

00:13:06,952 --> 00:13:09,188

Maybe not everyone out there is.

 

199

00:13:09,188 --> 00:13:13,292

Maybe some people look for, going back to our dinner example, maybe

 

200

00:13:13,292 --> 00:13:17,429

they look first and foremost at price but I think that

 

201

00:13:17,429 --> 00:13:21,834

you'll find a range of individuals out there that

 

202

00:13:21,834 --> 00:13:25,805

may take either end of that argument and hence why,

 

203

00:13:25,805 --> 00:13:29,942

as I mentioned, it's a little bit more polarizing, but certainly

 

204

00:13:29,942 --> 00:13:33,879

if the value is there for investors I think that those fees can be

 

205

00:13:33,879 --> 00:13:35,281

justifiable.

 

206

00:13:35,281 --> 00:13:38,651

For sure. Thank you for that, Rory. You mentioned stigmas earlier.

 

207

00:13:38,651 --> 00:13:41,854

There were a few that came to mind for me when it comes to thinking about

 

208

00:13:41,854 --> 00:13:46,692

alternative investing, the first being that they could be very risky.

 

209

00:13:46,692 --> 00:13:50,196

Secondly, maybe you mentioned transparency, that it might be hard for the end

 

210

00:13:50,196 --> 00:13:53,833

investor to know really where their money is going and what's being purchased.

 

211

00:13:53,833 --> 00:13:57,403

Then the final one being that are these alternatives really just meant for

 

212

00:13:57,403 --> 00:13:59,471

ultra-high net worth investors?

 

213

00:13:59,471 --> 00:14:03,142

What do you think about that? Is that fact or fiction?

 

214

00:14:03,142 --> 00:14:05,911

Let's parse through each one just briefly.

 

215

00:14:05,911 --> 00:14:09,882

You mentioned first kind of the risky aspect of it.

 

216

00:14:09,882 --> 00:14:12,051

Certainly not.

 

217

00:14:12,051 --> 00:14:16,322

There are a full gambit of opportunities for investors

 

218

00:14:16,322 --> 00:14:20,292

out there with an alternative. Some are certainly more risky, they may come

 

219

00:14:20,292 --> 00:14:24,363

with unique risks relative to what they experience in their

 

220

00:14:24,363 --> 00:14:28,400

stock or their bond portfolio but there are plenty of options out there

 

221

00:14:28,400 --> 00:14:32,471

for investors that are lower down the risk scale if you're

 

222

00:14:32,471 --> 00:14:36,609

kind of defining risk by the volatility or the amount that the

 

223

00:14:36,609 --> 00:14:38,310

investment moves around.

 

224

00:14:38,310 --> 00:14:42,982

The second thing that you mentioned was transparency or a lack thereof.

 

225

00:14:42,982 --> 00:14:47,519

I think maybe over kind of 10 years ago, if you were to go back

 

226

00:14:47,519 --> 00:14:49,521

that's a fair argument.

 

227

00:14:49,521 --> 00:14:53,726

I think it's less so now.

 

228

00:14:53,726 --> 00:14:55,294

I think that a few things are changing that.

 

229

00:14:55,294 --> 00:14:59,465

One is the amount of competitive pressure that's occurring out

 

230

00:14:59,465 --> 00:15:03,469

there. We talked earlier about the fact that mainstream

 

231

00:15:03,469 --> 00:15:07,373

media seems to be talking a little bit more about alternative investing,

 

232

00:15:07,373 --> 00:15:09,408

especially for the end investor.

 

233

00:15:09,408 --> 00:15:13,412

Well, guess what? What that does is it puts pressure

 

234

00:15:13,412 --> 00:15:17,483

on the manufacturers of these products or

 

235

00:15:17,483 --> 00:15:21,587

the asset managers, like the Fidelitys of the world, to make sure that

 

236

00:15:21,587 --> 00:15:25,724

we are delivering that service and that transparency as best as

 

237

00:15:25,724 --> 00:15:29,361

possible to investors.

 

238

00:15:29,361 --> 00:15:33,299

Nowadays with, as I mentioned, especially after the

 

239

00:15:33,299 --> 00:15:36,769

advent of the liquid alternative options that are out there, and even with some

 

240

00:15:36,769 --> 00:15:40,940

of the less liquid alternatives, transparency has certainly

 

241

00:15:40,940 --> 00:15:45,577

improved dramatically over the course of the past 10 years.

 

242

00:15:45,577 --> 00:15:49,782

The last point that you made there was in relation to this really

 

243

00:15:49,782 --> 00:15:54,219

only being an area that's accessible to very affluent

 

244

00:15:54,219 --> 00:15:59,091

or ultra-high net worth or institutional types of investors,

 

245

00:15:59,091 --> 00:16:02,761

and that's simply not the case anymore.

 

246

00:16:02,761 --> 00:16:07,733

I think that the financial industry over the course of

 

247

00:16:07,733 --> 00:16:12,371

the past little while, in particular, have made a lot of strides

 

248

00:16:12,371 --> 00:16:16,308

in terms of creating products,

 

249

00:16:16,308 --> 00:16:20,546

creating different vehicles where investors of all types can access

 

250

00:16:20,546 --> 00:16:24,783

these things and they don't necessarily need to pay an arm and a leg

 

251

00:16:24,783 --> 00:16:26,251

in order to do it.

 

252

00:16:26,251 --> 00:16:30,222

Going back to something that we talked about previously, just that question of,

 

253

00:16:30,222 --> 00:16:33,392

you know what, which alternative is best for me.

 

254

00:16:33,392 --> 00:16:37,529

If I were to give folks at home a piece of advice,

 

255

00:16:37,529 --> 00:16:42,935

if you work with an advisor ask them that question, is an

 

256

00:16:42,935 --> 00:16:48,140

alternative type of product based on what I'm currently invested in,

 

257

00:16:48,140 --> 00:16:53,212

is that the type of thing that we should potentially talk about, and, if so,

 

258

00:16:53,212 --> 00:16:57,316

what's the best option for me because there are so many different types

 

259

00:16:57,316 --> 00:17:02,054

of strategies, funds, products that

 

260

00:17:02,054 --> 00:17:06,025

may improve investor experiences and, hopefully, improve

 

261

00:17:06,025 --> 00:17:11,296

goals for investors over whether it's the short, medium, or longer term.

 

262

00:17:11,296 --> 00:17:14,366

Thank you for that, Rory, and the advisor is the expert in terms of all things

 

263

00:17:14,366 --> 00:17:18,370

alternatives here. We appreciate your expert insights from Fidelity today as

 

264

00:17:18,370 --> 00:17:21,407

well and thank you to our viewers for joining the show today.

 

265

00:17:21,407 --> 00:17:25,444

You can find more investor content from Fidelity at fidelity.ca under

 

266

00:17:25,444 --> 00:17:27,579

the investor education section.

 

267

00:17:27,579 --> 00:17:31,517

Sign up for articles, he Upside newsletter and get more information about

 

268

00:17:31,517 --> 00:17:33,519

upcoming live webcasts.

 

269

00:17:33,519 --> 00:17:36,088

Thanks for watching and I hope you'll join us again on The Upside.

 

270

00:17:36,088 --> 00:17:37,089

I'm Lauren Gardy.