"Hit ‘em where they ain’t"

David Wolf l Portfolio Manager
David Tulk, CFA l Portfolio Manager


Key takeaways

  • “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you in trouble, it’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”
  • Markets seem overly confident in US equities, undershooting inflation and Canadian economic resilience
  • We are positioned in our multi asset class funds to take the other side

As 2020 kicks off, let us begin by offering two famous quotations (variously attributed to Mark Twain or Yogi Berra among others) that we believe contain great and perhaps surprising wisdom for investors.

“Making predictions is hard, especially about the future.”


The dawn of a new year inevitably brings with it a slew of economic and market predictions for the year ahead. In aggregate these form consensus expectations that determine the pricing of financial assets. But these predictions are almost invariably wrong.  New information challenges the consensus and the market adjusts, often significantly. For example, the dovish pivot from the Federal Reserve caught many by surprise and led to a very strong 2019 for both global stocks and bonds. Now just in January, the emergence of the Wuhan coronavirus and heightened tensions in the Middle East have already challenged many 2020 outlooks. The lesson here is that forecasting may be a necessary exercise for investors, but it is an exceptionally difficult one.


“It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you in trouble, it’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”


It is a very human tendency to think that the world is more predictable than it actually is.  This often leads to inappropriate certainty among investors, with market pricing to match.  Following on the example above, a year ago markets were convinced that 10-year US Treasury yields would edge back up towards cycle highs around 3.25%. In fact, yields ended up 2019 at barely half that level as the global economy weakened and the Fed eased. 

A cornerstone of our investing approach, therefore, is not to take on the almost-impossible challenge of out-forecasting markets, but rather to look for opportunities where markets themselves appear certain about things they have no business being so certain about, and then take the other side.

With this approach in mind, and as we embark on a new decade, we discuss below three areas where we are positioning the Canadian multi asset class funds to take advantage of consensus expectations that look vulnerable to surprise:


Outperformance of the US equity market?

Investors have been convinced that the US equity market is the place to be. This has certainly been the case over the last decade, as the US equity market delivered a total return of around 250% versus 65% from the rest of the world (see Chart 1). The outperformance has been due not only to the relative strength of the US economy over this period but also the kind of companies listed in the US, notably the prevalence of growth-oriented technology stocks.

Chart 1 – An unsustainable-looking divergence

Chart 1 – An unsustainable-looking divergence
Equity prices
Chart 1 – An unsustainable-looking divergence Equity prices
Sources: S&P, MSCI, Haver Analytics, FMR Co.


The divergence between the US and other markets (which not coincidentally resembles the style divergence between growth and value stocks) may indeed have been warranted based on differing fundamentals over the past ten years.  However, such divergences historically have almost always reversed as investors get overconfident that the trend will continue forever, creating opportunities for contrarians. As a result, we have been moving equity capital out of the US to other areas of the world that have been left behind.  In many parts of European, Japanese and EM equity markets, there looks to be more room to outperform expectations than in the more expensive US market, where many companies seem priced for perfection.


Inflation will never return?

Chart 2 shows a market-based proxy for Canadian inflation expectations, which is running well below the 2% rate the Bank of Canada is mandated to deliver. The same story is largely true in many other parts of the world; markets generally seem convinced that inflation is gone for good. This expectation is certainly consistent with the past decade where inflation has remained stubbornly low despite the extraordinary efforts of central banks to inject unprecedented amounts of stimulus into the global economy. But in our view, it may be this very lack of inflation that makes higher inflation a greater risk down the road, primarily for the following reason.

Chart 2 – ‘Free insurance’ against inflation

Chart 2 – ‘Free insurance’ against inflation
Difference between nominal and real yields of Canadian government bonds
Chart 2 – ‘Free insurance’ against inflation
Sources: Haver Analytics, FMR Co


In the view of many, central bankers have been less effective in generating good economic outcomes and more effective in inflating asset markets, in turn worsening the inequality that is feeding populist and anti-globalization sentiment around the world.  The risk is that these forces lead to the loss of central banks’ independence and greater direct government control over the money printing presses, which historically has almost inevitably led to higher inflation.  And while this remains a low probability outcome, at least in the short term, it would be dangerous to dismiss it outright. As a result, we are taking the other side of the ‘deflation trade’ with overweights to inflation-sensitive assets like TIPS, RRBs, gold and other commodities.


Canada is in the clear?

The market continues to be discounting a relatively optimistic outlook for the Canadian economy. Chart 3 shows 2-year bond yields in various advanced market economies, which reflect both current and future expectations of short-term interest rates. Canada is the highest yielder, which effectively suggests that the economy is seen as less in need of stimulus than just about any other country – an expectation reinforced by the recent rebound in housing markets.

Chart 3 – Canada seen needing less stimulus

Chart 3 – Canada seen needing less stimulus
2-year government bond yields
Chart 3 – Canada seen needing less stimulus
Source: Bloomberg


But Canadian economic growth has already long been relying almost exclusively on housing and the consumer more generally, funded by record levels of household debt, to the point where these sectors represent their highest share of GDP in more than 50 years.  At the same time, the more productive sectors of the economy—exports and business investment—have contributed almost nothing to growth in recent years. This type and degree of economic of imbalance has not proved to be sustainable anywhere else in the world, and it is not likely to be in Canada either. The exact timing of when this imbalance will be unwound remains uncertain, but the market seems too complacent in barely pricing in this risk. As a result, we have generally underweighted assets levered to the Canadian economy, including the currency.

Let us conclude with a third quotation: “Hit ‘em where they ain’t”.  This one is attributed to Wee Willie Keeler, a baseball player in the 19th century explaining his batting prowess.  There is wisdom here too for investors.  Allocating to assets into which investors are already crowded based on consensus expectations is unlikely to lead to outperformance. It’s where those expectations are inappropriately certain that there is value to be added by investing where markets ‘ain’t’.  We can’t be sure what’s going to happen in 2020, but nobody else can either, and we will continue to seek to take advantage of market overconfidence in positioning for strong risk-adjusted returns in our Canadian multi asset class funds.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus, which contains detailed investment information, before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.

From time to time a manager, analyst or other Fidelity employee may express views regarding a particular company, security, and industry or market sector. The views expressed by any such person are the views of only that individual as of the time expressed and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time, based upon markets and other conditions, and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity Fund.

Certain Statements in this commentary may contain forward-looking statements (“FLS”) that are predictive in nature and may include words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “estimates” and similar forward-looking expressions or negative versions thereof. FLS are based on current expectations and projections about future general economic, political and relevant market factors, such as interest and assuming no changes to applicable tax or other laws or government regulation. Expectations and projections about future events are inherently subject to, among other things, risks and uncertainties, some of which may be unforeseeable and, accordingly, may prove to be incorrect at a future date. FLS are not guarantees of future performance, and actual events could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any FLS. A number of important factors can contribute to these digressions, including, but not limited to, general economic, political and market factors in North America and internationally, interest and foreign exchange rates, global equity and capital markets, business competition and catastrophic events. You should avoid placing any undue reliance on FLS. Further, there is no specific intentional of updating any FLS whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

“Fidelity Investments” and/or “Fidelity” refers collectively to: i) FMR LLC, a US company, and certain subsidiaries, including Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR Co.) and Fidelity Management & Research (Canada) ULC (“FMR-Canada”) – which carries on business in British Columbia as FMR Investments Canada ULC; and ii) Fidelity Investments Canada ULC (“FIC”) and its affiliates. Fidelity Management & Research (Canada) ULC (“FMRCanada”) commenced business in Ontario on February 1, 2018. FMRCanada is registered as a portfolio manager with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) and as a portfolio manager with the other Canadian securities commissions. The scope of FMR-Canada’s business is currently limited to offering the Global Asset Allocation (“GAA”) strategies through a discrete portfolio management team at FMR-Canada. The GAA strategies are offered by FMR-Canada on a sub-advised basis to accounts advised by Fidelity Investments Canada ULC (“FIC”), with FMR-Canada acting as either direct sub-adviser to FIC or as sub-sub-adviser through non-Canadian Fidelity advisers, including (and principally) US SEC-registered investment advisers, such as FMR Co., Inc. (“FMRCo”). FMR-Canada does not offer these strategies directly to investors in Canada. FMR-Canada has also registered “Fidelity Investments” as a trade name in Canada.

Commissions, fees and expenses may be associated with investment funds. Read a fund’s prospectus or offering memorandum and speak to an advisor before investing.  Funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and investors may experience a gain or loss.  Past performance may not be repeated.

Read our privacy policy.  By using or logging in to this website, you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy.

This site is for persons in Canada only.  Mutual funds and ETFs sponsored by Fidelity Investments Canada ULC are only qualified for sale in the provinces and territories of Canada.


Close Search